Open Access

Role of a polyphenol-enriched preparation on chemoprevention of mammary carcinoma through cancer stem cells and inflammatory pathways modulation

  • Tri Vuong1,
  • Jean-François Mallet2,
  • Maria Ouzounova3,
  • Sam Rahbar1,
  • Hector Hernandez-Vargas4,
  • Zdenko Herceg4 and
  • Chantal Matar1Email author
Journal of Translational Medicine201614:13

DOI: 10.1186/s12967-016-0770-7

Received: 23 October 2015

Accepted: 21 December 2015

Published: 14 January 2016

Abstract

Background

Naturally occurring polyphenolic compounds from fruits, particularly from blueberries, have been reported to be significantly involved in cancer chemoprevention and chemotherapy. Biotransformation of blueberry juice by Serratia vaccinii increases its polyphenolic content and endows it with anti-inflammatory properties.

Methods

This study evaluated the effect of a polyphenol-enriched blueberry preparation (PEBP) and its non-fermented counterpart (NBJ), on mammary cancer stem cell (CSC) development in in vitro, in vivo and ex vivo settings. Effects of PEBP on cell proliferation, mobility, invasion, and mammosphere formation were measured in vitro in three cell lines: murine 4T1 and human MCF7 and MDA-MB-231. Ex vivo mammosphere formation, tumor growth and metastasis observations were carried out in a BALB/c mouse model.

Results

Our research revealed that PEBP influence cellular signaling cascades of breast CSCs, regulating the activity of transcription factors and, consequently, inhibiting tumor growth in vivo by decreasing metastasis and controlling PI3K/AKT, MAPK/ERK, and STAT3 pathways, central nodes in CSC inflammatory signaling. PEBP significantly inhibited cell proliferation of 4T1, MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231. In all cell lines, PEBP reduced mammosphere formation, cell mobility and cell migration. In vivo, PEBP significantly reduced tumor development, inhibited the formation of ex vivo mammospheres, and significantly reduced lung metastasis.

Conclusions

This study showed that polyphenol enrichment of a blueberry preparation by fermentation increases its chemopreventive potential by protecting mice against tumor development, inhibiting the formation of cancer stem cells and reducing lung metastasis. Thus, PEBP may represent a novel complementary alternative medicine therapy and a source for novel therapeutic agents against breast cancer.

Keywords

Polyphenols Breast cancer stem cells Tumor Metastasis STAT3 MAPKs

Background

Life-style changes significantly contribute to cancer prevention and are considered an important paradigm in translational medicine [1]. For example, a dietary intervention showed that a few months of following a Mediterranean diet are sufficient to favorably modify the metabolic/endocrine characteristics of breast cancer survivors [2]. In fact, breast cancer patients are among the highest users of integrative medicine in conjunction with conventional oncology care [3]. Currently, cancer preventive phytochemicals are receiving increasing attention regarding their impact on Cancer Stem Cell (CSC) self-renewal pathways [4]. In line with these reports, our preliminary results have shown that repression of breast CSCs by fermented blueberry preparation, named Polyphenols-Enriched Blueberry Preparation (referred hereafter as PEBP), supports diet-mediated targeting of CSCs. The chemopreventive effects of blueberry polyphenolics on breast cancer are well-known [5, 6]. For example, phenolic extracts from European blueberry were shown to inhibit proliferation and induce apoptosis in breast cancer cells [7]. Therefore, increasing the phenolic content of blueberry might enhance its anticancer properties and reduce its metastatic potential. Indeed, biotransformation of blueberry juice with a novel strain of bacteria isolated from the blueberry flora increases its phenolic content and antioxidant activity [8].

CSCs, a highly tumorigenic cell subtype, are emerging as key drivers of cancer [9, 10]. CSCs in breast cancer have been identified as CD44+/CD24low phenotype and are able to grow as spheres named, in this case, mammospheres [11, 12]. Interleukin 6 (IL-6) and its major effector, the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), are part of an important inflammation-associated pathway in malignancies, and are highly involved in CSC development and progression [13]. STAT3 has been recently recognized as a key therapeutic target to reduce tumor growth [14] and metastasis [15] in different types of cancer. The persistent self-renewal observed in CSCs was reported to be epigenetically controlled in the IL-6/STAT3/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling pathway [16]. STAT3 with PTEN is part of the positive feedback loop that underlies the epigenetic switch that links inflammation to cancer. Thus, prevention or inhibition of deregulation in the PI3K/STAT3/PTEN signaling pathway could be beneficial for the treatment and better outcome of breast cancer. Several signal transduction pathways, such as the extracellular-signal-regulated kinase/mitogen-activated protein kinase (Erk/MAP) pathway and PI3K pathway have been implicated in mammary carcinogenesis [17].

Moreover, members of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways have been well studied for their role in controlling cellular responses to the environment and in regulating gene expression, cellular growth and apoptosis in cancer [18, 19]. The extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs)-1/2 were linked to cell proliferation and survival, whereas the stress-activated MAPKs, p38 and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), were connected to apoptosis [20]. Controlling MAPK pathways was shown to impact CSC-promoting IL-6 and modify CSC-like behavior [21].

Different studies have shown that the fermentation of PEBP greatly increased its antioxidant potential [8, 22] and endowed it with novel anti-inflammatory [23], antidiabetic [24, 25] and other biological activities [23]. Importantly, the anti-inflammatory effects of PEBP seemed to be connected to IL-6 related pathways, as demonstrated by decreasing hyperglycemia, activating AMPK pathways and mimicking Metformin metabolic effects [24]. Additionally, our studies have revealed that PEBP increases adiponectin secretion [24], probably by counteracting reactive oxygen species [26] and inhibiting the pro-inflammatory cytokines [27]; two mechanisms that contribute to the inflammatory response. Indeed, inflammation is linked to obesity, diabetes and cancer [28]. The goal of this study was to investigate the anticarcinogenic effects of polyphenol-enriched blueberry preparation (PEBP) on breast cancer stem cell development in cell models and in vivo, as well as to study the involvement of STAT3 and MAPKs signaling pathways in its chemopreventive activities.

Methods

Preparation of blueberry juices

Mature lowbush blueberries (Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.) were purchased from Cherryfield Foods Inc. (Cherryfield, ME) as fresh and untreated fruits. Blueberry juice was extracted by blending the fruit (100 g) in a Braun Type 4259 food processor. The fruit mixture was then centrifuged at 500×g for 10 min to remove insoluble particles. The resulting juice was sterilized using 0.22 µm Express Millipore filters (Millipore, Etobicoke, ON).

Serratia vaccinii bacteria were cultured as previously described [8]. Blueberry and polyphenol-enriched blueberry preparation have been partially characterized elsewhere [8, 29].

Cell culture

Murine 4T1, a 6-Thioguanine resistant cell line, human MCF-7 and human MDA-MB-231 cell lines were obtained from American Type Cell Collection (ATCC; Chicago, IL, USA). ATCC authenticated the human cell lines by using short tandem repeat profiling and the mice cell line was confirmed to be from mice by cytochrome C oxidase 1 gene assay. MCF-7 cells were cultured in MEM, 4T1 and MDA-MB-231 in RPMI-1640, media containing FBS (10 %, v/v) (ATCC), penicillin (100 µU/ml), streptomycin (100 µg/ml) (Sigma-Aldrich, Oakville, ON) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5 % CO2.

Cell viability

Cell viability was assessed by water soluble tetrazolium salts (WST-1) and Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) assays (Roche, Laval, QC). After a 24 h treatment, supernatants were collected for LDH assay following the manufacturer’s instructions. The absorbance was measured with the μ-Quant plate reader (Bio-Tek, Winooski, VT) [30].

Cell motility

Cells were plated in a six-well plate at density of 1 × 106 cells/0.2 ml/well and allowed to form a confluent monolayer for 24 h. The monolayer was then scratched with a pipette tip, washed with RPMI-1640 to remove floating cells, and photographed (time 0). The cells were treated with NBJ or PEBP for 24 h. The cells were then photographed again at three randomly selected sites per well. Cell motility was expressed as a percent of the surface area covered by migrating cells compared with time 0 [30].

Cell invasion

The cell invasion assay was performed on a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) membrane (8 µm pore size) in a Tissue Culture (TC) insert (BD biosciences, Mississauga, ON) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In short, cells are incubated in the superior chamber for 24 h. The insert is then transferred to a new plate containing HBSS supplemented with 4 µg/ml of Calcein AM for 1 h. The intensity of the fluorescence is measured and is expressed as a ratio of the control well without treatment [31].

Mammospheres formation

Adherent cells were detached by trypsin and single cells were counted using the Countess automated cell counter (Invitrogen, Burlington, ON). For tumor tissue, approximately 0.05 g of each tumor was minced and dissociated in RPMI-1640 media containing 300 U/ml collagenase (Sigma), and 100 U/ml hyaluronidase (Sigma) at 37 °C for 2 h. The cells were sieved sequentially through a 100 µm and a 40 µm cell strainer (BD Biosciences) to obtain a single cell suspension, and counted in a hemocytometer.

Single cells were plated in ultralow attachment 96-well plates (Costar) at 103 cells/0.2 ml/well, in the presence/absence of PEBP and NBJ, in DMEM-F12 (Invitrogen), supplemented with 10 ng/ml EGF, 20 ng/ml bFGF, 5 µg/ml insulin, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 0.5 µg/ml hydrocortisone, and penicillin/streptomycin (0.05 mg/ml) (Sigma) [16]. Cells grown in these conditions as non-adherent spherical clusters of cells or mammospheres were counted after 4–7 days.

IL-6 determination

BD OptEIA Mouse IL-6 ELISA sets (BD Biosciences) were used to measure extracellular IL-6 production by mammospheres following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Western blot analysis

Cells in mammospheres formation conditions were collected and lysed after 1, 2, 6 and 24 h treatment with/without PEBP and NBJ. Cell lysates were run on a 10 % acrylamide gel, transferred to a PVDF membrane, and probed with either anti-phosphorylated STAT3 (1:1000), PI3K (1:1000), Akt (1:1000), PTEN (1:1000), p38 MAPK (1:1000), ERK1/2 (1:1000), SAPK/JNK (1:1000), β-Actin (1:1000) (Cell Signaling Tech. Inc., Danvers, MA, USA). Bands were visualized via chemiluminescence using horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. Bands were quantified using β-actin as loading control by Bio-Rad Quantity One software (Bio-Rad, Mississauga, ON).

Animals

Six- to eight-week-old BALB/c female mice weighing 18–20 g (Charles River, Montreal, QC) were randomly distributed into seven experimental groups: control, NBJ 12.5 %, NBJ 25 %, NBJ 50 %, PEBP 12.5 %, PEBP 25 % and PEBP 50 %. Each experimental group consisted of 8 mice housed in a controlled atmosphere (temperature 22 ± 2 °C; humidity 55 ± 2 %) with a 12 h light/dark cycle. Mice were maintained and treated in accordance with the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care. The protocol (ME-289) was approved by the Animal Care Committee of University of Ottawa.

While mice in the control group received normal water, mice in NBJ- and PEBP-groups received either NBJ or PEBP, incorporated in their drinking water at three concentrations: 12.5, 25 and 50 % (v/v) respectively. After 2 weeks of treatment, all mice received a subcutaneous injection of 4T1 cells (1400 cells/0.1 ml/mice) into the abdominal mammary gland fat pad. Three weeks after the inoculation, tumors and lungs were collected and weighed [32]. Mice consumed an average of 2.9 ml of juice each day and both blueberry juices were well tolerated and did not affect mice body weight.

Lung metastasis

Lungs were minced and dissociated in RPMI-1640 media containing 300 U/ml collagenase (Sigma), at 37 °C for 15 min. After filtration through a 40 µm cell strainer (BD Biosciences), cells were collected and suspended in RPMI-1640 containing 10 % FBS (ATCC), penicillin/streptomycin (0.05 mg/ml) and 60 μM 6-Thioguanine (Sigma). The cells were plated in 10-cm culture dishes (Corning) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5 % CO2. After 14 days, the lung cells were fixed by methanol and stained with 0.03 % methylene blue solution. All blue colonies were counted, one colony representing one clonogenic metastatic cell [32].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of the data by ANOVA and Bonferroni’s post hoc tests were performed using GraphPad Prism software version 5.04 (San Diego, CA, USA). Statistical significance was set at p ≤0.05. Data are reported as mean ± SEM.

Results

Inhibition of breast cancer cell proliferation

At a concentration of 200 μM GAE, PEBP significantly inhibited the proliferation of 4T1, MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cancer cells by 34, 24 and 33 % respectively (Fig. 1), whereas the same concentration of NBJ only showed an inhibition of 32 % in 4T1 cell proliferation (Fig. 1a). No significant effects of NBJ were observed in MDA-MB-231 and MCF7 (Fig. 1b, c). Both PEBP and NBJ did not show any toxicity on the three cell lines at tested concentrations, as determined by an LDH assay (data not shown).
Fig. 1

PEBP suppressed the growth of mammary carcinoma cell lines. Proliferation of 4T1 (a), MDAMB-231 (b), and MCF-7 (c) cells after treatment with either 150 or 200 μM GAE (gallic acid equivalent) of either polyphenol-enriched blueberry preparation (PEBP) or normal blueberry juice (NBJ) for 24 h. All values are means of 3 separated experiments ±SEM. *Denotes statistical significance at p ≤ 0.05 vs. control. **Denotes p ≤ 0.01 vs. control

Reduction of motility and invasiveness potential

Both NBJ and PEBP at 150 μM Gallic Acid Equivalent (GAE) significantly reduced the invasive ability of 4T1 and MDA-MB-231 (Fig. 2d, e). However, only PEBP exhibited an inhibitive effect on the motility of all three breast cancer cell lines (Fig. 2a–c). NBJ did not show any significant effect on cell motility as compared to the control.
Fig. 2

PEBP decreased motility and invasiveness in gel invasion experiment. Cell mobility of 4T1 (a), MDAMB-231 (b), and MCF-7 (c) cells after treatment with 100 μM GAE (gallic acid equivalent) of either polyphenol-enriched blueberry preparation (PEBP) or normal blueberry juice (NBJ) for 24 or 48 h and cell invasion of 4T1 (d) and MDAMB-231 (e) cells after treatment with either 100 or 150 μM GAE of PEBP or NBJ for 24 h. Contrast was enhance to better show cell motility. All values are means of 3 separated experiments ±SEM. *Denotes statistical significance at p ≤ 0.05 vs. control

Inhibition of mammosphere formation

PEBP significantly decreased the formation of mammospheres in all three cell lines (Fig. 3), and nearly total inhibition was observed at 150 μM GAE of PEBP. A treatment with the same concentration of NBJ only exhibited an inhibition of 75 % in MDA-MB-231 (Fig. 3b), whereas it significantly increased the formation of mammospheres in 4T1 by 60 % (Fig. 3a).
Fig. 3

PEBP and NBJ decreased the formation of mammospheres in cell culture. Mammospheres formation of 4T1 (a), MDAMB-231 (b), and MCF-7 (c) cells after treatment with either 100 or 150 μM GAE (gallic acid equivalent) of either polyphenol-enriched blueberry preparation (PEBP) or normal blueberry juice (NBJ) for 4–7 days and IL-6 production by 4T1 (d), MDAMB-231 (e), and MCF-7 (f) cells after treatment with 150 μM GAE of PEBP or NBJ for 6 and 24 h. All values are means of 4 separated experiments ±SEM. Bars that have no letter in common are significantly different from each other (p ≤ 0.05)

Inhibition of IL-6/STAT3/PI3K signaling pathway

A 6 h-treatment with NBJ in mammosphere formation conditions significantly elevated the secretion of IL-6 in all three cell lines (Fig. 3d–f), while PEBP did not induce any modification as compared to the control cells.

Moreover, PEBP significantly inhibited the phosphorylation of STAT3 and PI3K/Akt in all three cell lines. This inhibition started after a 6 h-treatment (Fig. 4a–i) and lasted up to 24 h (data not shown), whereas NBJ only decreased the phosphorylation of PI3K. Both PEBP and NBJ significantly enhanced the activity of PTEN in 4T1 (Fig. 4j), but only PEBP increased PTEN phosphorylation in MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 (Fig. 4k–l).
Fig. 4

PEBP inhibited STAT3/PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Phosphorylation of STAT3, PI3K, Akt, and PTEN in 4T1 (a, d, g, j), MDAMB-231 (b, e, h, k), and MCF-7 (c, f, i, l) mammospheres after treatment with 150 μM GAE (gallic acid equivalent) of either polyphenol-enriched blueberry preparation (PEBP) or normal blueberry juice (NBJ) for 6 h. All values are means of 3 separated experiments ±SEM. Baseline represent the level of phosphorylation present in cells not exposed to the mammospheres forming medium. *Denotes statistical significance at p ≤ 0.05 vs. control at 6 h

Alterations of MAPKs pathway

Starting from 1 h after the addition of PEBP, a significant inhibition of ERK1/2 phosphorylation was observed in 4T1 and MCF-7 (Fig. 5a, c). PEBP also increased MAPK p38 and JNK/SAPK phosphorylation in all three cell lines. Their inhibited- or activated-state attainted the maximal level after 2 h of treatment and remained stable up to 24 h (Fig. 5d–i). NBJ did not show any significant modification of the three MAPKs family members.
Fig. 5

PEBP inhibited ERK1/2 but enhanced MAPKp38, and JNK signaling. Phosphorylation of ERK1/2, MAPK p38, and JNK in 4T1 (a, d, g), MDAMB-231 (b, e, h), and MCF-7 (c, f, i) mammospheres after treatment with 150 μM GAE (gallic acid equivalent) of either polyphenol-enriched blueberry preparation (PEBP) or normal blueberry juice (NBJ) for 2 h. All values are means of 3 separated experiments ±SEM. Baseline represent the level of phosphorylation present in cells not exposed to the mammospheres forming medium. * Denotes statistical significance at p ≤ 0.05 vs. control at 2 h

Reduction of tumor growth, mammosphere formation and metastasis in vivo

As illustrated in Fig. 6, when administered chronically over a 5-week period, NBJ reduced tumor volume and weight in a dose-dependent manner. However, significant effects were only observed in the NBJ 50 % group, whereas all three doses of PEBP-treated mice displayed significant delays of tumor growth (Fig. 6a, b). Moreover, the mammosphere formation from tumoral primary cells was significantly reduced exclusively in tumors of PEBP 50 %-treated animals (Fig. 6c). Similarly, the treatment with PEBP significantly reduced the metastasis in lungs of PEBP-treated mice, while all of the other groups did not show a significant difference as compared to control animals (Fig. 6d).
Fig. 6

Antitumoral effects of PEBP in BALB/c mice model with 4T1 cell challenge. Tumor volume (a), tumor weight (b), mammospheres formation from primary tumor cells (c) and metastasis present in lungs (d) of mice that received a 2-week pre-treatment and a 3-week post-inoculation treatment with either polyphenol-enriched blueberry preparation (PEBP) or normal blueberry juice (NBJ) incorporated in drinking water at concentrations of 12.5 % (NBJ 12.5 % and PEBP 12.5 %), 25 % (NBJ 25 % and PEBP 25 %), and 50 % (NBJ 50 % and PEBP 50 %). All values are means of 2 separated experiments ±SEM (n = 16). *Denotes statistical significance at p ≤ 0.05 vs. control

Discussion

Chemoprevention is an important part of integrative and translational medicine in oncology. Naturally occurring compounds, such as polyphenols in fruits, are increasingly recognized for their effects in controlling aberrant signaling pathways and inflammatory signals in CSCs. Our group has discovered that the fermented, probiotic-like product PEBP greatly accentuates its antioxidant potential and endows it with novel anti-inflammatory [22], antidiabetic [24, 25] and neuroprotective [23] biological properties. The common mechanisms underlining the multiple beneficial effects of PEPB are probably related to its capability to modulate the activity of global regulators that are associated with cellular transformation and inflammation. In addition, biotransformations involving fermentation and catabolic breakdown have been suggested to enhance bioavailability [33].

In fact, PEBP was found to inhibit adipogenesis and increase glucose uptake in muscle cells and adipocytes [25] through the activation of the AMP-activated kinase, mimicking Metformin activities [34, 35]. Particularly, the anti-inflammatory effect of PEBP is pointing out to the blockade of the STAT3 pathways (essential in CSCs, and inflammation) and the activation of AMPK, which in turn inhibits MAPK downstream (essential in diabetes and cancer).

In addition, PEBP mimics Metformin anti-inflammatory/antitumoral activities by inactivation of PI3K/AKT pathways. Metformin is now proposed as a major adjunct therapy in cancer with a powerful inhibitory effect on CSCs [36, 37]. This observation led us to further investigate the effect of PEBP on CSCs.

The antiproliferative effect of PEBP was observed in all three breast cancer cell lines at 200 μM GAE, whereas NBJ, at the same concentration, only had an effect in 4T1. NBJ did not show any antiproliferative effect in MDA-MB-231 as previously reported [38, 39]. This might be due to the low tested-doses in our study. Moreover, PEBP significantly inhibited the motility of all three cancer cell lines, which prompted further investigation for its antimetastatic activity in vivo. As expected, PEBP significantly reduced metastasis potential to the lung when tested in a murine breast cancer model.

There is now substantial evidence that many cancers, including breast cancer, are driven by a cellular subpopulation, identified as cancer stem cells, which mediate tumor metastasis and resistance to conventional therapies. Therefore, controlling CSC growth in breast cancer is a possible avenue to prevent tumor development and metastasis. Thus, the investigation of PEBP-induced molecular mechanisms that mediate CSC growth was important to clarify its anticancer and anti-metastatic activities. Indeed, our data indicated that PEBP significantly inhibited mammosphere formation in vitro. Moreover, its inhibitory effect was further confirmed by the reduction of ex vivo mammosphere development from PEBP-treated animals.

Polyphenols naturally have multi-target actions/mechanisms, which explain their wide spectrum of biological activities [40]. Their anti-inflammatory property is the key factor in the interface between inflammation and neoplasia [41]. At the cross road of cancer and inflammation, the STAT3 and MAPK pathways have been reported as crucial for CSC growth and their acquired EMT characteristics during metastasis [13, 42]. Depending on the cell type, the IL-6/STAT3-dependent pathways, such as the JAK/STAT [13], PI3K/AKT/NF-κB [43], or p38 MAPK [44], can enhance tumor growth and refractoriness to chemotherapy [13]. Therefore, our studies were conducted to examine the involvement of these pathways in PEBP’s antitumor activities. We demonstrated that IL-6 production, as well as STAT3 and PI3K phosphorylation, were decreased in CSC culture after PEBP treatment, when compared to the non-fermented control. Although, polyphenols from blueberry have demonstrated inhibitory activities on cancer cells via the control of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 [5], dramatic and biphasic increase of IL-6 occurs early in CSC cellular transformation [45], independently of STAT3 decrease. STAT3 signaling, an important inflammation-associated pathway in malignancies, has been recognized as a key therapeutic target to reduce tumor growth and metastasis [15]. Several signal transduction pathways such as STAT3, PI3K/AKT/NF-κB cascade, p38/MAPK/ERK, or the AMPK pathways play an important role in inflammation-mediated response at all stages of cancer development and refractoriness to chemotherapy [46]. Moreover, downstream effectors of the PI3K pathway include Akt, which is overexpressed in many cancer types and is associated with increased tumorigenicity [47, 48]. Our preliminary results showed that PEBP delayed the formation of CSCs in different types of cell culture and in vivo, through modulation of IL-6/STAT3, the PTEN/PI3K/AKT axis, and ERK/p38 in MAPK signaling pathways, which are all central nodes in CSC signaling and homeostasis [49] (Figs. 3, 5). We have demonstrated that STAT3, AKT, and PI3K are decreased, PTEN (a tumor suppressor gene upregulated by p53) is increased in a non-cell type dependent manner, and ERK1/2 was significantly inhibited in 4T1 and MCF7 (Fig. 5). In MAPK pathways, ERK1/2 is the most relevant to breast cancer. Increased expression of ERK1/2 was recently reported as driving endocrine resistance and breast cancer progression in an obesity-associated experimental model [50]. In fact, both PEBP and NBJ inhibited the phosphorylation of PI3K. These findings are consistent with previous reports, which attributed the inhibition of PI3K activity to the anticancer effects of blueberry [6, 38]. In our study, PEBP and NBJ also enhanced the activity of PTEN, an upstream inhibitor protein of PI3K, possibly via the inhibition of miRNA-21 expression [51]. These alterations, unfound with NBJ, could be exerted by the novel compounds that were produced during biotransformation and acted in concert on different types of receptors.

Treatment with PEBP rapidly increased p38-MAPK- and JNK- phosphorylation, which significantly reached its highest level at 2 h, and remained elevated for up to 24 h. PEBP reduced ERK1/2 phosphorylation in the same kinetic and cell-type independent manner. Modifications in MAPK family enzymes might contribute to the abolition of stem cell growth afforded by PEBP. Indeed, prolonged activations of JNK and MAPKp38 and/or inhibition of ERK1/2 induced apoptosis in most cancer cell lines [5255]. The mechanisms by which PEBP modified MAPKs’ activities are unknown. In addition, PEBP-induced alterations of upstream MAPK members might inhibit the downstream STAT3/PI3K/Akt signaling, indicating an extensive cross-talk and interplay between the MAPK cascade and STAT3 pathways.

We further confirmed the in vivo anticancer and antimetastatic potential of PEBP using the 4T1-induced breast cancer model in BALB/c mice. The 4T1 tumor is highly tumorigenic and invasive and, unlike most tumor models, can spontaneously metastasize from the primary tumor in the mammary gland to multiple distant sites [56, 57].

Chronic administration of PEBP via incorporation in drinking water significantly reduced tumor volume and breast cancer stem cell development derived from the tumor. This diminution supports the low count of metastasis in lungs of PEBP-treated animals. Especially, PEBP anticancer and antimetastatic effects were observed at a therapeutic dose as low as 12.5 %, which, according to dose translation from animal to human using body surface area, corresponds to 1.2 cups of juice per day for humans [58]. In contrast, NBJ at the same dose did not show any significant effect. NBJ could show a decrease in tumor size and weight only at the dose of 50 %, which represents a substantial consumption of blueberry juice for humans. These results are consistent with findings from previous studies, which reported that feeding mice with blueberry extracts or whole fruit powder has an impact on inflammation and could delay tumor growth [6, 38, 59]. However, NBJ failed to achieve the reduction of breast cancer stem cells and metastasis observed with PEBP. Nonetheless, the process of preparing PEBP, which greatly increases the content in total phenolic compounds, could clarify its effectiveness at a low therapeutic dose as compared to NBJ. Furthermore, the novel antimetastatic potential of PEBP could be explained by the change of phenolic composition from NBJ to PEBP during the biotransformation process. Indeed, the biotransformation of blueberry juice not only increases its phenolic content, but also produces novel compounds [8]. One interesting possibility is that these novel compounds may possess more potent anticancer and antimetastatic properties that could have contributed to the observed reduction in tumor size and metastasis, as opposed to components of NBJ. In addition, the biotransformation process has probably broken down long polyphenol chains, which are poorly absorbed into gastro-intestinal tracts, increasing their bioavailability, and rendering PEBP highly functional [60].

Conclusion

The results of the present study demonstrate that polyphenol-enriched blueberry preparation potently reduced the tumor growth and metastasis in mice. We have demonstrated that repression of breast Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) by fermented blueberry supports a diet-mediated targeting of CSCs. We have provided evidence that PEBP selectively inhibits the inflammatory signature in CSCs through signaling pathways linked to the maintenance stemness and metastasis. The mechanisms of action involve, at least in part, alterations in the MAPKs cascade and inhibition of the STAT3 signaling pathway, involved in inflammatory pathways. The results convincingly demonstrated that PEBP, indeed, holds great promise as a chemopreventive agent and may represent a novel complementary therapy against breast cancer and metastasis. Conclusively, the prospective modulation of CSCs by nutrition will probably mark a major advance in preventing breast cancer and further optimizing the management of this significant disease. It is an important approach in translational medicine for specific integrative therapies that can be recommended as evidence-based supportive care for cancer patients.

Abbreviations

CSC: 

cancer stem cells

ERK: 

extracellular signal-regulated kinase

IL-6: 

interleukine 6

JNK: 

c-Jun N-terminal kinase

GAE: 

gallic acid equivalent

MAPK: 

mitogen-activated protein kinase

NBJ: 

normal blueberry juice

PEBP: 

polyphenol-enriched blueberry preparation

STAT3: 

signal transducer and activator of transcription 3

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

TV prepared the PEBP, carried out the cell culture experiment and animal experiment and drafted the manuscript. JFM participated in the animal experiment, and the lung metastasis and drafted part of the manuscript. SR carried out the western blot. MO, HHV and ZH contributed to the design of the mammosphere experiment and revised the manuscript. CM drafted part of the manuscript and contributed to the conception and design of this research. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Funding of the study was provided by Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). We would like to thank Jairo Duarte for his contribution during animal handling.

Competing interests

Dr. Matar and Dr. Vuong have applied for a patent on the bacteria Serratia vaccinii. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Nutritional Sciences Program, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa
(2)
Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa
(3)
Cancer Center, Georgia Regents University
(4)
International Agency for Research on Cancer

References

  1. Slattery ML, Lundgreen A, Torres-Mejia G, Wolff RK, Hines L, Baumgartner K, et al. Diet and lifestyle factors modify immune/inflammation response genes to alter breast cancer risk and prognosis: the Breast Cancer Health Disparities Study. Mutat Res. 2014;770:19–28.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Villarini A, Pasanisi P, Traina A, Mano MP, Bonanni B, Panico S, et al. Lifestyle and breast cancer recurrences: the DIANA-5 trial. Tumori. 2012;98:1–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Greenlee H, Balneaves LG, Carlson LE, Cohen M, Deng G, Hershman D, et al. Clinical practice guidelines on the use of integrative therapies as supportive care in patients treated for breast cancer. JNCI Monogr. 2014;2014:346–58.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Rossi T, Gallo C, Bassani B, Canali S, Albini A, Bruno A. Drink your prevention: beverages with cancer preventive phytochemicals. Pol Arch Med Wewnętrznej. 2014;124:713–22.Google Scholar
  5. Kanaya N, Adams L, Takasaki A, Chen S. Whole blueberry powder inhibits metastasis of triple negative breast cancer in a xenograft mouse model through modulation of inflammatory cytokines. Nutr Cancer. 2014;66:242–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Montales MTE, Rahal OM, Kang J, Rogers TJ, Prior RL, Wu X, et al. Repression of mammosphere formation of human breast cancer cells by soy isoflavone genistein and blueberry polyphenolic acids suggests diet-mediated targeting of cancer stem-like/progenitor cells. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33:652–60.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Nguyen V, Tang J, Oroudjev E, Lee CJ, Marasigan C, Wilson L, et al. Cytotoxic effects of bilberry extract on MCF7-GFP-tubulin breast cancer cells. J Med Food. 2010;13:278–85.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Martin LJ, Matar C. Increase of antioxidant capacity of the lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium) during fermentation by a novel bacterium from the fruit microflora. J Sci Food Agric. 2005;85:1477–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Graziano A, d’Aquino R, Tirino V, Desiderio V, Rossi A, Pirozzi G. The stem cell hypothesis in head and neck cancer. J Cell Biochem. 2008;103:408–12.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. O’Connor ML, Xiang D, Shigdar S, Macdonald J, Li Y, Wang T, et al. Cancer stem cells: a contentious hypothesis now moving forward. Cancer Lett. 2014;344:180–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Camerlingo R, Ferraro GA, De Francesco F, Romano M, Nicoletti G, Di Bonito M, et al. The role of CD44+/CD24−/low biomarker for screening, diagnosis and monitoring of breast cancer. Oncol Rep. 2014;31:1127–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Podberezin M, Wen J, Chang CC. Cancer stem cells: a review of potential clinical applications. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013;137:1111–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Chang Q, Bournazou E, Sansone P, Berishaj M, Gao SP, Daly L, et al. The IL-6/JAK/Stat3 feed-forward loop drives tumorigenesis and metastasis. Neoplasia. 2013;15:848–62.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Lamy S, Akla N, Ouanouki A, Lord-Dufour S, Beliveau R. Diet-derived polyphenols inhibit angiogenesis by modulating the interleukin-6/STAT3 pathway. Exp Cell Res. 2012;318:1586–96.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Zhao X, Sun X, Li X. Expression and clinical significance of STAT3, P-STAT3, and VEGF-C in small cell lung cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev APJCP. 2012;13:2873–7.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Hernandez-Vargas H, Ouzounova M, Le Calvez-Kelm F, Lambert M-P, McKay-Chopin S, Tavtigian SV, et al. Methylome analysis reveals Jak-STAT pathway deregulation in putative breast cancer stem cells. Epigenetics. 2011;6:428–39.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Vivanco I, Sawyers CL. The phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase AKT pathway in human cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:489–501.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Yip NC, Fombon IS, Liu P, Brown S, Kannappan V, Armesilla AL, et al. Disulfiram modulated ROS-MAPK and NFκB pathways and targeted breast cancer cells with cancer stem cell-like properties. Br J Cancer. 2011;104:1564–74.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen J, Sun WL, Wasylyk B, Wang YP, Zheng H. c-Jun N-terminal kinase mediates microtubule-depolymerizing agent-induced microtubule depolymerization and G2/M arrest in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Anticancer Drugs. 2012;23:98–107.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Wagner EF, Nebreda AR. Signal integration by JNK and p38 MAPK pathways in cancer development. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:537–49.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Balko JM, Schwarz LJ, Bhola NE, Kurupi R, Owens P, Miller TW, et al. Activation of MAPK pathways due to DUSP4 loss promotes cancer stem cell-like phenotypes in basal-like breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2013;73:6346–58.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Vuong T, Martin L, Matar C. Antioxidant activity of fermented berry juices and their effects on nitric oxide and tumor necrosis factor-alpha production in macrophages 264.7 gamma no(–) Cell line. J Food Biochem. 2006;30:249–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Vuong T, Matar C, Ramassamy C, Haddad PS. Biotransformed blueberry juice protects neurons from hydrogen peroxide-induced oxidative stress and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway alterations. Br J Nutr. 2010;104:656–63.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Vuong T, Benhaddou-Andaloussi A, Brault A, Harbilas D, Martineau LC, Vallerand D, et al. Antiobesity and antidiabetic effects of biotransformed blueberry juice in KKAy mice. Int J Obes. 2009;33:1166–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Vuong T, Martineau LC, Ramassamy C, Matar C, Haddad PS. Fermented Canadian lowbush blueberry juice stimulates glucose uptake and AMP-activated protein kinase in insulin-sensitive cultured muscle cells and adipocytes. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2007;85:956–65.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Furukawa S, Fujita T, Shimabukuro M, Iwaki M, Yamada Y, Nakajima Y, et al. Increased oxidative stress in obesity and its impact on metabolic syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2004;114:1752–61.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Bruun JM, Lihn AS, Verdich C, Pedersen SB, Toubro S, Astrup A, et al. Regulation of adiponectin by adipose tissue-derived cytokines: in vivo and in vitro investigations in humans. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2003;285:E527–33.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Lashinger LM, Ford NA, Hursting SD. Interacting inflammatory and growth factor signals underlie the obesity-cancer link. J Nutr. 2014;144:109–13.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Matchett MD, MacKinnon SL, Sweeney MI, Gottschall-Pass KT, Hurta RA. Inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase activity in DU145 human prostate cancer cells by flavonoids from lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium): possible roles for protein kinase C and mitogen-activated protein-kinase-mediated events. J Nutr Biochem. 2006;17:117–25.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhou Y, Su J, Shi L, Liao Q, Su Q. DADS downregulates the Rac1-ROCK1/PAK1-LIMK1-ADF/cofilin signaling pathway, inhibiting cell migration and invasion. Oncol Rep. 2013;29:605–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Partridge J, Flaherty P. An in vitro FluoroBlok tumor invasion assay. J Vis Exp. 2009; 29.Google Scholar
  32. Pulaski BA, Ostrand-Rosenberg S. Mouse 4T1 breast tumor model. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2001; Chapter 20: Unit 20.2.Google Scholar
  33. Yang CS, Sang S, Lambert JD, Lee M-J. Bioavailability issues in studying the health effects of plant polyphenolic compounds. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2008;52(Suppl 1):S139–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Davis BJ, Xie Z, Viollet B, Zou M-H. Activation of the AMP-activated kinase by antidiabetes drug metformin stimulates nitric oxide synthesis in vivo by promoting the association of heat shock protein 90 and endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Diabetes. 2006;55:496–505.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Guigas B, Bertrand L, Taleux N, Foretz M, Wiernsperger N, Vertommen D, et al. 5-Aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-beta-d-ribofuranoside and metformin inhibit hepatic glucose phosphorylation by an AMP-activated protein kinase-independent effect on glucokinase translocation. Diabetes. 2006;55:865–74.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Jung J-W, Park S-B, Lee S-J, Seo M-S, Trosko JE, Kang K-S. Metformin represses self-renewal of the human breast carcinoma stem cells via inhibition of estrogen receptor-mediated OCT4 expression. PLoS One. 2011;6:e28068.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Hirsch HA, Iliopoulos D, Tsichlis PN, Struhl K. Metformin selectively targets cancer stem cells, and acts together with chemotherapy to block tumor growth and prolong remission. Cancer Res. 2009;69:7507–11.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Adams LS, Phung S, Yee N, Seeram NP, Li L, Chen S. Blueberry phytochemicals inhibit growth and metastatic potential of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells through modulation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway. Cancer Res. 2010;70:3594–605.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Faria A, Pestana D, Teixeira D, de Freitas V, Mateus N, Calhau C. Blueberry anthocyanins and pyruvic acid adducts: anticancer properties in breast cancer cell lines. Phytother Res. 2012;24:1862–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Fraga CG, Galleano M, Verstraeten SV, Oteiza PI. Basic biochemical mechanisms behind the health benefits of polyphenols. Mol Aspects Med. 2010;31:435–45.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Subbaramaiah K, Sue E, Bhardwaj P, Du B, Hudis CA, Giri D, et al. Dietary polyphenols suppress elevated levels of proinflammatory mediators and aromatase in the mammary gland of obese mice. Cancer Prev Res. 2013;6:886–97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Iliopoulos D, Hirsch HA, Wang G, Struhl K. Inducible formation of breast cancer stem cells and their dynamic equilibrium with non-stem cancer cells via IL6 secretion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:1397–402.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Iliopoulos D, Hirsch HA, Struhl K. An epigenetic switch involving NF-kappaB, Lin28, Let-7 MicroRNA, and IL6 links inflammation to cell transformation. Cell. 2009;139:693–706.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Koul HK, Pal M, Koul S. Role of p38 MAP kinase signal transduction in solid tumors. Genes Cancer. 2013;4:342–59.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Hirsch HA, Iliopoulos D, Struhl K. Metformin inhibits the inflammatory response associated with cellular transformation and cancer stem cell growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:972–7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Mauer J, Denson JL, Brüning JC. Versatile functions for IL-6 in metabolism and cancer. Trends Immunol. 2015;36:92–101.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Cheng JQ, Godwin AK, Bellacosa A, Taguchi T, Franke TF, Hamilton TC, et al. AKT2, a putative oncogene encoding a member of a subfamily of protein-serine/threonine kinases, is amplified in human ovarian carcinomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:9267–71.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Bellacosa A, de Feo D, Godwin AK, Bell DW, Cheng JQ, Altomare DA, et al. Molecular alterations of the AKT2 oncogene in ovarian and breast carcinomas. Int J Cancer J Int Cancer. 1995;64:280–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Korkaya H, Liu S, Wicha MS. Regulation of cancer stem cells by cytokine networks: attacking cancer’s inflammatory roots. Clin Cancer Res Off J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2011;17:6125–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Bowers LW, Cavazos DA, Maximo IXF, Brenner AJ, Hursting SD, deGraffenried LA. Obesity enhances nongenomic estrogen receptor crosstalk with the PI3K/Akt and MAPK pathways to promote in vitro measures of breast cancer progression. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15:R59.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Liu Z-L, Wang H, Liu J, Wang Z-X. MicroRNA-21 (miR-21) expression promotes growth, metastasis, and chemo- or radioresistance in non-small cell lung cancer cells by targeting PTEN. Mol Cell Biochem. 2013;372:35–45.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Chen J, Sun L. Formononetin-induced apoptosis by activation of Ras/p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in estrogen receptor-positive human breast cancer cells. Horm Metab Res Horm Stoffwechselforschung Horm Métabolisme. 2012;44:943–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Na H-K, Kim E-H, Choi M-A, Park J-M, Kim D-H, Surh Y-J. Diallyl trisulfide induces apoptosis in human breast cancer cells through ROS-mediated activation of JNK and AP-1. Biochem Pharmacol. 2012;84:1241–50.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Leisner TM, Moran C, Holly SP, Parise LV. CIB1 prevents nuclear GAPDH accumulation and non-apoptotic tumor cell death via AKT and ERK signaling. Oncogene. 2013;32:4017–27.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Yang L-H, Ho Y-J, Lin J-F, Yeh C-W, Kao S-H, Hsu L-S. Butein inhibits the proliferation of breast cancer cells through generation of reactive oxygen species and modulation of ERK and p38 activities. Mol Med Rep. 2012;6:1126–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Pulaski BA, Ostrand-Rosenberg S. Reduction of established spontaneous mammary carcinoma metastases following immunotherapy with major histocompatibility complex class II and B7.1 cell-based tumor vaccines. Cancer Res. 1998;58:1486–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Lelekakis M, Moseley JM, Martin TJ, Hards D, Williams E, Ho P, et al. A novel orthotopic model of breast cancer metastasis to bone. Clin Exp Metastasis. 1999;17:163–70.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Reagan-Shaw S, Nihal M, Ahmad N. Dose translation from animal to human studies revisited. FASEB J. 2008;22:659–61.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Mykkänen OT, Huotari A, Herzig K-H, Dunlop TW, Mykkänen H, Kirjavainen PV. Wild blueberries (Vaccinium myrtillus) alleviate inflammation and hypertension associated with developing obesity in mice fed with a high-fat diet. PLoS One. 2014;9:e114790.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Perez-Jimenez J, Fezeu L, Touvier M, Arnault N, Manach C, Hercberg S, et al. Dietary intake of 337 polyphenols in French adults. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;93:1220–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Vuong et al. 2016

Advertisement