From: Cancer classification using the Immunoscore: a worldwide task force
Must be | Immunoscore | Characteristics |
---|---|---|
Routine | YES | Technic to be performed by pathologist using bright field and precise cell evaluation |
Feasible | YES | Established pathology technics, using 2 regular whole slide FFPE section |
Inexpensive | YES | Automatized immunohistochemistry |
Rapid | YES | 2 simple staining less costly than complicated molecular techniccs |
Robust | YES | Autostainers, scanner, and digital pathology reduce the time to perform an Immunoscore |
Reproducible | YES | Two strong membrane staining, with no background, allowing the numeration of individual cells |
Quantitative | YES | Inter-observers variability is removed by the use of digital pathology, taking into account cell location and counts |
Standardized | YES | Standardized operating procedure should be performed to insure reproducibility and worldwide comparisons |
Pathology-base | YES | Necessity of pathologist expertise to validate cell type, cell location, and cell counts performed by digital pathology |
Powerful | YES | The immunoscore has a prognostic value highly significant even in Cox multivariate including TNM classification13 |