Inhibition of complement improves graft outcome in a pig model of kidney autotransplantation
- Pierre-Olivier Delpech†1, 2,
- Raphael Thuillier†2, 3, 4, 5,
- Thibault SaintYves†6,
- Jerome Danion7,
- Sylvain Le Pape2, 4,
- Edwin S. van Amersfoort8,
- Beatrijs Oortwijn8,
- Gilles Blancho9 and
- Thierry Hauet2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 11Email author
© The Author(s) 2016
Received: 17 May 2016
Accepted: 16 August 2016
Published: 23 September 2016
Ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) induced immune response is a critical issue in transplantation. Complement and contact system activation are among its key mechanisms.
We investigated the benefits of pre-reperfusion treatment with recombinant human C1INH (rhC1INH), inhibitor of both complement and contact activation, in a pig model of kidney autotransplantation, subjecting the organ to 60 min warm ischemia prior to 24 h static preservation to maximize damage.
Serum creatinine measurement showed that treated animals recovered glomerular function quicker than the Vehicle group. However, no difference was observed in tubular function recovery, and elevated level of urinary NGal (Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin) and plasma AST (Aspartate Aminotransferase) were detected, indicating that treatment did not influence IRI-mediated tubular cell necrosis. Regarding chronic graft outcome, rhC1INH significantly prevented fibrosis development and improved function. Immunohistochemistry and western blot showed decreased invasion by macrophages and T lymphocytes, and reduction of epithelial to mesenchymal transition. We determined the effect of treatment on complement activation with immunofluorescence analyses at 30 min post reperfusion, showing an inhibition of C4d deposition and MBL staining in treated animals.
In this model, the inhibition of complement activation by rhC1INH at reperfusion, while not completely counteracting IRI, limited immune system activation, significantly improving graft outcome on the short and long term.
KeywordsComplement system proteins Drug evaluation Ischemia Kidney transplantation Preclinical Reperfusion injury
The rise of transplantation science to the status of the most adapted treatment for end-stage renal disease increased the demand for organs. As a consequence, only one quarter of patients on waiting lists have access to an organ. This led to the extension of donor criteria and the acceptation of marginal donors , donors aged over 60, and donors aged 50–59 with at least two of three additional risk factors including cerebrovascular accident as a cause of death, history of hypertension, and serum creatinine above 1.5 mg/dl prior to transplantation. However, these organs are particularly sensitive to ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) , well demonstrated as having a dramatic impact on short  and long term  outcome. Current organ preservation techniques are not adapted to these new donor demographics, and it is thus of primary importance to better define IRI mechanisms in order to devise novel therapeutic protocols and improve organ quality.
The complement cascade is a key feature of the immune response, capable of inducing both innate and adaptive responses as well as lead to cell death . In recent years, evidence has accumulated towards the involvement of this pathway in transplantation complications. The complement system is activated immediately following reperfusion, continuing through the multiple stages of graft survival , from the early response to chronic fibrosis development . Indeed, complement is already involved at the donor level, playing for instance a key role in the tissue damage occurring during brain death .
The involvement of complement in IRI has been extensively demonstrated in a variety of mouse models , using multiple KO approaches for key factors such as C3, Factor B, C5, or DAF. This prompted the testing of complement-targeted therapies against IRI : in rats, an analog of C3 convertase inhibitor protected against ischemia reperfusion (IR) complications; in mice, a Mannose-Binding Lectin (MBL) inhibitor prevented thrombogenesis, while monoclonal antibodies against MBL reduced complement deposition in vitro and post-myocardial infarction lesion in rats; recombinant soluble complement receptor 1 was beneficial in models of IR and in models of transplantation (lung and liver). The importance of complement activation in reperfusion injury prompted the initiation of clinical trials to test the benefits of an anti-C5 antibody (Eculizumab) to prevent DGF (Delayed Graft Function) (NCT01403389; NCT01919346), which are still ongoing.
In the current study, we tested the benefits of a recombinant human C1 inhibitor (rhC1INH) . Therapeutic strategies centered on C1 have shown significant benefits in models of myocardial IR  as well as in lung transplantation models . This strategy downregulated the expression of surface receptors on endothelial cells, reducing the immune response . Endogenous C1 inhibitor (C1-INH) has a plasma concentration ∼240 mg/l, corresponding to 1 U/ml . It belongs to the serpin family (serine protease inhibitors) and while it targets the classical pathway, recombinant C1 inhibitors have been shown to target the lectin pathway as well in myocardial IR models , and to have several inhibitory activities on the alternative pathway, particularly through C3b .
C1INH also exhibits activities beyond its original target C1, as indeed it was demonstrated to target factor XIIa and plasma kallikrein of the contact system, factor XIa and thrombin of the coagulation pathway as well as plasmin and tissue plasminogen activator of the fibrinolytic pathway . Thus, this compound could have protective benefits beyond its actions on the complement pathway. Indeed, our own work [19, 20] highlighted the therapeutic benefits of using a molecule directed against the coagulation pathway in a preclinical model of kidney transplantation.
RhC1INH inhibited complement deposition in a large animal model of kidney warm ischemia . This prompted us to test rhC1INH in a preclinical model of kidney autotransplantation in the pig, an animal offering a very high degree of correlation to the clinical situation , in which the kidney was subjected to a period of 60 min warm ischemia prior to retrieval in order to maximize IRI. The experiments in this report demonstrate that a single dose of rhC1INH at the time of reperfusion reduces complement deposition and improves long term function of the transplanted kidney.
Both recombinant C1 esterase inhibitor (rhC1INH; Ruconest®) and vehicle were provided by Pharming B.V. (Leiden, The Netherlands) rhC1INH concentration was 150 U/mL. Vehicle contained sodium citrate (19.7 mol/L), citric acid (0.3 mol/L), sucrose (189.9 mol/L); pH 6.8.
Surgical and experimental protocols were performed in accordance with French Ministry of Agriculture, National Institute for Agronomic Research and Poitou–Charentes ethical comity of animal experimentation (protocol number CE2012-4). We used 3 months old Large White pigs (40 ± 4 kg, IBiSA, INRA Magneraud, France).
As previously described , after anesthesia the left kidney was approached through a midline abdominal incision. The left renal vascular pedicle and ureter were dissected, and warm ischemia induced by 60 min renal pedicle clamping. Unfractionated heparin (UFH, 125 UI/kg) was injected 10 min before clamping. The kidney was then removed and flushed with 4 °C University of Wisconsin preservation solution (UW) supplemented with 5000 IU/L UFH and stored at 4 °C for 24 h.
After preservation, the kidney was transplanted into the same animal by heterotopic autotransplantation. End-to-side aorta and inferior vena cava anastomoses and ureteroneocystostomy were performed.
The half-life of RhC1INH in patients is approximately 3 h for a 100 U/kg injection [24, 25]. Considering that the drug was well tolerated and that a previous study showed observable effects in the pig  for a 500 U/kg injection, we decided to inject RhC1INH (500 U/kg) or vehicle via the central line 15 min before unclamping. This timing is consistent with the distribution of the compound in both animals and humans, showing that it reached an effective dosage within 15–30 min . The contralateral kidney was removed 25 min after unclamping and biopsied to measure the compound effect on a non-ischemic organ. The transplanted kidney was biopsied 30 min after unclamping.
Two groups were studied: Vehicle (VEH): injected with 3.33 mL/kg vehicle 15 min before unclamping, rhC1INH: Injected with 3.33 mL/kg rhC1INH (500 U/kg) 15 min before unclamping. In case baseline values were needed, measurements or staining where performed in healthy littermates (Controls, CTL: values are indicated for reference and not included in the statistical analysis. 7 animals were used for each group, as determined by power calculations (Additional file 1: Tables S1, S2).
Renal function evaluation
Plasma creatinine (modified compensated Jaffé technique), plasma aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (IFCC procedure with pyridoxal phosphate) were measured with a COBAS bioanalyser (Roche-Diagnostics, France).
Urinary Ngal quantification
Urine levels of Ngal (Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin) were measured by ELISA (Eurobio, France) following the manufacturer’s recommendations.
Immunofluorescence: biopsy samples of kidney cortex were processed for cryosectioning. Antibodies: Anti Factor B (Novus Biologicals, UK), anti C4d, anti C1q (AbD Serotec, France), anti C3c, anti C5b-9 (DAKO, France), anti MBL, anti MASP2 (Cliniscience, France). Each slide was semi quantitatively evaluated by a trained nephropathologist.
Immunohistochemistry: biopsies were preserved in formalin. Antibodies: anti-vimentin (Cell-Marque, USA), anti-αSMA (alpha smooth muscle actin); (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), anti-Calprotectin reacting with Monocyte/Granulocytes/Macrophages (MAC-387, AbCam, France) and anti-CD3 (SouthernBiotech, Birmingham, Alabama, USA). Fibrosis was analyzed by Sirius Red staining. Staining quantification was performed in silico (Visilog 6.9 software): fibrosis: percent of stained area per field; inflammation: number of positive immune cells per field. We evaluated 10 fields (×100) per tissue sample.
Western blot procedure
We used specific antibodies against Transforming Growth Factor-β, Phospho Smad 3, Smad 3 and BMP7 (Santa-Cruz, France) and β actin as loading control (A1978; Sigma Aldrich, France).
We used NCSS software (NCSS LLC, USA). Normality was tested using the Skewness, Kurtosis and Omnibus tests while equality of variance was asserted using the modified-Levene Equal-Variance. In case these parameters were met, a two-sample T test analysis was performed, otherwise a Mann–Whitney U test was used. Data sets were tested for the presence of outliers using Grubbs’ test. Statistical power calculations were performed using Anastat (http://www.anastats.fr/). Statistical significance was accepted for p < 0.05.
Fraction of excreted sodium analysis (Additional file 2: Fig. 1a), showed no difference between groups, with elevated sodium fraction at D3 recovering to pretransplant levels by D7. Tubular injury marker urinary Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (Ngal) levels were high at day 3, with ~10,000 pg/mL in both groups, while the baseline in Large White pigs is ~700 pg/mL. These remained high until D7 (Fig. 1c). We also investigated plasma AST (Fig. 1d), which was strongly increased immediately after reperfusion, with a peak at 60 min ~110 UI/L. This was followed by a decrease to pretransplant levels by day 3. There was no difference between groups, suggesting that rhC1INH does not directly affect tubular IR lesions (Additional file 2: Fig. 1).
Chronic outcome: function
Chronic outcome: interstitial fibrosis
Chronic outcome: innate immunity and epithelial to mesenchymal transition
We thus explored upstream signaling of EMT, using Western blotting to detect markers of the TGF-β pathway (Fig. 5c). We determined that whereas TGF-β protein was higher in the rhC1INH group than in the VEH kidneys, the activation level of Smad 3 was higher in the VEH groups. This correlated with BMP-7 levels, a TGF-β antagonist, which remained high in the rhC1INH group. This discrepancy between TGF-β production on the one hand and Smad3/BMP7 on the other could suggest a role for TGF-β not related to fibrosis development as suggested by the red Sirius staining.
Complement deposition 30 min post reperfusion
Immunofluorescent staining was performed on 30 min biopsies to determine the extent of complement deposition.
Semi-quantitative evaluation of complement staining 30 min post-reperfusion
Glomerular capillary wall
Apex proximal tubules
Tubular basal membrane
Mannan-binding lectin serine protease 1 (MASP) was detected at the tubular basement membrane in CTL groups (Fig. 6b; Table 1). This pattern remained unchanged after transplantation in both treatment groups.
In CTL, important basal C3c deposition was detected in the glomeruli (Fig. 7b; Table 1). Following transplantation, there was an important C3c deposition at the apex of proximal tubules (VEH group) and glomerular deposits were unchanged. Treatment with rhC1INH did not affect this staining pattern.
There was a weak Mannan-binding lectin (MBL) staining in the tubules in the CTL group (Fig. 6c; Table 1). Post-transplantation, this staining remained detected in the VEH kidneys, but it was weaker in kidneys of rhC1INH treated animals.
In this study, we tested the relevance of targeting the complement system activation at the reperfusion stage in an auto-transplanted pig kidney model, using a compound with a wide range of activities, including inhibition of the complement, contact system, coagulation and fibrinolysis cascades.
RhC1INH treatment demonstrated a significant improvement of kidney function post-transplant. Measurement of serum creatinine levels showed that time to peak and height of peak were not altered, however there was a striking difference in recovery: while vehicle treated animals showed a slow recovery, rhC1INH treatment accelerated recovery with an earlier start (day 3) and sharper decreases reaching pretransplant levels within 14 days.
We investigated the chronic consequence of treatment: (i) function analysis showed that the rhC1INH- treated group recovered to pretransplant serum creatinine levels by month 1, while vehicle-treated animals never achieved levels below 250 µmol/L, threefold above baseline; (ii) IFTA exploration demonstrated that the treatment significantly reduced injury development; however rhC1INH-treated group levels were ~10 %, whereas in our experience with the same model, IFTA development could be reduced to 5 % ; (iii) immune response at 3 months was increased in the vehicle group, while it was lower in the rhC1INH-treated group; (iv) EMT activation was high in the vehicle group with both stainings observable in both the tubules and the interstitium of rhC1INH-treated kidneys.
Investigating further, we determined by western blot the activation of the signaling pathway emblematic of EMT and IFTA, i.e. TGF-β. This showed that rhC1INH treatment permitted some degree of protection, with reduced activation of Smad 3 and increased levels of BMP7. However, the observed increase in TGF-β expression in the rhC1INH group is surprising. This could be due to the fact that the treatment only partially protected against IRI. Our results are similar to another study on rhC1INH treatment and EMT , however the later uses a 30 min warm ischemia model in the pig, with outcomes measured after 24 h of reperfusion, hence representing a direct effect of the molecule, while herein we investigated the chronic consequences of the treatment. Hence, the treatment may have simply delayed the occurrence of fibrosis through the TGF-β pathway. Another explanation stems from the other role of TGF-β, namely as an anti-inflammatory cytokine [27, 28]. Indeed, the observed production of TGF-β could have a systemic effect, reducing immune activation. This hypothesis is in compatible with our results on innate and adaptive immune cell invasion.
We characterized the impact of the treatment on transplanted kidneys. We thus tested RhC1INH impact on complement activation using immunofluorescent staining on biopsies collected 30 min after reperfusion. In healthy pigs, complement pathway effectors are absent from the kidneys . In our hands, rhC1INH noticeably inhibited C4d deposition. We did not see an effect of the treatment on C1q, C3c or MASP staining, but rhC1INH also appeared to affect MBL staining, reducing its signal. However this was detected inside the cells, an atypical, although described , localization for this protein, and too little data is available to permit definite conclusions. Thus, rhC1INH had some effect on complement deposition, mostly C4d. This is surprising, as C4 is upstream of C3 in the complement activation cascade; however, C4d deposition is more stable, and associated to pathways beyond the cytotoxic consequences of the complement cascade, such as antibody-mediated rejection . RhC1INH was injected 45 min before the kidney was biopsied. Previous studies in humans and animals showed that it distributed rapidly and reached an effective dosage within 15–30 min , hence its high ratio of distribution and fast effect on complement could explain the lack of effects observed on its primary targets: the primary effect would have already taken place, and we only observe their consequences. Earlier biopsies could have revealed more, however the risk associated with the procedure was contrary to the aim of the study and ethical consideration.
Our results have commonalities with a recent study using rhC1INH in a pig warm ischemia model . Indeed, comparing only animal data, both studies demonstrated a beneficial effect of the molecule on C4d deposition, and an influence of the treatment on the lectin pathway (MASP in the warm IR model, MBL herein). Other results in the warm IR model were not reproduced in our hands, such as the effect on C5b-9, however these differences can be explained by specificities of the models used (30 min warm ischemia versus 60 min warm ischemia combined to cold storage), and the timing of treatment, which are likely to induce different complement kinetics. Furthermore, as discussed above, the timing of our biopsies is perhaps not adapted to detect the early effects of the compound. Indeed, our setting could not permit us to perform serial biopsies on the organ, as it was required to sustain life for 3 months, hence we may have missed the activation of a specific pathway or its inhibition. All in all, both studies concurred to shown that rhC1INH was able to impede complement activation, and our results demonstrate the long lasting benefits of such a strategy on graft outcome.
Treatment at reperfusion involves a risk, and may be unable to fully prevent IRI. Indeed, this injury starts at the time of organ collection and extends well throughout the post-reperfusion period. Result herein show that the treatment did not prevent tubular injury, as shown by measurement of sodium fraction in the urine, as well as urinary Ngal and circulating AST detection, increasingly acknowledged as important non-specific markers of kidney lesion [31, 32]. Absence of difference between groups highlights the limits of treatment at reperfusion: while the benefits are evident in regards to glomerular function, tissue damage is taking place and may impact outcome. Our results suggest that treatment likely protects against the consequences of IRI on the inflammatory response, activated in autotransplanted kidneys, likely on the innate arm of the response. It would thus affect the ability of the kidney to recover from the injury, rather than the level of the injury itself, hence the absence of difference until day 3 (IRI effects at the tissue level) but increased recovery after day 3 (unimpeded repair). Thus, while rhC1INH treatment demonstrates evident benefits to graft outcome, combining this strategy with other methods directed at cold ischemia could be even more beneficial.
Ruconest has already been tested in clinical trials, concerning its safety (NCT00851409) and the treatment of Hereditary Angioedema (NCT00262301, ) and it is currently under further clinical evaluation for this pathology. Such an advanced clinical development is rarely found in transplantation-related IR treatments and thus represents an opportunity for a rapid deployment of complement-inhibition based therapy at the patient level.
In conclusion, complement-directed therapy at reperfusion is beneficial to kidney grafts, improving function recovery and limiting chronic lesion development. However, this therapy may not be sufficient by itself to fully prevent IR-related damage, particularly EMT activation and IFTA development. In the current organ shortage, decreased donor organ quality requires new conceptual developments in organ preservation and emerging recipient care protocols. RhC1INH could be an integral part of such optimized protocols in conjunction with other agents, for instance targeting oxidative stress  and other key reperfusion pathways such as coagulation , or following machine perfusion  in order to obtain a maximal level of protection against IR, particularly in marginal donors situations.
delayed graft function
epithelial to mesenchymal transition
ischemia reperfusion injury
mannan-binding lectin serine protease 1
neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin
recombinant human C1 inhibitor
University of Wisconsin preservation solution
POD acquisition of data, revising the manuscript, giving final approval. RT study conception and design, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting and revising the manuscript, giving final approval. TS acquisition of data, giving final approval. JD acquisition of data, revising the manuscript, giving final approval. SLP acquisition of data, revising the manuscript, giving final approval. ESA study conception and design, drafting the manuscript, giving final approval. BO study conception and design, drafting the manuscript, giving final approval. GB study conception and design, revising the manuscript, giving final approval. TH project and study coordination, study conception and design, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, giving final approval. All authors agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy and integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors wish to express their gratitude for the financial support from the Région Poitou–Charentes, the CHU de Poitiers, the Inserm and the Fondation de l’Avenir. The authors also wish to acknowledge the invaluable technical help from Mrs. Virgine Ameteau, Mrs. Maïté Jacquard and Mrs. Sandrine Joffrion.
Availability of data and supporting materials
The data presented herein is the property of Pharming BV. The authors are not at liberty to make this data available. Requests for data and supporting materials are to be made to Pharming BV.
This research was funded by Pharming Technologies B.V. Edwin S van Amersfoort and Beatrijs Oortwijn are employed by Pharming Technologies B.V. The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial bias. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Surgical and experimental protocols were performed in accordance with French Ministry of Agriculture, National Institute for Agronomic Research and Poitou–Charentes ethical comity of animal experimentation (protocol number CE2012-4).
This research was funded by Pharming Technologies B.V.
This work has been presented as an oral presentation at the World Transplant Congress 2014, in San Francisco, USA; and as a poster at the AST+ ESOT Meeting 2014 on Personalized Transplantation in Madrid, as well as at the European Society Of Transplantation Congress 2013 in Vienna, Austria.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Rosengard BR, Feng S, Alfrey EJ, Zaroff JG, Emond JC, Henry ML, et al. Report of the Crystal City meeting to maximize the use of organs recovered from the cadaver donor. Am J Transplant. 2002;2:701–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meier-Kriesche H-U, Schold JD, Srinivas TR, Kaplan B. Lack of improvement in renal allograft survival despite a marked decrease in acute rejection rates over the most recent era. Am J Transplant. 2004;4:378–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jamieson RW, Friend PJ. Organ reperfusion and preservation. Front Biosci J Virtual Libr. 2008;13:221–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thuillier R, Allain G, Giraud S, Saintyves T, Delpech PO, Couturier P, et al. Cyclodextrin curcumin formulation improves outcome in a preclinical pig model of marginal kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2014;14:1073–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walport MJ. Complement. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1140–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sacks SH, Zhou W. The role of complement in the early immune response to transplantation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12:431–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Farrar CA, Sacks SH. Mechanisms of rejection: role of complement. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2014;19:8–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Werkhoven MB, Damman J, van Dijk MCRF, Daha MR, de Jong IJ, Leliveld A, et al. Complement mediated renal inflammation induced by donor brain death: role of renal C5a-C5aR interaction. Am J Transplant. 2013;13:875–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Riedemann NC, Ward PA. Complement in ischemia reperfusion injury. Am J Pathol. 2003;162:363–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sacks S, Karegli J, Farrar CA, Asgari E, Schwaeble W, Zhou W, et al. Targeting complement at the time of transplantation. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2013;735:247–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Veen HA, Koiter J, Vogelezang CJM, van Wessel N, van Dam T, Velterop I, et al. Characterization of recombinant human C1 inhibitor secreted in milk of transgenic rabbits. J Biotechnol. 2012;162:319–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Horstick G, Berg O, Heimann A, Götze O, Loos M, Hafner G, et al. Application of C1-esterase inhibitor during reperfusion of ischemic myocardium: dose-related beneficial versus detrimental effects. Circulation. 2001;104:3125–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scherer M, Demertzis S, Langer F, Moritz A, Schäfers H-J. C1-esterase inhibitor reduces reperfusion injury after lung transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:233–238–239.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Buerke M, Prüfer D, Dahm M, Oelert H, Meyer J, Darius H. Blocking of classical complement pathway inhibits endothelial adhesion molecule expression and preserves ischemic myocardium from reperfusion injury. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1998;286:429–38.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schapira M, de Agostini A, Schifferli JA, Colman RW. Biochemistry and pathophysiology of human C1 inhibitor: current issues. Complement Basel Switz. 1985;2:111–26.Google Scholar
- Buerke M, Schwertz H, Seitz W, Meyer J, Darius H. Novel small molecule inhibitor of C1s exerts cardioprotective effects in ischemia-reperfusion injury in rabbits. J Immunol. 1950;2001(167):5375–80.Google Scholar
- Jiang H, Wagner E, Zhang H, Frank MM. Complement 1 inhibitor is a regulator of the alternative complement pathway. J Exp Med. 2001;194:1609–16.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Davis AE, Lu F, Mejia P. C1 inhibitor, a multi-functional serine protease inhibitor. Thromb Haemost. 2010;104:886–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tillet S, Giraud S, Delpech PO, Thuillier R, Ameteau V, Goujon JM, et al. Kidney graft outcome using an anti-Xa therapeutic strategy in an experimental model of severe ischaemia-reperfusion injury. Br J Surg. 2015;102:132–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Favreau F, Thuillier R, Cau J, Milin S, Manguy E, Mauco G, et al. Anti-thrombin therapy during warm ischemia and cold preservation prevents chronic kidney graft fibrosis in a DCD model. Am J Transplant. 2010;10:30–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Castellano G, Melchiorre R, Loverre A, Ditonno P, Montinaro V, Rossini M, et al. Therapeutic targeting of classical and lectin pathways of complement protects from ischemia-reperfusion-induced renal damage. Am J Pathol. 2010;176:1648–59.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Giraud S, Favreau F, Chatauret N, Thuillier R, Maiga S, Hauet T. Contribution of large pig for renal ischemia-reperfusion and transplantation studies: the preclinical model. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2011;2011:532127.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hauet T, Goujon JM, Vandewalle A, Baumert H, Lacoste L, Tillement JP, et al. Trimetazidine reduces renal dysfunction by limiting the cold ischemia/reperfusion injury in autotransplanted pig kidneys. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000;11:138–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- van Doorn MBA, Burggraaf J, van Dam T, Eerenberg A, Levi M, Hack CE, et al. A phase I study of recombinant human C1 inhibitor in asymptomatic patients with hereditary angioedema. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;116:876–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Farrell C, Hayes S, Relan A, van Amersfoort ES, Pijpstra R, Hack CE. Population pharmacokinetics of recombinant human C1 inhibitor in patients with hereditary angioedema. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;76:897–907.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Curci C, Castellano G, Stasi A, Divella C, Loverre A, Gigante M, et al. Endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition and renal fibrosis in ischaemia/reperfusion injury are mediated by complement anaphylatoxins and Akt pathway. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29:799–808.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sanjabi S, Zenewicz LA, Kamanaka M, Flavell RA. Anti-inflammatory and pro-inflammatory roles of TGF-beta, IL-10, and IL-22 in immunity and autoimmunity. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2009;9:447–53.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Meng X-M, Chung ACK, Lan HY. Role of the TGF-β/BMP-7/Smad pathways in renal diseases. Clin Sci. 2013;124:243–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dumestre-perard C, Ponard D, Colomb MG. Analysis of low molecular weight intracellular associations of a human mannan binding lectin (MBL). Mol Immunol. 2004;40:795–801.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stegall MD, Chedid MF, Cornell LD. The role of complement in antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2012;8:670–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stogdale L. Correlation of changes in blood chemistry with pathological changes in the animal’s body: II Electrolytes, kidney function tests, serum enzymes, and liver function tests. J S Afr Vet Assoc. 1981;52:155–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jochmans I, Lerut E, van Pelt J, Monbaliu D, Pirenne J. Circulating AST, H-FABP, and NGAL are early and accurate biomarkers of graft injury and dysfunction in a preclinical model of kidney transplantation. Ann. Surg. 2011;254:784–791–792.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moldovan D, Reshef A, Fabiani J, Kivity S, Toubi E, Shlesinger M, et al. Efficacy and safety of recombinant human C1-inhibitor for the treatment of attacks of hereditary angioedema: European open-label extension study. Clin Exp Allergy. 2012;42:929–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chatauret N, Coudroy R, Delpech PO, Vandebrouck C, Hosni S, Scepi M, et al. Mechanistic analysis of nonoxygenated hypothermic machine perfusion’s protection on warm ischemic kidney uncovers greater eNOS phosphorylation and vasodilation. Am J Transplant. 2014;14:2500–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar