|  | Harrell’s C (95 % CI) | Change (95 % CI)a
| IDI (%) | P |
|---|
Without MBL | With MBL |
|---|
Model 1 | 0.56 (0.46–0.66) | 0.64 (0.53–0.76) | 0.085 (0.072–0.098) | 5.93 | 0.01 |
Model 2 | 0.64 (0.55–0.73) | 0.67 (0.57–0.77) | 0.033 (0.028–0.038) | 5.35 | 0.01 |
Model 3 | 0.71 (0.63–0.80) | 0.74 (0.65–0.83) | 0.027 (0.026–0.028) | 6.05 | 0.01 |
Model 4 | 0.73 (0.64–0.82) | 0.76 (0.68–0.85) | 0.033 (0.033–0.033) | 6.92 | 0.01 |
- Data are presented as Harrell’s concordance statistic (Harrell’s C) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) with P-value (P)
- Model 1: age and gender
- Model 2: age, gender, ultrafiltration volume and dialysis vintage
- Model 3: age, gender, ultrafiltration volume and dialysis vintage, history of CVD, DM and post-HD systolic blood pressure
- Model 4: age, gender, ultrafiltration volume and dialysis vintage, history of CVD, DM and post-HD systolic blood pressure and hsCRP
-
MBL mannose-binding lectin; CVD cardiovascular diseases; DM Diabetes Mellitus; HD hemodialysis; hsCRP high sensitive C-reactive protein
-
aChange in C-statistics compared to model without post-hemodialysis MBL levels
