Open Access

Targeting protein arginine methyltransferase 5 inhibits human hepatocellular carcinoma growth via the downregulation of beta-catenin

Contributed equally
Journal of Translational Medicine201513:349

DOI: 10.1186/s12967-015-0721-8

Received: 13 February 2015

Accepted: 2 November 2015

Published: 5 November 2015

Abstract

Background

Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5), a type II PRMT, is highly expressed in some tumors, but its role in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still unknown.

Methods

PRMT5 level in HCC specimens was determined by immunohistochemical staining and the association with clinicopathologic features was evaluated. PRMT5 was inhibited by AMI-1 (a small molecule inhibitor of PRMTs) or small interference RNA (siRNA). The proliferation of HCC cells was tested by Cell Counting Kit-8, cell migration was evaluated by Transwell assay and cell cycle and apoptosis were analyzed by flow cytometry. The effect of AMI-1 on HCC in vivo was examined by mouse xenograft model.

Results

PRMT5 expression was markedly upregulated in HCC tissues, and correlated inversely with overall patient survival. Knockdown of PRMT5 significantly reduced the proliferation of HCC cells, but did not affect the growth of normal liver cells. Furthermore, β-catenin was identified as a target of PRMT5. Silencing PRMT5 significantly down-regulated the expression of β-catenin and the downstream effector Cyclin D1 in HCC cells. AMI-1 strongly inhibited HCC growth in vivo, increased the ratio of Bax/Bcl-2, and led to apoptosis and loss of migratory activity in several HCC cells. Meanwhile, AMI-1 decreased the expression levels of symmetric dimethylation of H4 (H4R3me2s), a histone mark of PRMT5.

Conclusions

PRMT5 plays an important role in HCC. PRMT5 may be a promising target for HCC therapy.

Keywords

PRMT5 HCC β-Catenin AMI-1 H4R3 H3R8 methylation

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth leading cancer and the third most common cause for cancer death worldwide [13]. The overall survival of patients with HCC is less than 10 %. Surgical resection and liver transplantation is the main therapeutic strategy for HCC if patients are diagnosed at an early stage [4]. However, a majority of patients with HCC present with advanced disease and treatment options are limited [5]. Sorafenib has been recognized as the most effective targeted therapeutic agent for advanced HCC. However, compared with placebo groups, sorafenib only increased survival from 7.9 to 10.7 months [6]. Therefore, it is urgent to develop more effective therapeutic strategies and agents to treat HCC.

Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5), a type II arginine methyltransferase, is localized in both cytoplasm and the nucleus of mammalian cells [7, 8]. PRMT5-driven methylation of arginine residues leads to symmetric dimethylation of histone H3 (H3R8me2s) and H4 (H4R3me2s), which in turn alter chromatin structure to regulate gene expression [9, 10]. PRMT5 has been found to be overexpressed in multiple tumor types, including leukemia, lymphoma, lung cancer, colorectal cancer and breast cancer [1115]. However, the role of PRMT5 in hepatocarcinogenesis has not been established.

In this study we aimed to investigate the role of PRMT5 in hepatocarcinogenesis by using in vitro and in vivo models. We showed that PRMT5 protein is overexpressed in HCC tumor tissues, and its elevated level is associated with worse prognosis in patients with HCC. In addition, we found that specific deletion of PRMT5 by small interference RNA (siRNA) or the inhibition of its activity by arginine methyltransferase inhibitor 1 (AMI-1) significantly decreases HCC development. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the deletion of PRMT5 significantly down-regulates the expression of β-catenin and its downstream effector Cyclin D1 in HCC cells.

Methods

Human tissue samples and cell lines

Fifty-four pairs of HCC tissues and corresponding normal adjacent tissues (NATs) were purchased from the National Engineering Center for Biochips (Shanghai, China). All human materials were obtained with informed consent, and this study was approved by Ethics Committee of Lanzhou University. Four human HCC cell lines (HepG2, Bel-7404, Bel-7402 and SMMC-7721), one rat hepatoma cell line CBRH-7919 and one normal liver cell line HL-7702 were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA), and cultured under conditions recommended.

Immunohistochemical staining

Tissue arrays were constructed using 54 pairs of HCC tissues and corresponding NATs. Immunohistochemical staining was performed on 4 μm sections of paraffin-embedded human HCC tissues and matched NATs to determine the expression level of PRMT5 protein. Briefly, the slides were incubated with PRMT5 antibody at 4 °C overnight. After extensive washing, the sections were incubated with secondary antibody, followed by staining with DAB (ZSGB-BIO, Beijing, China). The slides were then washed and counterstained with hematoxylin. A semiquantitative scoring method according to the overall staining of the cells was applied for immunohistochemistry (IHC) [16, 17].

RNA interference

Three different siRNA each were synthesized against human PRMT5 by Ribobio (Guangzhou, China), and the most effective one (target sequence: CCGCTATTGCACCTTGGAA) was selected for the subsequent experiments with test siRNA. Cells were transfected with PRMT5 siRNA (si-PRMT5, final concentration of 50 nM) or scramble siRNA (Negative control siRNA, si-NC) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s protocol.

Cell proliferation assay and colony formation assay

Cells were seeded in flat-bottom 96-well plates (2.5 × 103 cells per well) in triplicate. After 24 h, cells were treated with si-NC, si-PRMT5 or AMI-1. Then cell proliferation was assessed using the Cell Counting Kit-8 (Dojindo, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. The efficacy of the treatment was expressed as best tumor growth inhibition [18, 19]. The T/C value was calculated as follows: %T/C = (median tumor weight of treated tumors/median tumor weight of control tumors) × 100. For the colony formation assay, HepG2 and HL-7702 cells were placed in 60 mm dishes at 200 cells per dish and maintained in the absence or presence of si-PRMT5 for 16 days. Cells were fixed with fixative (7 parts methanol: 1 part glacial acetic acid) for 15 min and then stained with crystal violet (0.2 g/L) for 30 min.

Cell cycle analysis and apoptosis assay

Cell cycle and apoptosis were analyzed by flow cytometry as described previously [20, 21]. Briefly, cells were seeded at 1 × 105 cells/well in 6-well plates and transfected with si-NC or si-PRMT5. After 72 h, cells were harvested using 0.25 % trypsin without EDTA and fixed in 75 % ethyl alcohol at −20 °C overnight. The next day, cells were exposed to 40 mg/ml propidium iodide and 100 mg/mL ribonuclease A in PBS for 30 min at room temperature in the dark. Cell DNA content was then analyzed using FACS. For apoptosis assay, the treated cells were harvested using 0.25 % trypsin, washed twice and resuspended in Binding Buffer at concentration of 1 × 106 cells/mL. 500 µL of cells were incubated with 5 µL of Annexin V-FITC and 5 µL of Propidium Iodide for 5 min at room temperature in the dark. The samples were then evaluated by FACS (Navios, Beckman Coulter, CA, USA).

Western blot analysis

Cell lysates were separated in 12 % SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and then transferred to PVDF membrane (Bio-Rad). After being blocked with 5 % non-fat milk for 1 h, the membranes were incubated with the following primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight: PRMT5 (1:400; Santa Cruz Biotech, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), PRMT7 (1:500; Santa Cruz Biotech), Cyclin D1 (1:500; Santa Cruz Biotech), CTNNB1 (β-catenin, 1:1000; ABclonal, MA, USA), H4R3me2s (1:2000; Abcam, MA, USA), H3R8me2s (1:250; Novus, CO, USA), Bax (1:1000; Cell Signaling, MA, USA), Bcl-2 (1:1000; Cell Signaling), PRMT7 (1:1000; Cell Signaling) or β-actin (1:2000; Cell Signaling), and then incubated with secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (ZSGB-BIO, Beijing, China). Immuno-reactivity was visualized using ECL Western blotting detection reagents and then analyzed by densitometry.

Migration assay

Cell migration assay was performed in 24-well transwell chambers, 8 µm pore size Transwell plate (Corning Inc.; NY, USA) [22, 23]. In brief, the cells resuspended in 100 µL serum-free medium (4 × 104 cells per well) were placed in upper chamber of insert in triplicate and medium with 600 µL 10 % FBS was used as chemo-attractant in lower chamber. AMI-1 or vehicle control was added to inner chamber. After 24 h, the cells remaining on the top surface of the membrane were removed with a cotton swab. The cells on the bottom surface of the membrane were fixed in methanol and stained with 0.2 % crystal violet.

Human HCC xenograft model

Female athymic BALB/c nude mice were purchased from Shanghai SLAC Laboratory Animal Co. Ltd (Shanghai, China) and maintained under specific pathogen-free room with a 12-h on/off light cycle, and fed autoclaved chow and water. Mice were manipulated and housed according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Treatment Committee of Lanzhou University. 5 × 106 HepG2 cells were inoculated subcutaneously (s.c) in the right flank of 5–6-week old healthy BALB/c nude mice. When tumors reached an average volume of about 70 mm3, the mice bearing too large or too small tumors were eliminated and the left were randomly divided into two treatment groups (8 animals per group): AMI-1 (0.5 mg in 100 µL of 0.9 % NaCl) or 100 µL of 0.9 % NaCl were administered intratumorly (i.t) twice a week. Control animals and animals treated with AMI-1 were sacrificed after 36 days and tumor were excised and weighted. Tumor volumes were calculated according to the following formula: (length × width 2) × 0.52.

Statistical analysis

Unless otherwise stated, data were presented as the mean ± SD and subjected to student’s t test. Differences were considered statistically significant as *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 or ***P < 0.001.

Results

PRMT5 is overexpressed in primary HCC tumors

To evaluate the clinical significance of PRMT5 in HCC development, we analyzed PRMT5 level and its distribution in HCC tissues by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. The array included the cancer tissue samples and corresponding normal adjacent tissues (NATs) from 54 HCC patients, which consisted of 48 males and 6 females, with a medium age of 53 years (range 38–72 years). Among the patients 31 (57.4 %) died of tumor related to causes, and 23 (42.6 %) were still alive as of the last follow-up (Table 1). PRMT5 levels in the tissues array specimens were assessed based on the staining density scores. We found that in cancer tissues, 31 cases (57.4 %) exhibited strong immunopositivity, 18 cases (33.3 %) exhibited moderate immunopositivity, and 5 cases (9.3 %) exhibited no or weak immunopositivity. In contrast, the majority of normal tissues (51.9 %) exhibited no or weak PRMT5 expression (Table 2). Statistical analysis revealed that PRMT5 level significantly increased in cancer tissues compared with the corresponding NATs (Fig. 1A, B). In addition, cytoplasmic PRMT5 level, but not nuclear PRMT5 level, had a trend to be negatively correlated with the survival rate of the patients with HCC (Fig. 1C). As negative control, PRMT5 antibody could not detect positive staining (Additional file 1: Figure 1). Notably, no significant association was found between PRMT5 expression in HCC and tumor size or TNM stage (P > 0.05, Table 1). Univariate Cox regression analyses showed that PRMT5 expression in the cytoplasm was significantly correlated with overall survival (Table 3). Furthermore, multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed that cytoplasmic PRMT5 expression could serve as independent predictor of the overall survival of patients with HCC (Table 3). In addition, we performed Western blot analysis to determine of PRMT5 protein level in several HCC cell lines. As shown in Additional file 1: Figure 2, PRMT5 was expressed in normal liver HL-7702 cells and highly expressed in Bel-7704, HepG2 and CBRH-7919 HCC cell lines. Taken together, these results indicate that PRMT5 overexpressed is tightly linked to HCC proliferation and development.
Table 1

Clinical and pathological characteristics of patients with HCC (n = 54)

Characteristics

n

%

PRMT5 score

P value

Gender

 Male

48

88.9

3.8542

0.369

 Female

6

11.1

3.3333

 

Age (years)

 ≤50

17

31.5

3.2059

0.034

 >50

37

68.5

4.0135

 

Tumor size (cm)

 ≤5

27

50

3.8611

0.573

 >5

27

50

3.6574

 

TNM stage

 I

6

11.1

4.0833

0.259

 II

37

68.5

3.6757

 

 III

11

20.4

8.8636

 
Table 2

Summary of PRMT5 scoring distribution

Composite score

Normal liver tissue (n = 54)

HCC tissue (n = 54)

<2 (weak immunopositivity)

28 (51.9 %)

5 (9.3 %)

2–4 (moderate immunopositivity)

22 (40.7 %)

18 (33.3 %)

≥4 (strong immunopositivity)

4 (7.4 %)

31 (57.4 %)

P values

 

<0.0001

P value calculated by χ 2 test for normal liver tissue versus HCC tissue

Fig. 1

Upregulation of PRMT5 in HCC tissues and its association with poor survival. A Immunohistochemical staining of PRMT5 in HCC tissues and corresponding NATs. Positive cells were stained brown. Magnification, (a, c) ×50; (b, d) ×100; scale bar 50 μm. B PRMT5 scores based on the nuclear or cytoplasmic levels of expression in 54 HCC patients, compared with matched normal tissues. C Association between PRMT5 expression and the survival of HCC patients

Table 3

Univariate and multivariate analyses of the survival of HCC patients

Covariate

n

Univariate analysis

Multivariate analysis

HR

95 % CI

P value

HR

95 % CI

P value

Gender

   

0.710

  

0.758

 Male

48

1.000

  

1.000

  

 Female

6

1.254

0.381–4.126

 

1.232

0.326–4.654

 

Age (years)

   

0.812

  

0.371

 ≤50

17

1.000

  

1.000

  

 >50

37

1.099

0.506–2.387

 

0.671

0.280–1.609

 

Tumor size (cm)

   

0.037

  

0.062

 ≤5

27

1.000

  

1.000

  

 >5

27

2.170

1.046–4.504

 

2.148

0.964

4.785

TNM stage

   

0.105

  

0.329

 I

6

1.000

  

1.000

  

 II

37

1.087

0.323–3.659

    

 III

11

2.395

0.633–9.058

 

1.459

0.683–3.116

 

Cytoplasmic PRMT5

   

0.033

  

0.029

 Low

36

1.000

  

1.000

  

 High

18

2.175

1.067–4.435

 

2.411

1.094–5.313

 

Nuclear PRMT5

   

0.963

  

0.691

 Low

40

1.000

  

1.000

  

 High

14

1.020

0.439–2.369

 

1.228

0.446–3.380

 

The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses to study the effects of the clinicopathological variables and PRMT5 expression on survival

HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval

Knockdown of PRMT5 suppresses HCC cell proliferation in vitro

To determine the role of PRMT5 in HCC cell proliferation, we employed siRNA against human PRMT5 to knockdown PRMT5 in two human HCC cells (HepG2 and Bel-7404) and one normal liver cell (HL-7702), and then cell proliferation was measured by CCK-8 assay. As shown in Fig. 2a–c, silencing PRMT5 significantly decreased proliferation and colony formation of HCC cells, but not normal hepatocyte HL-7702. In addition, because PRMT5 and PRMT7 have been shown to possess type II methyltransferase activity [24, 25], we tested the specificity of si-PRMT5 in HCC cell lines. The results showed that si-PRMT5 did not affect the protein levels of PRMT7 (data not shown).
Fig. 2

Silencing PRMT5 decreases human HCC cell growth in vitro. a HepG2 and Bel-7404 cells were transfected with PRMT5 siRNA (si-PRMT5) or scramble negative control siRNA (si-NC) and cell proliferation was analyzed. b Normal liver HL-7702 cells were transfected with PRMT5 siRNA (si-PRMT5) or scramble negative control siRNA (si-NC) and cell proliferation was analyzed. c The effect of si-PRMT5 on colony formation of HepG2 and HL-7702 cells. Representative results of colony formation of vehicle (left), si-NC (middle), and si-PRMT5 (right) HepG2 and HL-7702 cells. 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu) is used as a positive control. d Knockdown of PRMT5 led to G1 arrest. HepG2 cells were transfected with si-NC or si-PRMT5 and then subjected to cell cycle analysis. e and f Western blot analysis of whole-cell lysates derived from HepG2 cells transfected with si-NC or si-PRMT5 using antibodies against PRMT5, β-catenin, Cyclin D1, H4R3me2s or H3R8me2s

Knockdown of PRMT5 induces HCC cell cycle arrest

To explore the mechanism by which PRMT5 knockdown inhibits HCC cell proliferation, we performed cell cycle analysis. As shown in Fig. 2d, PRMT5 knockdown led to an increase of cell population at the G1 phase, with a corresponding decrease in S and G2/M phase, compared with si-NC, indicating that PRMT5 may be required for the G1-to-S phase transition.

To understand underlying mechanism of cell cycle arrest, the levels of several cell proliferation/cycle-related proteins in si-NC and PRMT5-knockdown HCC cells were analyzed by Western blot analysis. As shown in Fig. 2e, knockdown of PRMT5 significantly decreased the expression of β-catenin and Cyclin D1 in HCC cells. These results indicate that PRMT5 promotes cell cycle progression by regulating the expression of cell cycle-related proteins such as β-catenin and Cyclin D1.

Because PRMT5-driven methylation of arginine residues leads to H4R3me2s and H3R8me2s, we then measured H4R3me2s and H3R8me2s in HCC cells treated with si-PRMT5. We found that the levels of H4R3me2s and H3R8me2s were significantly decreased compared with si-NC (Fig. 2f).

AMI-1 inhibits HCC cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo

AMI-1 has been applied to inhibit type I PRMT (PRMT1, 3, 4, and 6) activity in vitro [26]. Interestingly, we found that AMI-1 also inhibited 84.2 % of type II PRMT5 activity at the tested concentration (nearly 50 µM) [27]. Therefore, we examined the in vitro and in vivo efficacy of AMI-1 on HCC using human HCC cell lines and xenograft mouse models. The concentrations of AMI-1 used for in vitro and in vivo experiments and for enzymatic assay are different, based on our preliminary experiments and previous literatures [2730]. As shown in Fig. 3a, AMI-1 elicited a significant inhibition on HCC cell growth. In animal tumor models, the tumors were injected with AMI-1 intratumorly (i.t.), because the drug via systemic delivery is easily denatured or degraded. We found that treatment with AMI-1 reduced tumor weight by 65.1 % compared with control-treated animals (Fig. 3b).
Fig. 3

AMI-1 inhibits HCC cell growth in vitro and in vivo. a The effect of AMI-1 on the proliferation of human HCC cell lines. b The effect of AMI-1 on tumor formation in a nude mouse xenograft model. c The expression of Bax, Bcl-2 and H4R3me2s in HepG2 cells treated with AMI-1 for 72 h. d Densitometric analysis of band intensities. β-actin was loading control. Control refers to vehicle-treated group

AMI-1 inhibits PRMT5 activity and induces apoptosis in HCC cells

To further explore the mechanism of PRMT5 action in HCC, Western blot analysis was performed to determine protein levels of Bax and Bcl-2 in HCC cells. The results showed that AMI-1 increased Bax/Bcl-2 ratio associated with apoptosis relative to control cells (Fig. 3c). As shown in Fig. 3c, d, the expression of H4R3me2s protein was significantly decreased in AMI-1 treated cells compared with control cells. These results indicate that AMI-1 inhibits HCC growth, at least partially through inhibiting PRMT5 activity in HCC cells.

PRMT5 inhibition promotes the apoptosis while inhibits the migration of HCC cells

Inhibition of PRMT5 overexpression can induce apoptosis in different types of cancer [24, 31, 32]. To investigate the effect of AMI-1 on HCC cell viability, Bel-7402 and HepG2 cells were treated with either AMI-1 or vehicle only, and apoptosis was determined by Annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry. As shown in Fig. 4a, PRMT5 inhibition by AMI-1 resulted in the induction of apoptosis/death in both cells compared with control cells. In addition, transwell assay showed that treatment of HCC cells with AMI-1 resulted in marked reduction in migration activity compared with control group (Fig. 4b). Furthermore, we employed siRNA to knockdown PRMT5 in HCC cells and found that PRMT5 siRNA increased the apoptosis while decreased the migration of HCC cells (Additional file 1: Figure 3).
Fig. 4

AMI-1 promotes the apoptosis and decreases migratory activity of HCC cells. a HCC cells were treated with vehicle or AMI-I and then stained by Annexin V-fluorescein isothicyanate (FITC) and propidium iodide (PI), followed by flow cytometry analysis. b AMI-1 decreased migratory activity of HCC cells measured by Transwell assay. Representative photos of stained cells are shown. Original magnification ×200. Control refers to vehicle-treated group

Discussion

PRMT5 emerges as an important regulator of multiple cellular processes and is expressed aberrantly in different types of cancer [1115]. However, the role of PRMT5 in the pathogenesis of HCC and the relationship between PRMT5 expression and clinicopathological factors of HCC are largely unknown. In this study, we found that PRMT5 expression was markedly up-regulated in HCC tissues compared with NATs, and that higher expression of PRMT5 in the cytoplasm was significantly correlated with poor prognosis of HCC patients. Furthermore, we demonstrated that PRMT5 knockdown by siRNA could significantly inhibit the proliferation and colony formation of HCC cells, and repress cell cycle progression by inducing G0/G1 cell cycle arrest. Collectively, these data indicate that PRMT5 may function as an oncogene and is a key mediator in carcinogenesis and progression of HCC.

Wnt/β-catenin signaling is frequently activated in HCC, but the causes of its activation are not well understood [33]. Cytoplasmic and nuclear accumulations of β-catenin occur in 40–70 % of HCCs [34]. Upon Wnt activation, accumulated β-catenin enters the nucleus and binds to T-cell factor/lymphoid enhancer factor (TCF/LEF) to activate the transcription of Wnt target genes [35, 36]. A key event in both Wnt signaling and cancer cell proliferation is the regulation of β-catenin stability and activity. Our results showed that silencing PRMT5 significantly attenuates the expression levels of β-catenin and Cyclin D1. As Cyclin D1 is a downstream target of Wnt/β-catenin pathway and plays a key role as a regulator of cell proliferation [37], these data suggest that PRMT5 might mediate HCC tumor proliferation and development by regulating Cyclin D1 through Wnt/β-catenin pathway. This finding also suggests that PRMT5 mediated methylation is bi-functional, either repressing or promoting transcription, depending on what genes are expressed [38]. Additional studies will be required to distinguish the multiple potential mechanisms for PRMT5 function in different events of gene expression regulation.

There are several strategies to inhibit PRMT5 overexpression in cancer. In this study, we demonstrated that knockdown of PRMT5 by siRNA effectively inhibited HCC cell proliferation and colony formation in vitro, but treatment with siRNA is still in the experimental stage [39, 40]. Moreover, as no specific potent inhibitors are yet available for members of the PRMT enzyme family [25], our efforts focus on the discovery and development of small molecule inhibitors of PRMT5. AMI-1, a symmetrical sulfonated urea, was discovered by Cheng et al. [26]. However, AMI-1 has been applied to inhibit type I PRMT activity only in vitro experiments.

PRMTs are classified as either type I or type II. Both types can catalyze the formation of omega-N monomethylarginine (MMA) as an intermediate, and type I PRMTs (PRMT1, PRMT3, PRMT4, and PRMT6) lead to the production of asymmetrical dimethylarginine (aDMA), whereas type II PRMTs (PRMT5 and PRMT7) catalyze the formation of symmetrical dimethylarginine (sDMA) [41]. In this study, we first demonstrated that AMI-1 inhibited HCC growth in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, we detected the expression of apoptosis related proteins such as Bax and Bcl-2 and found that AMI-1 up-regulated Bax/Bcl-2 ratio in HCC cells. AMI-1 also induced apoptosis and decreased migratory activity in several HCC cell lines. In addition, AMI-1 decreased the expression levels of H4R3me2s, a histone marker of PRMT5. These data suggest that AMI-1 exhibits anti-tumor effects against HCC, at least in part through inhibitting PRMT5.

Conclusion

These results strongly indicate that PRMT5 is frequently up-regulated and inversely correlated with poor prognosis in HCC patients. PRMT5 might function as an oncogene partly by mediating the repression of β-catenin and its downstream target Cyclin D1 in HCC. Therefore, PRMT5 might be a potential biomarker and a promising therapeutic target for HCC.

Notes

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

BLZ and SHD designed methods and experiments, carried out the laboratory experiments and wrote the paper. ZXL participated in collecting data and writing manuscript. LL collected experimental data and analyzed the data. SZ collected experimental data and wrote the manuscript. XC participated in collecting experimental data. XBC and YJW gave scientific advice. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Fundamental Research Funds of the Central Universities (No. lzujbky-2013-169 and No. lzujbky-2013-171).

Competing interests

The authors declare that have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pharmacology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University; Key Lab of Preclinical Study for New Drugs of Gansu Province
(2)
Gansu Provincial Second People’s Hospital
(3)
State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, and Collaborative Innovation Center for Biotherapy

References

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Shang N, Arteaga M, Zaidi A, Stauffer J, Cotler SJ, Zeleznik-Le NJ, Zhang J, Qiu W. FAK is required for c-Met/beta-catenin-driven hepatocarcinogenesis. Hepatology. 2015;61:214–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Zhang Y, Li T, Guo P, Kang J, Wei Q, Jia X, Zhao W, Huai W, Qiu Y, Sun L, Han L. MiR-424-5p reversed epithelial-mesenchymal transition of anchorage-independent HCC cells by directly targeting ICAT and suppressed HCC progression. Sci Rep. 2014;4:6248.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Raza A, Sood GK. Hepatocellular carcinoma review: current treatment, and evidence-based medicine. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:4115–27.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Johnson PJ. Non-surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. HPB (Oxford). 2005;7:50–5.Google Scholar
  6. Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, Hilgard P, Gane E, Blanc JF, de Oliveira AC, Santoro A, Raoul JL, Forner A, et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:378–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Branscombe TL, Frankel A, Lee JH, Cook JR, Yang Z, Pestka S, Clarke S. PRMT5 (Janus kinase-binding protein 1) catalyzes the formation of symmetric dimethylarginine residues in proteins. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:32971–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ren J, Wang Y, Liang Y, Zhang Y, Bao S, Xu Z. Methylation of ribosomal protein S10 by protein-arginine methyltransferase 5 regulates ribosome biogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:12695–705.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Pal S, Vishwanath SN, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Sif S. Human SWI/SNF-associated PRMT5 methylates histone H3 arginine 8 and negatively regulates expression of ST7 and NM23 tumor suppressor genes. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:9630–45.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhao Q, Rank G, Tan YT, Li H, Moritz RL, Simpson RJ, Cerruti L, Curtis DJ, Patel DJ, Allis CD, et al. PRMT5-mediated methylation of histone H4R3 recruits DNMT3A, coupling histone and DNA methylation in gene silencing. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009;16:304–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cho EC, Zheng S, Munro S, Liu G, Carr SM, Moehlenbrink J, Lu YC, Stimson L, Khan O, Konietzny R, et al. Arginine methylation controls growth regulation by E2F-1. EMBO J. 2012;31:1785–97.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gu Z, Gao S, Zhang F, Wang Z, Ma W, Davis RE, Wang Z. Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 is essential for growth of lung cancer cells. Biochem J. 2012;446:235–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Pal S, Baiocchi RA, Byrd JC, Grever MR, Jacob ST, Sif S. Low levels of miR-92b/96 induce PRMT5 translation and H3R8/H4R3 methylation in mantle cell lymphoma. EMBO J. 2007;26:3558–69.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Powers MA, Fay MM, Factor RE, Welm AL, Ullman KS. Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 accelerates tumor growth by arginine methylation of the tumor suppressor programmed cell death 4. Cancer Res. 2011;71:5579–87.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Wang L, Pal S, Sif S. Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 suppresses the transcription of the RB family of tumor suppressors in leukemia and lymphoma cells. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28:6262–77.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Al-Aynati MM, Radulovich N, Riddell RH, Tsao MS. Epithelial-cadherin and beta-catenin expression changes in pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:1235–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Cui Y, Wu J, Zong M, Song G, Jia Q, Jiang J, Han J. Proteomic profiling in pancreatic cancer with and without lymph node metastasis. Int J Cancer. 2009;124:1614–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Bello E, Colella G, Scarlato V, Oliva P, Berndt A, Valbusa G, Serra SC, D’Incalci M, Cavalletti E, Giavazzi R, et al. E-3810 is a potent dual inhibitor of VEGFR and FGFR that exerts antitumor activity in multiple preclinical models. Cancer Res. 2011;71:1396–405.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Zhang B, Dong S, Cen X, Wang X, Liu X, Zhang H, Zhao X, Wu Y. Ampelopsin sodium exhibits antitumor effects against bladder carcinoma in orthotopic xenograft models. Anticancer Drugs. 2012;23:590–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Epstein Shochet G, Tartakover Matalon S, Drucker L, Pomeranz M, Fishman A, Rashid G, Oron-Karni V, Pasmanik-Chor M, Lishner M. Hormone-dependent placental manipulation of breast cancer cell migration. Hum Reprod 2012;27:73–88.
  21. Wang L, Yao J, Zhang X, Guo B, Le X, Cubberly M, Li Z, Nan K, Song T, Huang C. miRNA-302b suppresses human hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting AKT2. Mol Cancer Res. 2014;12:190–202.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lei Y, Huang K, Gao C, Lau QC, Pan H, Xie K, Li J, Liu R, Zhang T, Xie N, et al. Proteomics identification of ITGB3 as a key regulator in reactive oxygen species-induced migration and invasion of colorectal cancer cells. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2011;10(M110):005397.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhang J, Shan WF, Jin TT, Wu GQ, Xiong XX, Jin HY, Zhu SM. Propofol exerts anti-hepatocellular carcinoma by microvesicle-mediated transfer of miR-142-3p from macrophage to cancer cells. J Trans Med. 2014;12:279.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Yan F, Alinari L, Lustberg ME, Martin LK, Cordero-Nieves HM, Banasavadi-Siddegowda Y, Virk S, Barnholtz-Sloan J, Bell EH, Wojton J, et al. Genetic validation of the protein arginine methyltransferase PRMT5 as a candidate therapeutic target in glioblastoma. Cancer Res. 2014;74:1752–65.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Yang Y, Bedford MT. Protein arginine methyltransferases and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13:37–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Cheng D, Yadav N, King RW, Swanson MS, Weinstein EJ, Bedford MT. Small molecule regulators of protein arginine methyltransferases. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:23892–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang B, Dong S, Zhu R, Hu C, Hou J, Li Y, Zhao Q, Shao X, Bu Q, Li H, et al. Targeting protein arginine methyltransferase 5 inhibits colorectal cancer growth by decreasing arginine methylation of eIF4E and FGFR3. Oncotarget. 2015;6:22799–811.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Andreu-Perez P, Hernandez-Losa J, Moline T, Gil R, Grueso J, Pujol A, Cortes J, Avila MA, Recio JA. Methylthioadenosine (MTA) inhibits melanoma cell proliferation and in vivo tumor growth. BMC Cancer. 2010;10:265.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Ansorena E, Garcia-Trevijano ER, Martinez-Chantar ML, Huang ZZ, Chen L, Mato JM, Iraburu M, Lu SC, Avila MA. S-adenosylmethionine and methylthioadenosine are antiapoptotic in cultured rat hepatocytes but proapoptotic in human hepatoma cells. Hepatology. 2002;35:274–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Li TW, Zhang Q, Oh P, Xia M, Chen H, Bemanian S, Lastra N, Circ M, Moyer MP, Mato JM, et al. S-Adenosylmethionine and methylthioadenosine inhibit cellular FLICE inhibitory protein expression and induce apoptosis in colon cancer cells. Mol Pharmacol. 2009;76:192–200.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Jansson M, Durant ST, Cho EC, Sheahan S, Edelmann M, Kessler B, La Thangue NB. Arginine methylation regulates the p53 response. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10:1431–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Tanaka H, Hoshikawa Y, Oh-hara T, Koike S, Naito M, Noda T, Arai H, Tsuruo T, Fujita N. PRMT5, a novel TRAIL receptor-binding protein, inhibits TRAIL-induced apoptosis via nuclear factor-kappaB activation. Mol Cancer Res. 2009;7:557–69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Shen G, Jia H, Tai Q, Li Y, Chen D. miR-106b downregulates adenomatous polyposis coli and promotes cell proliferation in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 2013;34:211–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Huang H, Fujii H, Sankila A, Mahler-Araujo BM, Matsuda M, Cathomas G, Ohgaki H. Beta-catenin mutations are frequent in human hepatocellular carcinomas associated with hepatitis C virus infection. Am J Pathol. 1999;155:1795–801.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Angers S, Moon RT. Proximal events in Wnt signal transduction. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10:468–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Tetsu O, McCormick F. Beta-catenin regulates expression of cyclin D1 in colon carcinoma cells. Nature. 1999;398:422–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Nishida N, Fukuda Y, Komeda T, Kita R, Sando T, Furukawa M, Amenomori M, Shibagaki I, Nakao K, Ikenaga M, et al. Amplification and overexpression of the cyclin D1 gene in aggressive human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1994;54:3107–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. LeBlanc SE, Konda S, Wu Q, Hu YJ, Oslowski CM, Sif S, Imbalzano AN. Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (Prmt5) promotes gene expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma2 (PPARgamma2) and its target genes during adipogenesis. Mol Endocrinol. 2012;26:583–97.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Luo M. Current chemical biology approaches to interrogate protein methyltransferases. ACS Chem Biol. 2012;7:443–63.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Yost JM, Korboukh I, Liu F, Gao C, Jin J. Targets in epigenetics: inhibiting the methyl writers of the histone code. Curr Chem Genomics. 2011;5:72–84.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Bedford MT, Richard S. Arginine methylation an emerging regulator of protein function. Mol Cell. 2005;18:263–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Zhang et al. 2015

Advertisement