Skip to main content

Table 3 Relationship between LIPC expression and clinicopathological features of 90 patients with HCC

From: Downregulation of TUSC3 promotes EMT and hepatocellular carcinoma progression through LIPC/AKT axis

LIPC expression

Features

n

Negative

Positive

χ2

P value

Age (years)

 ≤ 50

34

27 (79.4%)

7 (20.6%)

3.386

0.066

 > 50

56

34 (60.7%)

22 (39.3%)

Gender

 Male

79

53 (67.1%)

26 (32.9%)

0.141

0.708

 Female

11

8 (72.7%)

3 (27.3%)

Tumor size (diameters) (cm)

 ≤ 5

40

21 (52.5%)

19 (47.5%)

7.695

0.006

 > 5

50

40 (80.0%)

10 (20.0%)

Number of tumors

 = 1

67

41 (61.2%)

26 (38.8%)

5.203

0.023

 > 1

23

20 (87.0%)

3 (13.0%)

Differentiation

 Poor

26

19 (73.1%)

7 (26.9%)

  

 Moderate

54

40 (74.1%)

14 (25.9)

11.767

0.003

 High

10

2 (20.0%)

8 (80.0%)

  

Vascular invasion

 Absent

45

28 (62.2%)

17 (37.8%)

1.272

0.259

 Present

45

33 (73.3%)

12 (26.7%)

Tumor capsule

 Missing

15

12 (80.0%)

3 (20.0%)

1.231

0.267

 Complete

75

49 (65.3%)

26 (34.7%)

AFP (ug/l)

 ≤ 20

42

24 (57.1%)

18 (42.9%)

4.078

0.043

 > 20

48

37 (77.1%)

11 (22.9%)

HBsAg

 Negative

17

9 (52.9%)

8 (47.1%)

2.112

0.146

 Positive

73

52 (71.2%)

21 (28.8%)

Child–Pugh grade

 A

70

46 (65.7%)

24 (34.3%)

0.614

0.433

 B

20

15 (75.0%)

5 (25.0%)

BCLC stage

 A–B

21

10 (47.6%)

11 (52.4%)

5.097

0.024

 C–D

69

51 (73.9%)

18 (26.1%)