Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparison between umbilical cord blood samples from two cord blood banks

From: Detecting primitive hematopoietic stem cells in total nucleated and mononuclear cell fractions from umbilical cord blood segments and units

  

Cord Blood Bank 1 (N = 12)

Cord Blood Bank 2 (N = 29)

Cell concentration

Cell population

TNC (mean ± SEM %CV)

MNC (mean ± SEM %CV)

TNC (mean ± SEM %CV)

MNC (mean ± SEM %CV)

1,000

CFC-GEMM

0.09 ± 0.03, 91.9%

0.238 ± 0.06, 64.5%

0.057 ± 0.01 91.7%

0.122 ± 0.01, 60.6%

 

HPP-SP

0.099 ± 0.03, 99.7%

0.323 ± 0.06, 56.5%

0.06 ± 0.01, 90.3%

0.146 ± 0.02, 58.7%

2,000

CFC-GEMM (+)

0.165 ± 0.04, 74.2%

0.544 ± 0.1, 57.6% [1]

0.085 ± 0.01, 86.3%

0.25 ± 0.02, 46.1% [3]

 

HPP-SP (*)

0.21 ± 0.06, 79.6%

0.723 ± 0.13, 56.2% [2]

0.126 ± 0.03, 111.0%

0.308 ± 0.03, 79.7% [3]

4,000

CFC-GEMM (*)

0.284 ± 0.08, 87.4%

0.887 ± 0.16, 58.2% [2]

0.177 ± 0.03, 81.9%

0.499 ± 0.05, 49.0% [4]

 

HPP-SP (*)

0.396 ± 0.1, 73.0%

1.352 ± 0.2, 47.4% [2]

0.293 ± 0.05, 87.8%

0.704 ± 0.06, 45.9% [4]

  1. Samples from CBB 1 used Sepax technology.
  2. Samples from CBB 2 used AXP technology.
  3. (+) represents 2,000 cells/well between MNC from CBB1 vs CBB2, P = 0.05.
  4. (*) represents MNC from CBB1 vs CBB2, P < 0.001.
  5. [1] represents TNC vs MNC from CBB1, P = 0.05.
  6. [2] represents TNC vs MNC from CBB1, P < 0.001.
  7. [3] represents TNC vs MNC from CBB2, P = 0.05.
  8. [4] represents TNC vs MNC from CBB2, P < 0.001.
Back to article page

Journal of Translational Medicine

ISSN: 1479-5876

Contact us