Skip to main content

Table 3 Distinguishing and validation of 7 PGR co-expressed genes among DEGs

From: Comprehensive bioinformatics analysis of acquired progesterone resistance in endometrial cancer cell line

Gene symbol PGR co-expression
(548 EC tissues)
Microarray analysis GSE17025 Survival curve
(542 EC tissues)
Pearson score
Pearson score Spearman score LogFC −Log(p-value) r p-value HR LogRank p-value
ANO1 0.66 0.72 − 10.78 8.69 0.611 < 0.01 0.38 3.00E−06
CGNL1 0.39 0.45 − 7.19 3.38 0.438 < 0.01 0.48 0.00046
DACH1 0.33 0.39 − 6.67 4.60 0.285 < 0.01 0.79 0.27
SH3YL1 0.58 0.54 − 4.40 6.41 0.416 < 0.01 0.53 0.0027
RUNDC3B 0.43 0.46 − 4.23 4.64 0.235 < 0.1 0.73 0.21
CRISPLD1 0.39 0.39 − 4.09 4.42 0.434 < 0.01 0.64 0.038
SOX17 0.46 0.59 − 4.03 5.83 0.444 < 0.01 0.46 0.00021
  1. PGR co-expression showed correlation analysis among target genes and PGR using Cbioportal website. The third column shows the result of microarray analysis between Ishikawa and IshikawaPR cell. Negative means they were down-regulated in IshikawaPR cell. The fourth column is the PGR correlation analysis of target genes using GSE17025 dataset. Survival curve was performed using Kaplan–Meier plotter. FC, fold change
\