Skip to main content
Download PDF

Long term impact of CTLA4 blockade immunotherapy on regulatory and effector immune responses in patients with melanoma

Journal of Translational Medicine volume 16, Article number: 184 (2018) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

We previously reported early on-treatment significant modulation in circulating regulatory T cell (Treg), myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSC) and antigen-specific type I CD4+ and CD8+ T cells that correlated with clinical outcome in regionally advanced melanoma patients treated with neoadjuvant ipilimumab. Here, we investigated the long term immunologic impact of CTLA4 blockade.

Methods

Patients were treated with ipilimumab given at 10 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks for 2 doses bracketing surgery. Blood specimens were collected at baseline and during treatment for up to 9 months. We tested immune responses at 3, 6, and 9 months utilizing multicolor flow cytometry. We compared frequencies of circulating Treg and MDSC on-study to baseline levels, as well as frequencies of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells specific to shared tumor-associated antigens (Gp-100, MART-1, NY-ESO-1).

Results

Levels of Treg significantly increased when measured at 6 weeks following ipilimumab but returned to baseline by 3 months, with no significant difference in Treg levels between relapsed and relapse-free groups at 3, 6 or 9 months. However, lower baseline levels of circulating Treg (CD4+CD25hi+CD39+) were significantly associated with better relapse free survival (RFS) (p = 0.04). Levels of circulating monocytic HLA-DR+/loCD14+ MDSC were lower at baseline in the relapse-free group and further decreased at 6 weeks, though the differences did not reach statistical significance including measurements at 3, 6 or 9 months. We detected evidence of type I (interferon-γ producing), activated (CD69+) CD4+ and CD8+ antigen-specific T cell immunity against cancer-testis (NY-ESO-1) as well as melanocytic lineage (MART-1, gp100) antigens in the absence of therapeutic vaccination. These responses were significantly boosted at 6 weeks and persisted at 3, 6 and 9 months following the initiation of ipilimumab.

Conclusions

Lower Treg levels at baseline are significantly associated with RFS and increased Treg frequency after CTLA4 blockade was only transient. Lower MDSC was also associated with RFS and MDSC levels were further decreased after ipilimumab. Tumor specific effector immune responses are boosted with CTLA4 blockade and tend to be durable.

Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00972933

Background

Clinically detectable locally and regionally advanced melanoma has a 5-year relapse rate that exceeds 70% at 5 years [1,2,3,4]. The development of local or regional recurrence after initial surgical management portends an even poorer prognosis [5,6,7]. In the Melanoma Intergroup Surgical Trial, a local recurrence was associated with 5 and 10 year survival rates of 9–11% and 5%, respectively [6]. To date, interferon-alfa (IFN), ipilimumab (ipi) and nivolumab have achieved regulatory approvals for the adjuvant treatment of high-risk melanoma following surgical management, while the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib was granted a breakthrough therapy designation by the Food and Drug Administration for stage III melanoma with a BRAF V600 mutation [1]. Treatment with high-dose IFN was shown to improve relapse-free survival (RFS) in three cooperative group studies [8,9,10], and overall survival (OS) in two out of the three versus observation [9], and versus the GMK ganglioside vaccine [8]. Adjuvant ipilimumab at 10 mg/kg was approved by the FDA in 2015 after improved RFS compared to placebo in stage III melanoma was demonstrated in EORTC 18071 trial [11]. A recent update from this trial has also reported a significant OS benefit [12].

Ipilimumab is a monoclonal antibody directed against the immune checkpoint molecule CTLA-4. It was approved by the FDA in 2011 at the dose of 3 mg/kg for use in patients with inoperable advanced melanoma [13]. CTLA-4 is expressed on activated T cells under physiologic conditions and plays a role in downregulating the immune response and protecting against autoimmunity [14, 15]. While CTLA-4 is upregulated on activated T cells, it is expressed constitutively on CD4+CD25+ Treg, which in turn suppress effector T cells [16, 17]. One means of tumor escape from immune response is through recruitment of Treg to the tumor microenvironment, which then can recognize tumor-associated antigens and expand [18]. CTLA-4 blockade with ipilimumab should lead to suppression of Treg function, allowing an immune response to tumor antigens to emerge and expand.

We have previously reported the results of short-term (at baseline then at 6 weeks following the initiation of ipilimumab) testing of the immune response in the circulation and in the tumor microenvironment in patients receiving neoadjuvant ipilimumab for locally advanced melanoma [19]. In this study, 35 patients with resectable Stage IIIB/C melanoma received up to 2 doses of neoadjuvant ipi at 10 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks in the absence of limiting toxicity. Tumors were resected and patients received up to 2 additional doses of ipi (Fig. 1). Of 33 evaluable patients, 2 had a complete response, 1 a partial response, 21 had stable disease, and 8 had progression of disease on PET/CT 6 weeks after the initiation of ipi (by RECIST; unconfirmed). Median PFS was 10.8 months (95% CI 6.2–19.2). Peripheral blood and tumor immune response assessments were performed at 6 weeks by multicolor flow cytometry on 27 patients with available samples. We saw a significant increase in circulating Treg from baseline, with a greater increase in Foxp3+ Treg significantly associated with PFS (p = 0.034). We also observed a decrease in percentage of all populations of MDSC from baseline. The greatest decrease was seen for HLA DR+/lo CD14+ MDSC, while a greater decrease in Lin1−/HLA DR−/CD33+/CD11+ MDSC was associated with PFS (p = 0.03). In addition, there was evidence of type I (IFN gamma-producing), fully activated (CD69) CD4+ and CD8+ antigen specific T-cell immunity against cancer-testis (NY-ESO-1) and melanocytic lineage (MART-1 and gp100) antigens in the absence of therapeutic vaccine. The response was significantly potentiated at 6 weeks following ipilimumab. We hypothesized that the early on-treatment Treg increases seen were transient given the reported association with clinical benefit while the expected impact on MDSC and effector T cells was durable beyond the early-on treatment observations.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Neoadjuvant ipilimumab study design. Patients with locally and/or regionally advanced melanoma were enrolled and underwent excisional biopsy. They then received 2 cycles of ipilimumab 10 mg/kg every 21 days. A radical definitive surgery was then performed. Patients received 2 additional cycles of ipi 10 mg/kg every 21 days. Blood specimens (serum/peripheral blood monitoring) were collected at baseline, 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 9 months

Full size image

The present study reports results of long-term monitoring of Treg, MDSC, and tumor antigen-specific T cell responses at 3, 6, and 9 months following treatment relative to the previous changes seen at 6 weeks.

Methods

Patients

Ethics statement: the study was approved by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board (IRB; IRB# PRO09010033). All patients had a University of Pittsburgh IRB approved written informed consent obtained. The study was conducted in accordance with the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. Eligible patients were 18 years or older and had clinically detectable locally and/or regionally advanced melanoma (cutaneous, mucosal or unknown primary).

Table 1 Patient demographics and disease characteristics (n = 31)
Full size table

Laboratory methods

Multicolor flow cytometry was used to compare cell subset phenotypes on thawed patient peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), with healthy donor controls, run according to laboratory SOPs. Treg were defined as in the previous study (19) to allow direct comparison, as CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ or CD4+CD25hi+CD39+ cells, to incorporate the candidate functional marker CD39. MDSC were defined as cells expressing Lin-neg/HLA-DR−/CD33+/CD11b+ in either a “lymphocyte” (small FSCxSSC) gate, or in a “monocyte” (larger FSCxSSC) gate, and as HLA-DR+/lo CD14+ cells in a large gate. We compared frequencies of circulating Treg and MDSC on-study to baseline levels. We also tested the frequencies of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells specific to shared tumor-associated antigens (Gp-100, MART-1, NY-ESO-1) utilizing overlapping peptide libraries (15-mer peptides overlapping by 4) and a short (4–5 h) in vitro culture to identify activated (CD69+) and cytokine producing (intracellular IFNγ+) T cells. Detailed methods were described previously [19].

Statistics

The association of cell frequencies in relation to the probability of the event of melanoma relapse at 9 months was assessed. Patients were divided into two groups: relapsed (relapsed or died before 9 month) and non-relapsed (relapse-free by 9 months). There is no censoring during the first 9 months post-treatment. The level of each marker at baseline, 6 weeks, 3, and 6 months was compared between the two groups using Wilcoxon Rank-Sum tests. The change of each marker for each patient at 3 and 6 months from baseline was tested by Wilcoxon Signed-Rank tests. A total of 20 cell types were tested at each time point; however, given the exploratory nature of the analysis, no adjustment for multiple testing was made.

Results

Long term monitoring in patients with available specimens at 3 (n = 28), 6 (n = 22), and 9 (n = 13) months was performed utilizing multicolor flow cytometry according to the identical SOPs and antibody panels used in the earlier analysis. Among the 13 patients with biospecimens available at the 9 months’ time point, only 2 had relapsed.

Levels of Treg significantly increased when measured at 6 weeks following ipilimumab but almost returned to baseline levels by 3 months, with no significant difference in Treg levels between relapsed and relapse-free groups at 3, 6 or 9 months. In our monitoring of Treg, both CD4+CD25hiFoxp3+ and CD4+CD25hiCD39+ Treg phenotypes were examined. While levels of the intracellular transcription factor Foxp3 is an accepted marker for Treg, there is evidence that CD39, which interacts with CD73, may also be critically informative [20]. CD4+CD25hiCD39+ Treg produce adenosine and therefore may possess more immunosuppressive function [21]. Moreover, they are found in increased levels in cancer patients [22]. At baseline, there was a significant difference in CD39+ Treg phenotype between patients remaining relapse-free at 9 months versus those who relapsed or died (p = 0.04). Those in the relapse group had significantly higher Treg levels (Fig. 2a). The median levels of Treg (as well as the lower and upper quartiles) were higher in the relapsed group. By 3 months (Fig. 2b), there was no significant difference in Treg levels between the two groups (p = 0.266). Levels of CD39+ Treg in healthy donors at baseline were compared to those of melanoma patients and then separately to the relapsed and non-relapsed groups. The median levels of CD39+ Treg tended to be lower in patients than in healthy donors, though this difference did not reach statistical significance (Fig. 3a, p = 0.144). Figure 3b shows that median levels of CD39+ Treg was highest in the healthy donors and lowest in the non-relapsed patients. At 3 months, levels of Fox3p+ Treg returned nearly to baseline levels (Fig. 4a). There were no significant differences in Fox3p+ Treg levels between the two groups at later time points. Levels of CD39+ Treg also trended towards baseline levels at 3 months (Fig. 4b). There were likewise no significant differences in levels of CD39+ Treg at 3, 6, or 9 months. Figure 4 illustrates the variation in percent change of Treg over time compared to baseline in both patient groups who relapsed and those who did not.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Frequencies of peripheral blood CD4+CD25hi+CD39+ Treg at baseline and 3 months in patients who relapsed or were relapse-free at 9 months. a There was a significant difference in the percent of CD4+CD25hiCD39+ Treg at baseline between patients who had not relapsed at 9 months versus those who relapsed or died (p = 0.04). Those in the relapse group had significantly higher Treg levels. b By month 3, Treg in both groups tended to be higher compared to baseline, but to a greater degree in the relapse-free group. There was no significant difference in Treg levels at month 3 between the two groups (p = 0.266). Y axis shows the % of CD4+CD25hi+ cells that express CD39

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Frequencies of CD4+CD25hiCD39+ Treg at baseline in healthy donors and patients. a Median levels of CD39+ Treg at baseline was lower in patients than in healthy donors, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.144). b Median levels of CD39+ Treg at baseline was highest in healthy donors and lowest in non-relapsed patients, but the difference was not significant

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Frequencies of CD4+CD25hiFoxp3+ Treg and CD4+CD25hiCD39+ Treg from baseline through 9 months in patients who did not relapse or relapsed at 9 months. The solid blue line represents the median value of Treg for the relapse-free group, and the solid red line represents the median value for the relapsed group. a The levels of CD4+CD25hiFoxp3+ Treg increased at 6 weeks in both groups but returned to almost baseline levels starting 3 months. There were no significant differences in CD4+CD25hiFoxp3+ Treg between the two groups at baseline, 3, 6, or 9 months. b At 3 months, levels of CD4+CD25hiCD39+ Treg returned nearly to baseline. There were no significant differences in Treg levels between the two groups starting at 3 months

Full size image

Levels of circulating monocytic HLA-DR+/lo CD14+ MDSC were lower at baseline in the relapse-free group but tended to increase at 3 months compared to baseline, though the differences did not reach statistical significance. Levels in the relapsed group remained essentially the same (Fig. 5). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in levels of MDSC at 3, 6, or 9 months.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Frequencies of circulating HLA-DR+lowCD14+ MDSC at baseline and 3 months. a Levels of circulating monocytic HLA-DR+lowCD14+ MDSC were lower at baseline in the relapse-free group. b Median levels increased in the non-relapsed groups at 3 months while staying the same in the relapsed group, but there were no significant differences in levels of MDSC at 3, 6, or 9 months between the 2 groups

Full size image

We detected type I CD4+ and CD8+ antigen-specific T cell immunity against shared melanoma antigens at baseline in the absence of prior vaccination We examined melanocytic lineage antigens (MART-1, gp-100) as well as the cancer testis antigen NY-ESO-1. These responses were potentiated after ipilimumab at 6 weeks and at 3 months (Fig. 6). Both relapsed and relapse-free groups demonstrated significant potentiation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells specific to shared tumor-associated antigens (gp-100, MART-1, NY-ESO-1). No statistically significant differences in potentiation were seen between relapsed and relapse-free groups.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Forest Plots of Type I CD4 and CD8 Ag-specific T Cell Immunity (N = 27) at 6 weeks and at 3 months. Evidence of type I CD4+ and CD8+ antigen-specific T cell immunity against shared melanoma antigens, including lineage antigens (MART-1, gp-100) and cancer testis antigen (NY-ESO1), in the absence of prior vaccination. These responses were boosted after ipilimumab at a 6 weeks and b 3 months

Full size image

Discussion

Tumor immune escape is mediated in part by the recruitment of Treg, which recognize tumor-associated antigens and expand [2]. Treg can also suppress anti-tumor effector and helper T cells in both a tumor-antigen specific and non-specific manner through secretion of soluble factors [23]. Circulating Treg have been shown to be elevated at baseline in PBMCs of advanced melanoma patients compared to healthy donors [24, 25]. Because CTLA-4 is constitutively expressed on CD4+CD25+ Treg, CTLA-4 blockade might be expected to suppress Treg function and allow expansion of a tumor-specific immune response [3]. We previously reported a significant increase in circulating CD4+CD25hi+Foxp3+ and CD4+CD25hi+CD39+ Treg from baseline to 6 weeks following ipilimumab. We unexpectedly found that a greater increase in CD4+CD25hi+Foxp3+ Treg was associated with improved PFS (p = 0.034; HR = 0.57). There was also an association with greater increase in CD4+CD25hi+ T cells (p = 0.043; HR = 0.62) [19]. It was not clear whether the increase in Treg at 6 weeks was a transient or a long term impact of ipilimumab. In the present study with longer patient outcome follow up, we observed significantly higher levels of CD4+CD25hi+CD39+ Treg at baseline in patients who relapsed or died (p = 0.04). By week 6, Treg in both patient groups had increased, but to a greater degree in the relapse-free group. This may explain the previous observation that a greater increase in circulating Treg was associated with improved RFS. At 3 months, overall levels of CD4+CD25hi+FOXP3+ and CD4+CD25hiCD39+ Treg returned nearly to baseline. There were no significant differences in Treg levels between the two groups from 3 months onward. There were likewise no significant differences in levels of CD4+CD25hiFox3p+ Treg at 3, 6, or 9 months.

A number of previous studies reported no change in Treg following ipi, though several observed an increase in activated T responder cells [26,27,28]. One small study (n = 4) saw a trend toward a relative increase in Treg in some patients [29], whereas another study (n = 10) reported a small significant increase in Treg following tremelimumab [30]. In accordance with our findings, one study found an increase in Treg at 3 weeks followed by a decrease below baseline at week 9 (n = 5) following ipi at 3 or 10 mg/kg [31]. One study reported that change in Treg following 10 mg/kg ipi did not correlate with response [32], while another saw a decrease in Treg associated with increased disease control and survival following treme [33]. We observed no significant difference in baseline PBMC CD39+ Treg levels in healthy subjects compared to all patients or compared to non-relapsed and relapsed patients (Table 2). However, the finding that Treg are significantly higher at baseline in those with clinically poor outcomes despite treatment with ipi suggests that baseline Treg levels, compared to those of other patients with metastatic melanoma, might be prognostic. The additional finding that Treg levels rose in the relapse-free group to a much greater degree than in the relapse group, coupled with the previous finding that a greater increase in circulating Treg was associated with improved PFS, suggests that relative Treg level following ipilimumab may be a predictive indicator early on treatment.

Table 2 Healthy donors PBMC T-regulatory cell analysis
Full size table

MDSC are a heterogeneous population of immature myeloid cells associated with tumor immune escape and suppression of the immune response [34,35,36]. In the tumor microenvironment (TME), these cells are prevented from maturing into dendritic cells or macrophages acting against the tumor; instead, they become tumor-associated macrophages, promoting tumor growth and immune suppression [37]. They have been found in patients with many different cancers and have been associated with more extensive tumor burden and with poor prognosis [38,39,40]. HLA DR+/lo CD14+ MDSC have been detected specifically in melanoma patients. Studies have shown increased levels, often correlated with tumor burden and prognosis, and evidence of immune suppression [41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. Walter et al. tested six predefined populations of MDSC in patients with renal cell cancer treated with the IMA901 vaccine (consisting of multiple tumor-associated peptides) and found 2 to be prognostic for overall survival [4]. MDSC have also been studied in patients receiving CTLA-blockade [48, 49]. An association with decreased MDSC and clinical response was seen in one study [50].

As previously reported, at 6 weeks following ipilimumab, we observed a decrease in percentage of all populations of MDSC from baseline. The greatest decrease was seen for HLA DR+/lo CD14+ MDSC, while a greater decrease in Lin1−/HLA DR−/CD33+/CD11b+ MDSC was associated with PFS (p = 0.03) [19]. As a follow up analysis, it was important investigate what happened to MDSC beyond the initial early-on treatment significant reduction. In the present study, with longer follow up we found that levels of circulating monocytic HLA DR+/lo CD14+ MDSC were lower at baseline in the relapse-free group and further decreased at 6 weeks compared to baseline, though the differences did not reach statistical significance. There were no significant differences in levels of MDSC at 3, 6 months, or 9 months between the relapsed and nonrelapsed groups. A low frequency of CD14+CD11b+HLA-DR−/low MDSC has been previously associated with survival in patients with advanced melanoma [47]. In accord with our previous results, one study found that melanoma patients had increased levels of Lin−CD14+HLA-DR− monocytic MDSC compared to healthy controls, with levels increased with extensive metastases. Patients who responded to ipi clinically had significantly fewer of these MDSC than those who did not respond. Levels did not change significantly from baseline during treatment and did not change following tumor resection [50]. Another study saw a significant decrease in Lin−HLA-DR−/loCD15+CD33+CD11b+ granulocytic MDSC following the first dose of ipi, with low levels persisting at 9 weeks. Levels of CD3−CD19−HLA-DR−/loCD14+ monocytic MDSC remained constant. However, the authors did observe a significant increase in CD14+PD-L1hi monocytic MDSC at 3 weeks, with a return to baseline at 9 weeks. They speculated that early on treatment, activation of T cells triggered by ipi causes an inflammatory response [31]. Circulating monocytic HLA DR+/lo CD14+ MDSC may serve as a potential predictive marker for response to ipi.

Tumor associated antigens have long been a focus of research seeking to develop vaccines that would prompt a vigorous immune response to the tumor. We previously hypothesized that T cell responses to melanoma tumor antigens might be detected following ipi, even in the absence of therapeutic vaccination, and we reported evidence of type I (interferon-gamma producing), fully activated (CD69+) CD4+ and CD8+ antigen-specific T-cell immunity against NY-ESO-1 (cancer-testis), MART-1 and gp100 melanocytic lineage antigens following treatment with ipi at 6 weeks. The largest increases (greater than threefold) in CD3+/CD4+/IFN-gamma+ T cells were observed only in those patients who had not progressed at 6 months [19]. We were interested in evaluating whether there was evidence of a more durable effector T-cell response beyond the initial early-on treatment changes that may support the durable clinical impact of ipilimumab. In the present study, we again observed evidence of spontaneous T cell immunity against shared melanoma antigens potentiated after ipi at 6 weeks and 3 months. Both relapsed and relapse-free groups demonstrated significant potentiation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells specific to shared tumor-associated antigens (gp-100, MART-1, NY-ESO-1). There were no statistically significant differences in boosting pre-existing responses between relapsed and relapse-free groups starting at 3 months. Several prior studies have also detected an increase in T cell response to the tumor antigen NY-ESO-1 in serum of patients treated with ipi [51,52,53], sometimes with correlation to clinical benefit [47, 54, 55]. These findings and our own suggest that antigen-specific T cell immunity against shared tumor-associated antigens may be a predictive marker, at least early on treatment. Finally, the potential early-on treatment predictive value of the cellular changes observed warrant further investigation in relation to ipilimumab clinical benefit and these can be validated in larger studies with available biospecimens, individually and in combination with other markers as part of a biomarker signature. The differential impact on circulating Treg, MDSC and effector T cell levels induced by other checkpoint modulators (e.g., anti-PD1) and combinations (e.g., anti-PD1 + anti-CTLA4) relative to CTLA4 blockade alone would be interest in further illuminating the mechanistic impact of these agents and combinations. Since this was a neoadjuvant study with complete tumor resection planned shortly after the initiation of ipilimumab, a limitation of our current report is the inability to investigate the observed longer term cellular changes within the TME including the previously reported induction/potentiation of memory T cells (CD3+/CD8+/CD45RO+TNFα+) in the TME at 6 weeks. Such an evaluation would be of interest in future studies of stage IV patients with serial biopsies, possibly in the second line setting where ipilimumab is currently in clinical use.

Conclusions

Our long-term monitoring of Treg, MDSC, and tumor antigen response at 3, 6, and 9 months following treatment with ipilimumab resulted in several important findings. First, the significant increase in Treg (CD4+CD25hi+Foxp3+ and CD4+CD25hi+CD39+) at 6 weeks reversed starting 3 months. Second, CD4+CD25hiCD39+ Treg and HLA-DR+lowCD14+ MDSC may be baseline markers of immunotherapeutic benefit and warrant further study. Finally, antigen-specific T cell immunity against shared tumor-associated antigens (gp-100, MART-1, NY-ESO-1) are boosted with CTLA4 blockade and tend to be durable.

Abbreviations

Treg:

regulatory T cell

MDSC:

myeloid derived suppressor cells

RFS:

relapsed free-survival

IFN:

interferon-alfa

Ipi:

ipilimumab

OS:

overall survival

TME:

tumor microenvironment

References

  1. Agha A, Tarhini AA. Adjuvant therapy for melanoma. Curr Oncol Rep. 2017;19:36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nishikawa H, Sakaguchi S. Regulatory T cells in cancer immunotherapy. Curr Opin Immunol. 2014;27:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Balch CM, Soong SJ, Gershenwald JE, Thompson JF, Reintgen DS, Cascinelli N, et al. Prognostic factors analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: validation of the American Joint Committee on cancer melanoma staging system. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:3622–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ugel S, et al. Immune tolerance to tumor antigens occurs in a specialized environment of the spleen. Cell Rep. 2012;2:628–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Balch CM, Urist MM, Karakousis CP, Smith TJ, Temple WJ, Drzewiecki K, et al. Efficacy of 2-cm surgical margins for intermediate-thickness melanomas. Ann Surg. 1993;218:262–7 (discussion 267–9).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Balch CM, Soong SJ, Smith T, Ross MI, Urist MM, Karakousis CP, et al. Long-term results of a prospective surgical trial comparing 2 cm vs. 4 cm excision. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:101–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Karakousis CP, Balch CM, Urist MM, Ross MM, Smith TJ, Bartolucci AA. Local recurrence in malignant melanoma: long-term results of the multiinstitutional randomized surgical trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 1996;3:446–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kirkwood JM, Ibrahim JG, Sosman JA, Sondak VK, Agarwala SS, Ernstoff MS, et al. High-dose interferon alfa-2b significantly prolongs relapse-free and overall survival compared with the GM2-KLH/QS-21 vaccine in patients with resected stage IIB-III melanoma: results of intergroup trial E1694/S9512/C509801. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:2370–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kirkwood JM, Strawderman MH, Ernstoff MS, Smith TJ, Borden EC, Blum RH. Interferon alfa-2b adjuvant therapy of high-risk resected cutaneous melanoma: the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial EST 1684. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:7–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kirkwood JM, Ibrahim JG, Sondak VK, Richards JM, Flaherty LE, Ernstoff MS, et al. High- and low-dose interferon alfa-2b in high-risk melanoma: first analysis of intergroup trial E1690/S9111/C9190. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2444–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schadendorf D, Hodi FS, Robert C, Weber JS, Margolin K, Hamid O, et al. Pooled analysis of long-term survival data from phase II and phase III trials of ipilimumab in unresectable or metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:1889–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Eggermont AMM, Chiarion-Sileni V, Grob JJ, Dummer R, Wolchok JD, Schmidt H, Hamid O, Robert C, Ascierto PA, Richards JM, Lebbé C, Ferraresi V, Smylie M, Weber JS, Maio M, Bastholt L, Mortier L, Thomas L, Tahir S, Hauschild A, Hassel JC, Hodi FS, Taitt C, de Pril V, de Schaetzen G, Suciu S, Testori A. Prolonged survival in stage III melanoma with ipilimumab adjuvant therapy. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1845–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hodi FS, O’Day SJ, McDermott DF, Weber RW, Sosman JA, Haanen JB, et al. Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:711–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Waterhouse P, Penninger JM, Timms E, Wakeham A, Shahinian A, Lee KP, et al. Lymphoproliferative disorders with early lethality in mice deficient in Ctla-4. Science. 1995;270:985–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Karandikar NJ, Vanderlugt CL, Walunas TL, Miller SD, Bluestone JA. CTLA-4: a negative regulator of autoimmune disease. J Exp Med. 1996;184:783–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Read S, Malmström V, Powrie F. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 plays an essential role in the function of CD25(+)CD4(+) regulatory cells that control intestinal inflammation. J Exp Med. 2000;192:295–302.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wing K, Onishi Y, Prieto-Martin P, Yamaguchi T, Miyara M, Fehervari Z, et al. CTLA-4 control over Foxp3+ regulatory T cell function. Science. 2008;322:271–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nishikawa H, Sakaguchi S. Regulatory T cells in tumor immunity. Int J Cancer. 2010;127:759–67.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tarhini AA, Edington H, Butterfield LH, Lin Y, Shuai Y, et al. Immune monitoring of the circulation and the tumor microenvironment in patients with regionally advanced melanoma receiving neoadjuvant ipilimumab. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(2):e87705.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mandapathil M, Lang S, Gorelik E, Whiteside TL. Isolation of functional human regulatory T cells (Treg) from the peripheral blood based on the CD39 expression. J Immunol Methods. 2009;346:55–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schuler PJ, Harasymczuk M, Schilling B, Lang S, Whiteside TL. Separation of human CD4+CD39+ T cells by magnetic beads reveals two phenotypically and functionally different subsets. J Immunol Methods. 2011;369:59–68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schuler PJ, Schilling B, Harasymczuk M, Hoffmann TK, Johnson J, Lang S, et al. Phenotypic and functional characteristics of CD4+CD39+FOXP3+ and CD4+CD39+FOXP3neg T-cell subsets in cancer patients. Eur J Immunol. 2012;42:1876–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nishikawa H, Sakaguchi S. Regulatory T cells in cancer immunotherapy. Cur Opin Immunol. 2014;27:1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gray CP, Arosio P, Hersey P. Association of increased levels of heavy-chain ferritin with increased CD4+CD25+ regulatory T-cell levels in patients with melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:2551–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. McCarter MD, Baumgartner J, Escobar GA, Richter D, Lewis K, Robinson W, et al. Immunosuppressive dendritic and regulatory T cells are upregulated in melanoma patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2854–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Phan GQ, Yang JC, Sherry RM, Hwu P, Topalian SL, Schwartzentruber DJ, et al. Cancer regression and autoimmunity induced by cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 blockade in patients with metastatic melanoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:8372–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Sarnaik AA, Yu B, Yu D, Morelli D, Hall M, Bogle D, et al. Extended dose ipilimumab with a peptide vaccine: immune correlates associated with clinical benefit in patients with resected high-risk stage IIIc/IV melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:896–906.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Weber JS, O’Day S, Urba W, Powderly J, Nichol G, Yellin M, et al. Phase I/II study of ipilimumab for patients with metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5950–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Maker AV, Attia P, Rosenberg SA. Analysis of the cellular mechanism of antitumor responses and autoimmunity in patients treated with CTLA-4 blockade. J Immunol. 2005;175:7746–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Menard C, Ghiringhelli F, Roux S, Chaput N, Mateus C, Grohmann U, et al. CTLA-4 blockade confers lymphocyte resistance to regulatory T-cells in advanced melanoma: surrogate marker of efficacy of tremelimumab? Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:5242–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. de Coana YP, Poschke I, Gentilcore G, Mao Y, Nystrom M, Hansson J, et al. Ipilimumab treatment results in an early decrease in the frequency of circulating granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells as well as their arginase1 production. Cancer Immunol Res. 2013;1:158–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Yang A, Kendle RF, Ginsberg BA. CTLA-4 blockade with ipilimumab increases peripheral CD8+ T cells: correlation with clinical outcomes. J Clin Oncol. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2010.28.15_suppl.2555.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Robert L, Tsoi J, Wang X, Emerson R, Homet B, Chodon T, et al. CTLA4 blockade broadens the peripheral T-cell receptor repertoire. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:2424–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Gabrilovich DI, Nagaraj S. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as regulators of the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9:162–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Youn JI, Gabrilovich DI. The biology of myeloid-derived suppressor cells: the blessing and the curse of morphological and functional heterogeneity. Eur J Immunol. 2010;40:2969–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Marvel D, Gabrilovich DI. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the tumor microenvironment: expect the unexpected. J Clin Invest. 2015;125:3356–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Kumar V, Patel S, Tcyganov E, Gabrilovich DI. The nature of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the tumor microenvironment. Trends Immunol. 2016;37:208–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Almand B, Clark JI, Nikitina E, van Beynen J, English NR, Knight SC, et al. Increased production of immature myeloid cells in cancer patients: a mechanism of immunosuppression in cancer. J Immunol. 2001;166:678–89.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Diaz-Montero CM, Salem ML, Nishimura MI, Garrett-Mayer E, Cole DJ, Montero AJ. Increased circulating myeloid-derived suppressor cells correlate with clinical cancer stage, metastatic tumor burden, and doxorubicin–cyclophosphamide chemotherapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2008;58:49–59.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Solito S, Falisi E, Diaz-Montero CM, Doni A, Pinton L, Rosato A, et al. A human promyelocytic-like population is responsible for the immune suppression mediated by myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Blood. 2011;118:2254–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Filipazzi P, Valenti R, Huber V, Pilla L, Canese P, Iero M, et al. Identification of a new subset of myeloid suppressor cells in peripheral blood of melanoma patients with modulation by a granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulation factor-based antitumor vaccine. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2546–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Poschke I, Mougiakakos D, Hansson J, Masucci GV, Kiessling R. Immature immunosuppressive CD14+HLA-DR−/low cells in melanoma patients are Stat3hi and overexpress CD80, CD83, and DC-sign. Cancer Res. 2010;70:4335–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Filipazzi P, Huber V, Rivoltini L. Phenotype, function and clinical implications of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in cancer patients. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2011;61:255–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Gros A, Turcotte S, Wunderlich JR, Ahmadzadeh M, Dudley ME, Rosenberg SA. Myeloid cells obtained from the blood but not from the tumor can suppress T-cell proliferation in patients with melanoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:5212–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Jordan KR, Amaria RN, Ramirez O, Callihan EB, Gao D, Borakove M, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells are associated with disease progression and decreased overall survival in advanced-stage melanoma patients. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2013;62:1711–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Rudolph BM, Loquai C, Gerwe A, Bacher N, Steinbrink K, Grabbe S, et al. Increased frequencies of CD11b+CD33+CD14+HLA-DR low myeloid-derived suppressor cells are an early event in melanoma patients. Exp Dermatol. 2014;23:202–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Weide B, Martens A, Zelba H, Stutz C, Derhovanessian E, Di Giacomo AM, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells predict survival of patients with advanced melanoma: comparison with regulatory T Cells and NY-ESO-1- or Melan-A-specific T cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:1601–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Tarhini AA, Butterfield LH, Shuai Y, Gooding WE, Kalinski P, Kirkwood JM. Differing patterns of circulating regulatory T cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells in metastatic melanoma patients receiving anti-CTLA4 antibody and interferon-α or TLR-9 agonist and GM-CSF with peptide vaccination. J Immunother. 2012;35:702–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. de Coaña YP, Masucci G, Hansson J, Kiessling R. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells and their role in CTLA-4 blockade therapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2014;63:977–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Meyer C, Cagnon L, Costa-Nunes CM, Baumgaertner P, Montandon N, Leyvraz L, et al. Frequencies of circulating MDSC correlate with clinical outcome of melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2014;63:247–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Liakou CI, Kamat A, Tang DN, Chen H. CTLA-4 blockade increases IFNγ-producing CD4+ICOShi cells to shift the ratio of effector to regulatory T cells in cancer patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0806075105.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Goff SL, Robbins PF, El-Gamil M, Rosenberg SA. No correlation between clinical response to CTLA-4 blockade and presence of NY-ESO-1 antibody in patients with metastatic melanoma. J Immunother. 2009;32:884–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Weber JS, Hamid O, Chasalow SD, Wu DY, Parker SM, Galbraith S, et al. Ipilimumab increases activated T cells and enhances humoral immunity in patients with advanced melanoma. J Immunother. 2012;35:89–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Yuan J, Gnjatic S, Li H, Powel S, Gallardo HF, Ritter E, et al. CTLA-4 blockade enhances polyfunctional NY-ESO-1 specific T cell responses in metastatic melanoma patients with clinical benefit. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:20410–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Yuan J, Adamow M, Ginsberg BA, Rasalan TS, Ritter E, Gallardo HF, et al. Integrated NY-ESO-1 antibody and CD8+ T-cell responses correlate with clinical benefit in advanced melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:16723–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contributions

Data acquisition: JR, AAT, LHB. Writing: All the authors. Methodology: AAT, LHB. Review and editing: All. Conceptualization: AAT. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Competing interests

AT consultant role and research grant support from Bristol Myers. The rest of the authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent for publication

Not applicable. All patient provided written IRB approved consent form.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board (IRB; IRB# PRO09010033). All patients had a University of Pittsburgh IRB approved written informed consent obtained. The study was conducted in accordance with the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Funding

Supported by National Institutes of Health award P50CA121973 and by a grant from Bristol Myers Squibb. This project used UPCI shared resources (including the Immunologic Monitoring Lab [L.H. Butterfield, Director]) that are supported in part by award P30 CA047904. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, USA

    Janet Retseck, Alexis Nasr, Yan Lin, Huang Lin & Ahmad A. Tarhini

  2. Department of Hematology and Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, 9500 Euclid Ave CA6-157, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA

    Prateek Mendiratta & Ahmad A. Tarhini

  3. Departments of Medicine, Surgery and Immunology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, USA

    Lisa H. Butterfield

  4. Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, USA

    Ahmad A. Tarhini

Authors
  1. Janet Retseck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexis Nasr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yan Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Huang Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Prateek Mendiratta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lisa H. Butterfield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ahmad A. Tarhini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmad A. Tarhini.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Retseck, J., Nasr, A., Lin, Y. et al. Long term impact of CTLA4 blockade immunotherapy on regulatory and effector immune responses in patients with melanoma. J Transl Med 16, 184 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-018-1563-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-018-1563-y

Keywords

Journal of Translational Medicine

ISSN: 1479-5876

Contact us