Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies

From: Inulin-type fructans supplementation improves glycemic control for the prediabetes and type 2 diabetes populations: results from a GRADE-assessed systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis of 33 randomized controlled trials

References, country

Participants

Intervention

Comparison

Outcomea

Study design

N (I/C)

Age

Gender

BMI

Population

Type

Dosage

Alles [21], Netherlands

20 (20/20)

59

M-9 F-11

28.3 ± 3.5

T2DM

FOS

15 g/days (20 days)

Glucose

↔FBG

C, RCT, SB

Asemi [22], Iran

54 (27/27)

35–70

M and F

30.4 ± 5.3

T2DM

Inulin and Lactobacillus sporogenes

8.4 g/days (56 days)

L. sporogenes bread

↔FBG, ↓FINS, HbA1c

P, RCT, DB

Behrouz [23], Iran

59 (29/30)

20–60

M and F

25–40

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

Oligofructose and probiotic

16 g/days (84 days)

Maltodextrin

↔FBG, FINS, HbA1c

P, RCT, DB

Bomhof [24], Canada

14 (8/6)

≥ 18

M-8 F-6

> 25

non-alcoholic steatohepatitis with overweight

Oligofructose

16 g/days (252 days)

Maltodextrin

↔FINS, HOMA-IR, ↑FBG

P, RCT, DB

Bonsu [25], Canada

26 (12/14)

> 40

M and F

30.3 ± 4.4

T2DM

Inulin

10 g/days (84 days)

Xylitol

↔FBG, HOMA-IR

P, RCT, DB

Canfora [26], Netherlands

44 (21/23)

45–70

M and F

28–40

Overweight or obese

GOS

15 g/days (84 days)

Maltodextrin

↔FBG, FINS

P, RCT, DB

Daubioul [27], Italy

7 (7/7)

48–60

M and F

21.7–37.6

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

FOS

16 g/days (56 days)

Maltodextrin

↔FBG, FINS

C, RCT, DB

de Luis [28], Spain

32 (16/16)

25–60

M and F

30–35

Obese

FOS

9.84 g/days (30 days)

Control cookie

↔FBG, FINS, HbA1c

P, RCT, DB

Dehghan [31], Iran

52 (27/25)

20–65

F-only

25–34.99

T2DM

Oligofructose and inulin

10 g/days (56 days)

Maltodextrin

↓FBG, HOMA-IR

P, RCT, TB

Dehghan [32], Iran

49 (24/25)

20–65

F-only

> 25

T2DM

Inulin

10 g/days (56 days)

Maltodextrin

↓FBG, FINS, HbA1c, HOMA-IR

P, RCT, DB

Dehghan [29], Iran

49 (27/22)

30–65

F-only

25–34.99

T2DM

Oligofructose and inulin

10 g/days (60 days)

Maltodextrin

↓FBG, HOMA-IR, ↔ FINS

P, RCT, DB

Dewulf [32], Belgium

30 (15/15)

18–65

F-only

> 30

Obese

Inulin and oligofructose

16 g/days (90 days)

Maltodextrin

↔FBG, FINS, HbA1c, HOMA-IR

P, RCT, DB

Forcheron [33], France

17 (9/8)

31.7 ± 4.0

M-6 F-11

ND

Healthy

Inulin and oligofructose

10 g/days (180 days)

Maltodextrin

↔FBG, FINS

P, RCT, DB

Gargari [34], Iran

49 (24/25)

20–65

F-only

25–35

T2DM

Inulin

10 g/days (60 days)

Maltodextrin

↓FBG, FINS, HbA1c, HOMA-IR

P, RCT, TB

Ghavami [35], Iran

46 (23/23)

30–50

M and F

25–35

T2DM

Inulin

10 g/days (42 days)

Starch

↔FBG, FINS, HbA1c, ↓HOMA-IR

P, RCT, DB

Giacco [36], Italy

30 (30/30)

45.5 ± 9.9

M-20 F-10

26.6 ± 2.2

Mild hypercholesterolaemia

FOS

10.6 g/days (60 days)

Maltodextrine plus aspartame

↔FBG

C, RCT, DB

Guess [37], UK

38 (20/18)

> 18

M and F

25–35

Prediabetes

Inulin

30 g/days (126 days)

Cellulose

↓FBG, FINS, HbA1c

P, RCT, DB

Guess [38], UK

34 (34/34)

≥ 18

M and F

25–35

Overweight subjects with prediabetes

Inulin

30 g/days (42 days)

Cellulose

↔FINS, ↓HbA1c

C, RCT, DB

Jackson [39], UK

54 (27/27)

35–65

M and F

20–32

Healthy

Inulin

10 g/days (56 days)

Maltodextrin

↔FBG, FINS

P, RCT, DB

Javadi [40], Iran

38 (19/19)

20–60

M and F

30.7 ± 3.7

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

Inulin

10 g/days (90 days)

Maltodextrin

↔FBG, ↓FINS, HbA1c

P, RCT, DB

Luo [41], France

12 (12/12)

19–32

M-only

21.0 ± 1.7

Healthy

FOS

20 g/days (28 days)

Sucrose

↔FBG, FINS

C, RCT, DB

Luo [42], Belgium

10 (10/10)

57.0 ± 6.3

M-6 F-4

28.0 ± 3.2

T2DM

FOS

20 g/days (28 days)

Sucrose

↔FBG, FINS, HOMA-IR

C, RCT, DB

Meksawan [43], Thailand

9 (9/9)

> 50

M-5 F-4

ND

Elderly CAPD patients

FOS

20 g/days (30 days)

Sucrose

↔FBG

C, RCT, DB

Parnell [44], Canada

39 (21/18)

20–70

M and F

>25

Overweight or obese

Oligofructose

21 g/days (84 days)

Maltodextrin

↔FBG

P, RCT, DB

Pedersen [45], UK

29 (14/15)

42–65

M-only

28.2 ± 1.0

T2DM

GOS

5.5 g/days (84 days)

Maltodextrin

↔FBG, FINS, HbA1c, HOMA-IR

P, RCT, DB

Rajkumar [46], India

30 (15/15)

20–25

M-14 F-16

18.5–24.9

Healthy

FOS and L. salivarius

10 g/days (42 days)

L. salivarius

↔FBG, FINS, HbA1c

P, RCT, SB

Roshanravan [47], Iran

30 (15/15)

30–55

M and F

27–35

T2DM

Inulin

10 g/days (45 days)

Starch

↔FBG, FINS, HbA1c, HOMA-IR

P, RCT, DB

Russo [48], Italy

15 (15/15)

18.8 ± 0.7

M-only

22.8 ± 2.3

Healthy

Inulin

11 g/days (35 days)

Control pasta

↔FBG, HbA1c, HOMA-IR, ↑FINS

C, RCT, DB

Scheid [49], Brazil

72 (35/37)

67.1 ± 6.1

M and F

27.9 ± 5.0

Elderly

FOS

7.4 g/days (63 days)

Maltodextrin

↔FBG, FINS, HbA1c

P, RCT, DB

Shakeri [50], Iran

52 (26/26)

53

M and F

30.3 ± 5.3

T2DM

Inulin and Lactobacillus sporogenes

8.4 g/days (56 days)

Lactobacillus sporogenes control breads

↔FBG

P, RCT, DB

Tovar [51], Mexican

59 (30/29)

18–50

F-only

≥ 25

Obese

Inulin

10 g/days (90 days)

No treatment

↔FBG

P, RCT, DB

Tripkovic [52], UK

10 (10/10)

30–55

M-only

25–35

Overweight

Inulin

15 g/days (28 days)

Control bread rolls

↔FBG, FINS, HbA1c

C, RCT, DB

Vulevic [53], UK

45 (45/45)

18–65

M-16 F-29

> 25

Overweight

GOS

5.5 g/days (84 days)

Maltodextrin

↔FBG, ↓FINS

C, RCT, DB

  1. C Cross-over, CAPD continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, DB double-blinded, FBG fasting blood glucose, FINS fasting insulin, FOS fructooligosaccharide, GOS galactooligosaccharides, HbA1c glycosylated hemoglobin, HOMA-IR homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance, ND no data, P Parallel, RCT randomized controlled trial, SB single-blinded, TB triple-blinded, T2DM Type 2 diabetes
  2. a↑: means the glycemic indicator(s) in the ITF intervention group was (were) significantly increased while compared with their control group; ↔, means the glycemic indicator(s) in the ITF intervention group was (were) not significantly changed while compared with their control group; ↓, means the glycemic indicator(s) in the ITF intervention group was (were) significantly decreased while compared with their control group