Open Access

Examining clinical similarities between myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and d-lactic acidosis: a systematic review

Journal of Translational Medicine201715:129

DOI: 10.1186/s12967-017-1229-1

Received: 8 February 2017

Accepted: 30 May 2017

Published: 7 June 2017

Abstract

Background

The pursuit for clarity in diagnostic and treatment pathways for the complex, chronic condition of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) continues. This systematic review raises a novel question to explore possible overlapping aetiology in two distinct conditions. Similar neurocognitive symptoms and evidence of d-lactate producing bacteria in ME/CFS raise questions about shared mechanisms with the acute condition of d-lactic acidosis (d-la).

Methods

d-la case reports published between 1965 and March 2016 were reviewed for episodes describing both neurological symptoms and high d-lactate levels. Fifty-nine d-la episodes were included in the qualitative synthesis comparing d-la symptoms with ME/CFS diagnostic criteria. A narrative review of d-la mechanisms and relevance for ME/CFS was provided.

Results

The majority of neurological disturbances reported in d-la episodes overlapped with ME/CFS symptoms. Of these, the most frequently reported d-la symptoms were motor disturbances that appear more prominent during severe presentations of ME/CFS. Both patient groups shared a history of gastrointestinal abnormalities and evidence of bacterial dysbiosis, although only preliminary evidence supported the role of lactate-producing bacteria in ME/CFS.

Limitations

Interpretation of results are constrained by both the breadth of symptoms included in ME/CFS diagnostic criteria and the conservative methodology used for d-la symptom classification. Several pathophysiological mechanisms in ME/CFS were not examined.

Conclusions

Shared symptomatology and underlying microbiota–gut–brain interactions raise the possibility of a continuum of acute (d-la) versus chronic (ME/CFS) presentations related to d-lactate absorption. Measurement of d-lactate in ME/CFS is needed to effectively evaluate whether subclinical d-lactate levels affect neurological symptoms in this clinical population.

Keywords

Acidosis, lactic Dysbiosis Fatigue syndrome, chronic Encephalomyelitis, myalgic Microbiota-gut–brain Neurological symptoms

Background

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is a complex condition with evidence of multi-systemic dysfunction. The primary symptom of post-exertional fatigue is accompanied by heterogeneous neurological, immune, cardiovascular, respiratory and/or gastrointestinal manifestations [1]. Research efforts continue to search for biomarkers to aid etiological understandings and treatment options for this debilitating condition. It has been proposed that some neurological symptoms may be related to an imbalance of commensal gut bacteria (i.e., gut dysbiosis [2]). Within ME/CFS, evidence of gut dysbiosis [3, 4] and associations between microbial genus and symptom expression [5] raise questions about whether gut dysbiosis plays a causative or mechanistic role in onset, maintenance and/or symptomatic variability. The mechanisms are not clear because microbe–gut–brain interactions can occur through several pathways (i.e., central, autonomic, and enteric nervous systems; neuroendocrine and neuroimmune; enteric microbiota) [68]. Investigations of other conditions with similar presentations may aid the current etiological understanding of ME/CFS. d-Lactic acidosis (d-la) is an acute condition that shares some similar features with ME/CFS and provides a clear example of the microbe–gut–brain interaction.

d-la is a type of metabolic acidosis with the primary presentation of encephalopathy (i.e., impaired mental state including confusion, loss of memory or cognitive capacity) [9]. d-la has also been referred to as “d-lactate neuropathy” or “d-lactate encephalomyelitis” in humans and “floppy kid syndrome”, or “drunken lamb syndrome” in animals. Originally described in ruminants [10], the condition has now been observed in multiple human case reports since 1979 [11].

The neurological symptoms and associated biochemical imbalances of d-la appear to result from gastrointestinal dysfunction. d-la is most commonly observed in patients with short bowel syndrome (SBS), often after surgery or removal of a section of the small bowel [12]. This reduced length diminishes the small bowel’s functional capacity to effectively metabolise carbohydrates leading to excessive bacterial fermentation in the colon [13]. Small intestinal carbohydrate malabsorption precipitates an increase in colonic acidity and the consequential overgrowth of certain species of colonic microbiota that produce an abundance of d-lactate. Healthy humans have the capacity to effectively metabolise d-lactate [14, 15]. However, the combination of high levels and insufficient d-lactate metabolic capacity can result in excess accumulation of d-lactate in the blood and absorption within the brain, resulting in the neurological symptoms characteristic of d-la [13].

Higher levels of d-lactate producing bacteria (such as Streptococcus and Enterococcus) have been identified in stool samples from patients with ME/CFS [4]. This evidence, combined with some similar neurological symptoms in both conditions, has led to comparison with d-la and proposal of the d-lactate hypothesis for ME/CFS. Accordingly, this hypothesis suggests that an increased abundance of d-lactate producing bacteria and suspected higher circulating levels of d-lactate may contribute to the neurological manifestations of ME/CFS. However, this hypothesis has not been systematically evaluated. Neither plasma nor urine d-lactate levels have been documented in ME/CFS to date. This lack of clinical d-lactate data coupled with confusion surrounding the degree of symptom overlap between d-la and ME/CFS provide the rationale for this qualitative review. To help ascertain the relevance of the d-lactate hypothesis for ME/CFS, Part A of this review aims to (a) systematically summarise published d-la episodes that report neurological symptoms and d-lactate levels; and (b) examine the overlap between d-la and ME/CFS symptom. Part B provides a narrative review of proposed neurological mechanisms in d-la to examine its relevance for ME/CFS aetiology.

Main text

Part A. Systematic qualitative review

Method

MEDLINE (via Ebscohost) and PubMed databases were searched for publications from 1965 to April 1 2016. To obtain papers referring to d-la, the following search terms were used: d-lact* AND (acidosis OR encephalopathy OR neuropathy). These databases were also searched for ME/CFS articles referring to acidosis (search terms: acidosis AND (“chronic fatigue syndrome” OR “myalgic encephalomyelitis”). Reference lists from articles obtained were manually screened to find other relevant references. Figure 1 shows the PRISMA flowchart for identification, screening and article exclusion.
Fig. 1

PRISMA flowchart of systematic search and article selection. Asterisk eligibility criteria included episodes of d-lactic acidosis where both neurological symptoms and d-lactate levels were reported

Qualitative synthesis

Sixty-eight case reports were screened for inclusion in the qualitative synthesis (see Table 1). Case reports were screened in a two-step process. The first stage of this process involved identifying case reports that reported both d-lactate levels and neurological symptoms during an episode of d-la. Fifteen case reports were excluded at this stage due to an inability to obtain full-text or inadequate reporting of neurological symptoms and/or d-lactate levels. A serum d-lactate level of greater than 3.0 mmol/L has been proposed as a marker for d-la diagnosis [16]. However, using this criterion for exclusion was considered to be inappropriate when there were varying measurement methods used throughout the case reports. To reduce bias in case report selection, all cases that measured d-lactate and indicated that the patient’s d-lactate level was ‘high’ or above the ‘normal’ range, as stipulated by the authors and relevant measurement method, were included. Only one episode was excluded [17] when plasma d-lactate fell within the normal range according to the chosen method of measuring d-lactate defined within this case report. Across the episodes reviewed, there were considerable discrepancies between sampling and measurement methods (see Additional file 1: Table S1). A discussion paper on measurement issues and analyses is being compiled by our team and beyond the scope of the current review.
Table 1

d-Lactic acidosis case reports screened for qualitative synthesis

Episode code #

References

Included

Reasons for exclusion

1

[20]

N

d-Lactate measurement not specified

2

[17]

N

Plasma d-lactate within normal range

3

[21]

N

d-Lactate measurement not specified

4

[22]

Y

 

5

[23]

N

d-Lactate measurement not specified

6

[24]

Y

 

7

[25]

N

d-Lactate not d-la; No comparison between d-lactate and neurological symptoms

8

[26]

Y

 

9

[27]

Y

 

10

[28]

Y

 

11

[29]

Y

 

12a and 12b

[30]

Y

 

13

[31]

Y

 

14

[32]

Y

 

15

[33]

Y

 

161 and 162

[34]

Y

 

17

[35]

Y

 

18

[36]

Y

 

19

[37]

Y

 

20

[38]

Y

 

21

[39]

Y

 

22

[15]

N

d-Lactate levels not presented in relation to neurological symptoms

23

[40]

Y

 

24

[41]

Y

 

25

[42]

Y

 

26*

[43]

Y

 

27

[44]

Y

 

28

[45]

Y

 

29

[46]

Y

 

30

[47]

Y

 

31

[48]

Y

 

32

[49]

N

Unable to obtain full-text

33

[50]

Y

 

341 and 342

[51]

Y

 

35

[52]

Y

 

36*

[53]

Y

 

37

[54]

Y

 

38

[55]

N

Neurological symptoms not specified

39*

[56]

Y

 

40

[57]

Y

 

41

[58]

Y

 

42*

[59]

Y

 

43

[60]

Y

 

44

[11]

Y

 

45

[61, 62]

N

Same case for both references; d-lactate levels not specified

46

[63]

N

d-Lactate not measured

47a and 47b

[64]

Y

 

48

[65]

Y

 

49

[66]

Y

 

50

[67]

Y

 

51a and 51b

[68]

Y

 

52

[69]

Y

 

53

[70]

Y

 

54

[71]

N

Unable to obtain English full-text

55

[72]

Y

 

56

[73]

Y

 

57

[74]

Y

 

58a and 58b

[75]

Y

 

59

[76]

Y

 

60

[77]

Y

 

61

[78]

N

d-Lactate measurement not specified

62

[79]

Y

 

63

[80]

N

Neurological symptoms not specified

64

[16]

Y

 

65

[81]

Y

 

66

[82]

Y

 

67

[83]

N

d-Lactate only measured during intervention

Subscript numbers (1 and 2) indicate separate episodes for the same patient. The letters a and b identify different patient cases reported in the same reference. Episodes from non-SBS patients are marked with an asterisk. Episodes included in qualitative synthesis simultaneously reported at least one high D-lactate level (from blood or urine analysis) and documented neurological symptoms

During the second stage of screening, the remaining 53 case reports were independently assessed for quality by a team of three critical appraisers. Each article was assessed by two appraisers using the checklist developed by The Joanna Briggs Institute [18] based on the CARE Guidelines [19] established to improve the quality of reporting clinical cases. Appraisers rated (Yes, Unclear, No or N/A) on the eight items pertaining to (1) Demographic characteristics; (2) Patient history; (3) Current clinical condition; (4) Diagnostic tests; (5) Treatment/intervention; (6) Post-intervention clinical condition; (7) Adverse events; and (8) Take away lessons. Items 1–4 were prioritised as they were most relevant for the focus of this review. When comparing ratings across these four items, most articles (47/53, 90.1%) were rated as ‘Yes’ by both critical appraisers. For the remaining 6 articles, at least one reviewer provided a rating of ‘Unclear’ on an item. Discrepancies in ratings were discussed and the appraisers agreed that all articles adequately covered these priority domains and were deemed appropriate for inclusion in the qualitative synthesis.

Case reports that described multiple episodes (either for the same patient or different patients) were included as separate episodes if they met the eligibility criteria. From the 53 case reports, a total of 59 episodes were identified and included for qualitative synthesis. Each episode was reviewed with information about patient demographics, medical history, comorbid conditions, proposed triggers, neurological symptoms, non-neurological symptoms, d-lactate levels, l-lactate levels, anion gap, pH levels, microbial composition and treatment tabulated (Additional file 1: Table S1).

Determining ME/CFS and d-la symptom overlap

Reported d-la symptoms (neurological and non-neurological) were compared with ME/CFS International Consensus Criteria (ICC; [1]. Comorbid mood symptoms (including anxiety and depression) not required for ME/CFS diagnosis but frequently experienced by patients were also included for comparison with d-la presentations. d-la symptoms were classified as ‘matching’ ME/CFS symptoms or ‘ambiguous/other’. d-la symptoms were only classified as matching if terminology was directly comparable to the symptoms described in the ICC (see Table 2). All other symptoms were categorised as ambiguous/other.
Table 2

Mapping overlap between myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) and d-lactic acidosis (d-la) symptoms

ME/CFS International Consensus Criteria [1]

d-la symptoms mapped to ME/CFS criteria

Matching

Ambiguous/other

A. Postexertional neuroimmune exhaustion (compulsory)

A. Lethargy/fatigue

 

B. Neurological impairments (at least one symptom from 3 of the 4 categories)

 B1. Neurocognitive impairments

 B2. Pain

 B3. Sleep disturbances

 B4a. Neurosensory and perceptual and

 B4b. Motor disturbances

B1. Encephalopathy/Mental confusion/disorientation/dazed/Concentration difficulties/Slow processing and responding to questions/slow speech

B2. Headaches/Muscle pain

B3. Drowsiness/sleepiness/somnolence

B4a. Blurred vision

B4b. Weakness/hypotonic (lowered muscle tone)/flaccidity/impaired gait (staggering/wide/ataxic/unsteady/instability)/ataxia (movement and co-ordination difficulties)/impaired balance

B1. Altered mental state/cortical dysfunction (e.g., disoriented to date, time, place and space)/delirium/blunted judgment/abnormal EEG

B4a. Hallucinations (visual and auditory)/delusions/paranoid ideation

B4b. Slowed cerebellar function/movement/dysiadochokinesia (difficulty performing rapid movement)/impaired reflexes/Neuropathy (fine motor coordination difficulties)/unable to grasp objects/Ptosis (eye drooping)/Asterixis (hand ‘flapping’/tremor)/Spasms: nystagmus (eye spasms)/opisthotonos (muscle spasms leading to hyperextended posture)/Bruxism

  

Speech symptoms: Slurred and incoherent speech/dysarthria (speech pronunciation difficulties, weak muscles effecting speech)/thickened speech/ataxic speech (explosive—pauses between syllables)

  

Consciousness: Altered/fluctuating/comatose/intermittent coma/stupor/induced sleep/depressed level of consciousness/obtunded/fluctuating from unrousable to alert

C. Immune, gastro-intestinal and genitourinary impairments (at least one symptom from 3 of the 5 categories)

 C1. Flu-like symptoms

 C2. Prone to viral infections

 C3. Gastro-intestinal abnormalities: nausea, abdominal pain, irritable bowel syndrome, bloating

 C4. Genitourinary symptoms

 C5. Sensitivities to food, medication, odours or chemicals

C3. Gastrointestinal symptoms*:

Increased diarrhea/bowel movements

Nausea/vomiting

Diffuse abdominal pain

 

D. Energy production/transportation impairments (at least 1 symptom)

 D1. Cardiovascular: orthostatic intolerance (inability to tolerate an upright position), postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, palpitations, arrhythmias, hypotension, dizziness, pallor

 D2. Respiratory: labored breathing, air hunger, fatigue of chest wall muscles

 D3. Thermostatic instability: lowered body temperature, cold extremities, marked diurnal fluctuations, sweating, episodic feverishness

 D4. Intolerance to temperature extremes

D1. Inability to stand/sit upright/Tachycardia (rapid heart rate)/Respiratory arrhythmia/Hypotension/low blood pressure/Dizziness/Pallor

D2. Breathing difficulties: hyperpnoea (deep breathing)/dyspnoea (shortness of breath)/tachypnea (rapid breathing)/Kussmaul (deep and laboured)/breathlessness/hyperventilation

D3. Body temperature changes (high or low)

D1. Bradycardia (slowed heart rate)

D2. Respiratory acidosis and hypercarbic respiratory failure

Comorbid Mood and Behavioural Disturbances

1. Depressive symptoms

2. Anxiety symptoms

1. Unhappy/agitation/irritability

2. Anxiety

Irrational/unusual/disturbed behavior/aggressive/hostile/abusive/combative/uncooperative behavior/euphoria/aloofness

Uncategorized d-la symptoms

  

Metabolic acidosis

  

Other abnormalities:

dehydration/cravings (water, cigarettes)/excessive thirst

Acute renal failure/hyperchloremic acidosis/liver dysfunction

ME/CFS broad category B. Neurological impairments are highlighted as the primary focus of this review and to show three subcategories of delineation under ambiguous/other symptoms (i.e., in accordance with specific ICC criteria (B1 – B4), speech/language symptoms, and level of consciousness)

* Gastro-intestinal symptoms associated with short bowel syndrome or the patient’s medical history were not included as symptoms of d-la. Only reports of a change in gastrointestinal symptoms were included

ambiguous/other: symptoms that were not clearly identified as consistent with ME/CFS presentation (see Table 2 for detailed symptom delineation), d -la d-lactic acidosis, matching: mapped overlap between ME/CFS and d-la symptoms, ME/CFS myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome

Neurological symptoms

As neurological symptoms were the primary focus of this review, further categorisation was used to obtain more information about the types of neurological symptoms that accompany a d-la presentation. The ambiguous/other neurological symptoms were delineated into ME/CFS categories B1–B4, speech and consciousness subgroups (see Table 2). Reports of altered consciousness formed a distinct subcategory (consciousness) to identify the proportion of patients that presented with this more severe neurological symptom.

Speech and language impairment may have shared pathophysiology with other motor or neurocognitive disturbances. The ME/CFS ICC describes ‘slow speech’ without mentioning any other specific speech or language impairments [1]. Impaired information processing and word retrieval have been described as cognitive manifestations of ME/CFS, with speech therapy being a suggested treatment option [84]. The transient speech and language symptoms (e.g. dysarthria and/or slurred and incoherent speech) in d-la are likely to be overt behavioural manifestations of underlying muscle weakness and/or neurocognitive disturbances. However, without further information from each report, speech symptoms (excluding ‘slow speech’) were grouped as a subcategory for further investigation.

Conservative methodology

As highlighted by the aforementioned distinct classification of speech and language symptoms, we chose to pursue a conservative method of symptom categorisation. Several other ambiguous d-la symptoms were highly suggestive of ME/CFS and more likely to reflect discrepancies in terminology rather than different symptomatology per se. Inconsistent assessment and reporting of symptoms can reflect differences between patient demographics (i.e., age or sex), disciplines, and professional settings. This is particularly pertinent when considering comparisons between terminology used to describe chronic (i.e., ME/CFS) versus acute (i.e., d-la) presentations. For example, a patient presenting with ‘fluctuating consciousness’ or ‘comatose’ may preclude further neurological assessment and thus limit reporting of other covert symptoms. Similarly, the observable nature of motor and speech/language symptoms may be more frequently reported during an acute hospital presentation unlike some neurocognitive symptoms that require more specific testing and comparative measures to notice, for example a deterioration in memory, attention and clarity of thought. In another example, ‘slowed cerebellar function’ was used to describe d-la symptoms. This term is likely to reflect similar ME/CFS motor disturbances. However, the ICC does not specifically refer to ‘slowed’ movement, hence this symptom was classified as ambiguous/other. Consequently, our method of clinically comparing ME/CFS and d-la symptoms was conservative and chosen to ensure that symptom overlap was not inflated.

The presence of each reported d-la symptom was identified by episode number (see Table 1). This enabled frequencies and percentages to be calculated for both broad (A–D) and specific (B1–B4, C1–5, D1–4) ME/CFS ICC categories. Many episodes reported multiple neurological symptoms both within and between different subcategories i.e. neurocognitive impairments (B1) and motor disturbances (B4b). In these circumstances, each episode was only counted once for each specific subcategory. Likewise, an episode was only included once when calculating the presence of symptoms in each broad category, i.e. neurological impairments (B). Frequencies and percentages were calculated for each symptom category and delineated by available demographic details (age and sex). Episodes were classified as paediatric (≤17 years) or adult (≥18 years).

Results

Systematic summary of d-la episodes

A total of 59 episodes of d-la reported both neurological symptoms and d-lactate levels. The average patient age during d-la presentation was 29.9 years (SD = 21.0). Twenty-two paediatric (age range 10 months to 16 years, M = 7.1 years, SD = 4.5 years) and 37 adult (age range 18–60 years, M = 43.4 years, SD = 13.9 years) episodes were examined. There were 35 male and 23 female episodes with similar sex ratios documented for adult males (n = 20) and females (n = 17). Patient sex was not identified in one paediatric case. A predominance of male paediatric episodes (n = 15) were found compared with female paediatric episodes (n = 6). d-la episodes were primarily from patients with a history of SBS (55/59, 93.2%). The four patient episodes without SBS presented with propylene glycol intoxication [43], chronic pancreatitis [53], acute lymphoblastic leukaemia [56], and surgery error [59]. Table 3 summarises the frequency and percentage of reported d-la symptoms by age (paediatric and adult), sex (male and female) and total episodes.
Table 3

Frequency of episodes that reported matching and/or ambiguous/other d-lactic acidosis (d-la) symptoms as a function of age and sex

ME/CFS ICC

d-La symptom overlap with ME/CFS

Episode frequencies

Paediatric (≤17 years)

Adult (≥18 years)

Total

Male (15 episodes)

Female (6 episodes)

NI (1 episode)

Total (22 episodes)

Male (20 episodes)

Female (17 episodes)

Total (37 episodes)

(59 episodes)

n

%

n

%

n

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

A. Postexertional neuroimmune exhaustion

Matching

8

53.3

1

16.7

9

40.9

2

20.0

4

23.5

6

16.2

15

25.4

Ambiguous/other

B. Neurological impairments

Matching

12

80.0

6

100

1

19

86.4

18

90.0

15

88.3

33

89.2

52

88.1

Ambiguous/other

11

73.3

2

33.3

1

14

63.6

17

85.0

14

82.4

31

83.8

45

76.3

Ambiguous/other B1B4

3

20.0

1

16.7

1

5

22.7

11

55.0

6

35.3

17

45.9

22

37.3

Speech/language

7

46.7

2

33.3

1

10

45.5

11

55.0

9

52.9

20

54.1

30

50.8

Consciousness

5

33.3

5

22.7

5

25.0

3

17.6

8

21.6

13

22.0

C. Immune, gastrointestinal, genitourinary impairments

Matching

3

20.0

3

13.6

6

30.0

4

23.5

9

24.3

12

20.3

Ambiguous/other

D. Energy production/transportation impairments

Matching

8

53.3

3

50.0

11

50.0

7

35.0

2

11.8

9

24.3

20

33.9

Ambiguous/other

2

10.0

2

5.4

2

3.4

Mood/behavior

Matching

2

13.3

1

16.7

3

13.6

2

10.0

3

17.6

5

13.5

8

13.6

Ambiguous/other

6

40.0

6

27.3

4

20.0

3

17.6

7

18.9

13

22.0

Uncategorized d-la symptoms

 

Metabolic acidosis

15

100

6

100

1

22

100

20

100

16

94.1

36

97.3

58

98.3

 

Other abnormalities

4

26.7

4

18.2

6

30.0

2

11.8

7

18.9

11

18.6

Percentages were calculated from fractions of the number of episodes that reported relevant symptoms (n) against the number of possible episodes (noted in column subheadings) within each sex and age category. ME/CFS broad category B Neurological impairments are highlighted as the primary focus of this review. The ambiguous/other symptoms are further delineated into three subcategories (ICC criteria B1–B4, speech/language symptoms, and level of consciousness; see Table 2 for explanations). In each subcategory the same episode code number can be shown several times to represent multiple symptoms during each d-la episode. See Additional file 2: Table S2 for an expansion of these results showing episode code numbers that were included for each symptom category

Ambiguous/other symptoms that were not clearly identified as consistent with ME/CFS presentation (see Table 2 for detailed symptom delineation), B1–B4 neurocognitive impairments, pain, sleep disturbances, neurosensory and perceptual, motor disturbances, d-la d-lactic acidosis, ICC International Consensus Criteria, Matching mapped overlap between ME/CFS and d-la symptoms, ME/CFS myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, NI sex not identified

Table 3 shows some evidence of shared symptomatology across each broad ME/CFS ICC category. The highest percentage of overlap was found for neurological symptoms. Other symptoms specific to d-la were also frequently reported (e.g., metabolic acidosis). ME/CFS symptom categories are discussed sequentially to examine similarities with d-la symptoms.

Overlap between d-la and ME/CFS symptoms

Post-exertional neuroimmune exhaustion

This ME/CFS symptom describes a chronic pattern of excessive and disproportionate fatigue upon exertion. This is the core compulsory symptom of ME/CFS [1]. In the context of the chronicity of ME/CFS symptoms, it is difficult to directly compare this pattern of post-exertional exhaustion with an acute presentation of d-la. Nevertheless, one quarter of patients reported symptoms of lethargy and fatigue during a d-la episode (15/59, 25.4%). In contrast, all ME/CFS patients experience fatigue and lethargy as it is a required diagnostic criterion. The lower frequency of fatigue reported in d-la, may accurately reflect characteristic distinctions between the two conditions. Alternatively, an acute presentation of d-la can include fluctuating levels of consciousness and hence symptoms of fatigue may be less relevant and/or underreported within this emergency hospital setting.

Neurological impairments

Episodes reviewed in this qualitative synthesis required neurological symptoms to be reported (as an inclusion criterion), accordingly, all episodes of d-la reported at least one neurological impairment. The majority of neurological symptoms that were reported overlapped with ME/CFS symptomatology (52/59, 88.1%). The frequencies of matching ME/CFS neurological symptoms were similar when comparing paediatric (19/22, 86.4%) and adult (33/37, 89.2%) episodes as well as male (30/35, 85.7%) and female (21/23, 91.3%) episodes. Ambiguous/other neurological impairments (e.g., altered mental state or cortical dysfunction) were also frequently reported (45/59, 76.3%). The more severe neurological symptom of an altered level of consciousness was reported in 13 episodes (22.0%). Five case reports documented the patient’s altered consciousness as the only neurological symptom during the d-la episode. The remaining reports described additional neurological symptoms and a deterioration in symptoms affecting consciousness.

When considering more specific types of neurological impairments, motor disturbance (B4b) was the most frequently reported matching ME/CFS neurological symptom (42/59, 71.2%, see Fig. 2). This was notably higher than the other neurological symptoms (B1. Neurocognitive = 25/59, 42.4%, B2. Pain = 3/59, 5.1%, B3. Sleep = 10/59, 16.9%, B4a. Neurosensory and Perceptual = 2/59, 3.4%). Common motor disturbances in ME/CFS include muscle weakness, clumsiness, balance and coordination difficulties [84]. The ICC noted that the presence of balance and gait instabilities are more frequently observed in severe cases [1]. Ambiguous/other neurocognitive, neurosensory, perceptual and motor disturbances were reported in 37.3% of total d-la episodes (22/59). Within these 22 episodes, 90.9% (20/22) of episodes simultaneously reported at least one matching neurological symptom akin with ME/CFS diagnostic criteria. Therefore, there was considerable overlap between matching symptoms and ambiguous/other neurological symptoms.
Fig. 2

Percentages of d-lactic acidosis (d-la) episodes that reported ME/CFS matching and ambiguous/other neurological impairments. Total percentages are reported for neurocognitive symptoms (B1), pain (B2), sleep disturbance (B3), neurosensory and perceptual disturbances (B4a), motor disturbances (B4b), speech symptoms, and altered consciousness. N.B. The same episode may be represented multiple times for both matching and ambiguous/other symptom groups across all neurological impairment subcategories

Approximately half of d-la episodes reported impairments in speech (30/59, 50.9%). Notably, all episodes that reported speech and language impairments also reported at least one other ME/CFS-matching neurological impairment, which may reflect the shared pathophysiology that underlies the behavioural manifestation of overt speech symptoms.

Immune, gastrointestinal and genitourinary impairments

The majority of d-la episodes were from patients with SBS (55/59, 93.9%). As such, these patients had a history of extensive gastrointestinal abnormalities. The case report of the patient with leukaemia [56] was the only episode of d-la that did not report any gastrointestinal symptoms during the acute stage or prior history. This episode was also an exception as it was the only episode of d-la without metabolic acidosis (discussed below). A change in ME/CFS-matching gastrointestinal symptoms associated with the d-la presentation was only reported in 22.0% of the total episodes (13/59). These changes included an increase in diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting and/or abdominal pain/distension.

Immune or genitourinary impairments (matching or ambiguous/other) were not specifically reported during d-la episodes. Conversely, immune symptoms are a primary component of ME/CFS as a neuro-immune condition with evidence of immune abnormalities [85] and autoimmune mechanisms [86].

Energy production and transportation impairments

ME/CFS-matching energy production and transportation impairments were reported in 33.9% (20/59) of total d-la episodes. These symptoms were more frequently reported in male (15/35, 42.9%) compared with female episodes (5/23, 21.7%; see Table 3). Ambiguous/other cardiovascular (bradycardia) and respiratory symptoms (respiratory acidosis and hypercarbic respiratory failure) were documented during two adult male episodes (2/59, 3.4%).

Comorbid mood and behavioural disturbances

Mood disturbances are not included in ME/CFS diagnostic criteria. However, patients with ME/CFS frequently experience comorbid anxiety and depressive symptoms [1, 87]. Matching mood (depressive and anxiety) symptoms were reported in 13.6% of d-la episodes (8/59). Ambiguous/other ME/CFS mood and behavioural disturbances were described in 22.0% of d-la episodes (13/59). The higher frequency of ambiguous/other mood and behavioural disturbances seen in paediatric male (6/15, 40.0%) compared to paediatric female episodes (0/6) may reflect the tendency for boys to externalise behaviours more than girls [88].

Other symptoms (non-ME/CFS)

Metabolic acidosis as defined by blood pH values below 7.35 [89] and/or as stipulated in each case report based on patients’ anion gap, was confirmed in all except one episode of d-la (58/59, 98.3%). Metabolic acidosis occurs when there is a decrease in serum bicarbonate, excess hydrogen ions and, commonly, a lower pH value suggestive of acidosis [90]. However, in some situations an underlying metabolic acidosis can be reflected in higher pH values that are indicative of alkalosis but are secondary to a metabolic acidosis, sometimes referred to as a compensatory process [90]. In Mendu et al. [56] the authors described the normal serum pH values (7.35–7.45) as a “compensated metabolic acidosis” due to simultaneous higher l-lactate levels observed in this patient (p. 90). Metabolic acidosis is a primary marker of d-la but is not described in ME/CFS diagnostic criteria. Blood pH values are not routinely measured in ME/CFS, therefore, the symptomatic overlap cannot be determined.

Other abnormalities such as dehydration, cravings and excessive thirst were infrequently reported in the d-la episodes (9/59, 15.3%). Acute renal failure, hyperchloremic acidosis and liver dysfunction were reported in three separate episodes (3/59, 5.1%).

Discussion

Examples of matching ME/CFS and d-la symptoms were found throughout the d-la case reports. More than 96.6 per cent (57/59) of d-la episodes reported at least one matching ME/CFS symptom. Whilst there was considerable overlap, some symptoms of both ME/CFS and d-la were distinct. Figure 3 provides an overview of shared and distinct symptoms in these acute and chronic clinical conditions.
Fig. 3

Proposed continuum of d-lactic acidosis and ME/CFS symptoms. A continuum showing, from left to right; distinct myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) symptoms, shared and distinct d-lactic acidosis (d-la) symptoms. Continuum also shows chronic compared to acute presentations

This qualitative synthesis has confirmed that the type of neurological impairments reported during d-la episodes are similar to those experienced by ME/CFS patients. However, the most commonly reported motor disturbances in d-la are considered a more severe presentation within ME/CFS [1]. This may reflect differing pathophysiology or alternatively may support a proposal for both conditions to lie on a continuum. ME/CFS may fall at one end as a chronic condition with fluctuating severity and d-la at the other extreme as an exacerbation of an acute presentation (see Fig. 3). The fluctuating neurological symptoms that present in both d-la and ME/CFS may vary in severity and the corresponding treatment response [66]. Htyte et al. [40] described these transient symptoms as “usually mild and self-limiting in patients with normal renal function” (p. 1435), highlighting the individual variation in presentation and reporting of symptoms with less severe symptoms unlikely to prompt acute emergency care.

Some key areas of disparity between d-la and ME/CFS symptoms related to immune impairments and metabolic acidosis. These results may accurately reflect pathophysiological differences between the two conditions. Alternatively, some other plausible explanations warrant consideration. The lack of reports relating to specific immune symptoms in d-la may be related to symptom prioritisation during an acute presentation. Reports of bacterial infection preceding d-la onset, bacterial overgrowth during the d-la episode and response to antibiotic treatment (see Additional file 1: Table S1), suggest that immune dysfunction may still be relevant for d-la patients.

Without measurement of blood pH levels the prevalence of metabolic acidosis in ME/CFS is unknown. Other research raises questions about the possibility of similar mechanisms of metabolic acidosis (or the compensatory acidosis described above) in ME/CFS. Alkalosis in skeletal muscles may result in a compensated acidosis in the blood, precipitating hyperventilation [91]. This theory has been proposed from evidence of hyperventilation in patients with ME/CFS [92] and an inverse association between skeletal muscle pH and cerebral blood flow [91]. Compared to sedentary controls, ME/CFS patients have higher skeletal muscle pH at rest [93] and at recovery after exercise [93]. Alkalosis in skeletal muscle has been proposed as a mechanism effecting orthostatic and neurocognitive ME/CFS symptoms [91]. Blood acidosis can also directly alter the function of cellular membranes [91], therefore, our current understanding of the mechanisms involved remain rudimentary. Routine assessment of blood pH levels in ME/CFS will ascertain the prevalence of metabolic acidosis/alkalosis for this clinical population.

Limitations

These results need to be considered with an awareness of potential methodological limitations. Firstly, the inclusion criteria for selected case reports in this review may have been problematic. Although unavoidable, the requirement of neurological symptoms during d-la episodes may have increased reporting bias during this review process leading to an exaggerated focus on neurological symptoms. However, the effect of this limitation may be moderated when considering the high percentage of case reports meeting both the eligibility criteria of describing neurological symptoms and d-lactate measurement during the episode (80.0%).

Findings from this qualitative review are also limited by the lack of standardised procedures used when reporting symptoms in case reports. Differences in assessment procedures and terminology used for reporting neurological symptoms may impede accurate interpretation. Some ambiguous/other symptoms described as distinct may share similar pathophysiology. This may be particularly pertinent for speech symptoms. On the one hand, the results may underestimate the level of overlap based on the conservative classification of symptoms. Alternatively, the breadth of ME/CFS symptoms included in the ICC diagnostic criteria may inflate the findings. Reliance on qualitative symptom report comparisons only provide a preliminary guide to shared symptomatology. Whilst useful for theoretical purposes it is insufficient to draw confirmatory conclusions.

Implications

Mindful of these limitations, the proposal of a continuum of acute and chronic encephalopathy related to d-lactate warrants further investigation. Within d-la, several authors have proposed that the level of acidosis and associated encephalopathy may result in differing severity and either an acute or chronic presentation [27, 28, 32]. A subclinical elevation of d-lactate has been reported in SBS patients and diverse populations [94]. Higher d-lactate levels were recorded in 2.8% of randomly selected hospital patients [40]. Minimal details were provided about this sample other than noting that 40% of these patients did not have a history of gastrointestinal surgery [40]. Higher levels of d-lactate have also been recorded in response to trauma or infection [95]; and in patients with diabetes compared with healthy controls [96]. Thornalley et al. [97] showed positive correlations between the level of d-lactate and duration of diabetes. They found that the duration of disease was positively associated with retinopathy, neuropathy and nephropathy complications of diabetes. The relevance of d-lactate for diverse presentations is currently unknown.

Even within SBS populations, d-la has been under-recognised and frequently misdiagnosed [9]. Misdiagnosis is complicated by issues related to accurate and efficient measurement of d-lactate. A further diagnostic complication related to the clinical presentation of d-la is that the neurological manifestations can present without gastrointestinal complications or a change in gastrointestinal symptoms. Less than one-quarter of d-la episodes analysed in this review described a worsening of gastrointestinal symptoms. Therefore, it is plausible that clinicians may focus on the neurological presentation and overlook the underlying gastrointestinal mechanism. The case report from Scully et al. [70] highlighted this when the 16-year old male patient was first treated by a psychiatrist with lithium carbonate for suspected bipolar disorder and tested for illicit drug use before being diagnosed with d-la. The patient presented with aggression, somnolence and weight loss without current gastrointestinal symptoms, although had an abdominal trauma one year prior that required short-bowel surgery [70]. The presence of neurological symptoms in the absence of current gastrointestinal symptoms may lead to frequent misdiagnoses. The proposed mechanisms of d-la (i.e., carbohydrate malabsorption and related bacterial overgrowth [32, 36]) may have relevance for patients presenting with neurological symptoms but without an observable change in gastrointestinal symptoms.

Carbohydrate malabsorption is not exclusive to SBS populations and can vary in severity. Altschule et al. [98] found that d-lactate was more slowly metabolised in patients with schizophrenia, manic-depression and psychosis compared with healthy controls. Even earlier studies have shown increased lactate after fructose or glucose ingestion and disturbed lactate metabolism after exercise within these populations [98], suggesting difficulties with carbohydrate metabolism. Within ME/CFS, carbohydrate restriction (e.g., avoidance of sugars and grains) may be advantageous [99, 100]. Whilst there is minimal empirical support, clinical reports suggest that dietary triggers can exacerbate symptoms and that some patients benefit from dietary exclusions [99]. The response to treatment for small intestine bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) in ME/CFS patients [101], suggests that carbohydrate malabsorption may be relevant for a subgroup of this population. An analysis of mechanisms involved in d-la is provided to help identify shared pathophysiology between d-la and ME/CFS.

Part B. Narrative review

Proposed mechanisms in d-lactic acidosis

Understanding d-la involves firstly establishing the reason for increased d-lactate levels before examining proposed neurological mechanisms. Figure 4 summarises the contextual factors, triggers and proposed mechanisms leading to d-la. The presentation of d-la requires both an increase in d-lactate absorption that exceeds the metabolic and/or excretion capacity of the patient.
Fig. 4

Overview of mechanisms in d-lactic acidosis. Legend. Summary of contextual factors, triggers and proposed mechanisms leading to d-lactic acidosis (d-la). A presentation of d-la requires an increase in d-lactate absorption. The proposed mechanisms of increased d-lactate production can be through (1) bacterial dysbiosis and/or (2) endogenous production of d-lactate. Simultaneous to the increased absorption, patients who present with d-la also require (3) slowed metabolism of d-lactate. Hence, the d-lactate production exceeds the body’s metabolic and/or excretion capacity. Short bowel syndrome (SBS); d-2-hydroxy acid dehydrogenase (d-2-HDH); adenosine triphosphate (ATP); tricarboxylic acid (TCA)

Bacterial dysbiosis

Bacterial dysbiosis (i.e., an imbalance in commensal bacteria [2]) has been suggested as the primary mechanism influencing d-la presentation in SBS populations. The dysbiosis is distinguished by an increased colonisation of lactic acid-producing bacteria, particularly bacteria that produce d-lactate (e.g., Lactobacillus fermenti, L acidophilus, and Streptococcus; see review by Petersen [13]). An overgrowth of Lactobacilli has been identified in SBS patients with increased d-lactate levels [26, 28, 37, 47, 64, 68, 72, 74, 75, 103]. This dysbiosis has been proposed as a result of an impaired small intestine, either due to congenital causes, surgery for midgut volvulus, gangrene or inflammatory bowel disease [104]; functional SBS and carbohydrate malabsorption [32, 36]; or colonic stagnation [62]. With reduced absorptive capacity of the small intestine, malabsorbed carbohydrates are more likely to enter the colon and provide fuel for colonic bacteria leading to increased bacterial fermentation [54, 81]. Increased bacterial fermentation can further reduce bowel motility [31], alter colonic pH and change the level of bacterial metabolites. This can include a reduction in volatile fatty acids [26] and increased d-lactate production [shown in 26, 54, 64, 66, 75, 105].

Dietary, probiotic and antibiotic intake have preceded bacterial dysbiosis and d-la presentations. Some episodes of d-la have been triggered by increased sugars/carbohydrate (e.g., [31, 42, 66]) or a change from parenteral to oral intake (e.g., [48, 70]). In patients with bacterial dysbiosis, diet and probiotic supplementation can increase bacterial fermentation and further alter bacterial composition. It appears that the type of diet or probiotics can influence d-lactate production in either a beneficial or detrimental manner. Whilst antibiotics are commonly used as a treatment for d-la, indiscriminate and inappropriate use of antibiotics has also been shown to precede and potentially trigger d-la [36]. The way antibiotics alter bacterial composition may lead to further dysbiosis and an increased d-lactate production in vulnerable patients.

Although bacterial dysbiosis is the primary mechanism used to explain the occurrence of d-la, enteric microbial composition was only measured prior to treatment for 21 of the 59 episodes screened for the qualitative review (35.6%). More consistent measurement of the gut microbiome may add clarity to d-la etiology and individual treatment.

Slowed d-lactate metabolism/excretion

Whilst it is beyond the scope of this review to explain lactate metabolism (see [13, 106]) a brief overview of d-lactate metabolism in relation to d-la is provided. Humans can effectively metabolise large amounts of d-lactate. Hove and Mortensen [15] confirmed that humans have the enzyme d-2-hydroxy acid dehydrogenase (d-2-HDH) to enable conversion of d-lactate to pyruvate. Certain conditions such as increased oxalate and low pH can inhibit the activity of d-2-HDH enzymes, as shown in animal tissue [107]. The kidney and liver have the highest concentrations of d-2-HDH. Therefore, kidney and liver impairments can reduce effective metabolism of d-lactate indicated by d-lactate accumulation in patients with renal dysfunction [40] and liver cirrhosis [108]. The presence of adequate d-2-HDH is required for d-lactate metabolism.

Colonic bacteria can be involved in both lactate production and excretion during pyruvate metabolism. Human and some bacterial mitochondria have the enzyme dl-lactate racemase which enables conversion between d-and l-lactate [15]. For example, Lactobacillus species are common producers of lactate but the ratio of d- and l-lactate production and the direction of conversion is dependent on the species (see [109]). Therefore, impaired colonic metabolism of d-lactate may also be a consequence of bacterial dysbiosis. Colonic flora that is predominated by lactate-producing bacteria and a reduced capacity to convert lactate to short chain fatty acids (SCFA) will result in less SCFA and reduced metabolism of d-lactate [13].

Impaired metabolism of consequential d-lactate accumulation is required for the presentation of d-la [25]. It may be beneficial to categorise patients into lactate accumulators vs non-lactate accumulators. When examining bacterial composition in a sample of SBS patients, Mayeur et al. [110] showed that some patients preferentially accumulated d-lactate compared with l-lactate, suggesting the influence of bacterial composition on d-lactate profiles. The d-lactate accumulators were more likely to experience encephalopathy symptoms. Therefore, multiple factors including increasing bacterial d-lactate production, other endogenous production of d-lactate, nutritional status and altered d-lactate metabolism will effect d-lactate accumulation and the clinical presentation of an episode of d-la.

Proposed neurological mechanisms in d-lactic acidosis

Metabolic acidosis and increased d-lactate levels are synonymous with the presentation of d-la. However, neither condition can predict the development of neurological symptoms. Acidosis can occur without associated neurological symptoms and in reverse, encephalopathy can be present without the accompanying acidosis [13]. Similarly, whilst increased d-lactate levels are required in d-la, the presence of high d-lactate is not the sole cause or determinant of neurological symptoms. Some studies have shown a temporal association between d-lactate level and symptom onset [30] as well as severity [103]. However, this has not always been replicated (e.g., [48]). Other factors must also be required because higher d-lactate levels have been shown in patients with SBS and other gastrointestinal disorders but without concurrent encephalopathy [111]. These inconsistencies suggest that there are several possible direct and indirect mechanisms responsible for the neurological manifestations in d-la (see Fig. 5).
Fig. 5

Proposed mechanisms of gut–brain interaction leading to neurological symptoms observed in d-lactic acidosis. Supporting and opposing evidence for proposed central nervous system (CNS) mechanisms are categorised according to direct effects of d-lactate, indirect effects of d-lactate and other possible mechanisms unrelated to d-lactate. Abbreviations: enteric nervous system (ENS); d-2-hydroxy acid dehydrogenase (d-2-HDH); adenosine triphosphate (ATP); short chain fatty acids (SCFA)

Possible pathways of gut–brain interaction

Three pathways have been proposed to explain how excess d-lactate production in the colon can impact neurological symptoms [112]. Firstly, a colonic environment with lowered pH and high lactate levels can increase intestinal permeability (i.e., aberrations in the mucosal lining of the gastrointestinal tract [113, 114]) and result in systemic inflammation. For example, in ruminants, preliminary findings showed that lactic acidosis (lowered pH and increased faecal lactate) was significantly associated with increased tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α [115]). Translocation of luminal content, including endotoxins, to bodily fluid or tissue may result in an increased immune response and associated neurological sequelae [116].

A second pathway of gut–brain interaction is through neural mechanisms. The bidirectional communication between the enteric nervous system (ENS) and central nervous system (CNS) via the vagus nerve can regulate or dysregulate neurotransmitter production [117]. Bacterial dysbiosis can have both direct and indirect effects on neurotransmitter production and associated neurological symptoms (see [2]). Dahlquist et al. [30] suggest that the effect of d-lactate on neurotransmitter production is one possible explanation for the temporal association between neurological symptoms and d-lactate levels observed during some d-la episodes. Alternatively, d-lactate may act by reducing neuronal energy metabolism as explored below.

Thirdly, excess d-lactate can act centrally in the colon and be absorbed and transported from the gut to the brain through the circulation. Hanstock et al. [112] provided support for this being a primary mode of action finding significant associations between plasma and colon/caecum d-lactate levels in rats. d-Lactate can cross the blood–brain barrier with evidence of d-lactate in both circulating plasma and cerebrospinal fluid in human case reports of d-la [48, 70]. Whilst murine models show reduced uptake of d-lactate compared with l-lactate within the brain [112], slowed metabolism due to low d-2-HDH in the brain may explain the subsequent neurological symptoms [31]. An increased d-lactate level within the brain may exert direct and indirect effects on the CNS.

Proposed central nervous system mechanisms

Direct effect of d-lactate

As a substrate on its own, the direct neurotoxic effect of d-lactate is questionable and unlikely. Intravenous infusion of d-lactate in healthy males did not result in evidence of neurological symptoms [118]. However, at substantially higher levels, as shown in propylene glycol intoxication [43], or in combination with nutritional deficiencies [30], direct neurotoxic effect may be possible. d-Lactate may act as a “false neurotransmitter” [30, p. 145]. Similar fluctuations in biochemistry concurrent with non-specific EEG abnormalities during an adult episode of d-la may support this proposal [74]. However, this remains propositional without further evidence of the precise mechanisms involved.

The neuroprotective properties of d-lactate have also been described raising doubt about the neurotoxicity of d-lactate alone. Castillo et al. [119] showed that both l- and d-lactate can exert neuroprotective properties in a male mouse model of cerebral ischemia (stroke). Unexpectedly, they found that d-lactate showed near equivalent neuroprotective properties (i.e., reduced cell death, less damage observed on behavioural measures) to that shown with l-lactate. Unlike earlier findings, their results indicated that d-lactate can be metabolised by the rodent brain. This raises the possibility that d-lactate may also be able to be metabolised within human cerebral tissue. Notably this evidence is from a stroke animal model and requires investigation before generalising to d-la. It further highlights that d-lactate alone may not be neurotoxic but can play deleterious roles in certain environments when combined with other necessary conditions (e.g., nutritional deficiencies, excess glutamate, or mitochondrial toxicity) to produce the encephalopathy observed in d-la.

It has also been proposed that d-lactate can inhibit l-lactate transportation [120]. Considering that l-lactate can have an inhibitory effect on the adrenal cortex [46], it could be surmised that excess d-lactate may reduce available l-lactate and consequentially increase adreno-cortico activity. Further investigation of this mechanism is warranted. Growing evidence provides support for the role of d-lactate in energy metabolism.

Indirect effects of d-lactate and implications for energy metabolism

Previous research has proposed that d-lactate levels can reduce the pH balance within the brain and impede neurological processes [81]. Low pH can interfere with l-lactate metabolism [42]. However, in animal models it appears that the intraneural acidosis itself is not the primary mechanism at play (see [121]). Similarly in clinical d-la cases, in isolation the acidosis does not directly cause neurological symptoms [32]. Reduced d-lactate is more closely related to clinical improvement than neutralizing pH [39]. Bongaerts et al. [122] also showed that there was not a direct correlation between d-la and acidosis. Rather than intraneural acidosis, the competing role of l- and d-lactate for cerebral metabolism is a preferred explanation [121].

Pairing lactate and glutamate in the first in vivo studies in male rats demonstrated the neuroprotective properties of l-lactate and neurotoxic properties of d-lactate [120]. The mechanism appears to be related to d-lactate’s influence on energy metabolism. When d-lactate was combined with glutamate, larger cortical lesions were produced [120]. This result suggests that d-lactate inhibits transport of l-lactate and prevents l-lactate being used for neuronal energy. Ros et al. [120] findings indicate the compounding neurotoxic effects of d-lactate when combined with excess glutamate. In a comparable murine study, Cassady et al. [121] showed that compared to d-lactate, l-lactate is the preferred substrate for cerebral energy. d-Lactate increased the excretion of amino acids and therefore was unable to act as an efficient metabolic substrate [121]. Variable levels of glutamate and other amino acids may explain why some people experience neurological symptoms and others do not.

Overlap between symptoms of pyruvate metabolism disorders and d-la presentation suggest that d-lactate can interfere with pyruvate metabolism and consequently reduce energy (adenosine triphosphate: ATP) and neurotransmitter production [81, 123]. Lower levels of a primary enzyme required for pyruvate metabolism, pyruvate dehydrogenase, have been found in the healthy cerebellum [124]. An increased d-lactate level that further impedes pyruvate metabolism may explain the predominance of motor/cerebellar symptoms observed in d-la [81]. Pyruvate metabolism abnormalities can interfere with optimal mitochondrial energy production [123]. This has potentially more revealing implications for organs that require greater energy, such as the brain and heart [123]. Ling et al. [123] found that d-lactate was an inadequate metabolic substrate and produced lower respiration in murine brain and heart mitochondria, however equivalent respiration rates were shown in liver tissue. d-Lactate was shown to inhibit l-lactate and pyruvate metabolism in brain and heart tissue.

The inhibition of l-lactate by d-lactate effects memory formation in day old chickens [125, 126]. The impaired metabolism may not only occur in neuronal cells as suggested by Baker and Edwards [125]. Gibbs and Hertz [125] results revealed that the inhibitory action of d-lactate occurs in astrocytes either through an extracellular effect or an intracellular effect impairing pyruvate metabolism in astrocytic mitochondria. Astrocytes play a primary role in maintaining homeostasis in the brain, including regulating glutamate use and removal, neuronal energy, and neuronal pH [127]. Gibbs and Hertz’s [125] results demonstrated that the presence of d-lactate prior to a learning task prevented memory formation, but memory loss was delayed by 20 min when d-lactate was injected 10 min after the learning task. The authors suggest that impaired memory formation in day-old chicks is comparable with the encephalopathy observed in d-la. Therefore, similar mechanisms may be responsible for neurological symptoms in the mammalian brain.

Other possible mechanisms, not d-lactate

Most research has focused on d-lactate’s role in precipitating the neurological symptoms observed in d-la. However, other metabolites and nutritional deficiencies may play causative and/or contributory roles in the encephalopathy observed in this condition. The suggestion to investigate other causative factors has been supported by evidence of increased d-lactate levels in healthy populations [14, 118] and poor direct association between d-lactate level and clinical symptoms [13]. Colonic bacteria can produce several other metabolites (including alcohol, organic acids, amines, mercaptans, and aldehydes) that may exert neurotoxic or neuromodulating effects by influencing neurotransmitter production [128]. Indirectly, higher d-lactate produced by an increased abundance of lactic-acid producing bacteria may reduce the presence of other bacteria that metabolise SCFAs. The reduced availability of SCFA can impact energy metabolism and neurotransmitter production [13]. Currently unidentified organic acids or unknown bacterial metabolites may cause simultaneous neurotoxic effects or impairment in energy metabolism similar to those proposed for d-lactate [20].

As alluded to earlier, the nutritional deficiencies commonly present in SBS populations may exacerbate the clinical presentation [20]. Adequate nutrition is required for brain development with nutrient deficiency or insufficiency having both broad and specific effects on regions of the brain and neural functioning (see Georgieff [129]). Within d-la, nutritional deficiencies may directly impact neurological symptoms or the reduced availability of nutritional substrates may alter d-lactate metabolism, clearance or utilization within the brain. Hudson et al. [40] presented a case report of a patient with d-la and thiamine deficiency where thiamine supplementation effectively resolved neurological symptoms. Interestingly in Wernicke encephalopathy, another condition that presents with acute confusion, delirium and ataxia, thiamine deficiency is responsible for these neurocognitive symptoms that resolve once adequate thiamine levels are restored (see Latt and Dore [130]). Thiamine is required for effective pyruvate metabolism in the brain, particularly within the cerebellum, hence thiamine deficiency may contribute to the encephalopathy seen in some patients with d-la.

Summary

There is more support for the indirect effect of d-lactate interfering with energy metabolism in the CNS compared with the direct neurotoxic effects of d-lactate. Multiple mechanisms may be at play. Evidence of the inhibitory action of d-lactate on utilisation of l-lactate in neural cells and astroglia appears a particularly pertinent mechanism that may explain the neurological symptoms observed in d-la. The relevance of other bacterial metabolites remains in question. The vulnerability of certain individuals related to predisposing genetic, microbial factors or nutritional status that influence d-lactate production and/or adequate excretion/metabolism is likely to contribute to the presentation of d-la.

What is the relevance for ME/CFS?

Whilst d-lactate levels have not been specifically measured in ME/CFS patients, elevated lactate levels within ventricular cerebrospinal fluid have been observed. Significantly higher levels of ventricular lactate were recorded in the ME/CFS patient group compared to both generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and control groups. From this small sample of 16 CFS patients, 10 patients had high ventricular lactate levels, indicated by lactate levels above 2 standard deviations above control mean whereas the remaining 6 participants had equivalent lactate levels to both the GAD and healthy control groups. This distinction between clinical and control groups gives promise for ventricular lactate being a potential biomarker useful for establishing ME/CFS subgroups. Interestingly lactate level was not associated with any other demographic or clinical variables, including severity of illness. Notably, clinical measures of anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep quality and fibromyalgia were used as outcome variables but cognitive symptoms were not measured. More detailed analysis of associations between objective neurocognitive symptoms and ventricular lactate level would be valuable. The authors explained the potential mechanisms related to mitochondrial dysfunction and/or oxidative stress that precede reduced cerebral blood flow which in turn upregulates anaerobic glycolysis and consequential lactate accumulation [131]. Mitochondrial dysfunction or increased oxidative stress may have bacterial and/or viral origins, or be related to underlying gastrointestinal abnormalities.

Gastrointestinal abnormalities

Examination of gastrointestinal abnormalities in ME/CFS indicate some similarities between d-la mechanisms and ME/CFS pathophysiology. Gastrointestinal dysfunction is included as one of the multiple symptoms in ME/CFS. Although not required for a diagnosis, gastrointestinal abnormalities and comorbid irritable bowel syndrome are frequently reported by patients with ME/CFS [132]. ME/CFS patients more frequently experience gastrointestinal symptoms and use corresponding treatments (i.e., antacids, H2 blockers, proton pump inhibitors) compared with healthy controls [133]. Estimates based on a clinical patient group of 1400 patients show recurring gastrointestinal symptoms are experienced by between 80 and 90% of patients [134]. In a sample of 165 CFS patients, Chia and Chia [134] identified evidence of chronic inflammation and enterovirus of the stomach in 95 and 82% of patient biopsies respectively. As the authors suggest, the presence of viral markers in the stomach years after initial infection suggest that chronic viral infections of the stomach may contribute to continued pathophysiology. Viral infections have been proposed to precipitate and perpetuate the bacterial dysbiosis observed in ME/CFS (see review by Navaneetharaja et al. [135]).

Bacterial dysbiosis, antibiotic and probiotic treatment

Evidence of gut dysbiosis has been observed through measurement of fecal microbial composition in ME/CFS populations. Differences between microbial composition of healthy compared with ME/CFS populations have been reported using both culture-based [136, 137] and genetic sequencing methods [3, 138]. Treatment using antibiotic [139], probiotic [140142] or bacteriotherapy [143] have also been used to help modulate the gut microbiota in ME/CFS with somewhat unpredictable and varied success.

Using culture-based methods, we have previously observed a predominance of d-lactate producing bacteria (Enterococcus and Streptococcus species) in ME/CFS patients [4]. These bacteria produce high levels of lactate in vitro, compared with fecal isolates [4] which would support the maintenance of a more acidic colonic environment as one of the mechanisms in d-la that was previously described. This inference about the acidity of the colon in ME/CFS patients has been deduced from in vitro methods only, as we are not aware of any research that has measured colonic pH in this population. Within our prior clinical investigations, responders to a short-term antibiotic treatment for Streptococcus overgrowth was associated with increased vigor on self-reports and selected improvement on objective sleep markers [139]. Extending from these preliminary findings, we are currently examining interactions between microbiota, broader neuropsychological symptoms and d-lactate levels in a clinical pilot evaluating treatment aimed at reducing an overgrowth of Streptococcus in a subgroup of ME/CFS patients. Our group have also compared culture-based fecal assessment and symptom expression within a larger sample (N = 274) of ME/CFS patients [5]. This observational study showed partial support for d-lactate theory in ME/CFS whilst raising questions about sex differences. Significant positive associations between some lactate producing bacteria (Lactobacillus and Streptococcus genera) and ME/CFS symptoms were shown for males but not females [5, 144]. Notably, the relative abundance of genera measured was consistent across the sexes raising questions about the functional differences of microbiota or a differing response to d-lactate for males compared to females. The heterogeneity of presentation and differing response to treatments could have varied explanations. Through the d-lactate lens, a preferential uptake of d-lactate (i.e., d-lactate accumulation as proposed by Mayeur et al. [110]) may contribute to variable symptoms and/or treatment response.

Using sequencing methods, Frémont et al. [3] examined ME/CFS patients and healthy controls from Norway and Belgium. Comparison between patient and control groups revealed no significant difference in bacterial diversity across the groups but differences in composition were observed. When comparing Norwegian patient and control samples there was a significant difference in bacterial composition, with ME/CFS patients showing a lower proportion of genus within the Firmicutes phylum. Interestingly, microbial differences between culturally diverse control samples (i.e., Norwegian compared with Belgian; [3] highlight the importance of considering inter-individual characteristics that may contribute to microbial variation.

Unlike Frémont et al. [3] findings of similar bacterial diversity, Giloteaux et al. [138] reported evidence of decreased diversity of microbial composition and instability in the microbial community in ME/CFS patients compared with controls. Significant differences were not shown when comparing the composition of ME/CFS and control samples at the phylum or genus level. However, at the operational taxonomic unit (OTU) level, proportions significantly differed for 40 OTU’s. For example, the proportion of Faecalibacterium and Bifidobacterium was significantly lower in ME/CFS patients compared with controls. The few studies that have examined fecal microbial composition in ME/CFS have shown some inconsistent results making current interpretation incomplete suggesting that evaluation of subgroups, species-level comparison and measurement of metabolites is required. Replication using a combination of culturing and genetic sequencing methods with larger samples and varied demographics will help ascertain the relevance of d-lactate neurotoxicity in ME/CFS.

Bifidobacterium are high lactate-producing bacteria. Whilst the ratio of D/L lactate vary between species, a lower proportion of Bifidobacterium species raises some doubt about the relevance of d-lactate theory for ME/CFS. Selected Bifidobacterium (Bifidobacterium adolescentis, Bifidobacterium breve) and Lactobacillus (L. plantarum, L. salivarius, L. casei subspecies rhamnosus, L. delbrueckii subsp. Lactis, L. acidophilus, L. fermentum, L. buchneri) species have been identified as predominant in patients with d-la [26, 28, 29, 37, 47, 54, 64, 68, 74, 75, 145]. Similarity between species identified as overgrown in d-la patients and those used in probiotic studies could also generate skepticism about the relevance of d-lactate theory for ME/CFS. Both a small open-label [140] and two randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled studies [141, 142] examining the efficacy of probiotic supplementation in ME/CFS have indicated modest improvements for selected symptoms.

ME/CFS patients supplemented with a lactic-acid producing bacterial strain probiotic showed clinical improvement in self-reported neurological symptoms but no significant changes in fatigue or activity levels [140]. Rao et al.’s (2009) small double-blind RCT used an eight-week probiotic supplementation of Lactobacillus casei to examine changes in emotional symptoms. ME/CFS patients in the treatment group reported a significant reduction in anxiety symptoms compared with controls. No change was recorded for subjective reports of depression. More recently, treatment using Bifidobacterium infantis 35,624 resulted in reduced inflammation in ME/CFS patients, however neurological symptoms were not measured [142]. Preliminary results indicate the need for further investigation of the efficacy of probiotic treatment in ME/CFS. Of relevance to the current hypothesis in question, the d-lactate potential of selected strains used in the aforementioned studies is unknown. Therefore, results from these treatment studies suggest support for gut–brain interaction in ME/CFS but fail to provide additional information about the relevance of d-lactate for this population.

Bacterial overgrowth in the small intestine may also have implications for d-lactate production. Logan et al. [146] hypothesized that SIBO is involved in ME/CFS and related to the immune alterations observed in this condition. SIBO can be a cause of functional short bowel and result in carbohydrate malabsorption. Patients with comorbid SIBO and CFS have shown clinical improvement (on subjective reports of depression, memory/concentration and pain) following antibiotic treatment [101]. d-Lactate levels were not measured in this study but dependent on the type of bacterial overgrowth, excess production of bacterial metabolites (including but not limited to d-lactate) may act centrally, through ENS activation or systemically due to intestinal permeability.

Implications for gut–brain interaction

Systemic inflammation as a consequence of gut mucosal damage and intestinal permeability as the first proposed pathway of gut–brain interaction in d-la has also been suggested as a pathophysiological mechanism in ME/CFS [116]. Initial support for this hypothesis in ME/CFS is reflected by findings of an increased immune response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (as measured by serum IgA and IgM to selected bacteria [116] and clinical improvement after treatment to restore intestinal permeability [113]. Measurement of plasma levels of LPS have been used as an indicator of microbial translocation as they are produced in response to Gram-negative bacteria [138]. Chronic LPS stimulation can be measured by plasma sCD14 and plasma LPS-binding protein (LBP) levels [138]. Recently, additional evidence of intestinal permeability in ME/CFS patients has been shown through significantly higher proportions of plasma LPS, LBP and sCD14 compared with controls [138]. These results support the hypothesis of an inflammatory and/or immune response to microbial translocation that occurs when there is chronic gut mucosal damage and intestinal permeability in ME/CFS patients.

Nutritional deficiencies in ME/CFS

Nutritional status can be impaired for individuals with chronic health conditions and comorbid gastrointestinal abnormalities. Nutritional deficiencies require careful monitoring and treatment for ME/CFS patients [1]. Coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) was shown to be significantly lower in the plasma of ME/CFS patients compared with healthy controls [147]. Treatment that includes nutritional supplementation is frequently employed with CoQ10, magnesium, l-carnitine and S-adenosylmethionine indicated as potentially beneficial for this population [148, 149]. Improvements in cognitive symptoms (mental fatigue, attention, concentration) have been described after supplementation with acetyl-L-carnitine and propionyl-L-carnitine for patients with ME/CFS [150]. Colabamin (B12) injections are proposed to exert effects by reducing oxidative stress [151] but the implications of B12 deficiency may also be relevant when considering the role of B12 in the TCA cycle and lactate metabolism (see [152]). Considering the impact of nutritional deficiencies in d-la, this may interact with the symptom presentation in ME/CFS and the potential for excess d-lactate accumulation or issues with metabolism. Nutritional deficiencies in ME/CFS may have varied origins, including but not limited to, genetic vulnerabilities, stress, infection, inadequate dietary sources and/or impaired metabolism that are factors involved in the etiology of ME/CFS [153]. Dietary modifications appear helpful for some ME/CFS patients (self-report in [154]) and in clinical case reports [148]. Similarly, dietary treatments and reduced carbohydrate intake were common recommendations for d-la patients (see Additional file 1: Table S1). It would be useful to understand the role of diet as a potential moderating factor (precedent, perpetuating or consequential) in bacterial dysbiosis and d-lactate production in ME/CFS patients and whether this varies for moderately impaired compared to severely impaired (i.e., bedbound) patients.

Conclusions

d-la is an acute condition that provides a clear example of the microbe–gut–brain interaction with encephalopathy similar to ME/CFS. Growing evidence supports the proposal of the microbiota–gut–brain interaction in ME/CFS. Specific mechanisms are yet to be confirmed. Our qualitative review of d-la case studies shows considerable overlap between d-la and ME/CFS neurological symptoms. Subclinical levels of d-lactate may be related to fluctuating neurological symptoms in ME/CFS. Our review of the d-la literature has led us to propose the hypothesis that d-la and ME/CFS may lie on a continuum, with notable distinctions related to differences in acute versus chronic presentations (see Fig. 3). Increased prevalence of d-lactate producing bacteria in an ME/CFS sample compared with controls [4] provides the only clear evidence supporting d-lactate theory in ME/CFS. Gut dysbiosis in fecal microbiota, SIBO, and preliminary responses to antibiotics warrant measurement of d-lactate levels in this clinical population.

We acknowledge the complexity and heterogeneity of ME/CFS. Explanation of other pathophysiological mechanisms in ME/CFS (including but not limited to neuro-immune, oxidative stress and inflammatory pathways, [116, 147, 153, 155, 156] was beyond the scope of the current review. We stress that d-lactate theory may be relevant for a select subgroup and if not causative, may be a factor that perpetuates or exacerbates neurological symptoms. To date, there is no research that has measured d-lactate levels in ME/CFS. Improved efficiency and availability of d-lactate measurement in urine and blood samples is needed. Measurement of d-lactate will clarify its role of d-lactate in this population and may generate an avenue for alternative treatments. Subclinical levels of d-lactate in diverse populations suggest that this may be extended to other conditions. The proposed continuum is relevant for general physicians, gastroenterologists, psychiatrists and psychologists alike. Awareness of gastrointestinal origins for neurological presentations may hasten diagnostic accuracy, prevent misdiagnosis and improve treatment outcomes.

Abbreviations

D-la: 

d-lactic acidosis

SBS: 

short bowel syndrome

ME/CFS: 

myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome

d-2-HDH: 

d-2-hydroxy acid dehydrogenase

ENS: 

enteric nervous system

CNS: 

central nervous system

ATP: 

adenosine triphosphate

TCA: 

tricarboxylic acid

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

AW conducted data acquisition and drafted the manuscript. AW, MB and DB were involved in the critical appraisal of case reports and data analysis. All authors contributed to study conception and design, interpretation of data and critical revision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

None required.

Competing interests

Bioscreen (Aust.) Pty Ltd. and Victoria University provided post-graduate scholarship funding to A.W. without restriction on publication. D.B., M.B., H.B. and D.P.L. declare no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All data is provided as Additional material supporting this manuscript.

Funding

Bioscreen (Aust.) Pty Ltd. and Victoria University provided post-graduate scholarship funding to A.W. without restriction on publication.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Psychology Department, College of Health and Biomedicine, Victoria University
(2)
College of Engineering & Science, Victoria University
(3)
Bioscreen Yarraville (Aust) Pty Ltd
(4)
CFS Discovery Clinic

References

  1. Carruthers BM, van de Sande MI, De Meirleir KL, Klimas NG, Broderick G, Mitchell T, et al. Myalgic encephalomyelitis: international consensus criteria. J Intern Med. 2011;270:327–38.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Moloney RD, Desbonnet L, Clarke G, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. The microbiome: stress, health and disease. Mamm Genome. 2014;25:49–74.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Fremont M, Coomans D, Massart S, De Meirleir K. High-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing reveals alterations of intestinal microbiota in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome patients. Anaerobe. 2013;22:50–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Sheedy JR, Wettenhall REH, Ssanlon D, Gooley PR, Lewis DP, McGregor NR, et al. Increased d-lactic acid intestinal bacteria in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. In Vivo (Brooklyn). 2009;23:621–8.Google Scholar
  5. Wallis A, Butt H, Ball M, Lewis DP, Bruck D. Support for the microgenderome: associations in a human clinical population. Sci Rep. 2016;6:19171.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Cryan JF, Dinan TG. Mind-altering microorganisms: the impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;13:701–12.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Rhee SH, Pothoulakis C, Mayer EA. Principles and clinical implications of the brain–gut–enteric microbiota axis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;6:306–14.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Mayer EA. Gut feelings: the emerging biology of gut–brain communication. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12:453–66.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Kowlgi NG, Chhabra L. d-Lactic acidosis: an underrecognized complication of short bowel syndrome. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:476215.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Dunlop RH, Hammond PB. d-Lactic acidosis of ruminants. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1965;119:1109–32.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Oh MS, Phelps KR, Traube M, Barbosa-Saldivar JL, Boxhill C, Carroll HJ. d-Lactic acidosis in a man with the short-bowel syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1979;301:249–52.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Tappenden KA. Pathophysiology of short bowel syndrome: considerations of resected and residual anatomy. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2014;38(1 Suppl):14S–22S.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Petersen C. d-Lactic acidosis. Nutr Clin Pract Off Publ Am Soc Parenter Enter Nutr. 2005;20:634–45.Google Scholar
  14. de Vrese M, Koppenhoefer B, Barth CA. D-lactic acid metabolism after an oral load of dl-lactate. Clin Nutr. 1990;9:23–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Hove H, Mortensen PB. Colonic lactate metabolism and d-lactic acidosis. Dig Dis Sci. 1995;40:320–30.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Uchida H, Yamamoto H, Kisaki Y, Fujino J, Ishimaru Y, Ikeda H. d-Lactic acidosis in short-bowel syndrome managed with antibiotics and probiotics. J Pediatr Surg. 2004;39:634–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Angelet P, Compte MT, Cid JL, Soriano T, Vilaseca J, Bartolomé J. Recurrent episodes of acidosis with encephalopathy in a hemodialysis program patient with short bowel syndrome. Nefrol Publicación Of La Soc Española Nefrol. 2002;22:196–8.Google Scholar
  18. Institute TJB. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual: 2016 edition. Australia; 2016. http://joannabriggs.org/research/critical-appraisal-tools.html.
  19. Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, Moher D, Sox H, Riley D. The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case report guideline development. J Diet Suppl. 2013;10:381–90.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Al Chekakie MO, Al Kotoub ML, Nielsen C. 53-years-old with mental status changes. Compr Ther. 2004;30:87–92.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Azhar SS, Beach RE. d-Lactic acidosis in a diabetic patient with a short bowel. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2002;15:316–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Bongaerts G, Severijnen R, Skladal D, Bakkeren J, Sperl W. Yeast mediates lactic acidosis suppression after antibiotic cocktail treatment in short small bowel? Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005;40:1246–50.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Bueno J, Redecillas S, GarcÍa L, Lara A, Giné C, Molino JA, et al. Duodenal lengthening in short bowel with dilated duodenum. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50:493–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Burski CM, Miller CS, Centor RM. Formerly obese, now thin and confused: the utility of mnemonics in the approach to altered mental status. Am J Med Sci. 2013;346:499–502.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Bustos D, Pons S, Pernas JC, Gonzalez H, Caldarini MI, Ogawa K, et al. Fecal lactate and short bowel syndrome. Dig Dis Sci. 1994;39:2315–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Caldarini MI, Pons S, D’Agostino D, DePaula JA, Greco G, Negri G, et al. Abnormal fecal flora in a patient with short bowel syndrome. An in vitro study on effect of pH on d-lactic acid production. Dig Dis Sci. 1996;41:1649–52.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Carr DB, Shih VE, Richter JM, Martin JB. d-Lactic acidosis simulating a hypothalamic syndrome after bowel bypass. Ann Neurol. 1982;11:195–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Coronado BE, Opal SM, Yoburn DC. Antibiotic-induced d-lactic acidosis. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122:839–42.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Dahhak S, Uhlen S, Mention K, Romond MB, Fontaine M, Gottrand F, et al. d-Lactic acidosis in a child with short bowel syndrome. Arch Pédiatrie Organe Off La Sociéte Française Pédiatrie. 2008;15:145–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Dahlquist NR, Perrault J, Callaway CW, Jones JD. d-Lactic acidosis and encephalopathy after jejunoileostomy: response to overfeeding and to fasting in humans. Mayo Clin Proc. 1984;59:141–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Dahlqvist G, Guillen-Anaya MA, Vincent MF, Thissen JP, Hainaut P. d-Lactic acidosis: an unusual cause of encephalopathy in a patient with short bowel syndrome. Acta Clin Belg. 2013;68:229–31.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Day AS, Abbott GD. d-Lactic acidosis in short bowel syndrome. NZ Med J. 1999;112:277–8.Google Scholar
  33. Flourie B, Messing B, Bismuth E, Etanchaud F, Thuillier F, Rambaud JC. d-Lactic acidosis and encephalopathy in short-bowel syndrome occurring during antibiotic treatment. Gastroentérol Clin Biol. 1990;14:596–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Gigante A, Sardo L, Gasperini ML, Molinaro A, Riggio O, Laviano A, et al. d-Lactic acidosis 25 years after bariatric surgery due to Salmonella enteritidis. Nutrition. 2012;28:108–11.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Godey F, Bouasria A, Ropert M, Diakite M, Le Treut A, Balençon M. Don’t forget to test for d-lactic acid in short bowel syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:3675–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Grünert S, Schmidts M, Kenzel S, Sass JO, Greiner P, Pohl M, et al. d-Lactic acidosis: “right–left disorientation” in laboratory testing: acute encephalopathy in a child with carbohydrate malabsorption syndrome. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010;50:106–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Haan E, Brown G, Bankier A, Mitchell D, Hunt S, Blakey J, et al. Severe illness caused by the products of bacterial metabolism in a child with a short gut. Eur J Pediatr. 1985;144:63–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Halverson J, Gale A, Lazarus C. d-Lactic acidosis and other complications of intestinal bypass surgery. Arch Intern Med. 1984;144:357–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Hingorani AD, Macdougall IC, Browne M, Walker RW, Tomson CR. Successful treatment of acute d-lactate encephalopathy by haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transpl Off Publ Eur Dial Transpl Assoc Eur Ren Assoc. 1993;8:1283–5.Google Scholar
  40. Htyte N, White L, Sandhu G, Jones J, Meisels I. An extreme and life-threatening case of recurrent d-lactate encephalopathy. Nephrol Dial Transpl Off Publ Eur Dial Transpl Assoc Eur Ren Assoc. 2011;26:1432–5.Google Scholar
  41. Hudson M, Pocknee R, Mowat NA. d-Lactic acidosis in short bowel syndrome—an examination of possible mechanisms. Q J Med. 1990;74:157–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. James PD, Black D, Kuper A, Saibil F. d-Lactic acidosis and ataxia in a man with Crohn disease. C Can Med Assoc J. 2010;182:276–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Jorens PG, Demey HE, Schepens PJC, Coucke V, Verpooten GA, Couttenye MM, et al. Unusual d-lactic acid acidosis from propylene glycol metabolism in overdose. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol. 2004;42:163–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Jover R, León J, Palazón J, Domínguez J. d-Lactic acidosis associated with use of medium-chain triglycerides. Lancet. 1995;346:314.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Kadakia SC. d-Lactic acidosis in a patient with jejunoileal bypass. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1995;20:154–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Kamar M, Raziel A, Susmallian S, Kyzer S, Charuzi I. d-Lactic acidosis in a patient after subtotal colectomy. Isr Med Assoc J IMAJ. 2003;5:891–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Kaneko T, Bando Y, Kurihara H, Satomi K, Nonoyama K, Matsuura N. Fecal microflora in a patient with short-bowel syndrome and identification of dominant Lacto bacilli. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:3181–5.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Karton M, Rettmer RL, Lipkin EW. Effect of parenteral nutrition and enteral feeding on d-lactic acidosis in a patient with short bowel. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1987;11:586–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Koletzko S, Waag KL, Koletzko B. Recurrent d-lactic acidosis with encephalopathy in a boy with short-bowel syndrome]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1994;119:458–62.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Lalive PH, Hadengue A, Mensi N, Burkhard PR. Recurrent encephalopathy after small bowel resection. Implication of d-lactate. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2001;157:679–81.Google Scholar
  51. Ludvigsen CW, Thurn JR, Pierpont GL, Eckfeldt JH. Kinetic enzymic assay for d(−)-lactate, with use of a centrifugal analyzer. Clin Chem. 1983;29:1823–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Munakata S, Arakawa C, Kohira R, Fujita Y, Fuchigami T, Mugishima H. A case of d-lactic acid encephalopathy associated with use of probiotics. Brain Dev. 2010;32:691–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Mason PD. Metabolic acidosis due to d-lactate. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986;292:1105–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Mayne AJ, Handy DJ, Preece MA, George RH, Booth IW. Dietary management of d-lactic acidosis in short bowel syndrome. Arch Dis Child. 1990;65:229–31.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. McNeil A, Walmsley RN. A case of combined d-lactate and renal tubular acidosis. Clin Chem. 1984;30:1722.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Mendu DR, Fleisher M, McCash SI, Pessin MS, Ramanathan LV. d-Lactic acidosis mediated neuronal encephalopathy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia patient: an under diagnosis. Clin Chim Acta. 2015;441:90–1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Modi BP, Langer M, Duggan C, Kim HB, Jaksic T. Serial transverse enteroplasty for management of refractory d-lactic acidosis in short-bowel syndrome. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006;43:395–7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Narula RK, El Shafei A, Ramaiah D, Schmitz PG. d-Lactic acidosis 23 years after jejuno-ileal bypass. Am J Kidney Dis Off J Natl Kidney Found. 2000;36:E9–E9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Nghiem CH, Bui HD, Chaney RH. An unusual cause of d-lactic acidosis. West J Med. 1988;148:332–4.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Obando Pacheco P, Navas López VM, Yahyaoui Macías R, Sierra Salinas C. d-Lactic acidosis in a ten months old infant with short bowel syndrome: early suspicion equals early treatment. An Pediatr (Barcelona, Spain 2003). 2015;1:56–7.Google Scholar
  61. Oh M, Uribarri J, Carroll H. Electrolyte case vignette: a case of unusual organic acidosis. Am J Kidney Dis. 1988;11:80–2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Uribarri J, Oh MS, Carroll HJ. d-Lactic acidosis. A review of clinical presentation, biochemical features, and pathophysiologic mechanisms. Medicine (Baltimore). 1998;77:73–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Park B, Fichadia U, Shah A. A 3-year-old boy with ataxia. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2015;31:220–1.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Perlmutter DH, Boyle JT, Campos JM, Egler JM, Watkins JB. d-Lactic acidosis in children: an unusual metabolic complication of small bowel resection. J Pediatr. 1983;102:234–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Puwanant M, Mo-Suwan L, Patrapinyokul S. Recurrent d-lactic acidosis in a child with short bowel syndrome. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2005;14:195–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Ramakrishnan T, Stokes P. Beneficial effects of fasting and low carbohydrate diet in d-lactic acidosis associated with short-bowel syndrome. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1985;9:361–3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Rosenthal P, Pesce M. Long-term monitoring of d-lactic acidosis in a child. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1985;4:674–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Satoh T, Narisawa K, Konno T, Katoh T, Fujiyama J, Tomoe A, et al. d-Lactic acidosis in two patients with short bowel syndrome: bacteriological analyses of the fecal flora. Eur J Pediatr. 1982;138:324–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Schoorel EP, Giesberts MA, Blom W, van Gelderen HH. d-Lactic acidosis in a boy with short bowel syndrome. Arch Dis Child. 1980;55:810–2.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Scully TB, Kraft SC, Carr WC, Harig JM. d-Lactate-associated encephalopathy after massive small-bowel resection. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1989;11:448–51.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Sela BA, Zlotnik J, Masos T, Danieli J, Mazia-Beni S, Jonas A. d-Lactic acidosis in short bowel syndrome. Harefuah. 1999;136:347.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Singh PM, Borle A, Trikha A. Diagnostic dilemma: rare case of recurrent d-lactic acidosis leading to recurrent acute cardiac failure. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwanica Off J Taiwan Soc Anesthesiol. 2013;51:94–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Soler Palacín P, Garzón Lorenzo P, Castilla Fernández Y, Arranz Amo JA, Scheider S, Tormo Carnicé R, et al. d-Lactic acidosis in an 11-year-old patient with short bowel syndrome. An Pediatr (Barcelona, Spain 2003). 2006;64:385–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Spillane K, Nagendran K, Prior PF, Tabaqchali S, Wilks M. Serial electroencephalograms in a patient with d-lactic acidosis. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;91:403–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Stolberg L, Rolfe R, Gitlin N, Merritt J, Mann L Jr, Linder J, et al. d-Lactic acidosis due to abnormal gut flora: diagnosis and treatment of two cases. N Engl J Med. 1982;306:1344–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Takahashi K, Terashima H, Kohno K, Ohkohchi N. A stand-alone synbiotic treatment for the prevention of d-lactic acidosis in short bowel syndrome. Int Surg. 2013;98:110–3.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Tapia GMJ, Olveira G, Bravo UM, Colomo RN, Fernández GJC. d-Lactic acidosis secondary to short bowel syndrome]. Nutr Hosp. 2010;25:864–6.Google Scholar
  78. Traube M, Bock J, Boyer JL. d-Lactic acidosis after jejunoileal bypass. N Engl J Med. 1982;307:1027.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Traube M, Bock JL, Boyer JL. d-Lactic acidosis after jejunoileal bypass: identification of organic anions by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Ann Intern Med. 1983;98:171–3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  80. Tsao Y-T, Tsai W-C, Yang S-P. A life-threatening double gap metabolic acidosis. Am J Emerg Med. 2008;26:385.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Vella A, Farrugia G. d-Lactic acidosis: pathologic consequence of saprophytism. Mayo Clin Proc. 1998;73:451–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Zhang DL, Jiang ZW, Jiang J, Cao B, Li JS. d-Lactic acidosis secondary to short bowel syndrome. Postgrad Med J. 2003;79:110–2.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Gurevitch J, Sela B, Jonas A, Golan H, Yahav Y, Passwell JH. d-Lactic acidosis: a treatable encephalopathy in pediatric patients. Acta Paediatr (Oslo, Norw 1992). 1993;82:119–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Carruthers BM, Van de Sande MI. Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: a clinical case definition and guidelines for medical practitioners: an overview of the canadian consensus document. The National Library of Canada Cataloguing-in-Publication Data; 2005.Google Scholar
  85. Brenu E, van Driel M, Staines D, Ashton K, Ramos S, Keane J, et al. Immunological abnormalities as potential biomarkers in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis. J Transl Med. 2011;9:81.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Maes M, Ringel K, Kubera M, Anderson G, Morris G, Galecki P, et al. In myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, increased autoimmune activity against 5-HT is associated with immuno-inflammatory pathways and bacterial translocation. J Affect Disord. 2013;150:223–30.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Jason LA, Brown A, Clyne E, Bartgis L, Evans M, Brown M. Contrasting case definitions for chronic fatigue syndrome, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and myalgic encephalomyelitis. Eval Heal Prof. 2012;35:280–304.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  88. Hammarberg A, Hagekull B. Changes in externalizing and internalizing behaviours over a school-year: differences between 6-year-old boys and girls. Infant Child Dev. 2006;15:123–37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  89. Stacpoole PW, Wright EC, Baumgartner TG, Bersin RM, Buchalter S, Curry SH, et al. Natural history and course of acquired lactic acidosis in adults. Am J Med. 2016;97:47–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. Goraya N, Wesson DE. Overview of acid–base physiology. In: Wesson DE, editor. Metabolic acidosis. A guide to clinical assessment and management. Springer: New York; 2016. p. 1–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. He J, Hollingsworth KG, Newton JL, Blamire AM. Cerebral vascular control is associated with skeletal muscle pH in chronic fatigue syndrome patients both at rest and during dynamic stimulation. NeuroImage Clin. 2013;2:168–73.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. Nixon PG. Effort syndrome: hyperventilation and reduction of anaerobic threshold. Biofeedback Self Regul. 1994;19:155–69.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. Jones DEJ, Hollingsworth KG, Jakovljevic DG, Fattakhova G, Pairman J, Blamire AM, et al. Loss of capacity to recover from acidosis on repeat exercise in chronic fatigue syndrome: a case–control study. Eur J Clin Invest. 2012;42:186–94.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Ewaschuk JB, Naylor JM, Palmer R, Whiting SJ, Zello GA. d-Lactate production and excretion in diarrheic calves. J Vet Intern Med. 2004;18:744–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. Ewaschuk JB, Naylor JM, Zello GA. d-Lactate in human and ruminant metabolism. J Nutr. 2005;135:1619–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Hasegawa H, Fukushima T, Lee J-A, Tsukamoto K, Moriya K, Ono Y, et al. Determination of serum d-lactic and l-lactic acids in normal subjects and diabetic patients by column-switching HPLC with pre-column fluorescence derivatization. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2003;377:886–91.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Thornalley PJ, McLellan AC, Lo TW, Benn J, Sönksen PH. Negative association between erythrocyte reduced glutathione concentration and diabetic complications. Clin Sci (London, Engl 1979). 1996;91:575–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  98. Altschule MD, Henneman DH, Holliday P, Goncz RM. Carbohydrate metabolism in brain disease. VI. Lactate metabolism after infusion of sodium d-lactate in manic-depressive and schizophrenic psychoses. AMA. Arch Intern Med. 1956;98:35–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  99. Craig C. Mitoprotective dietary approaches for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: caloric restriction, fasting, and ketogenic diets. Med Hypotheses. 2015;85:690–3.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  100. Trabal J, Leyes P, Fernández-Solá J, Forga M, Fernández-Huerta J. Patterns of food avoidance in chronic fatigue syndrome: is there a case for dietary recommendations? Nutr Hosp. 2012;27:659–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Pimentel M, Chow EJ, Lin HC. Eradication of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth reduces symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:3503–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  102. Lu J, Zello GA, Randell E, Adeli K, Krahn J, Meng QH. Closing the anion gap: contribution of d-lactate to diabetic ketoacidosis. Clin Chim Acta. 2011;412:286–91.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  103. Bongaerts G, Bakkeren J, Severijnen R, Sperl W, Willems H, Naber T, et al. Lactobacilli and acidosis in children with short small bowel. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2000;30:288–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  104. Lord LM, Schaffner R, DeCross AJ, Sax HC. Management of the patient with short bowel syndrome. AACN Clin Issues. 2000;11:604–18.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  105. Kholostova VV, Dronov AF, Smirnov AN, Zalikhin DV, Mannanov AG, Ermolenko EI, et al. Surgical treatment of Hirschprung’s disease total form in children. Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2014;7:44–54.Google Scholar
  106. Adeva-Andany M, López-Ojén M, Funcasta-Calderón R, Ameneiros-Rodríguez E, Donapetry-García C, Vila-Altesor M, et al. Comprehensive review on lactate metabolism in human health. Mitochondrion. 2014;17:76–100.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  107. Tubbs PK. The metabolism of d-alpha-hydroxy acids in animal tissues. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1965;119:920–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  108. Ruan P, Gong Z-J, Zhang Q-R. Changes of plasma d(−)-lactate, diamine oxidase and endotoxin in patients with liver cirrhosis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int HBPD INT. 2004;3:58–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. Goffin P, Deghorain M, Mainardi J-L, Tytgat I, Champomier-Vergès M-C, Kleerebezem M, et al. Lactate racemization as a rescue pathway for supplying d-lactate to the cell wall biosynthesis machinery in Lactobacillus plantarum. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:6750–61.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  110. Mayeur C, Gratadoux JJ, Bridonneau C, Chegdani F, Larroque B, Kapel N, et al. Faecal d/l lactate ratio is a metabolic signature of microbiota imbalance in patients with short bowel syndrome. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e54335.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  111. Thurn JR, Pierpont GL, Ludvigsen CW, Eckfeldt JH. d-Lactate encephalopathy. Am J Med. 1985;79:717–21.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  112. Hanstock TL, Mallet PE, Clayton EH. Increased plasma d-lactic acid associated with impaired memory in rats. Physiol Behav. 2010;101:653–9.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  113. Maes M, Leunis JC. Normalization of leaky gut in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is accompanied by a clinical improvement: effects of age, duration of illness and the translocation of LPS from Gram-negative bacteria. Neuroendocrinol Lett. 2008;29:101–9.Google Scholar
  114. Maes M, Mihaylova I, Kubera M, Leunis JC, Twisk FNM, Geffard M. IgM-mediated autoimmune responses directed against anchorage epitopes are greater in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) than in major depression. Metab Brain Dis. 2012;27:415–23.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  115. Clayton EH, Jones GPD. Preliminary observations of tumour necrosis factor-alpha in the faeces of sheep following acute lactic acidosis. Aust J Agric Res. 2001;52:869–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  116. Maes M, Mihaylova I, Leunis JC. Increased serum IgA and IgM against LPS of enterobacteria in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS): indication for the involvement of Gram-negative enterobacteria in the etiology of CFS and for the presence of an increased gut–intestinal permeability. J Affect Disord. 2007;99:237–40.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  117. Grenham S, Clarke G, Cryan JF, Dinan TG. Brain–gut–microbe communication in health and disease. Front Physiol. 2011;2:94.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  118. Oh MS, Uribarri J, Alveranga D, Lazar I, Bazilinski N, Carroll HJ. Metabolic utilization and renal handling of d-lactate in men. Metabolism. 1985;34:621–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  119. Castillo X, Rosafio K, Wyss MT, Drandarov K, Buck A, Pellerin L, et al. A probable dual mode of action for both l- and d-lactate neuroprotection in cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2015;35:1561–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  120. Ros J, Pecinska N, Alessandri B, Landolt H, Fillenz M. Lactate reduces glutamate-induced neurotoxicity in rat cortex. J Neurosci Res. 2001;66:790–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  121. Cassady CJ, Phillis JW, O’Regan MH. Further studies on the effects of topical lactate on amino acid efflux from the ischemic rat cortex. Brain Res. 2001;901:30–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  122. Bongaerts G, Tolboom J, Naber T, Bakkeren J, Severijnen R, Willems H. d-Lactic acidemia and aciduria in pediatric and adult patients with short bowel syndrome. Clin Chem. 1995;41:107–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. Ling B, Peng F, Alcorn J, Bandy B, Zello GA, Lohmann K. d-Lactate altered mitochondrial energy production in rat brain and heart but not liver. Nutr Metab. 2012;9:6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  124. Cross SA, Callaway CW. d-Lactic acidosis and selected cerebellar ataxias. Mayo Clin Proc. 1984;59:202–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  125. Baker KD, Edwards TM. d-Lactate inhibition of memory in a single trial discrimination avoidance task in the young chick. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2007;88:269–76.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  126. Gibbs ME, Hertz L. Inhibition of astrocytic energy metabolism by d-lactate exposure impairs memory. Neurochem Int. 2008;52:1012–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  127. Bélanger M. The role of astroglia in neuroprotection. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2009;11:281–95.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  128. Halperin ML, Kamel KS. d-Lactic acidosis: turning sugar into acids in the gastrointestinal tract. Kidney Int. 1996;49:1–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  129. Georgieff MK. Nutrition and the developing brain: nutrient priorities and measurement. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85:614S–20S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  130. Latt N, Dore G. Thiamine in the treatment of Wernicke encephalopathy in patients with alcohol use disorders. Intern Med J. 2014;44:911–5.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  131. Matthew S, Mao X, Keegan K, Levine S, Smith E, Heier L, et al. Ventricular cerebrospinal fluid lactate is increased in chronic fatigue syndrome compared to generalized anxiety disorder: an in vivo. NMR Biomed. 2009;22:251–258.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  132. Aaron LA, Burke MM, Buchwald D. Overlapping conditions among patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, fibromyalgia, and temporomandibular disorder. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:221–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  133. Jones JF, Nisenbaum R, Reeves WC. Medication use by persons with chronic fatigue syndrome: results of a randomized telephone survey in Wichita, Kansas. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:74.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  134. Chia JK, Chia AY. Chronic fatigue syndrome is associated with chronic enterovirus infection of the stomach. J Clin Pathol. 2007;61:43–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  135. Navaneetharaja N, Griffiths V, Wileman T, Carding S. A role for the intestinal microbiota and virome in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS)? J Clin Med. 2016;5:55.PubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  136. Butt HL, Dunstan RH, McGregor NR, Roberts TK, Harrison TL, Granger JR. Faecal microbial growth inhibition in chronic fatigue/pain patients. In: Proceedings of the AHMF international clinical and scientific conference. Sydney; 1998.Google Scholar
  137. Evengård B, Nord CE, Sullivan Å. P1239 patients with chronic fatigue syndrome have higher numbers of anaerobic bacteria in the intestine compared to healthy subjects. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007;29:S340.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  138. Giloteaux L, Goodrich JK, Walters WA, Levine SM, Ley RE, Hanson MR. Reduced diversity and altered composition of the gut microbiome in individuals with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Microbiome. 2016;4:30.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  139. Jackson ML, Butt H, Ball M, Lewis DP, Bruck D. Sleep quality and the treatment of intestinal microbiota imbalance in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: a pilot study. Sleep Sci. 2015;8:124–33.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  140. Sullivan A, Nord CE, Evengård B. Effect of supplement with lactic-acid producing bacteria on fatigue and physical activity in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Nutr J. 2009;8:4.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  141. Rao AV, Bested AC, Beaulne TM, Katzman MA, Iorio C, Berardi JM, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study of a probiotic in emotional symptoms of chronic fatigue syndrome. Gut Pathog. 2009;1:6.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  142. Groeger D, O’Mahony L, Murphy EF, Bourke JF, Dinan TG, Kiely B, et al. Bifidobacterium infantis 35,624 modulates host inflammatory processes beyond the gut. Gut Microbes. 2013;4:325–39.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  143. Borody TJ, Nowak A, Finlayson S. The GI microbiome and its role in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: a summary of bacteriotherapy. J Australas Coll Nutr Environ Med. 2012;31:3.Google Scholar
  144. Wallis A, Butt H, Ball M, Lewis DP, Bruck D. Support for the microgenderome invites enquiry into sex differences. Gut Microbes. 2017;8:46–52.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  145. Singh A, Petrides JS, Gold PW, Chrousos GP, Deuster PA. Differential hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis reactivity to psychological and physical stress. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84:1944–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. Logan AC, Rao AV, Irani D. Chronic fatigue syndrome: lactic acid bacteria may be of therapeutic value. Med Hypotheses. 2003;60:915–23.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  147. Maes M, Mihaylova I, Kubera M, Uytterhoeven M, Vrydags N, Bosmans E. Coenzyme Q10 deficiency in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) is related to fatigue, autonomic and neurocognitive symptoms and is another risk factor explaining the early mortality in ME/CFS due to cardiovascular disorder. Neuroendocrinol Lett. 2009;30:470–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  148. Myhill S, Booth NE, McLaren-Howard J. Targeting mitochondrial dysfunction in the treatment of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS)—a clinical audit. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2013;6:1–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. Porter NS, Jason LA, Boulton A, Bothne N, Coleman B. Alternative medical interventions used in the treatment and management of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia. J Altern Complement Med. 2010;16:235–49.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  150. Vermeulen RCW, Scholte HR. Exploratory open label, randomized study of acetyl- and propionylcarnitine in chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychosom Med. 2004;66:276–82.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  151. Pall ML. Cobalamin used in chronic fatigue syndrome therapy is a nitric oxide scavenger. J Chronic Fatigue Syndr. 2001;8:39–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  152. Mahmood L. The metabolic processes of folic acid and Vitamin B12 deficiency. J Heal Res Rev. 2014;1:5–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  153. Wallis A, Jackson ML, Ball M, Lewis DP, Bruck D. Sleep, cognitive and mood symptoms in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: examining the role of the gut–brain axis. In: Cooper CL, Quick JC, editors. The handbook of stress and health. A guide to research and practice. 1st ed. West Sussex: Wiley; 2017.Google Scholar
  154. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (or encephalopathy) diagnosis and management of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (or encephalopathy) in adults and children. London: National Collaborating Centre for Primary Care Royal College of General Practitioners; 2007.Google Scholar
  155. Hornig M, Montoya JG, Klimas NG, Levine S, Felsenstein D, Bateman L, et al. Distinct plasma immune signatures in ME/CFS are present early in the course of illness. Sci Adv. 2015;1:e1400121.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  156. Morris G, Berk M, Galecki P, Walder K, Maes M. The neuro-immune pathophysiology of central and peripheral fatigue in systemic immune-inflammatory and neuro-immune diseases. Mol Neurobiol. 2015;53:1195–219.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017