Lack of shared neoantigens in prevalent mutations in cancer

Tumors are mostly characterized by genetic instability, as result of mutations in surveillance mechanisms, such as DNA damage checkpoint, DNA repair machinery and mitotic checkpoint. Defect in one or more of these mechanisms causes additive accumulation of mutations. Some of these mutations are drivers of transformation and are positively selected during the evolution of the cancer, giving a growth advantage on the cancer cells. If such mutations would result in mutated neoantigens, these could be actionable targets for cancer vaccines and/or adoptive cell therapies. However, the results of the present analysis show, for the first time, that the most prevalent mutations identified in human cancers do not express mutated neoantigens. The hypothesis is that this is the result of the selection operated by the immune system in the very early stages of tumor development. At that stage, the tumor cells characterized by mutations giving rise to highly antigenic non-self-mutated neoantigens would be efficiently targeted and eliminated. Consequently, the outgrowing tumor cells cannot be controlled by the immune system, with an ultimate growth advantage to form large tumors embedded in an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). The outcome of such a negative selection operated by the immune system is that the development of off-the-shelf vaccines, based on shared mutated neoantigens, does not seem to be at hand. This finding represents the first demonstration of the key role of the immune system on shaping the tumor antigen presentation and the implication in the development of antitumor immunological strategies. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12967-024-05110-0.


Introduction
Somatic mutations occur in the genomes of all normal and neoplastic dividing cells.They are the result of errors occurring during DNA replication as well as exposure to exogenous or endogenous mutagens.However, if most of these mutations are repaired by cellular mechanisms, a minority remains fixed in the cell genome.Most of such fixed mutations are biologically neutral and already present in the progenitor cell, before the transformation into the final clonal cancer cell ("passenger" mutations).The remaining ones are "driver" mutations that confer growth advantage on the cell, increasing survival or proliferation, and are selected.The accumulation of the driver mutations over the lifetime of an individual will induce cell transformation and cancer development [1][2][3].The number of mutations required to drive a cancer significantly varies across tumor types [4].Studies have shown that carcinogenesis may be driven by a small number of driver mutations.In particular, one driver mutation per patient is sufficient in sarcomas, thyroid, and testicular cancers; and about four driver mutations per patient are needed in bladder, endometrial, and colorectal cancers [1,2,5].The different mutations in cancer cells show different rates.In particular, most cancers carry 1000 to 20,000 somatic point mutations and a few to hundreds of insertions, deletions, and rearrangements [1].
Such mutations in the genomic sequences of cancer cells may generate modified protein sequences, which may give rise to new epitopes unique to cancer cells.These mutated epitopes ("neoantigens") are tumor-specific non-self-antigens efficiently recognized by the immune system.Therefore, therapeutic vaccines based on such neoantigens would elicit a T cell immune response that can exclusively target the tumor while sparing healthy tissue [6].The presence and biological relevance of the T cell immunity against neoantigens in cancer patients is demonstrated by the higher clinical efficacy of Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in tumors with high tumor mutational burden (TMB) [7][8][9] and with neoantigen-specific CD8 + T cells [10].
However, mutations and neoantigens are strictly individual (private) and their identification requires a combination of high throughput omics bioinformatics pipeline for each cancer patient, whose reliability has not been fully proven yet.Indeed, a comprehensive meta-analysis of the literature showed that only < 2.7% of prioritized predicted neoantigens are recognized by patient-derived T cells [11].This has been further confirmed by the tumor neoantigens selection alliance (TESLA) global consortium [12].Neoantigens were predicted with different pipelines by each participating member from the same tumor sequencing data but only approximately 6% of such predicted neoantigens were recognized by the T cells.
In addition to the complexity and reliability of the approaches, which appear highly difficult to be applied on a large scale, this strictly personalized strategy may fail due to the high mutational rate of tumors, which drives a constant generation of new target mutated neoantigens in the same patient.This would require subsequent rounds of neoantigens identification and vaccine production.More than 100 active or completed clinical trials are listed in clinicaltrials.govwhen searching for the terms 'vaccine' and 'neoantigens' , but a clear clinical benefit has not been demonstrated [13].Only recently, an early phase trial in pancreatic cancer has generated a clinical benefit in terms of prolonged recurrence free survival (RFS) [14].
In this framework, it would be of the highest priority to identify mutated neoantigens, derived from the most frequent mutations and shared among cancer patients, to develop off-the-shelf cancer vaccines.
The results of the present study show that, indeed, such shared mutated neoantigens are not predicted for the most frequent cancer mutations (substitutions and insertion/deletion) in association to the most frequent HLA alleles.This would strongly suggest that only cancer cells lacking immunogenic tumor-specific non-self neoantigens, "poorly-visible" to the immune system, have a growth advantage and proliferate to generate clinically visible tumors.Therefore, off-the-shelf cancer vaccines based on shared mutated neoantigens have low chance to be a feasible strategy.

Selection of cancer mutations from TCGA
The first 100 mutations reported at the TCGA database were selected for the study.Collectively, they represent 55.8% of all mutations identified in human cancers.

Prediction of mutated neoantigens
Each of the wild-type (wt) proteins were downloaded from the UniProt database (https:// www.unipr ot.org).The amino acid sequences were manually modified, introducing the described mutation (substitution or insertion/deletion).The paired wt and mutated sequences from each protein were analyzed using the NetMHCpan 4.1 algorithm (https:// servi ces.healt htech.dtu.dk/ servi ce.php?NetMH Cpan-4.1) to predict the best nonamers with affinity values 0-400 nM to the 12 most frequent HLA-A and B alleles.Only those with an affinity value < 100 nM (strong binders -SB) were then selected for subsequent analyses.

Homology search for neoantigens in literature
The mutated neoantigens, identified as SB according to the NetMHCpan 4.1 prediction tool, were submitted to the Immune Epitope Database & Tools (www.iedb.org) to verify whether the predicted epitopes have been already described and validated in literature.The analysis was performed setting the parameters to search for epitopes with exact match in any host.

Statistical analysis
The statistical significance of the observed predicted neoantigens derived from either missense or InDel mutations, was calculated based on the observed predicted neoantigens in all samples at TCGA.The normal distribution was calculated as Z = (X − µ)/σ , where X is the experimental result; μ is the mean value; σ is the standard deviation.P value was calculated as left-tailed.The confidence interval was calculated as µ ± Z σ √ n , where μ is the mean value; Z is the Z-score; σ is the standard deviation; n is the sample population.

Most frequent mutations in cancers
The total number of somatic mutations reported in the TCGA database is 190,632.They have been identified in 14,254 cancer cases.The most frequent 100 mutations occur in 8074 cases, which represent 56.65% of all cases, and the top frequent mutation is the BRAF V640E/V600E , found in 619/14,254 cases (4.34%) (Additional file 1: Table S1).
Among these 100 hot-spot mutations, 62% are missense mutations identified in 5967 cases (73.9%) and 23% are frameshift mutations identified in 1417 cases (17.55%).In addition, 13% are stop-gained mutations identified in 610 cases (7.56%) (Fig. 1A).The TP53 protein is characterized by the highest number of different mutations (nr.20), which cumulatively are identified in the highest number of cases (1487 of the 8074 cases, 18%) (Fig. 1B; Additional file 1: Table S2).Among the 100 hotspot mutations are included all the hot-spot mutations identified in each of the 51 primary cancer sites present in TCGA.The frequency of such hot-spot mutations in the different cancer sites is quite variable and broad, going from 3.10% of TP53 R175H identified in the retro peritoneum ca to 61.52% of BRAF V640E/V600E in the thyroid ca.In particular, considering cancers with a high unmet clinical need (namely, < 20% 5 year overall survival -OS), the IDH1 R132H is found in 37.65% of brain ca; the KRAS G12D is found in 32.87% of pancreas ca; the ACVR2A K437Rfs*5 is found in 14.13% of stomach ca (Additional file 1: Table S2).

Selection of HLA alleles for epitope prediction from top 100 mutations.
In the quest for such shared TSAs, the peptide sequences including each of the top 62 missense mutations or derived from each of the 23 InDel mutations were analyzed for prediction of epitope binding to MHC class I molecules.Such analysis was performed including the 12 most frequent HLA-A and B alleles that, collectively, cover 60% (HLA-A alleles) and 35% (HLA-B alleles) of the world population (Fig. 2A).In particular, HLA-A*02:01 is present in 44% of the European population and in more than 10% in all other populations, with exception of Southeast Asian, North African and Oceania.The HLA-A*24:02 is present more than 10% in all populations, with exception of North African.Among the HLA-B alleles, the B*07:02 and 08:01 alleles show in Europeans a high prevalence of 21.8% and 20.6%, respectively.Furthermore, the B*40:01 allele shows a high prevalence in Australians (16.4%) and Southeast Asians (19.1%).All other Table 1 Example of overlapping peptides from wt and missense mutated protein sequences for neo-epitope prediction.Mutated aminoacid residue is indicated in bold.In each overlapping peptide, the residue involved in the missense mutation is indicated in red Fig. 3 Number of predicted neoantigens from missense mutations.The number of predicted neoantigens for each missense mutations are reported.The predicted affinity of such neoantigens, expressed in nM, is indicated with color-code Table 2 Predicted neo-epitopes derived from missense mutations with an affinity value to the HLA alleles < 100 nM (green highlighted).
The neo-epitopes pass the validation only when the corresponding wt epitope is a poor binder.The frequency of the validated neo-epitopes in the TCGA database is indicated.Identity to peptides in iedb is indicated Fig. 4 High-affinity predicted neoantigens from missense mutations and HLA restriction.The number of predicted neoantigens for each missense mutations are reported with indication of the HLA restriction HLA-A and B alleles show low prevalence (< 10%) across populations (Fig. 2B,C).

Neoantigen prediction from the missense mutations.
In order to predict neoantigens from proteins with a single amino acid missense mutation, the amino acid sequence was downloaded from UniProt for each of the 62 proteins.A 17mer peptide was selected, centered around the mutated residue (from − 8 to + 8), and overlapping peptides were designed with the mutated residue at each of the 9 positions (Table 1).The wt and mutated peptides were subjected to the prediction analysis, to assess the affinity to the 12 HLA-A and B alleles.The results on the 945 peptides analyzed showed that only 49 mutated peptides (neoantigens) (5.18%) have an affinity < 400 nM (Fig. 3; Additional file 1: Table S3).
In order to verify the statistical significance of the observed low number of predicted neoantigens, we have considered all the mutations generating predicted epitopes in the 8547 samples present at TCGA (https:// gdc.cancer.gov/ about-data/ publi catio ns/ panim mune).Overall, 56.86% of all 1,327,063 missense mutations generate predicted epitopes.On the contrary, the 62 hot spot missense mutations analyzed in the present study generate only 10 mutations (16.13%).Therefore, the number   The Immune Epitope Database & Tools (www.iedb.org) was interrogated in order to verify whether the predicted epitopes have been already described and validated in literature.The search returned only three peptides, the CTNNB1 S37F SYLDSGIHF peptide (PMID: 8642260; PMID:35122353), the PIK3CA H1047L ALHGGWTTK peptide (PMID: 35484264; PMID: 37415627) and the PIK3CA R88Q RQLCDLRLF peptide (PMID: 37415627).The first two are confirmed to be restricted to HLA-A*24:02 and HLA-A*03:01, respectively.On the contrary, a discordance is observed for the PIK3CA R88Q peptide, which has been reported as restricted to HLA-A*24:02 while our analysis predicted a very strong binding to HLA-B*15:01 (14.01 nM) and a low binding to HLA-A*24:02 (495.74 nM) (Table 2).

Neoantigen prediction from the frameshift mutations.
Similarly, neoantigen predictions from the 23 proteins with a frameshift mutation were carried out.The amino acid sequence was downloaded from UniProt for each of the proteins but, in this case, the selection of peptides for neoantigen prediction was different for the wt and mutated sequences.Indeed, as for the missense mutations, the prediction of wt-peptides was based on a 17mer peptide, centered around the mutated residue (from − 8 to + 8), and overlapping peptides were designed with the mutated residue at each of the 9 positions (Table 4).On the contrary, the prediction of the mutated-peptides was based on a sequence starting at position − 8 from the mutated amino acid residue and including the entire downstream protein sequence.The number of mutated peptides ranged from 4 to 62, according to the position of the newly generated stop codon along the shifted reading frame.The wt and mutated peptides were subjected to the prediction analysis, to assess the affinity to the 12 HLA-A and B alleles.The results on the 686 peptides analyzed showed that 103 mutated peptides (neoantigens) (15.01%) have an affinity < 400 nM (Fig. 6; Additional file 1: Table S4).
Of these, 40 have an affinity value to the HLA alleles < 100 nM (5.83%) and only 9 (1.31%) include the mutated residue from which the frameshift starts (Table 5).The remaining 31 mutated epitopes cover the new sequence generated by the alternative open Table 4 Example of overlapping peptides from wt and frameshift mutated protein sequences for neo-epitope prediction.
Mutated aminoacid residue is indicated in bold and the downstream sequence from the alternative reading frame is indicated in italics.In each overlapping peptide in the wt and mutated sequence, the mutated residue is indicated in red reading frame.All of them can be considered optimal neoantigens given that the corresponding wt-epitopes either show very low affinity values to the HLA alleles (> 1000 nM), and are not antigenic, or are a completely different sequence and cannot be considered a "corresponding" epitope (Table 5).Only two of such neoantigens are strong binders to more than a single HLA allele: (RFN43 G659Vfs*41 TQLARFFPI) is a strong binder to three HLA alleles (A*02:01, B*08:02 and B*39:01); (ARID1A D1850Tfs*33 WRIGGG TPL) is a strong binder to two HLA alleles (B*27:05 and B*39:01).All other epitopes are strong binders to a single HLA allele (Fig. 7A).
However, the "abnormal" mRNAs generated by the frameshift contain premature termination codons (PTCs), which are recognized and degraded by nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD).[15,16] Moreover, even when PTC-containing mRNAs escape from NMD, truncated proteins are not generated due to a translational repression [17].Therefore, these epitopes have very low or no real chance to be presented by cancer cells, implying that only 9 neoantigens (1.31%) derived from InDels could be taken into consideration (Fig. 7B).
Indeed, the 23 hot spot InDel mutations analyzed in the present study generate a total of 40 predicted neoantigens (1.74 per InDel), which falls in the normal distribution of the expected values derived from the 6610 samples at TCGA with a confidence level of 99.99% (Fig. 8).None of the predicted epitopes derived from the frameshift mutations were found in the Immune Epitope Database & Tools (www.iedb.org), indicating that they have not been already described and validated in literature.Moreover, all the predicted neoantigens are identified in a very low percentage of tumor samples, ranging from 0.22% (ARID1A2 F2141Sfs*59 WLRGTAWQL, VPLQCRRAV and LATPPSAAW; BLM N515Mfs*16 MKALISQEM, SQEMFSQAL, QEMFSQALL and KALISQEMF); to 1.23% (RFN43 G659Vfs*41 TQLARFFPI) (Table 6) (Additional file 1: Fig S2).

HLA polymorphism and neoantigen prediction in cancers.
The polymorphism of the HLA molecules taken into consideration in the present study greatly influences the array of peptides binding the HLA pocket.

Y
The neo-epitopes pass the validation only when the corresponding wt epitope is a poor binder Furthermore, the HLA alleles do influence the mutated proteins for which neoantigens are predicted.Indeed, 50 out of the 62 top missense mutation (80.6%) as well as 12 out of the 23 top frameshift mutations (52.2%) are not predicted to include neoantigens sequences binding to the most frequent HLA alleles.Most importantly, none of the missense and frameshift mutations identified in a relevant percentage of a specific tumor type, is predicted to include neoantigens sequences (Table 7).Looking the other way around, the percentage of tumor cases characterized by missense or frameshift mutations, generating neoantigens in specific HLA alleles, is extremely variable, Fig. 7 High-affinity predicted neoantigens from frameshift mutations and HLA restriction.The number of predicted neoantigens for each frameshift mutations are reported with indication of the HLA restriction, considering the total number of mutations (A) or only those not including the product of "abnormal" mRNA (B) ranging from 42.5% (eye) to 0.17% (hematopoietic) with an average of 6.97% and a median of 2.42%.Considering the so-called big killers, the percentage range from 18.8% (colon) to 0.4% (prostate).Furthermore, for those with a high-unmet medical need, the percentage is 2.4% for pancreatic ca and 1.78 for brain ca (Fig. 10A).
However, the alleles more prevalently associated to the predicted neoantigens are not from the A locus, which overall has a 60% frequency in the general population.Indeed, most of them are predicted to be linked to alleles of the B locus, in particular HLA-B*58:01, which are among the less frequent and not equally distributed in the global population (Fig. 10B).

Discussion
The first 100 most frequent cancer mutations reported in the TCGA database were selected to predict shared mutated neoantigens that could be useful for developing off-the-shelf cancer vaccines and/or T cell therapies.Such a selection is significantly representative of all cancer mutations.Indeed, although the first 100 mutations represent a large minority of all somatic mutations in the database (100/193,061 = 0.005%), they cover 56.65% of all identified cancer mutations.Moreover, from the 100th mutation on, each of them is identified in a number of cases lower than 29/14,254 cases and, from the 19,000th mutation, in a single case.
The majority of mutations considered for the study are missense mutations (62%).The top 100 mutations contain the most prevalent ones in the different cancer types, including those with a high unmet medical need (e.g.brain ca, pancreas ca, stomach ca).Indeed, the IDH1 R132H is the most prevalent mutation in brain tumors, the KRAS G12D in pancreatic cancer and the ACVR2A K437Rfs*5 in gastric cancer, which have a 5 year relative survival rates of almost 36%, 12% and 33%, respectively.Therefore, if such mutations would generate shared tumor specific antigens (TSAs), they would be the optimal antigens for developing specific "off-the-shelf " immunotherapies for about one third of patients affected by these difficultto treat cancers.
To perform the prediction analyses, the proteins present in the top 100 mutations were manually modified, according to the specific mutations.For the missense mutations, peptides were selected in order to have the mutated residue in each the nine positions (P 1 to P 9 ); for the frameshift mutations, peptides were selected also with the sequence downstream of the shifted reading frame.Consequently, while the 945 mutated peptides derived from the missense mutations diverged from the corresponding wt peptides only for a single amino acid, the 686 derived from the InDels included also peptides with a sequence completely different from the wt peptides.
The number of mutated peptides (neoantigens) with affinity < 400 nM to one of the 12 HLA alleles considered in the study is very low, 49 (5.18%) for the ones derived from the missense mutations and 103 (15.01%) for the ones derived from the frameshift mutations.However, the number significantly drops to 20 (2.11%) and 40 (5.83%), respectively, when considering a higher affinity of < 100 nM.Indeed, only peptides with a predicted affinity < 100 nM have been previously shown to have a 100% concordance with ex vivo binding assay [18].Considering that a neoantigen can be classified as optimal only if the corresponding wt peptide is not antigenic, only 10 neoantigens (1.05%) are identified from the missense mutations.Likewise, also the number of neoantigens derived from the frameshift mutations with a real chance to be presented by cancer cells drops to 9 (1.31%) given that the "abnormal" mRNAs generated by the frameshift contain premature termination codons (PTCs) are recognized and degraded by nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) [15,16].Moreover, even when PTC-containing mRNAs escape from NMD, truncated proteins are not generated due to a translational repression [17].
Considering both types of mutations, the HLA alleles associated with the highest number of predicted neoantigens are from the B loci, namely the B*58:01   Overall, the percentage of tumor cases characterized by missense or frameshift mutations generating neoantigens in specific HLA alleles is low, variable and associated to low-frequent HLA alleles.Indeed, the average of tumor cases is 6.97% and a median of 2.42% with a wide range going from 42.5% (eye) to 0.17% (hematopoietic).22 out of 31 tumors (71%) show a percentage of cases characterized by mutations generating neoantigens lower than 5% and most of the big killers (e.g.breast, lung, prostate, liver ca) as well as those with a high unmet medical need (e.g.pancreas and brain ca) are in the lower part of the list (< 5%).The number of observed predicted neoantigens from the hot-spot missense mutations is significantly lower than the expected ones.On the contrary, the number of observed predicted neoantigens from the hot-spot InDel mutations is perfectly comparable to the expected ones.This supports the hypothesis that, the first ones are selected by the immunological pressure, while the latter are not because they are not translated and not presented to the immune system.
However, also the few cancers with a relevant percentage of cases (> 10%) with mutations generating neoantigens, these are associated to low prevalent HLA alleles.The GNA11 Q209L missense mutation, giving rise to the FRMVDVGGL epitope, is the most frequent mutation in uveal melanoma (UM) (42,50% of all cases reported in TCGA).Unfortunately, the clinical impact of this neoantigen appears to be very limited because UM is a rare tumor, with an average incidence rate of 5 per million globally [19]  cancer vaccines based on TSAs.Considering that they show and age-standardized rate (ASR) of 6.2 and 6.1, respectively, this would be a huge advancement in cancer therapy.Unfortunately, such neoantigens are mostly associated to the B loci of the HLA, that show a prevalence much lower than 10%, and even lower than 1%, in world populations.This drastically reduce the potential application of such therapy.The only exception is represented by the predicted neoantigens derived from PIK3CA H1047L (FMKQMNDAL) and LARP4BT163Hfs*47 (VLKKH-WNSA), linked to HLA-B*08:01, as well as the one derived from RFN43G659Vfs*41 (HPQRKRRGV), linked to HLA-B*07:02.Indeed, these two alleles cover 21.8% and 20.5% of the European population and, therefore, could represent a great opportunity for providing an additional therapeutic opportunity to European patients affected by such deadly cancers.
In conclusions, the search for shared mutated tumorspecific neoantigens for developing off-the-shelf highly specific immunotherapies results in an unfortunate failure.The most frequent mutations, either missense or InDel, do not give rise to any predicted neoantigen with high affinity to the most frequent HLA-A and B alleles.Such evidence is likely to be the result of a very strong selection by the immune system in the very early stages of tumor development, which eliminates cancer cells expressing mutated immunogenic neoantigens.At that stage, the tumor cells characterized by mutations giving rise to highly antigenic non-self-mutated neoantigens would be efficiently targeted and eliminated.The result is the selection of cancer cells expressing only wild type self-antigens and, consequently, able to escape the immune control.Finally, they will form tumor lesions embedded in a very immune-suppressive microenvironment, which is difficult to be accessed by T cells (Fig. 11).
Therefore, cancer vaccines may only rely upon personalized mutated neoantigens, with all the caveats and limitations, or upon wild type over-expressed tumorassociated antigens (TAAs), which may suffer from immunological tolerance.In order to overcome the latter drawback, non-self-antigens mimicking the TAAs (molecular mimicry), and able to elicit cross-reactive T cells, should be actively searched (i.e.antigens derived from microorganisms).This will provide the essential tool for developing off-the-shelf vaccines with the optimal immunogenicity to elicit an efficient anti-tumor T cell immune response [20][21][22][23].

Fig. 1 Fig. 2
Fig. 1 Top 100 mutations identified in cancers at TCGA database.A Percentage of type of mutations; B percentage of tumors presenting mutations of the indicated proteins

Fig. 5 Z
Fig. 5 Z-score of the observed predicted neoantigens from the hot-spot missense mutations.The normal distribution of the percentage of predicted neoantigens from the 8547 samples present at TCGA.The Z-score of the observed predicted neoantigens from the hot-spot missense mutations is indicated.The result shows a statistically significant lower percentage than what expected (p-value = 0.006; 99.37% confidence level) of observed mutations is significantly lower than what expected, with a p-value = 0.006 and a 99.37% confidence level (Fig.5).No neoantigens were predicted for HLA-A*01:01, A*26:02, B*07:02 and B*40:01; one neoantigen was predicted for HLA-A*02.01,A*24:02, B*08:02, B*27:05, B*39:01 and B*15:01.Only for HLA-A*03:01 and B*58:01 were predicted more than a single neoantigen, three and two respectively.

Fig. 8 Z
Fig. 8 Z-score of the observed predicted neoantigens from the hot-spot InDel mutations.The normal distribution of the number of predicted neoantigens from InDel mutations in the 6610 samples present at TCGA.The Z-score of the observed predicted neoantigens from the hot-spot InDel mutations is indicated.It falls in the normal distribution of the expected values with a confidence level of 99.99% (p-value = 0.49)

Fig. 9
Fig. 9 Number of predicted neoantigens for each haplotype.The number of predicted neoantigens is indicated for each of the 12 haplotypes taken into consideration.The numbers are indicated in a top-down listing in a clockwise direction.Neoantigens derived from missense mutations are listed in panel A; those derived from frameshift mutations are listed in panel B; the total neoantigens are listed in panel C

Fig. 10 Fig. 11
Fig. 10 Predicted neoantigens in each tumor and haplotype.The percentage of cases with mutations predicting for neoantigens are indicated for each cancer (A); the percentage of neoantigens associated to each haplotype are indicated for each cancer (B)

Table 3
Predicted neo-epitopes with an affinity value to the HLA alleles < 100 nM, derived from missense mutations, are listed with selected informationThe peptide sequences include the mutated aminoacid residue (bold & underlined).Values in the column of the haplotypes indicate the predicted affinity (nM).TOT FREQ: frequency in the TCGA database; TOP FREQ: top frequency in specific tumor; TUMOR: tumor type in which the top frequency is reported

Table 5
Predicted neo-epitopes derived from frameshift mutations with an affinity value to the HLA alleles < 100 nM (green highlighted)

Table 6
Predicted neo-epitopes with an affinity value to the HLA alleles < 100 nM, derived from missense mutations, are listed with selected information.

Table 7
Missense and frameshift mutations for which neoepitopes have not been predicted in any of the 12 haplotypes considered in the study

Table 7
(continued)For those, which are reported as top frequent in a specific tumor, the tumor types are listed (TOP FREQ.)