Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis

From: Vitamin D deficiency associated with Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis of 55 observational studies

Study

Year

Study design

Country

Disease

Totle, CD/UC/control

Female, CD/UC/control

Matching or adjustment

Maturity (CD/UC/control)

Vitamin D assessment tool

Vitamin D deficiency definition (ng/mL for 25(OH)D, pg/mL 1,25(OH)2D)

Vitamin D supplementation

Quality score

Driscoll [25]

1982

Case–control

US

CD

82/–/40

NR/–/NR

NR

> 18

CPBA

Normal: 15.1–27.9

Yes

5

Harries [26]

1985

Case–control

Wales

CD and UC

40/20/9

21/9/6

NR

38.75 ± 15.42/45 ± 17/–

RIA

NR

No

5

Westarp [69]

1987

Case–control

Canada

CD

39/–/64

25/–/37

NR

9.3 ± 0.3

CPBA

NR

No

5

Martin [70]

1994

Case–control

Italy

CD

20/–/12

0/–/0

Age

38.8 ± 9.94/–/43 ± 14

HPLC

NR

No

6

Pollak [27]

1998

Case–control

Israel

CD and UC

63/41/–

23/21/–

Age, sex

37.7 ± 14.5 (IBD)/34.6 ± 11.2

RIA

Normal: 10–45

No

4

Gokhale [28]

1998

Case–control

US

CD and UC

58/37/–

22/17/–

NR

14.3 ± 2.9/13.7 ± 3.5/–

CPBA

25(OH)DNormal: 10–60; 1,25(OH)2DNormal (2–12 years): 10.8–90.2

No

5

Ardizzone [29]

2000

Case–control

Italy

CD and UC

51/40/30

30/15/16

Age, sex

38.7 ± 13.2/34.4 ± 12.5/39.4 ± 11.6

RIA

25(OH)DNormal: 15–40; 1,25(OH)2DNormal: 14–50

No

7

Jahnsen [30]

2002

Cross-sectional

Norway

CD and UC

60/60/–

36/36/–

Age, sex

36 ± 16.5/38 ± 13.5/–

HPLC + RIA

25(OH)DNormal: 12–44; 1,25(OH)2DNormal: 19–56

No

7

Haderslev [31]

2003

Case–control

Denmark

CD and UC

42/–/384

24/–/NR

NR

50.3 ± 12.3

RIA

Deficiency: < 15

No

4

Tajika [32]

2004

Case–control

Japan

CD and UC

33/11/15

8/5/7

Age, sex

37.6 ± 7.5/47.6 ± 12.4/37.7 ± 10.0

CPBA + RIA

25(OH)DNormal: 10–55; deficiency: ≤ 10; 1,25(OH)2DNormal: 20–60

No

6

Duggan [33]

2004

Case–control

Ireland

CD

44/–/44

29/–/29

NR

36.9 ± 11.1/–/36.7 ± 11.0

ELISA

NR

6.7 ± 5.1/6.7 ± 4.8 μg

6

Abreu [34]

2004

Cohort

US

CD and UC

138/29/96

63/12/NR

NR

37.7 ± 1.1/38.1 ± 3.3/40.0 ± 1.0

CPBA

Elevated 1,25(OH)2D: > 60; normal 1,25(OH)2D: < 60

No

6

McCarthy [35]

2005

Case–control

Ireland

CD

44/–/44

29/–/29

Age, sex

36.9 ± 11.1/–/36.7 ± 11.1

ELISA

Insufficiency: < 32; sufficiency: > 32; replete: > 20; mild deficiency: 10–20; moderate deficiency: 5–10; severe deficiency: < 5

2.5–20 μg/day

6

Gilman [36]

2006

Cross-sectional

Ireland

CD and UC

47/26/73

NR/NR/NR

Age, sex

> 18

ELISA

Deficiency: < 20

No

5

Pappa [37]

2006

Cross-sectional

US

CD and UC

94/36/–

43/20/–

NR

15 ± 3/14 ± 4/–

NR

Deficiency: ≤ 15; severe deficiency: ≤ 8

Yes

3

Sinnott [38]

2006

Cohort

US

CD and UC

30/18/–

14/9/–

Age, sex

48.0 ± 12.0/48.9 ± 15.7/–

NR

NR

No

4

Vagianos [39]

2007

Cross-sectional

canada

CD and UC

84/42/–

52/25/–

NR

37.6 ± 14.3/36.6 ± 12.9/–

CPBA

Normal: 14–80; deficiency: 20–30

Yes

4

Kuwabara [40]

2008

Cross-sectional

Japan

CD and UC

29/41/–

9/17/–

NR

32.2 ± 6.7/39.3 ± 14.6/–

RIA

Deficiency: < 20; insufficiency: 21–29

No

3

Leslie [41]

2008

Cohort

Canada

CD and UC

56/45/–

NR/NR/–

NR

> 18

RIA

Optimal: > 30; marginally deficient: 20–30; insufficiency: 10–19; deficiency: < 10

No

6

Souza [71]

2008

Cohort

Brazil

CD and UC

39/37/40

18/25/24

NR

32.1 ± 8.7/35.0 ± 8.5/34.0 ± 7.0

RIA

 

No

6

Joseph [42]

2009

Case–control

India

CD and UC

34/34/–

10/10/–

Age, sex

39.2 ± 12.9/38.9 ± 13.4 (IBS)

RIA

Deficiency: < 20; insufficiency: 20–32; adequate: > 32

No

6

Kumari [43]

2010

Prospective case–control

Georgia

CD

4/–/4

0/–/0

Age

35.5 ± 9.75/–/42.40 ± 5.13

ELISA

Insufficiency: < 30

240.50 ± 119.92/211.60 ± 132.11 (IU)

6

EI-Matary [44]

2011

Cross-sectional

Canada

CD and UC

39/21/56

20/11/31

Age, sex, ethnicity

12.2 ± 3.2/12.4 ± 3.7/11.3 ± 4.2

CPBA

Optimum: ≥ 32

No

3

Levin [45]

2011

Cross-sectional

Australia

CD and UC

70/8/–

NR/NR/–

NR

12.6 ± 3.5

CLIA

NR

No

3

Pappa [47]

2011

Cross-sectional

US

CD and UC

288/143/–

127/78/–

Age, sex, ethnicity

15.9 ± 3.1/15.4 ± 3.3/–

CLIA

Optimum: ≥ 32

Yes

4

Atia [48]

2011

Cross-sectional

US

CD and UC

43/80/–

3/7/–

NR

61.4 ± 14.7/66.5 ± 11.5/–

CLIA

Deficiency: < 20; insufficiency: < 30

No

2

EI-Hodhod [46]

2012

Case–control

Egypt

CD and UC

20/27/50

2/13/9

Age, sex

10.49 ± 3.34/12.77 ± 1.71/12.8 ± 3.77

RIA

Deficiency: < 15; severe deficiency: < 8

No

6

Suibhne [49]

2012

Case–control

Ireland

CD

81/–/70

48/–/42

Age, sex,socio-economic status.

36.43 ± 11.00/–/36.34 ± 9.53

RIA

2cut-points: (1) deficiency: < 20; (2) deficiency: < 32

200–400 IU; ≥ 800 IU

5

Hassan [50]

2012

Cohort

Iran

CD and UC

26/34/–

7/10/–

NR

34 ± 18/30 ± 11/–

RIA

Sufficiency: ≥ 30; insufficiency: 11–29; deficiency: ≤ 10 ng/mL

No

7

Chatu [51]

2012

Retrospective cohort

UK

CD and UC

107/61/–

NR/NR/–

NR

34.98 ± 14.36(IBD)/–

CPBA

Normal: ≥ 20; deficiency: < 20; severe: < 10

No

4

Fu [52]

2012

Cohort

Canada

CD and UC

40/60/–

18/32/–

NR

40 ± 13.2/42.1 ± 13.9/–

RIA

Hypovitaminosis: < 20

No

5

Salacinski [53]

2012

Cohort

US

CD

19/–/19

10/–/10

Age, sex

44.16 ± 10.28/–/41.68 ± 11.19

HPLC

Low 25(OH)D levels: < 20 ng/mL; insufficient: 20–32 ng/mL

No

3

Garg [54]

2013

Cohort

Australia

CD and UC

40/31/23

18/14/13

Sunlight exposure

41 ± 13.25/44 ± 15/42 ± 11.5

CLIA

Sufficiency:  ≥ 30; insufficiency: 20–30; deficiency: < 20

795/927/473(UI)

6

Prosnitz [55]

2013

Cohort

US

CD

78/–/221

34/–/109

Anthropometry, body composition, pubertal development weight and height

12.7 ± 2.8/–/13.5 ± 4.4

RIA

Deficiency: < 20

No

7

Miznerova [56]

2013

Cohort

Slovakia

CD and UC

46/30/–

25/15/–

NR

36 ± 12.75/47 ± 13.5/–

ECLIA

Deficiency: < 30; very low: < 10

No

4

Grunbaum [17]

2013

Case–control

Canada

CD and UC

34/21/48

21/13/38

Age, sex, ethnicity, weight

39.9 ± 12.3/44.2 ± 13.7/39.6 ± 13.8

RIA

Replete: ≥ 30; insufficiency: 20–29; deficiency: < 20; severely deficiency: < 10

932.4/1020.8 (IU)

6

Jorgensen [72]

2013

Cross-sectional

Denmark

CD

182/–/62

57/–/52

NR

36 ± 10.2/–/32 ± 11

LC–MS

Deficiency: < 20

Yes

5

Middleton [57]

2013

Cross-sectional

US

CD

52/–/40

20/–/25

NR

17.0 ± 0.9/–/11.0 ± 2.5

CLIA + LC–MS

Deficiency: ≤ 15; insufficiency: < 32

No

5

Lorinczy [58]

2013

Cross-sectional

Hungary

CD and UC

128/41/–

NR/NR/–

Age, sex

35.8 ± 12.0

CLIA

NR

No

5

Alkhouri [59]

2013

Case–control

US

CD and UC

46/12/61

14/6/31

Age, sex

12.1 ± 4.1/12.3 ± 3.5/12.1 ± 3.6

NR

Deficiency: < 12; severely deficiency: < 4

No

4

Bruyn [60]

2014

Prospective case–control

Netherlands

CD

98/–/43

68/–/NR

NR

36 ± 10.2/–/32 ± 7.3

CLIA

Normal:  ≥ 30; insufficiency: 20–30; deficiency: < 20

Yes

5

Dumitrescu [61]

2014

Prospective case–control

Romania

CD and UC

14/33/94

6/16/44

Age, sex

36 ± 9/42 ± 14/42 ± 12

HPLC

Sufficiency: ≥ 30; insufficiency: 20–30; deficiency: < 20

No

7

Tan [62]

2014

Case–control

China

CD and UC

107/124/122

61/39/55

Age, sex

38.0 ± 15.3/39.6 ± 14.4/39.43 ± 12.71

ELISA

Sufficiency: ≥ 20; insufficiency: 10–20; deficiency: < 10

No

7

Oikonomou [63]

2014

Case–control

Greece

CD

44/–/20

22/–/14

NR

31 ± 8/–/30 ± 6.75

CLIA

NR

No

4

Veit [64]

2014

Cohort

US

CD and UC

40/18/116

16/11/67

Age

16.61 ± 2.20/16.13 ± 1.99/14.56 ± 4.35

CPBA

Sufficiency:  ≥ 30 ng/mL; insufficiency: 20–29.9; deficiency: < 20 ng/mL

No

7

Basson [65]

2015

Cross-sectional

South Africa

CD

186/–/199

NR/–/NR

NR

47.35 ± 14.20/–/34.11 ± 15.16

CLIA

Deficiency: ≤ 20 or 29 ng/mL

No

7

Thorsen [66]

2016

Case–control

Danish

CD and UC

155/210/384

69/114/196

NR

13.65 ± 2.24/14.30 ± 4.48/NS

LC–MS

NR

No

7

Schäffler [67]

2017

Cohort

Germany

CD and UC

123/85/–

NR/NR/–

NR

NR

NR

Deficiency: < 50 nmol/mL; insufficiency: < 75 nmol; normal: ≥ 75 nmol

No

4

Opstelten [68]

2018

Multicenter cohort

UK

CD and UC

72/169/144 338

56/82/112 164

Age, sex

49.55 ± 4.62/51.63 ± 2.20/48.94 ± 3.37; 51.61 ± 1.96

LCMS

Deficiency: ≤ 50 nmol/mL; insufficiency: 50–75 nmol/mL; sufficiency: ≥ 75 nmol/mL

No

5

Scotti [73]

2018

Cohort

Italy

CD and UC

126/174/–

56/76/–

Age, sex

51 ± 16.7/51 ± 17.9/–

ELISA

Severe deficiency: ≤ 10 ng/mL; deficiency: 11–20 ng/mL; insufficient levels 21–30 ng/mL; adequate levels > 30 ng/mL

No

6

Garg [74]

2018

Cohort

Australia

UC

–/17/8

–/7/3

Age, sex

–/47.26 ± 11.55/50.75 ± 8.95

LCMS

Deficiency: < 50 nmol/mL

40000 IU/week

7

Caviezel [75]

2018

Cross-sectional

Switzerland

CD and UC

99/57/–

48/31/–

Age, sex

41.2 ± 14.5/41.5 ± 13.6/–

CPBA

Deficiency: < 50 nmol/mL

NO

7

Kyoung [18]

2018

Retrospective cohort

Korea

CD and UC

42/45/–

17/13/–

Age, sex

40.9 ± 15.6/48.5 ± 13.7/–

CLIA

Deficiency: < 20 ng/mL

No

6

Strisciuglio [76]

2018

Cohort

Italy

CD and UC

12/21/18

17/8

Age, sex

11 ± 3.25 (IBD)/9.2 ± 2.5

ELISA

NR

No

7

Grag [77]

2019

Cohort

Australia

CD and UC

20/15/14

8/5/7

Age, sex

43.75 ± 11.75/42.75 ± 11.75/48.25 ± 13.56

NR

NR

Yes

8

  1. CPBA competitive protein binding assay, RIA radioimmunoassay, ECLIA electrochemiluminescence immunoassay, ELISA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, CLIA chemiluminescence, HPLC high performance liquid chromatography, LC–MS liquid chromatograph mass spectrometer, NR not reported