Skip to main content

Table 4 Univariate Cox regression analysis of the impact of the lncRNA signature and other clinicopathological features on OS in the three NSCLC patient cohorts

From: Identification of a 4-lncRNA signature predicting prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter study in China

Parameters

Training cohort

Validation cohort

Independent cohort

Hazard ratio (95% CI)

P value

Hazard ratio (95% CI)

P value

Hazard ratio (95% CI)

P value

Signature

 (High vs low)

3.20 (0.58–1.65)

< 0.001

2.84 (1.59–5.07)

< 0.001

2.84 (1.59–5.07)

0.009

Age

 (≥ 60 vs < 60)

1.24 (0.73–2.09)

0.417

1.13 (0.67–1.91)

0.330

0.88 (0.36–2.13)

0.782

Gender

 (Male vs female)

0.86 (0.48–1.52)

0.619

1.24 (0.63–2.41)

0.050

0.98 (0.37–2.57)

0.978

TNM stages

 (III vs II vs I)

1.67 (1.28–2.19)

< 0.001

1.70 (1.30–2.23)

0.001

1.74 (1.04–2.89)

0.031

Histological type

 (ADC vs SCC)

1.30 (0.74–2.29)

0.346

1.39 (0.82–2.36)

0.589

0.53 (0.15–1.83)

0.320

Tumor size

 (≥ 5 cm vs < 5 cm)

1.17 (0.69–1.98)

0.545

1.15 (0.68–1.95)

0.017

3.00 (1.00–9.00)

0.048

Differentiation

 (Poor vs well/mod)

0.98 (0.58–1.65)

0.951

1.43 (0.85–2.42)

0.079

1.80 (0.74–4.32)

0.188

Lymph metastasis

 (Yes vs no)

1.44 (0.86–2.43)

0.163

0.73 (0.43–1.24)

0.025

1.38 (0.46–4.14)

0.561

Smoking history

 (Yes vs no)

0.91 (0.54–1.54)

0.736

1.63 (0.92–2.91)

0.024

1.11 (0.46–2.68)

0.812

Fam. cancer hist.

 (Yes vs no)

1.04 (0.52–2.06)

0.899

1.18 (0.58–2.42)

0.580

0.47 (2.97–7.64)

0.618

  1. Italic P values represent the statistic significance
  2. Fam. cancer hist. Family cancer history