Skip to main content

Table 3 Correlation of postoperative CTC number to clinicopathological characteristics

From: A prospective study on the changes and clinical significance of pre-operative and post-operative circulating tumor cells in resectable gastric cancer

Characteristics

3-year recurrence rate%

No. of patients (%)

CTC ≥ 1/7.5 ml

CTC ≥ 2/7.5 ml

CTC ≥ 3/7.5 ml

CTC ≥ 4/7.5 ml

CTC ≥ 5/7.5 ml

Gender

 Male (n = 46)

60.9

18 (39.1%)

10 (21.7%)

9 (19.6%)

7 (15.2%)

3 (6.5%)

 Female (n = 17)

57.5

3 (17.6%)

1 (5.9%)

1 (5.9%)

1 (5.9%)

1 (5.9%)

 p value

0.606

0.108

0.272

0.352

0.574

1.000

Age

 ≤ 45 (n = 13)

57.1

5 (38.5%)

2 (15.4%)

2 (15.4%)

2 (15.4%)

1 (7.7%)

 > 45 (n = 50)

60.6

16 (32.0%)

9 (18.0%)

8 (16.0%)

6 (12.0%)

3 (6.0%)

 p value

0.565

0.912

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

Primary sitea

 EGJ (n = 19)

43.5

7 (36.8%)

3 (15.8%)

3 (15.8%)

3 (15.8%)

1 (5.3%)

 Non-EGJ (n = 44)

67.2

14 (31.8%)

8 (18.2%)

7 (15.9%)

5 (11.4%)

3 (6.8%)

 p value

0.001

0.698

1.000

1.000

0.943

1.000

Differentiationb

 Good (n = 15)

66.0

5 (33.3%)

3 (20.0%)

2 (13.3%)

1 (6.7%)

0 (0.0%)

 Poor (n = 48)

57.8

16 (33.3%)

8 (16.7%)

8 (16.7%)

7 (14.6%)

4 (8.3%)

 p value

0.244

1.000

1.000

1.000

0.719

0.564

Lauren

 Intestinal (n = 25)

62.0

8 (32.0%)

5 (20.0%)

4 (16.0%)

2 (8.0%)

0 (0.0%)

 Diffuse (n = 16)

65.7

4 (25.0%)

3 (18.8%)

3 (18.8%)

3 (18.8%)

2 (12.5%)

 Mixed (n = 22)

52.4

9 (40.9%)

3 (13.6%)

3 (13.6%)

3 (13.6%)

2 (9.1%)

 p value

0.115

0.580

0.844

0.913

0.505

0.167

TNM classification

 I (n = 15)

100.0

2 (13.3%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

 II (n = 16)

54.7

5 (31.3%)

4 (25.0%)

3 (18.8%)

2 (12.5%)

1 (6.3%)

 III (n = 32)

43.1

14 (43.8%)

7 (21.9%)

7 (21.9%)

6 (18.8%)

3 (9.4%)

 p value

0.062

0.117

0.106

0.161

0.249

0.798

Depth of penetration

 T1/T2 (n = 19)

89.5

2 (10.5%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

 T3 (n = 25)

51.2

10 (40.0%)

4 (16.0%)

3 (12.0%)

3 (12.0%)

1 (4.0%)

 T4 (n = 19)

41.4

9 (47.4%)

7 (36.8%)

7 (36.8%)

5 (26.3%)

3 (15.8%)

 p value

0.000

0.036

0.008

0.005

0.043

0.178

Lymph node

 N0 (n = 16)

100.0

4 (25.0%)

2 (12.5%)

1 (6.3%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

 N1/N2 (n = 26)

54.5

8 (30.8%)

6 (23.1%)

6 (23.1%)

5 (19.2%)

2 (7.7%)

 N3 (n = 21)

33.3

9 (42.9%)

3 (14.3%)

3 (14.3%)

3 (14.3%)

2 (9.5%)

 p value

0.001

0.488

0.761

0.375

0.185

0.663

Lymph-vascular invasion

 Yes (n = 34)

49.8

10 (29.4%)

5 (14.7%)

5 (14.7%)

3 (8.8%)

2 (5.9%)

 No (n = 29)

71.4

11 (37.9%)

6 (20.7%)

5 (17.2%)

5 (17.2%)

2 (6.9%)

 p value

0.002

0.475

0.533

1.000

0.453

1.000

CEAc level before operation (ng/ml)

 < 5 (n = 51)

62.6

18 (35.3%)

9 (17.6%)

9 (17.6%)

8 (15.7%)

4 (7.8%)

 ≥ 5 (n = 12)

48.6

3 (25.0%)

2 (16.7%)

1 (8.3%)

0 (0.0%)

0 (0.0%)

 p value

0.046

0.734

1.000

0.722

0.324

1.000

  1. Italic values indicate that there are significant differences in post-operative CTCs between different clinicopathological types
  2. aEGJ, gastroesophageal junction
  3. bGood, including high or moderate differentiation; Poor, including low differentiation, mucinous adenocarcinoma, and signet-ring cell carcinoma
  4. ccarcinoembryonic antigen