| Â | OR (95% CI) | P-value |
|---|
Model 1 | 1.37 (1.32, 1.42) | < 0.001 |
Model 2 | 1.33 (1.29, 1.38) | < 0.001 |
Model 3 | 1.27 (1.22, 1.31) | < 0.001 |
Model 4 | 1.26 (1.22, 1.31) | < 0.001 |
Model 5 | 1.24 (1.20, 1.29) | < 0.001 |
Model 6 | 1.25 (1.21, 1.30) | < 0.001 |
Model 7 | 1.26 (1.21, 1.31) | < 0.001 |
Model 8 | 1.25 (1.21, 1.30) | < 0.001 |
Model 9 | 1.25 (1.20, 1.30) | < 0.001 |
Model 10 | 1.24 (1.20, 1.29) | < 0.001 |
Model 11 | 1.25 (1.21, 1.30) | < 0.001 |
Model 12 | 1.25 (1.20, 1.29) | < 0.001 |
Model 13 | 1.24 (1.20, 1.29) | < 0.001 |
Model 14 | 1.25 (1.20, 1.29) | < 0.001 |
- OR: Odds ratios; CI: confidence interval; other abbreviations as in Table 1
- Model 1 adjusted sex, age and WC
- Model 2 adjusted model I + SBP, DBP, habit of exercise, smoking status and drinking status
- Model 3 adjusted model II + ALT, AST, GGT, FPG and HbA1c
- Model 4 adjusted model II + TC; Model 5 adjusted model II + HDL-C; Model 6 adjusted model II + TG; Model 7 adjusted model II + LDL-C; Model 8 adjusted model II + non-HDL-C; Model 9 adjusted model II + RC; Model 10 adjusted model II + TC/HDL-C ratio; Model 11 adjusted model II + TG/HDL-C ratio; Model 12 adjusted model II + LDL-C/HDL-C ratio; Model 13 adjusted model II + non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio; Model 14 adjusted model II + RC/HDL-C ratio
- Models 4–14 show the correlation between BMI and NAFLD when lipid parameters are included in the regression model
