Skip to main content

Table 4 Changes in clinical parameters in the subgroups according to the treatments

From: A new nutraceutical (Livogen Plus®) improves liver steatosis in adults with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

ITT

Variables

Placebo (n = 65)

Nutraceutical (n = 62)

p-value

CAP score (dB/m)a

− 20 ± 5

− 34 ± 5

0.045

CAP (%)a

− 6.4 ± 2

− 11.2 ± 2

0.049

Improvement (%)a

40

53

0.09

PP

Variables

Placebo (n = 54)

Nutraceutical (n = 55)

p-value

CAP score (dB/m)b

− 18 ± 5

− 37 ± 5

0.018

CAP (%)b

− 5.9 ± 2

− 11.7 ± 2

0.034

Improvement (%)b

39

55

0.041

Men

Variables

Placebo (n = 29)

Nutraceutical (n = 30)

p-value

CAP score (dB/m)b

− 17 ± 7

− 37 ± 7

0.07

CAP (%)b

− 4.6 ± 2

− 12.1 ± 2

0.042

Improvement (%)b

31

50

0.019

Age ≤ 60 years

Variables

Placebo (n = 41)

Nutraceutical (n = 36)

p-value

CAP score (dB/m)b

− 18 ± 6

− 36 ± 7

0.05

CAP (%)b

− 5.6 ± 2

− 12.3 ± 2

0.044

Improvement (%)b

44

56

0.12

Insulin resistance (HOMA IR > 2)

Variables

Placebo (n = 36)

Nutraceutical (n = 32)

p-value

CAP score (dB/m)b

− 20 ± 6

− 31 ± 6

0.21

CAP (%)b

− 5.9 ± 2

− 10.1 ± 2

0.14

Improvement (%)b

31

56

0.031

Low HDL-C

Variables

Placebo (n = 17)

Nutraceutical (n = 18)

p-value

CAP score (dB/m)b

− 6 ± 10

− 38 ± 10

0.05

CAP (%)b

− 1.1 ± 3

− 12.5 ± 3

0.038

Improvement (%)b

24

61

0.05

AST reduction

Variables

Placebo (n = 30)

Nutraceutical (n = 23)

p-value

CAP score (dB/m)b

− 13 ± 8

− 47 ± 9

0.007

CAP (%)b

− 3.7 ± 3

− 15.1 ± 3

0.006

Improvement (%)b

33

58

0.043

  1. Difference between means by unpaired samples t test with adjustment by General Linear Model
  2. CAP controlled attenuation parameter
  3. aAdjusted for CAP score and TG at the baseline, changes of serum γGT, and vegetable and animal proteins, cholesterol intake at the follow-up
  4. bAdjusted for TG at the baseline, changes of serum γGT, and vegetable proteins intake at the follow-up