Skip to main content

Table 2 Ranking for all the interventions’ outcomes in the network meta-analysis

From: Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells for spinal cord injury: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

 

Interventions

ASIA motor score

ASIA sensory score

Barthel index

Adverse reactions

SUCRA(%)

PrBest

Mean rank

SUCRA(%)

PrBest

Mean rank

SUCRA(%)

PrBest

Mean rank

SUCRA(%)

PrBest

Mean rank

Cell sources

Re

4.3

0

2.9

5.3

9

2.9

5

0

2.9

99.9

99.8

1

Auto

95.4

90.8

1.1

97.8

95.6

1

92.4

85.2

1.2

34.4

0.1

2.3

Allo

50.4

9.2

2

46.9

4.4

2.1

52.6

14.8

1.9

15.7

0.1

2.7

Cell transplantation ways

Re

7.8

0

3.8

13.6

0

3.6

19.1

0.6

3.4

91.4

75.8

1.3

IT

85.5

60.2

1.4

91.2

75.8

1.3

61.4

24.5

2.2

46.7

6.9

2.6

IL

38.3

4.9

2.9

42.3

6.4

2.7

44

21.8

2.7

19.7

0.1

3.4

IV

68.4

34.9

1.9

52.9

17.8

2.4

75.5

53.1

1.7

42.3

17.2

2.7

  1. SUCRA surface under the cumulative ranking, PrBest the probability of best treatment, Auto Autologous mesenchymal stem cells, Allo allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells, Re rehabilitation, IT intrathecal injection, IL intralesional injection, IV intravenous injection