Skip to main content

Table 3 Performance of different classification models developed using support vector machine as machine learning technique

From: ProInflam: a webserver for the prediction of proinflammatory antigenicity of peptides and proteins

Feature

Thre

Sen

Spec

Acc

MCC

AUC

Parameters

Performance on training data

 AAC

0.6

73.58

70.07

72.92

0.36

0.77

t:2 g:0.005 c:80 j:1

 DPC

0.4

86.11

62.04

81.53

0.45

0.8

t:2 g:0.001 c:10 j:1

 PHY

0.7

91.25

24.82

78.61

0.20

0.57

t:2 g:0.001:c:50:j:4

 DPCHyb_NONE

0.4

87.82

62.04

82.92

0.48

0.84

t:2 g:0.001 c:20 j:1

 DPCHyb_KOOL

0.4

89.54

60.58

84.03

0.49

0.85

t:2 g:0.001 c:4 j:2

 DPCHyb_BETTS

0.3

93.65

62.04

87.64

0.58

0.88

t:2 g:0.001 c:8 j:3

Performance on validation data

 DPCHyb_BETTS

0.3

91.1

50

83.33

0.43

0.71

 
  1. The hybrid model prepared using Dipeptide composition based features and MERCI displayed the best performance with an accuracy of 87.6 %. The same model showed an accuracy of 83.3 % on validation dataset