Table 3 Two variables analyses and 5 × 2 cross-validation protocol (average results obtained in 10 analyses with each model).
INPUT | MODELS | No. | Sensitivity | Specificity | Mean Accuracy | No. Errors | SD Mean Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APP ADAM | FF_Sn | 10 | 92,98% | 76,99% | 84,99% | 4,2 | 4,23 |
| Â | FF_Bm | 10 | 93,51% | 73,08% | 83,29% | 4,6 | 6,06 |
| Â | FF_Bp | 10 | 89,12% | 74,74% | 81,93% | 5,2 | 5,27 |
| Â | SMDA | 10 | 87,98% | 69,17% | 78,58% | 6,1 | 6,12 |
| Â | LDA | 10 | 82,52% | 63,46% | 72,99% | 7,8 | 8,74 |
APP BACE | FF_Sn | 10 | 84,33% | 80,06% | 82,20% | 5,4 | 3,53 |
| Â | FF_Bm | 10 | 81,69% | 79,94% | 80,82% | 5,9 | 4,24 |
| Â | FF_Bp | 10 | 83,27% | 79,17% | 81,22% | 5,7 | 3,92 |
| Â | SMDA | 10 | 82,81% | 76,60% | 79,70% | 6,1 | 4,21 |
| Â | LDA | 10 | 79,53% | 64,68% | 72,11% | 8,2 | 4,54 |
ADAM BACE | FF_Sn | 10 | 86,52% | 80,19% | 83,36% | 5 | 5,91 |
| Â | FF_Bm | 10 | 86,02% | 76,92% | 81,47% | 5,5 | 5,60 |
| Â | FF_Bp | 10 | 84,88% | 79,42% | 82,15% | 5,4 | 6,61 |
| Â | SMDA | 10 | 83,86% | 74,61% | 79,24% | 6,2 | 7,05 |
| Â | LDA | 10 | 85,97% | 63,53% | 74,75% | 7,2 | 6,76 |