Skip to main content

Table 3 Univariate analysis of factors influencing willingness to collaborate in TMR among clinicians

From: Collaborative relationships in translational medical research among Chinese clinicians: an internet-based cross-sectional survey

Characteristic

Willingness of collaboration in TMR

Statistic

P-value

Very unwilling

Unwilling

Uncertain

Willing

Very willing

 

9

5

57

429

304

  

Sex

     

− 1.479

0.139

 Male

3

3

30

243

183

  

 Female

6

2

27

186

121

  

Age (year)

     

9.562

0.049*

 20–30

3

1

26

117

73

  

 31–40

2

3

17

219

158

  

 41–50

3

1

9

77

64

  

 51–60

1

0

5

15

9

  

 > 60

0

0

0

1

0

  

Educational level

     

22.161

 < 0.0001*

 Junior college degree

0

1

4

7

7

  

 Bachelor’s degree

5

1

33

123

70

  

 Master’s degree

3

3

10

159

106

  

 Doctor’s degree

1

0

10

140

121

  

Professional title

     

10.213

0.017*

 Junior

3

2

32

128

84

  

 Intermediate

3

3

17

192

127

  

 Associate senior

1

0

4

88

64

  

 Senior

2

0

4

21

29

  

Department

     

5.685

0.128

 Surgical department

1

2

14

134

108

  

 Non-surgical department

4

2

21

175

108

  

 Medical technology department

2

0

8

82

57

  

 Management department

2

1

14

38

31

  

Current research type

     

27.285

 < 0.0001*

 Clinical research

1

2

15

179

109

  

 Laboratory research

0

0

0

27

24

  

 Clinical and laboratory research

3

0

7

109

98

  

 Public health management research

1

0

2

21

17

  

 Do not conduct research

4

3

33

93

56

  

Role in current research

     

34.147

 < 0.0001*

 National PI

0

0

2

38

46

  

 Provincial PI

1

0

0

28

29

  

 City-level PI

1

0

2

25

32

  

 Department-level PI

1

1

3

22

22

  

 Project participants

1

1

13

196

93

  

 No project support

5

3

37

120

82

  

Current research pressure

     

44.411

 < 0.0001*

 Very low

1

3

9

9

9

  

 Low

0

1

2

25

10

  

 Moderate

5

0

21

123

57

  

 High

2

1

18

214

141

  

 Very high

1

0

7

58

87

  

Communication methods used in collaboration

       

 Face-to-face

9

5

57

429

304

19.615

0.001*

 Telephone

9

5

57

429

304

6.415

0.170

 WeChat

9

5

57

429

304

13.868

0.008

 Email

9

5

57

429

304

5.748

0.219

 Research record, research abstract, memorandum

9

5

57

429

304

2.710

0.608

 Videoconference

9

5

57

429

304

6.342

0.175

 Face-to-face group meeting

9

5

57

429

304

4.749

0.314

 Mobile short message

9

5

57

429

304

5.133

0.274

Preferred collaboration partners at the institutional or individual level

     

39.784

 < 0.0001*

 Institutions

3

0

22

190

165

  

 Individuals

4

3

29

238

139

  

 Uncertain

2

2

6

1

0

  

Preferred partners of collaboration

       

 University

9

5

57

429

304

64.543

 < 0.0001*

 Hospital

9

5

57

429

304

43.938

 < 0.0001*

 Research institute

9

5

57

429

304

68.770

 < 0.0001*

 Industry

9

5

57

429

304

33.436

 < 0.0001*

 Community

9

5

57

429

304

19.394

0.001*

Preferred partners of collaboration in the research application stage

       

 University

7

2

31

297

248

− 4.853

 < 0.0001*

 Hospital

5

2

25

184

170

3.176

0.002*

 Research institute

7

2

38

301

238

− 2.764

0.006*

 Industry

4

1

15

103

102

2.326

0.020*

 Community

2

1

9

43

51

1.672

0.095*

Preferred partners of collaboration in the research implementation stage

       

 University

5

3

22

201

199

− 5.217

 < 0.0001*

 Hospital

6

2

28

247

205

− 3.225

0.001*

 Research institute

6

2

38

294

233

− 2.702

0.007*

 Industry

5

0

18

169

152

− 16.779

 < 0.0001*

 Community

2

1

9

72

90

4.011

 < 0.0001*

Preferred partners of collaboration in the research achievement promotion stage

       

 University

3

2

17

157

145

3.431

0.001*

 Hospital

8

2

26

223

194

− 3.166

0.002*

 Research institute

4

1

29

193

161

1.828

0.068

 Industry

6

2

29

292

226

− 3.277

0.001*

 Community

4

1

19

169

161

4.035

 < 0.0001*

Preferred partners of collaboration in the research application stage

       

 Laboratory scientist

5

2

37

331

257

− 3.998

 < 0.0001*

 Clinical scientist

8

1

38

301

231

− 2.070

0.039*

 Industrial staff

4

0

18

102

101

2.015

0.044*

 Community staff

4

2

17

74

62

− 0.686

0.493

 Health management scientist

3

1

13

87

109

4.194

 < 0.0001*

Preferred partners of collaboration in the research implementation stage

       

 Laboratory scientist

4

1

32

268

211

− 2.859

0.004*

 Clinical scientist

1

3

17

101

62

− 1.601

0.109

 Industrial staff

5

1

27

174

150

1.765

0.078

 Community staff

4

1

19

127

109

0.925

0.355

 Health management scientist

4

1

12

125

116

2.973

0.003*

Preferred partners of collaboration in the achievement promotion stage

       

 Laboratory scientist

3

1

25

166

139

1.674

0.094

 Clinical scientist

7

1

33

248

181

− 0.457

0.648

 Industrial staff

5

1

33

275

228

− 3.899

 < 0.0001*

 Community staff

5

2

29

225

173

− 1.314

0.189

 Health management scientist

4

1

23

211

192

− 4.501

 < 0.0001*

  1. *Indicates statistically significant results (p < 0.05)