Skip to main content

Table 1 Analysis of hnRNPD protein expression and correlation with clinicopathological parameters

From: Nuclear heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein D is associated with poor prognosis and interactome analysis reveals its novel binding partners in oral cancer

Clinicopathological features

Total cases

N

Nuclear n

Positivity (%)

p value

Odd’s ratio

(95 % CI)

Normal

106

20

(18.9)

   

Dysplasia

44

24

(54.5)

<0.001 a

5.4

(2.5–11.7)

 Mild

31

18

(58.0)

   

 Moderate

10

4

(40)

   

 Severe

3

1

(33.3)

   

OSCCs

183

120

(65.6)

<0.001 b

8.1

(4.6–14.5)

Age (median 45 years)

(range 15–85 years)

 <45

64

47

(73.4)

   

 ≥45

119

73

(61.3)

0.10

0.5

(0.2–1.1)

Gender

 Male

149

102

(68.5)

   

 Female

34

18

(52.9)

0.08

1.9

(0.9–4.1)

Differentiation

 WDSCC

89

57

(64.0)

   

 MDSCC

86

58

(67.4)

   

 PDSCC

8

5

(62.5)

0.87

 

–

Tumor size

 T1 + T2

65

34

(52.3)

   

 T3 + T4

118

86

(72.9)

0.005

2.4

(1.3–4.6)

Tumor stage

 I + II

31

15

(48.4)

   

 III + IV

152

105

(69.1)

0.02

2.3

(1.0–5.2)

Nodal status

 N0

61

37

(60.7)

   

 N1–4

122

83

(68.0)

0.32

1.3

(0.7–2.6)

Habits*

 Non consumer

33

27

(69.7)

   

 Tobacco consumer

150

97

(64.7)

0.58

0.7

(0.3–1.7)

  1. * Tobacco consumption habits include tobacco chewing and/or smoking of bidi or cigarettes, chewing of betel quid, areca nut or pan masala
  2. aNormal vs. dysplasia
  3. bNormal vs. OSCCs