Skip to main content

Table 5 CGI-GI and CGI-EI scales at 24w

From: Transplantation of human cord blood mononuclear cells and umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells in autism

 

 CGI scale

Combinationab

CBMNCa

Control

CGI-GI

Not assessed

0(0.00%)

0(0.00%)

1(7.69%)

N (%)

Very much improved

3(33.33%)

1(7.14%)

0(0.00%)

Much improved

5(55.56%)

6(42.86%)

1(7.69%)

Minimally improved

1(11.11%)

2(14.29%)

11(84.62%)

No change

0(0.00%)

5(35.71%)

1(7.69%)

Minimally worse

0(0.00%)

0(0.00%)

0(0.00%)

Much worse

0(0.00%)

0(0.00%)

0(0.00%)

Very much worse

0(0.00%)

0(0.00%)

0(0.00%)

CGI-EI

Unchanged or worse

0(0.00%)

5(35.71%)

1(7.69%)

N (%)

Minimal

1(11.11%)

2(14.29%)

11(84.62%)

Moderate

6(66.67%)

7(50.00%)

1(7.69%)

Marked

2(22.22%)

0(0.00%)

0(0.00%)

 

Total(missed)

9(0)

14(0)

13(1)

  1. Note: aThe percent of “Very much improved” and “Much improved” in the CGI-GI scale and the percent of “Marked” and “Moderate” effects in the CGI-EI scale were significantly higher in the Combination and CBMNC groups when compared with the Control group at 24w (p < 0.05). bThe percent of “Very much improved” and “Much improved” in the CGI-GI scale and the percent of “Marked” and “Moderate” effects in the CGI-EI scale were significantly higher in the Combination group when compared with the CBMNC group at 24w (p < 0.05).