Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of allo-HSCT patients with PGF and GGF

From: Aberrant T cell responses in the bone marrow microenvironment of patients with poor graft function after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Characteristics

PGF* (n = 20)

GGF* (n = 40)

P value**

BM evaluated time (post-HSCT days)

102 (53–152)

92.5 (24–561)

0.14

Blood cell count

 Median WBC (×109/L) (range)

1.1 (0.3–2.7)

5.01 (1.93–9.83)

<0.0001

 Median ANC (×109/L) (range)

0.7 (0.1–1.8)

2.62 (0.84–7.1)

0.0007

 Median Hb (g/L) (range)

83 (68–104)

114.5 (85–165)

<0.0001

 Median PLT (×109/L) (range)

29 (4–53)

149.5 (31–266)

<0.0001

Age at HSCT (years, median, range)

33.5 (11–62)

26 (7–51)

0.10

Gender (male/female)

15/5

24/16

0.39

Underlying disease

  

0.78

 AML

6

14

 

 ALL

9

16

 

 CML

0

2

 

 MDS

3

4

 

 sAA

2

4

 

Status at HSCT

  

0.54

 Standard-risk

4

12

 

 High-risk

16

24

 

Source of stem cell

  

0.99

 BM and G-PB

19

38

 

 G-PB

1

2

 

Transplanted total nucleated cell dose (×108/kg, median, range)

8.08 (6.01–14.49)

7.615 (5.22–13.81)

0.68

Transplanted CD34+ cell dose (×108/kg, median, dose)

2.29 (1.18–0.5.28)

2.49 (0.85–6)

0.09

Donor match

  

0.34

 HLA-identical unrelated donor

1

2

 

 HLA-identical sibling donor

3

12

 

 HLA-partially matched related

16

26

 

Sex mismatch

  

0.99

 Female to male

5

9

 

 Female to female

2

2

 

 Male to female

4

13

 

 Male to male

9

16

 

ABO mismatch

  

0.47

 No

12

26

 

 Minor

3

6

 

 Major

5

8

 

Pre-HSCT cycles of chemotherapy

4 (0–6)

3.5 (0–11)

0.86

Conditioning

  

0.34

 BU/CY

3

12

 

 BU/CY + ATG

17

28

 

History of aGvHD

13

21

0.77

History of CMV reactivation

17

24

0.08

  1. allo-HSCT allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation, PGF poor graft function, GGF good graft function, AML acute myelogenous leukemia, ALL acute lymphocytic leukemia, CML chronic myelogenous leukemia, MDS myelodysplastic syndrome, sAA sever aplastic anemia, HLA human leukocyte antigen, BU busulfan, CY cyclophosphamide; ATG anti-human thymus globulin; aGvHD acute graft-versus-host disease, CMV cytomegalovirus
  2. * Group matching criteria included age at HSCT (±1 years), pre-HSCT cycles of chemotherapy (±1 cycle), disease status at HSCT and BM microenvironment evaluated time after HSCT (±5 days). For each PGF case, two GGF control was randomly selected from the same cohort at which the PGF occurred (“risk-set sampling”)
  3. ** The continuous variables were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test, and the differences in frequency between the 2 groups were compared using the Chi square test. The criterion for statistical significance was P < 0.05