Open Access

A novel cytoprotective peptide protects mesenchymal stem cells against mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis induced by starvation via Nrf2/Sirt3/FoxO3a pathway

Contributed equally
Journal of Translational Medicine201715:33

DOI: 10.1186/s12967-017-1144-5

Received: 12 December 2016

Accepted: 8 February 2017

Published: 15 February 2017

Abstract

Background

Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) has been widely explored in the past decade as a cell-based treatment for various diseases. However, poor survival of adaptively transferred MSCs limits their clinical therapeutic potentials, which is largely ascribed to the nutrient starvation. In this study, we determined whether a novel kidney protective peptide CHBP could protect MSCs against starvation and invested the underlying mechanisms.

Methods

MSCs were subjected to serum deprivation and CHBP of graded concentrations was administered. Cell viability and apoptosis were detected by CCK-8, Annexin V/PI assay and Hoechst staining. ROS generation, mitochondrial membrane potential indicated by JC-1 and mitochondrial mass were measured by flow cytometry. The location of cytochrome c within cells was observed under fluorescence microscopy. Expressions of Nrf2, Sirt3, and FoxO3a were analyzed by western blot. In addition, preconditioning MSCs with CHBP was applied to test the possible protection against starvation. Finally, the effect of CHBP on the differentiation and self-renewal capacity of MSCs was also examined.

Results

CHBP improved cell viability and suppressed apoptosis in a dose dependent manner. Starvation resulted in the mitochondrial dysfunction and treatment of CHBP could alleviate mitochondrial stress by diminishing oxidative injury of ROS, restoring mitochondrial membrane potential and maintaining mitochondrial membrane integrity. Importantly, Nrf2/Sirt3/FoxO3a pathway was activated by CHBP and Sirt3 knockdown partially abolished the protection of CHBP. Moreover, MSCs pretreated with CHBP were more resistant to starvation. Under normal condition, CHBP exerted little effects on the differential and self-renewal capacity of MSCs.

Conclusions

The present study demonstrated the efficient protection of CHBP upon MSCs against starvation-induced mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis and indicated possible involvement of Nrf2/Sirt3/FoxO3a pathway in the protective effect.

Keywords

Cyclic helix B peptide Mesenchymal stem cell Starvation Nrf2 Sirt3 FoxO3a

Background

Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) is a common adult stem cell originating from the mesoderm and characterized by its multi-potentiality and unique immune-modulatory property [1, 2]. Besides their classic tri-lineage differentiation into adipocytes, osteoblasts, and chondrocytes, it is reported that MSCs can also differentiate into ectodermal and endodermal cells, such as endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells, hepatocytes, and cardiomyocytes [3, 4]. Importantly, as adult stem cells, MSCs can be easily isolated and feasibly expanded ex vivo [5]. In this respect, MSC is considered as an ideal cell-based therapy.

An increasing body of evidence has demonstrated that MSCs hold great promise for the therapy of tissue injuries, inflammatory diseases, and allograft rejections [612]. However, in most cases the survival rate of adoptively transferred MSCs is poor, which significantly hampers the treatment efficiency [1315]. Although the therapeutic capability of MSCs, in the settings of some diseases, might rely on regulating inflammation and enhancing endogenous tissue repair [16, 17], longer survival and retention time would optimize MSC-based therapy efficacies. The reason that transplanted MSCs are short-lived could be largely ascribed to the complex microenvironments. After adoptive transfer, MSCs will encounter with various undesirable factors including nutrient deprivation, oxidative stress, inflammation reactions and so on, all of which could decrease the cell viability and thereby compromise their therapeutic activities [1821]. Nutrient starvation is one of the major obstacles confronted by engrafted MSCs, especially within injured tissues. In spite that appropriate preconditioning with hypoxia and serum starvation could augment the cellular viability, prolonged exposure to starvation will be a lethal disaster for MSCs [22, 23]. Therefore, improving survival of MSCs under starvation conditions is of vital importance for the MSC-based cell therapies.

Cyclic helix B peptide (CHBP) is a novel erythropoietin-derived peptide synthesized by our group recently with prominent renoprotective effect [2427]. Our previous studies have demonstrated that CHBP could alleviate kidney ischemia–reperfusion injury through inhibiting apoptosis as well as inflammatory responses [25, 26]. However, whether CHBP is able to exert cytoprotection in the background of starvation remains elusive. In the present study, we adopted the serum deprivation strategy to mimic the starvation during MSCs’ administration. Treatment of CHBP significantly improved mitochondrial dysfunction, prevented apoptosis and prolonged cell survival. Moreover, we revealed that CHBP exerted its cytoprotection through Nrf2/Sirt3/FoxO3a pathway. This research provided a novel pharmacological recognition of CHBP for the cytoprotective effects and suggested CHBP as a promising adjuvant agent in cell-based treatments.

Methods

Cell culture and treatment

Primary bone marrow-derived MSCs of C57/BL6 mice were purchased from Cyagen Biosciences Inc. (Guangzhou, China). MSCs were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium/F12 (DMEM/F12) medium with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 2 mmol/L glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 mg/ml streptomycin at 37 °C in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2. All experiments were performed on MSCs from 6th to 10th passages. Apoptosis was induced by serum deprivation. Briefly, after MSCs were seeded into 6-well plates or 96-well plates, the culture medium was replaced with serum-free DMEM low glucose with or without CHBP at various concentrations (0.1, 1, 10 nmol/L). MSCs maintained in complete medium were used as the normal control. To exclude a nonspecific impact of peptide itself, a scrambled control peptide (LSEARNQSEL) was also used. Both CHBP and scrambled peptide were dissolved in PBS.

Cell viability

Cell viability in response to starvation was examined by Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8, Dojindo, Shanghai, China). Cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 1 × 104 cells/well. After different treatment, 10ul of CCK-8 reagent was added to each well of the 96-well plates and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. The absorbance of each sample at 450 nm was measured by a microplate reader.

Meanwhile, trypan blue staining was used to distinguish cell death. MSCs were seeded in 6-well plates 1 × 106 cells/well cells and treated differently. Then non-adherent and adherent cells were harvested and resuspended in 1 ml complete medium. 5 μl of these cell suspensions were aspirated and mixed with an equal volume of 0.4% trypan blue solution, and finally counted using a hemacytometer under microscope.

Annexin V/PI assay

To further explore the protection of CHBP against starvation, cell death was analyzed using Annexin V–FITC/PI apoptosis detection kit (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China). According to the manufacturer’s protocol, cells were harvested and resuspended in 100 μl binding buffer mixed with 5 μl Annexin V-FITC reagent and 5 μl PI reagent. After incubation for 15 min at room temperature in the dark, another 400 μl binding buffer was added, and cells were measured by flow cytometry (Beckman Coulter). Data was analyzed with FlowJo software.

Hoechst staining

Hoechst 33258 (Beyotime, Nanjing, China) was used for to examine the morphological changes of apoptosis. MSCs with different treatment were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 2 h and subsequently stained with Hoechst 33258 reagent for 30 min at room temperature. Nuclear alterations were then observed under fluorescence microscopy. Fragmentation and condensation of the nucleus were recognized as the characteristics of apoptotic cells.

Reactive oxygen species (ROS), mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), and mitochondrial mass detection

Briefly, for quantitative detection of mitochondria-derived ROS, MMP and mitochondrial mass, cells were incubated with MitoSOX reagent (2.5 mmol/L, Invitrogen), JC-1 reagent (5 mg/mL, Beyotime), and MitoRed (50 nmol/L, KeyGEN Biotech) for 30 min at 37 °C. Subsequently, MSCs were collected, washed with PBS and then analyzed by flow cytometry.

Immunofluorescence staining

Cells were first incubated with 50 nmol/L MitoRed for 30 min at 37 °C. To examine cytochrome c location, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 2 h, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 for 5 min. After blocked with 10% bovine serum albumin for 1 h at room temperature, cells were incubated with primary antibody against cytochrome c (1:500, Beyotime) overnight at 4 °C, and subsequently incubated with FITC-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:1000, Beyotime). Locations of mitochondria and cytochrome c were visualized under fluorescence microscopy.

Knockdown of Sirt3 by small interfering RNA (siRNA)

For knockdown of Sirt3 in vitro, siRNA targeting Sirt3 (ThermoFisher Scientific, AM16708) was used. The siRNA was transfected into MSCs using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen) according the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, MSCs were seeded in 6-well plates with serum-free DMEM medium, and then subjected to the mixture of siRNA and Lipofectamine 3000 reagent. After incubation for 6 h, medium was changed and the cells were harvested for the further experiments.

Western blotting analysis

Briefly, total proteins from MSCs were separated on SDS–polyacrylamide gels, transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes, blocked and incubated with anti-Nrf2, anti-Sirt3, anti-total FoxO3a, and phosphorylated-FoxO3a (p-FoxO3a, Ser253 and Ser318/321) antibodies (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology) and anti-tubulin antibodies (1:10000, Abcam) overnight at 4 °C. Membranes were then washed 3 times and incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. The semi-quantitative analysis (AlphaView Software 3.3, Cell Biosciences, Inc.) results were expressed as the optical volume densities (OD × mm2) normalized to tubulin.

MSC differentiation

For osteogenic differentiation, MSCs were cultured in osteogenic differentiation medium containing 10% FBS, 0.2 mmol/L ascorbate, 10 mmol/L b-glycerolphosphate, 0.1 mmol/L dexamethasone, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 mg/ml streptomycin (all from Cyagen, Guangzhou, China) at the confluence of 60–70%. Osteogenic medium was changed every 3 days. After induction for 21 days, cells were fixed by 4% formaldehyde, and then stained with Alizarin Red S to assess calcium deposits.

MSCs at 100% confluence were used for adipogenic differentiation. Cells were first cultured in adipogenic induction medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 1 mmol/L dexamethasone, 100 mmol/L indomethacin, 0.5 mmol/L methyisobutylxanthine, 10 mmol/L insulin, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 mg/ml streptomycin for 3 days, followed by cultivating in maintenance medium consisting of 10% FBS, 5 mg/ml insulin, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 mg/ml streptomycin for 24 h. After 4 cycles of induction/maintenance exchange, MSCs were cultured in maintenance medium for 6 days and finally fixed by 4% formaldehyde. Lipid droplets were examined using oil red O solution staining.

Colony forming unit (CFU) assay

To test the self-renewal capacity of CHBP-treated MSCs, CFU assay was conducted. In brief, MSCs were plated in 10 cm dishes at a density of 50 cells/cm2 and cultured in normal complete medium in the presence or absence of 10 nM CHBP for 14 days, with medium exchange every 3 days. At the end of cultivation, cells were washed with PBS, fixed by 4% formaldehyde for 30 min and stained with 2% crystal violet for 10 min. Subsequently, cells were washed with PBS for 3 times and left drying. Colonies consisting of more than 50 cells were defined as CFUs and were counted.

Statistical analysis

All data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student’s t test or one-way ANOVA by SPSS 19.0 software (SPSS Inc., Armonk, NY, USA). P < 0.05 was recognized as statistically significant.

Results

CHBP preserved the viability of MSCs during starvation

To examine the possible protection of CHBP, cell viability of nutrient-starved MSCs treated with different concentrations of CHBP (0, 0.1, 1, 10 nmol/L) was analyzed using CCK-8 assay. Figure 1a exhibited the dynamics of cell viability during starvation. Serum deprivation, just as expected, caused significant decrease of cell viability compared with normal control. CHBP were able to partially alleviate the decrease of viability in a dose-dependent manner, and the protective effect was observed for up to 72 h of starvation. We observed that starvation resulted in the detachment of cells, which usually represented cell death. Therefore, we further used Trypan blue staining to determine loss of cell membrane integrity and found that CHBP could obviously inhibit starvation-induced cell death (Fig. 1b). To exclude a possible protective effect of peptide molecule itself, a scrambled peptide was used and identified no detectable protection. To examine whether CHBP itself has an effect on the proliferation of MSCs, we subjected MSCs to CHBP at various concentrations in complete medium. As shown in Fig. 1c, CHBP had no detectable impact on the proliferation of MSCs at the concentration used in the present study. Collectively, our data suggested that CHBP could preserve cell viability against starvation by alleviating cell death.
Fig. 1

CHBP preserved the viability of MSCs during starvation. a MSCs were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 1 × 104 cells/well and subjected to starvation. CHBP was administered at indicated concentrations. Scrambled peptide was also used as a control. Cell viability was determined by CCK-8. b MSCs seeded in 6-well plates at 1 × 106 cells/well were incubated in serum-free medium for 24 h in the absence or presence of CHBP and harvested for Trypan blue staining. c Effect of CHBP on the proliferation of MSCs under normal conditions was measured by CCK-8. Experiments were performed in triplicate. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001

CHBP attenuated starvation-induced apoptosis in MSCs

To further delineate the effect of CHBP in starvation-induced cell death, apoptosis and necrosis was qualitatively analyzed using Annexin V/PI assay by flow cytometry. Annexin V−/PI− represents live cells; Annexin V+/PI− or Annexin V−/PI+ represents early or late apoptosis phase respectively; Annexin V+/PI+ reflects necrosis. As suggested in Figs. 2a, 3a, starvation induced significant apoptosis (Annexin V+) that exacerbated over time and CHBP, in contrast, markedly inhibited apoptosis in a concentration dependent manner. The highest concentration (10 nmol/L) was therefore applied for the following experiments. The protective effect of CHBP was also confirmed using Hoechst staining. Nuclear condensation observed in starved MSCs was obviously prevented by CHBP treatment (Fig. 3b). Taken together, these results indicated that CHBP attenuated starvation-induced apoptosis in MSCs.
Fig. 2

CHBP suppressed apoptosis induced by serum deprivation. MSCs were seeded in 6-well plates at a concentration of 1 × 106/well and incubated in serum-free medium for indicated time. The protective effect of CHBP against apoptosis was evaluated by Annexin V/PI asaay and Hoechst 33258 staining. a Annexin V/PI asaay was performed by flow cytometry. Annexin V−/PI− represents live cells; Annexin V+/PI− or Annexin V−/PI+ represents early or late apoptosis phase respectively; Annexin V+/PI+ reflects necrosis. Fragmentation and condensation of the nucleus were recognized as the characteristics of apoptotic cells. Experiments were performed in triplicate. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. *P < 0.05 compared with control. **P < 0.01 compared with control

Fig. 3

CHBP suppressed apoptosis induced by serum deprivation. MSCs were seeded in 6-well plates at a concentration of 1 × 106/well and incubated in serum-free medium for indicated time. The protective effect of CHBP against apoptosis was evaluated by Annexin V/PI asaay and Hoechst 33258 staining. a Quantification analysis of flow cytometry results was performed and demonstrated. b Hoechst 33258 staining was observed under fluorescence microscopy at ×100 magnification. Fragmentation and condensation of the nucleus were recognized as the characteristics of apoptotic cells. Experiments were performed in triplicate. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. *P < 0.05 compared with control. **P < 0.01 compared with control

CHBP improved mitochondrial dysfunction in response to serum deprivation

Mitochondria are the main energy-producing organelles within cells and also play a key role in regulating cell bioactivity. Previous studies have shown that serum deprivation could result in mitochondrial dysfunction, which acted as an important contributor to apoptosis [2830]. Therefore, we explored whether CHBP were able to diminish mitochondrial stress. Mitochondria are the main source of intracellular ROS, which is an inevitable product of the respiratory chain during oxidative phosphorylation. Excessive ROS accumulate during pathological conditions and cause oxidative damage. Several studies indicated that ROS might serve as an initiator of the mitochondrial change [31, 32]. As shown in Fig. 4a, serum deprivation led to an obvious increase of ROS, which was significantly alleviated by CHBP. MMP is recognized as a marker of mitochondrial statement. Physiologically, JC-1 is prone to form aggregates that are fluorescent red depending on the polarization of MMP; in contrast, when MMP collapses, JC-1 disperses into monomers that are fluorescent green. Our data suggested that CHBP could help maintain a normal polarized MMP (Fig. 4b). Mitochondrial injury damages the integrity of mitochondrial membrane and leads to the leakage of cytochrome c, a promoter of inner apoptosis pathway. Normally, as shown in Fig. 4c, cytochrome c labeled with FITC colocalized with MitoRed-stained mitochondria. Under starvation, green fluorescence dramatically increased, indicating a release of cytochrome c from mitochondria. Consistent with the ROS generation and MMP results, CHBP inhibited mitochondrial membrane breakdown. However, CHBP did not prevented the decrease in starvation-associated mitochondrial mass (Fig. 4d).
Fig. 4

CHBP prevented mitochondrial dysfunction. MSCs were seeded in 6-well plates at a concentration of 1 × 106/well and incubated in serum-free medium for 24 h with or without 10 nmol/L CHBP. MSCs cultured in complete medium were used as control. a To detect of mitochondria-derived ROS, cells were incubated with MitoSOX reagent (2.5 mmol/L) for 30 min and analyzed by flow cytometry. b To measure mitochondrial membrane potential, cells were incubated with JC-1 reagent (5 mg/mL) for 30 min and analyzed by flow cytometry. c Cytochrome c was labeled by FITC and mitochondria were stained by MitoRed (50 nmol/L). Cells were observed by fluorescence microscopy under ×200 magnification. d For detection of mitochondrial mass, cells were incubated with MitoRed (50 nmol/L) for 30 min and analyzed by flow cytometry. Experiments were performed in triplicate. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01

Nrf2/Sirt3/FoxO3a pathway may involve in the protection of CHBP against serum deprivation

Previous studies have shown that erythropoietin could upregulate nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), which could further induce Sirt3 expression to exert protective effect. Therefore, we presumed that CHBP, as an erythropoietin deviant, might protect MSCs against starvation stress via Nrf2/Sirt3 related pathway. To confirm this hypothesis, we detect the expression of Nrf2, Sirt3, total FoxO3a, and p-FoxO3a by western blot. As shown in Fig. 5a, Nrf2 and Sirt3 were significantly upregulated by CHBP, while p-FoxO3a was suppressed. It is well accepted that FoxO3a plays a crucial role in mitochondrial protection and the phosphorylation of FoxO3a can prevent its activation [33]. To further determine the role of Sirt3/FoxO3a pathway in the effect of CHBP, Sirt3 siRNA was used. Compared with negative control (NC) siRNA-treated group, Sirt3 siRNA increased the level of p-FoxO3a and thereby inhibited the activation of FoxO3a. The NC siRNA were prone to downregulate p-FoxO3a, which, however, did not reach the statistic significance (Fig. 5a). Furthermore, we repeated the apoptosis assay by flow cytometry using Sirt3 siRNA-treated MSCs. As indicated in Fig. 5b, Sirt3 knockdown partially abolished the protection of CHBP, indicating a certain role of sirt3 in the protective effect of CHBP. Taken together, all these results suggested that Nrf2/Sirt3/FoxO3a pathway might participate in the protection of CHBP on MSCs against serum deprivation.
Fig. 5

Nrf2/Sirt3/FoxO3a pathway participated in the protective mechanism of CHBP against starvation. a MSCs were treated with siRNA targeting Sirt3 and then subjected to starvation with CHBP (10 nmol/L). Total protein was prepared from cultured cells. Expressions of Nrf2, Sirt3, total FoxO3a and p-FoxO3a were analyzed by western blotting. b Sirt3 siRNA treated MSCs were subjected to serum deprivation and apoptosis was detected by Annexin V/PI asaay. Experiments were performed in triplicate. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01

MSCs pretreated with CHBP were more resistant to starvation

Pharmacological preconditioning is a well-accepted strategy to improve poor survival of transplanted cells. To investigate the potential protection of CHBP in a pretreatment manner, MSCs were pretreated with CHBP for 24 h and then subjected to serum-free medium. The results demonstrated that preconditioning of CHBP could also significantly inhibit apoptotic cell death in MSCs during serum deprivation (Fig. 6a, b). The protective effect was observed for up to 48 h of starvation, although the decrease of apoptosis at 48 h did not reach a statistical significance (P = 0.054). However, preconditioning MSCs with CHBP for 24 h failed to improve the viability at 72 h (data not shown).
Fig. 6

CHBP preconditioning rendered MSCs more resistant to starvation. a MSCs were preconditioned with CHBP at a concentration of 10 nmol/L and then subjected to serum starvation. Apoptosis was detected by Annexin V/PI asaay. b Quantification analysis of flow cytometry results was performed and demonstrated. Experiments were performed in triplicate. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation

CHBP exerted little effects on the differential and self-renewal capacity of MSCs

Multipotential differentiation and self-renewal capacities are hallmarks to define a stem cell. MSCs, as adult stem cells, are characterized by their differentiations into osteoblasts and adipocytes. To test whether treatment of CHBP could affect these biological activities, differentiation and CFU assay were performed. As shown in Fig. 7a, b, preconditioning MSCs with CHBP at 10 nmol/L in normal medium for 3 days has no significant impact on the differential and self-renewal capability.
Fig. 7

CHBP had no impact on the differential and self-renewal capacity of MSCs. MSCs were incubated with CHBP at a concentration of 10 nmol/L for 3 days and then harvested for a adipogenic differentiation, b osteogenic differentiation, and c Colony forming unit assay. Photographs are representatives of three independent experiments. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation

Discussion

In the past decade, there has been considerable interest in the exploration of MSCs as cell-based treatment for various diseases. However, poor survival of adaptively transferred MSCs limits their clinical therapeutic potential, which to a great extent is due to the nutrient starvation. Therefore, it is of vital importance to discover regimens that improve the viability of starved MSCs. This study aims to determine whether the organ-protective peptide CHBP can rescue MSCs that were subjected to serum deprivation. Serum deprivation is a widely used model of starvation that could initiate the intrinsic apoptotic pathway [34]. In the present study, we confirmed that serum deprivation could result in apoptosis and exacerbate cell death as starvation time increased. It is demonstrated that CHBP could limit apoptosis of MSCs in a concentration-dependent manner. To detect whether this protection is a by-product effect of peptide molecule itself, a scrambled peptide is used as a control. No detectable protection was recognized for the scrambled peptide. Although erythropoietin and its deviants have been shown cytoprotection in the background of starvation, the underlying mechanisms are not fully elucidated [3538].

Mitochondria, in addition to the well-known energy-producing function, also serve as a crucial mediator of cell injury and death [39, 40]. Physiologically, the homeostasis of mitochondria is finely orchestrated by a complex network consisting of intracellular proteins and microenvironments. Upon severe stresses, such homeostasis can be dramatically damaged, leading to mitochondrial dysfunction and consequent cell death. Consistent with previous studies [2830, 41], out data showed that serum deprivation induced mitochondrial dysfunction, resulting in increased ROS, impaired MMP and release of cytochrome c. ROS is an inevitable product of the respiratory chain during oxidative phosphorylation. Pathological stimuli such as nutrient starvation cause a functional disruption of mitochondria and consequently result in excessive ROS generation, which induced undesirable oxidative damage to DNA, proteins, and organelles and even lead to cell death [4244]. Simultaneously, as the main source of ROS, mitochondria itself acts as a preferable target for the deleterious effect of ROS. Oxidative stress in turn deteriorates mitochondrial dysfunction and amplifies mitochondrial collapse in a positive feedback loop. In contrast, CHBP could alleviate mitochondrial stress by diminishing oxidative injury of ROS, restoring MMP and maintaining mitochondrial membrane integrity.

Our results further indicated that antioxidant Nrf2/Sirt3/FoxO3a axis might involve in the protection of CHBP against serum deprivation. Nrf2, also known as GA-binding protein, is a transcription factor belonging to E26 transformation-specific factor family [45]. Nrf2 interacts with PGC-1α to regulate key functional signaling within mitochondria and actives the expression of many cytoprotective proteins including Sirt3 [4648]. Previous studies have shown that erythropoietin could induce Nrf2 expression [4951]. Accordingly, we found that CHBP was also able to upregulate Nrf2 as well as Sirt3 in the background of starvation. Very recently, increasing evidence demonstrated that Sirt3/FoxO3a pathway served as an important contributor to the mitochondrial protection in response to cellular stresses [5254]. Sirt3 is a mitochondrial deacetylase involving in several important metabolic processes [55, 56]. The Sirt3-mediated deacetylation of FoxO3a further reduces FoxO3a phosphorylation [53]. The function of FoxO3a is critically modulated by phosphorylation: phosphorylated FoxO3a retains in the cytoplasm and keeps functionally inactive; in contrast, dephosphorylation leads to its transfer to the nucleus to activate target genes [33]. Our results provided direct evidence for the activation of FoxO3a by Sirt3 and revealed that Sirt3 knockdown partially abolished the protection of CHBP.

Scientific community has paid much attention to improve the viability of MSCs in response to nutrient deprivation. Treatment of various reagents is considered as a feasible procedure to protect MSCs from starvation. Among them, there are hormone, endogenous substance, clinically approved drug, peptide and energy resource ATP [5762]. Neuropeptide substance P (SP) is a peptide containing 11 amino acids and has been suggested to inhibit starvation-induced apoptosis by enhancing Wnt pathway [60]. Moreover, another study shows that the glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) exerts an anti-apoptotic function by regulating adenylate cyclase [58]. These studies suggested that peptides serve as effective adjuvant agents for improving MSC-based therapies. As a peptide, CHBP is relatively low-cost, feasible for large-scale production and stable under various pathophysiologic conditions. In addition, no obvious effect of CHBP is observed upon the osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation, as well as the self-renewal capacity that are crucial hallmarks of MSCs. In this regard, CHBP shows a promising prospect in the clinical practice.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the present study demonstrates the efficient protection of CHBP upon MSCs against starvation-induced apoptosis and unveils the underlying mechanism of this protective effect. These results provide a better understanding of the multiple pharmacologic functions of CHBP and indicate a possible role of CHBP in regulating nutrient-associated biological processes. Our study suggests that CHBP holds great promise for sustaining cell survival under nutrient-deprived conditions and improving the therapeutic effectiveness of MSC-based treatment. However, the efficacy of CHBP-treated MSCs needs further confirmation in vivo in the future.

Notes

Abbreviations

CHBP: 

cyclic helix B peptide

DMEM: 

Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium

MMP: 

mitochondrial membrane potential

MSC: 

mesenchymal stem cell

ROS: 

reactive oxygen species

Nrf2: 

nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2

siRNA: 

small interfering RNA

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

CY and TZ conceived and designed the study and analyzed the data. SW performed cell proliferation and apoptosis assay, conducted siRNA infection and wrote the draft. CZ performed mitochondria-related experiments and revised the manuscript. SN performed western blotting and revised the manuscript. LZ and JL performed differentiation and CFU assay. MX and RR supported the study. WZ revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

None.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 81400752 to CY, 81270832 to RR, 81370852 to MX, 81270833, 81570674 to TZ).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University
(2)
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation
(3)
Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University
(4)
Department of Transfusion, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University

References

  1. Bianco P, Robey PG, Simmons PJ. Mesenchymal stem cells: revisiting history, concepts, and assays. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;2:313–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Keating A. Mesenchymal stromal cells: new directions. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;10:709–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD, Moorman MA, Simonetti DW, Craig S, Marshak DR. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. 1999;284:143–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Jiang Y, Jahagirdar BN, Reinhardt RL, Schwartz RE, Keene CD, Ortiz-Gonzalez XR, Reyes M, Lenvik T, Lund T, Blackstad M, Du J, Aldrich S, Lisberg A, Low WC, Largaespada DA, Verfaillie CM. Pluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult marrow. Nature. 2002;418:41–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Huss R. Isolation of primary and immortalized CD34-hematopoietic and mesenchymal stem cells from various sources. Stem Cells. 2000;18:1–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ren G, Chen X, Dong F, Li W, Ren X, Zhang Y, Shi Y. Concise review: mesenchymal stem cells and translational medicine: emerging issues. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2012;1:51–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernardo ME, Fibbe WE. Mesenchymal stromal cells: sensors and switchers of inflammation. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;13:392–402.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bianco P, Cao X, Frenette PS, Mao JJ, Robey PG, Simmons PJ, Wang CY. The meaning, the sense and the significance: translating the science of mesenchymal stem cells into medicine. Nat Med. 2013;19:35–42.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Wei X, Yang X, Han ZP, Qu FF, Shao L, Shi YF. Mesenchymal stem cells: a new trend for cell therapy. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2013;34:747–54.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Alagesan S, Griffin MD. Autologous and allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells in organ transplantation: what do we know about their safety and efficacy? Curr Opin Organ Transpl. 2014;19:65–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Erpicum P, Detry O, Weekers L, Bonvoisin C, Lechanteur C, Briquet A, Beguin Y, Krzesinski JM, Jouret F. Mesenchymal stromal cell therapy in conditions of renal ischaemia/reperfusion. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2014;29:1487–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Guo K, Ikehara S, Meng X. Mesenchymal stem cells for inducing tolerance in organ transplantation. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2014;2:8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Dow J, Simkhovich BZ, Kedes L, Kloner RA. Washout of transplanted cells from the heart: a potential new hurdle for cell transplantation therapy. Cardiovasc Res. 2005;67:301–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Shi RZ, Li QP. Improving outcome of transplanted mesenchymal stem cells for ischemic heart disease. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;376:247–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Toma C, Wagner WR, Bowry S, Schwartz A, Villanueva F. Fate of culture-expanded mesenchymal stem cells in the microvasculature: in vivo observations of cell kinetics. Circ Res. 2009;104:398–402.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ma S, Xie N, Li W, Yuan B, Shi Y, Wang Y. Immunobiology of mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Death Differ. 2014;21:216–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Wang Y, Chen X, Cao W, Shi Y. Plasticity of mesenchymal stem cells in immunomodulation: pathological and therapeutic implications. Nat Immunol. 2014;15:1009–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Haider H, Ashraf M. Preconditioning and stem cell survival. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2010;3:89–102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Zhou H, Yang J, Xin T, Li D, Guo J, Hu S, Zhou S, Zhang T, Zhang Y, Han T, Chen Y. Exendin-4 protects adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells from apoptosis induced by hydrogen peroxide through the PI3K/Akt-Sfrp2 pathways. Free Radic Biol Med. 2014;77:363–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Li CJ, Sun LY, Pang CY. Synergistic protection of N-acetylcysteine and ascorbic acid 2-phosphate on human mesenchymal stem cells against mitoptosis, necroptosis and apoptosis. Sci Rep. 2015;5:9819.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Zhang Q, Liu S, Li T, Yuan L, Liu H, Wang X, Wang F, Wang S, Hao A, Liu D, Wang Z. Preconditioning of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells with hydrogen sulfide improves their therapeutic potential. Oncotarget. 2016;7:58089–104.
  22. Zhu W, Chen J, Cong X, Hu S, Chen X. Hypoxia and serum deprivation-induced apoptosis in mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells. 2006;24:416–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Potier E, Ferreira E, Meunier A, Sedel L, Logeart-Avramoglou D, Petite H. Prolonged hypoxia concomitant with serum deprivation induces massive human mesenchymal stem cell death. Tissue Eng. 2007;13:1325–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Yang C, Xu Z, Zhao Z, Li L, Zhao T, Peng D, Xu M, Rong R, Long YQ, Zhu T. A novel proteolysis-resistant cyclic helix B peptide ameliorates kidney ischemia reperfusion injury. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1842:2306–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Yang C, Cao Y, Zhang Y, Li L, Xu M, Long Y, Rong R, Zhu T. Cyclic helix B peptide inhibits ischemia reperfusion-induced renal fibrosis via the PI3K/Akt/FoxO3a pathway. J Transl Med. 2015;13:355.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Yang C, Liu J, Li L, Hu M, Long Y, Liu X, Zhu T, Huang X, Zhao S, Liu S, Rong R. Proteome Analysis of renoprotection mediated by a novel cyclic helix B peptide in acute kidney injury. Sci Rep. 2015;5:18045.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Yang C, Zhang Y, Wang J, Li L, Wang L, Hu M, Xu M, Long Y, Rong R, Zhu T. A novel cyclic helix B peptide inhibits dendritic cell maturation during amelioration of acute kidney graft rejection through Jak-2/STAT3/SOCS1. Cell Death Dis. 2015;6:e1993.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Uittenbogaard M, Baxter KK, Chiaramello A. The neurogenic basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor NeuroD6 confers tolerance to oxidative stress by triggering an antioxidant response and sustaining the mitochondrial biomass. ASN Neuro. 2010;2:e00034.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhuge J, Cederbaum AI. Serum deprivation-induced HepG2 cell death is potentiated by CYP2E1. Free Radic Biol Med. 2006;40:63–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Pandey S, Lopez C, Jammu A. Oxidative stress and activation of proteasome protease during serum deprivation-induced apoptosis in rat hepatoma cells; inhibition of cell death by melatonin. Apoptosis. 2003;8:497–508.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Makino A, Scott BT, Dillmann WH. Mitochondrial fragmentation and superoxide anion production in coronary endothelial cells from a mouse model of type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2010;53:1783–94.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Wu S, Zhou F, Zhang Z, Xing D. Mitochondrial oxidative stress causes mitochondrial fragmentation via differential modulation of mitochondrial fission–fusion proteins. FEBS J. 2011;278:941–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Nho RS, Hergert P. FoxO3a and disease progression. World J Biol Chem. 2014;5:346–54.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Bialik S, Cryns VL, Drincic A, Miyata S, Wollowick AL, Srinivasan A, Kitsis RN. The mitochondrial apoptotic pathway is activated by serum and glucose deprivation in cardiac myocytes. Circ Res. 1999;85:403–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Sharples EJ, Patel N, Brown P, Stewart K, Mota-Philipe H, Sheaff M, Kieswich J, Allen D, Harwood S, Raftery M, Thiemermann C, Yaqoob MM. Erythropoietin protects the kidney against the injury and dysfunction caused by ischemia-reperfusion. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15:2115–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Jia Y, Warin R, Yu X, Epstein R, Noguchi CT. Erythropoietin signaling promotes transplanted progenitor cell survival. FASEB J. 2009;23:3089–99.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Hu R, Cheng Y, Jing H, Wu H. Erythropoietin promotes the protective properties of transplanted endothelial progenitor cells against acute lung injury via PI3K/Akt pathway. Shock. 2014;42:327–36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Bohr S, Patel SJ, Vasko R, Shen K, Iracheta-Vellve A, Lee J, Bale SS, Chakraborty N, Brines M, Cerami A, Berthiaume F, Yarmush ML. Modulation of cellular stress response via the erythropoietin/CD131 heteroreceptor complex in mouse mesenchymal-derived cells. J Mol Med (Berl). 2015;93:199–210.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Youle RJ, van der Bliek AM. Mitochondrial fission, fusion, and stress. Science. 2012;337:1062–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhan M, Brooks C, Liu F, Sun L, Dong Z. Mitochondrial dynamics: regulatory mechanisms and emerging role in renal pathophysiology. Kidney Int. 2013;83:568–81.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Jung EH, Lee JH, Kim SC, Kim YW. AMPK activation by liquiritigenin inhibited oxidative hepatic injury and mitochondrial dysfunction induced by nutrition deprivation as mediated with induction of farnesoid X receptor. Eur J Nutr. 2015. doi:10.1007/s00394-015-1107-7.
  42. Lee SB, Kim JJ, Kim TW, Kim BS, Lee MS, Yoo YD. Serum deprivation-induced reactive oxygen species production is mediated by Romo1. Apoptosis. 2010;15:204–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Shadel GS, Horvath TL. Mitochondrial ROS signaling in organismal homeostasis. Cell. 2015;163:560–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Willems PH, Rossignol R, Dieteren CE, Murphy MP, Koopman WJ. Redox homeostasis and mitochondrial dynamics. Cell Metab. 2015;22:207–18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Rosmarin AG, Resendes KK, Yang Z, McMillan JN, Fleming SL. GA-binding protein transcription factor: a review of GABP as an integrator of intracellular signaling and protein-protein interactions. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2004;32:143–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Bruni F, Polosa PL, Gadaleta MN, Cantatore P, Roberti M. Nuclear respiratory factor 2 induces the expression of many but not all human proteins acting in mitochondrial DNA transcription and replication. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:3939–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Friedman JR, Nunnari J. Mitochondrial form and function. Nature. 2014;505:335–43.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Satterstrom FK, Swindell WR, Laurent G, Vyas S, Bulyk ML, Haigis MC. Nuclear respiratory factor 2 induces SIRT3 expression. Aging Cell. 2015;14:818–25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Genc K, Egrilmez MY, Genc S. Erythropoietin induces nuclear translocation of Nrf2 and heme oxygenase-1 expression in SH-SY5Y cells. Cell Biochem Funct. 2010;28:197–201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Jin W, Ming X, Hou X, Zhu T, Yuan B, Wang J, Ni H, Jiang J, Wang H, Liang W. Protective effects of erythropoietin in traumatic spinal cord injury by inducing the Nrf2 signaling pathway activation. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76:1228–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Meng H, Guo J, Wang H, Yan P, Niu X, Zhang J. Erythropoietin activates Keap1-Nrf2/ARE pathway in rat brain after ischemia. Int J Neurosci. 2014;124:362–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Tseng AH, Shieh SS, Wang DL. SIRT3 deacetylates FOXO3 to protect mitochondria against oxidative damage. Free Radic Biol Med. 2013;63:222–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Tseng AH, Wu LH, Shieh SS, Wang DL. SIRT3 interactions with FOXO3 acetylation, phosphorylation and ubiquitinylation mediate endothelial cell responses to hypoxia. Biochem J. 2014;464:157–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Rangarajan P, Karthikeyan A, Lu J, Ling EA, Dheen ST. Sirtuin 3 regulates Foxo3a-mediated antioxidant pathway in microglia. Neuroscience. 2015;311:398–414.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Yang H, Yang T, Baur JA, Perez E, Matsui T, Carmona JJ, Lamming DW, Souza-Pinto NC, Bohr VA, Rosenzweig A, de Cabo R, Sauve AA, Sinclair DA. Nutrient-sensitive mitochondrial NAD + levels dictate cell survival. Cell. 2007;130:1095–107.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Green MF, Hirschey MD. SIRT3 weighs heavily in the metabolic balance: a new role for SIRT3 in metabolic syndrome. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013;68:105–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Gong X, Fan G, Wang W, Wang G. Trimetazidine protects umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells against hypoxia and serum deprivation induced apoptosis by activation of Akt. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2014;34:2245–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Berlier JL, Kharroubi I, Zhang J, Dalla Valle A, Rigutto S, Mathieu M, Gangji V, Rasschaert J. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide prevents serum deprivation-induced apoptosis in human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and osteoblastic cells. Stem Cell Rev. 2015;11:841–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Berlier JL, Rigutto S, Dalla Valle A, Lechanteur J, Soyfoo MS, Gangji V, Rasschaert J. Adenosine triphosphate prevents serum deprivation-induced apoptosis in human mesenchymal stem cells via activation of the MAPK signaling pathways. Stem Cells. 2015;33:211–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Fu S, Jin D, Liu S, Wang L, Wang Z, Mei G, Zou ZL, Wu JQ, Xu ZY. Protective effect of neuropeptide substance P on bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells against apoptosis induced by serum deprivation. Stem Cells Int. 2015;2015:270328.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Zeng K, Deng BP, Jiang HQ, Wang M, Hua P, Zhang HW, Deng YB, Yang YQ. Prostaglandin E(1) protects bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells against serum deprivation-induced apoptosis. Mol Med Rep. 2015;12:5723–9.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Mirzamohammadi S, Mehrabani M, Tekiyehmaroof N, Sharifi AM. Protective effect of 17β-estradiol on serum deprivation-induced apoptosis and oxidative stress in bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2016;35:312–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement