Skip to main content

Table 1 The characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis

From: Sugar-sweetened beverages increases the risk of hypertension among children and adolescence: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis

First author

Country

Journal/year

Disease status/setting

Design/gender

Num. (total-each category)

Age range (y)

Dietary assessment tool

SSB dose (mean/median g/d)

SSB type

Main Results

Adjustments

Ambrosini GL [8]

Australia

Am J Clin Nut/2013

Apparently healthy/community

Cohort/both

1433/478

14, 17

FFQ

47.5 ± 37.1

Carbonated + cordials or and non-100% fruit juice/

SBP in higher tertiles of SSB intake was higher than lower tertile (P = 0.03). No difference in DBP was found.

Age, pubertal stage, physical fitness, dietary misreporting, maternal education, family income, BMI, healthy and Western dietary pattern scores.

Barstad LH [37]

Norway

BMC Pediatrics/2018

Severe obesity/clinic

Cross-sectional

313/(62-70)

12–18

Self-administered FFQ

None to at least 4 glasses per week ( ̴ 1375)

Sugar-sweetened soda

SBP in higher intakes of SSB was higher than lower.

Bortsov AV [26]

USA

Acta Diabetologica/2011

Youth with T1DM/clinic

Cross-sectional/both

902/(304-600)

10–22

FFQ

0-750

Sugar-sweetened soda

No significant difference in SBP or DBP between three categories SSB intake

Age, sex, race/ethnicity, parental education, diabetes duration, skipping insulin, time watching TV, involvement in team sports, and total energy intake, BMI-z-score, saturated fat intake, total fiber intake

Bremer AA [39]

USA

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med/2009

Apparently healthy/community

Cross-sectional/both

2630/(876)

12-19

FFQ

Low (≤ 20th percentile) to high (≥ 80th percentile) of the sum of the number of SSB serving equivalents

Caloric soft drinks, colas, sugar-sweetened fruit drinks, or other SSBs

Significantly higher SBP values (P = 0.03) and no difference in DBP values between low and high SSB consumers

PA, age, sex, race,

energy intake (in kilocalories)

Chan TF [13]

Taiwan

Nutrients/2014

Apparently healthy/school

Cross-sectional/females

2727/(242-196)

12–16

FFQ

Non to > 750

Any type

No significant difference between SBP and DBP of different SSB categories

Age, gender, study area, PA, total calories, alcohol and smoking

Chan TF [13]

Taiwan

Nutrients/2014

Apparently healthy/school

Cross-sectional/males

2727/(406-120)

12–16

FFQ

Non to > 750

Any type

Significantly higher SBP in higher intakes compared with lower intakes of SSB (P = 0.043). No difference in DBP was observed.

Age, gender, study area, PA, total calories, alcohol and smoking.

DeBoer EC [19]

USA

Clinical Nutrition- ESPEN/2013

Apparently healthy/home

Birth cohort/both

9600

5–6

FFQ

0-750

Chocolate milk, yogurt drinks, lemonades, juices and soft drinks

Significantly higher SBP in higher versus lower SSB tertiles

Sex, height and age, ethnicity, maternal SES, BMI, PA, screen time, gestational age, birth weight, maternal BMI and paternal BMI, pubertal stage

DeBoer EC [19]

USA

Clinical Nutrition- ESPEN/2013

Apparently healthy/home

Birth cohort/both

2516/(794-905)

11-12

FFQ

0-950

Yogurt drinks, soft drinks, juices, lemonades, sport drinks and energy drinks

Significantly higher SBP in higher versus lower SSB tertiles

Sex, height and age, ethnicity, maternal SES, BMI, PA, screen time, gestational age, birth weight, maternal BMI and paternal BMI, pubertal stage

Gui ZH [23]

China

Nutrients/2017

Apparently healthy/community

Cross-sectional/both

53,151/(15 763- 17773)

6-17

FFQ

0-500

Coca-Cola, Sprite, orange juice, Nutrition Express, and Red Bull

Significantly higher SBP and DBP in higher versus lower SSB intakes (P < 0.001), no difference in odds of HTN in different SSB intakes.

Age, sex, and residence, maternal education, paternal education, family income, screen time, and PA, meat and fried food for overweight, obesity, and abdominal obesity; and meat, fried food, height, and BMI for blood pressure.

He B [24]

China

J AtherosclThromb/

2018

Apparently healthy/school

Cross-sectional/both

2032/(440-705)

6–18

FFQ

0-120

Carbonated drinks, juices, and sports and sweet tea beverages.

Significantly higher SBP and DBP in higher versus lower SSB intakes (P < 0.001).

Age, gender, physical activities, sleeping duration, sedentary behavior, and dietary information

Lin WT [38]

Taiwan

Int J Obesity/2013

Apparently healthy/School

Cross-sectional/both

2727/(164-317)

12-16

FFQ

non-intake to ≥ 1000 ml/d

SSB, including soft drinks, fruit drinks and sweetened teas.

Significant increase in SBP (3.47 mmHg; P = 0.004) and no significant change in DBP (p = 0.514) in higher versus lower SSB consumers.

The study area, age, gender, PA, total calories, the intake of meat, seafood, fruit, fried food and a food with jelly/honey, as well as for alcohol drinking and cigarette smoking.

Loh DA [27]

Malaysia

Pediatric Obes/2015

Apparently healthy/School

Cross-sectional/both

881/(293)

13

FFQ

338.75

Carbonate beverages

No significant difference in SBP and DBP between SSB tertiels.

Mirmiran et al. [15]

Iran

Nutr Metab/2015

Apparently healthy/Community

Cohort/both

424/(106)

6–18

FFQ

132.7

Sugar sweetened carbonated soft drinks (SSSDs) and fruit juice drinks (non-100% fruit juices)

Significantly higher SBP in highest versus lowest SSB category (P = 0.021). No difference in DBP between SSB quartiles (P = 0.52). Higher odds of HTN in highest versus lowest SSB category (2.90 (0.91–9.26); P = 0.043)

Age, sex, total energy intake, PA, family history of diabetes dietary fiber, tea and coffee, red and processed meat, fruit, and vegetable, BMI

Qin Z [9]

China

J Hyper/2018

Apparently healthy/School

Cross-sectional/both

10091/(249-203)

Grade 4: 9.04 ± 0.38

Grade 7: 12.03 ± 0.41

FFQ

Consumers/non-consumers

Sprite and Coca-Cola

Higher odds of HTN in SSB consumers versus non-consumers [OR:1.40 (1.15,1.70)]

School, parental educational attainment, PA, diet

intake of meat and snacks

Souza BSN [10]

Brazil

J Hypert/2016

Apparently healthy/school

Cross-sectional/both

488/(419-25)

9–16

FFQ

500

Soft drinks, fruit drinks and sweetened teas

Significantly higher SBP and DBP in SSB consumers than non-consumers (P < 0.05)

Age, sex, BMI, PA, addition of salt to food at the table, and education of the head of the family

Zhu Z [11]

China

Pediatric Obes/2020

Apparently healthy/Community

Cross-sectional/both

3958/(343-2582)

6-17

FFQ

201.7

Nonalcoholic beverages sweetened by sugar, excluding fresh juice.

Significantly higher SBP and DBP in high consumers versus low consumers (P < 0.001; P = 0.004)

Age, gender, energy intake, pubertal stage, daily sedentary time, maternal education, household income,

  1. SSB sugar sweetened beverages, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, BMI body mass index, FFQ food frequency questionnaire, HTN hypertension, PA physical activity, T1DM type one diabetes mellitus