Skip to main content

Table 1 Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis of risk factors associated with overall survival

From: A novel signature derived from immunoregulatory and hypoxia genes predicts prognosis in liver and five other cancers

GSE14520

Hazard Ratio (95% CI)

P-value

 

Univariate

45-gene signature (high vs. low risk)

1.823 (1.18–2.816)

0.00683

8-gene signature (high vs. low risk)

2.36 (1.49–3.74)

0.00026

Tumour size (> 5 cm vs. < 5 cm)

2.159 (1.406–3.316)

0.00044

Cirrhosis (yes vs. no)

4.665 (1.147–18.97)

0.0314

TNM staging (II and III vs. I)

2.26 (1.706–2.994)

1.30E−08

BCLC staging (B and C vs. A and 0)

2.181 (1.722–2.762)

9.86E−11

AFP (> 300 ng/mL vs. < 300 ng/mL)

1.606 (1.049–2.46)

0.0293

 

Multivariate (45-gene signature)

45-gene signature (high vs. low risk)

1.8864 (1.2088–2.944)

0.00519

Tumour size (> 5 cm vs. < 5 cm)

0.9487 (0.5605–1.606)

0.8445

Cirrhosis (yes vs. no)

4.5927 (1.1084–19.031)

0.03557

TNM staging (II and III vs. I)

1.4359 (1.2752–2.114)

0.04684

BCLC staging (B and C vs. A and 0)

1.7808 (1.2521–2.533)

0.00132

AFP (> 300 ng/mL vs. < 300 ng/mL)

1.4159 (0.9102–2.203)

0.12295

 

Multivariate (8-gene signature)

8-gene signature (high vs. low risk)

1.715 (1.054–2.791)

0.0198

Tumour size (> 5 cm vs. < 5 cm)

1.1834 (0.4822–1.481)

0.556

Cirrhosis

2.820 (0.6811–11.673)

0.1527

TNM staging (II and III vs. I)

1.540 (1.178–2.383)

0.0422

BCLC staging (B and C vs. A and 0)

1.675 (1.178–2.383)

0.00408

AFP (> 300 ng/mL vs. < 300 ng/mL)

1.164 (0.7304–1.855)

0.52297

TCGA-LIHC

Hazard Ratio (95% CI)

P-value

 

Univariate

45-gene signature (high vs. low risk)

1.839 (1.164–2.904)

0.008

8-gene signature (high vs. low risk)

2.423 (1.51–3.89)

0.00025

TNM staging (II and III vs. I)

2.000 (1.533–2.608)

3.14E−07

TP53 mutation (Yes vs. No)

2.484 (1.485–4.155)

5.30E−04

CTNNB1 mutation (Yes vs. No)

1.894 (1.084–3.311)

0.025

 

Multivariate (45-gene signature)

45-gene signature (high vs. low risk)

1.606 (1.014–2.542)

0.03329

TNM staging (II and III vs. I)

1.879 (1.434–2.461)

4.65E−06

TP53 mutation (Yes vs. No)

2.150 (1.271–3.635)

0.0043

CTNNB1 mutation (Yes vs. No)

1.553 (0.884–2.726)

0.13

 

Multivariate (8-gene signature)

8-gene signature (high vs. low risk)

2.229 (1.388–3.580)

0.000914

TNM staging (II and III vs. I)

1.865 (1.428–2.434)

4.63E−06

TP53 mutation (Yes vs. No)

1.939 (1.158–3.246)

0.012

CTNNB1 mutation (Yes vs. No)

1.917 (1.085–3.385)

0.025

LIRI-JP

Hazard Ratio (95% CI)

P-value

 

Univariate

45-gene signature (high vs. low risk)

2.671 (1.361–5.240)

0.00328

8-gene signature (high vs. low risk)

3.45 (1.69–7.04)

0.00067

Fibrosis (yes vs. no)

1.024 (0.8155–1.286)

0.838

Tumour size (> 3 cm vs. < 3 cm)

2.415 (1.263–4.615)

0.00764

Portal vein invasion (yes vs. no)

2.281 (1.712–3.039)

2.00E−08

Hepatic vein invasion (yes vs. no)

1.822 (1.112–2.985)

0.0173

Bile duct invasion (yes vs. no)

1.392 (0.987–1.963)

0.059

TNM staging (II and III vs. I)

2.267 (1.556–3.304)

2.03E−05

 

Multivariate (45-gene signature)

45-gene signature (high vs. low risk)

2.201 (1.112–4.357)

0.0236

Tumour size (> 3 cm vs. < 3 cm)

1.471 (0.746–2.898)

0.265

TNM staging (II and III vs. I)

2.009 (1.348–2.995)

0.000617

 

Multivariate (45-gene signature)

45-gene signature (high vs. low risk)

2.286 (1.139–4.587)

0.02

Portal vein invasion (yes vs. no)

2.314 (1.635–3.275)

2.19E−06

Hepatic vein invasion (yes vs. no)

0.843 (0.462–1.539)

0.579

 

Multivariate (8-gene signature)

8-gene signature (high vs. low risk)

2.578 (1.228–5.412)

0.0123

Tumour size (> 3 cm vs. < 3 cm)

1.386 (0.698–2.752)

0.3513

TNM staging (II and III vs. I)

1.878 (1.268–2.781)

0.00167

 

Multivariate (8-gene signature)

8-gene signature (high vs. low risk)

2.419 (1.141–5.129)

0.0213

Portal vein invasion (yes vs. no)

2.057 (1.449–2.920)

5.40E−05

Hepatic vein invasion (yes vs. no)

0.914 (0.508–1.646)

0.765

  1. Significant covariates are in italics