Open Access

Low RBM3 protein expression correlates with tumour progression and poor prognosis in malignant melanoma: An analysis of 215 cases from the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study

  • Liv Jonsson1,
  • Julia Bergman1,
  • Björn Nodin1,
  • Jonas Manjer2, 3,
  • Fredrik Pontén4,
  • Mathias Uhlén5, 6 and
  • Karin Jirström1Email author
Contributed equally
Journal of Translational Medicine20119:114

DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-9-114

Received: 31 March 2011

Accepted: 21 July 2011

Published: 21 July 2011

Abstract

Background

We have previously reported that expression of the RNA- and DNA-binding protein RBM3 is associated with a good prognosis in breast cancer and ovarian cancer. In this study, the prognostic value of immunohistochemical RBM3 expression was assessed in incident cases of malignant melanoma from a prospective population-based cohort study.

Methods

Until Dec 31st 2008, 264 incident cases of primary invasive melanoma had been registered in the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study. Histopathological and clinical information was obtained for available cases and tissue microarrays (TMAs) constructed from 226 (85.6%) suitable paraffin-embedded tumours and 31 metastases. RBM3 expression was analysed by immunohistochemistry on the TMAs and a subset of full-face sections. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for comparison of RBM3 expression and relevant clinicopathological characteristics. Kaplan Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards modelling were used to assess the relationship between RBM3 and recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

RBM3 could be assessed in 215/226 (95.1%) of primary tumours and all metastases. Longitudinal analysis revealed that 16/31 (51.6%) of metastases lacked RBM3 expression, in contrast to the primary tumours in which RBM3 was absent in 3/215 (1.4%) cases and strongly expressed in 120/215 (55.8%) cases. Strong nuclear RBM3 expression in the primary tumour was significantly associated with favourable clinicopathological parameters; i.e. non-ulcerated tumours, lower depth of invasion, lower Clark level, less advanced clinical stage, low mitotic activity and non-nodular histological type, and a prolonged RFS (RR = 0.50; 95% CI = 0.27-0.91) and OS (RR = 0.36, 95%CI = 0.20-0.64). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the beneficial prognostic value of RBM3 remained significant for OS (RR = 0.33; 95%CI = 0.18-0.61).

Conclusions

In line with previous in vitro data, we here show that RBM3 is down-regulated in metastatic melanoma and high nuclear RBM3 expression in the primary tumour is an independent marker of a prolonged OS. The potential utility of RBM3 in treatment stratification of patients with melanoma should be pursued in future studies.

Background

Malignant melanoma is an aggressive form of cancer with a variable clinical course even in patients with thin melanomas and localized disease [14]. Despite increasing insights into melanoma biology and the discovery of gene- and protein-signatures that supplement established prognostic clinicopathological parameters [57], no biomarkers have yet been incorporated into clinical protocols.

The RNA-binding motif protein 3, RBM3, was initially identified in a human fetal brain tissue cDNA library [8]. The RBM3 gene maps to Xp11.23 and encodes two alternatively spliced RNA transcripts. RBM3 transcripts have been found in various human tissues [8] and in vitro, RBM3 is one of the earliest proteins synthesized in response to cold shock [9]. RBM3 contains one RNA-recognition motif (RRM) and is able to bind to both DNA and RNA, whereby a glycine rich region adjacent to the RNA binding motif is thought to enhance the protein-RNA or protein-DNA interaction [8, 10].

Based on an initial discovery in the Human Protein Atlas (HPA) http://www.proteinatlas.org[1113], we have recently demonstrated that tumour-specific expression of RBM3, in particular its nuclear localization, is associated with a significantly improved survival in breast cancer [14] and ovarian cancer [15], and that RBM3 confers cisplatin sensitivity in ovarian cancer cells [15]. Apart from these studies, we are not aware of any other publications related to the prognostic or treatment predictive impact of the tumour-specific expression of RBM3 in human cancer, and the biological processes underlying these observations have not yet been unraveled. It is evident that RBM3 is up-regulated in various types of human malignancies [14, 16, 17] and in vitro studies in a wide range of different model systems have demonstrated that RBM3 is involved in multiple processes central to cancer biology, like proliferation [1517], apoptosis [18, 19] and angiogenesis [16].

The prognostic value of RBM3 expression has, to our knowledge, not yet been investigated in malignant melanoma. However, down-regulation of RBM3 at the gene expression level has been demonstrated in an in vitro model of melanoma progression [20].

In the present study, we investigated the prognostic impact of immunohistochemical (IHC) RBM3 expression in 215 incident malignant melanomas in the prospective, population-based cohort Malmö Diet and Cancer Study (MDCS) [21]. For this purpose, tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed from suitable tumours (n = 226) and a subset of metastases (n = 31). It is demonstrated that strong nuclear expression of RBM3 correlates with favourable clinicopathological parameters and independently predicts a significantly prolonged overall survival. In addition, a markedly reduced expression of RBM3 was observed in metastases compared to primary tumours, which is quite in line with previous in vitro data [20].

Methods

The Malmö Diet and Cancer Study

The Malmö Diet and Cancer Study (MDCS) is a population-based prospective cohort study with the main aim to examine whether a Western diet rich in fat and low in fruit and vegetables increases the risk of certain forms of cancer. Between 1991-1996, a total number of 28 098 individuals; 11 063 (39,4%) men and 17 035 (60,6%) women between 44-74 years where enrolled (from a background population of 74 138). All participants completed the baseline examination, which included a questionnaire, measures of anthropometric/body compositions and a dietary assessment. The questionnaire covered questions on physical activity, use of tobacco and alcohol, heredity, socio-economic factors, education, occupation, previous and current disease and current medication. In addition, blood samples were collected and stored in -80°C. Follow up is done annually by record-linkage to national registries for cancer and cause of death [22].

Ethical permissions for the MDCS (Ref. 51/90) and the present study (Ref. 530/2008) were obtained from the Ethical Committee at Lund University.

Incident malignant melanomas until Dec 31st 2008

Until end of follow-up 31 December 2008, 264 incident invasive malignant melanomas had been registered in the study population. Cases were identified from the Swedish Cancer Registry up until 31 Dec 2007, and from The Southern Swedish Regional Tumour Registry for the period of 1 Jan-31 Dec 2008. All tumours with available slides and/or paraffin blocks were histopathologically re-evaluated on haematoxylin and eosin stained slides whereby information on lymphocytic infiltration (none, mild, moderate or high), ulceration (absent or present), mitotic count and vascular invasion was obtained. Data on location, Clark level and Breslow depth of invasion was obtained from the clinical- and/or pathology records.

Information on recurrence (local, regional or distant) was obtained in 2010 from patient records and pathology reports. Information on vital status and cause of death was obtained from the Swedish Cause of Death Registry up until 31 Dec 2009.

Tissue microarray construction

Paraffin-embedded tumour specimens were collected from the archives of the pathology departments in the region of Skåne in Southern Sweden. Tumours with an insufficient amount of material were excluded. Areas representative of cancer were then marked on haematoxylin & eosin stained slides and TMAs constructed as previously described [23]. In brief, three 0,6 mm cores were taken from each tumour and mounted in a new recipient block using semi-automated arraying device (TMArrayer, Pathology Devices, Westminster, MD, USA). In addition, metastases (representing both regional and distant metastases in various organs) were sampled from 31 cases. Thin melanomas (< 1 mm) were subjected to TMA construction if the diameter was > 1 cm. To check for heterogeneity, IHC staining was also performed on additional full-face sections from 25 cases.

Immunohistochemistry and evaluation of RBM3 staining

For immunohistochemical analysis, 4 μm TMA-sections were automatically pre-treated using the PT-link system (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) and then stained in a Autostainer Plus (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) with the mouse monoclonal anti-RBM3 antibody (AAb030038; Atlas Antibodies AB, Stockholm, Sweden, diluted 1:5000). The specificity of the antibody has been validated previously [15].

As RBM3, when present, was expressed in > 75% of the cells, predominantly in the nuclei and in varying intensities, only the intensity of the staining was accounted for and denoted a score from 0 (negative), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate) and 3 (strong). The staining was evaluated by three independent observers (LJ, JB, and BN) who were blinded to clinical and outcome data. Scoring differences were discussed in order to reach consensus.

Statistical analysis

Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for comparison of RBM3 expression and relevant clinicopathological characteristics. Recurrence was defined as local, regional or distant recurrence or death from malignant melanoma and risk of recurrent disease was referred to as recurrence free survival (RFS). Follow-up started at date of diagnosis and ended at recurrent disease, death, lost to follow-up (emigration) or last date of follow- up with regard to recurrent disease. No recurrences were recorded following the last date of follow-up regarding death, i.e. 31 Dec 2009. Overall survival (OS) was assessed by calculating the risk of death from all causes, overall mortality. Follow-up started at date of diagnosis and ended at death, emigration or 31 Dec 2009, whichever came first.

Kaplan-Meier analysis and log rank test were used to illustrate differences in RFS and OS. Cox regression proportional hazards models were used to estimate the impact of the investigated parameters on RFS and OS in both uni- and multivariate analysis. Some subjects had no information on one or several markers and missing values were coded as a separate category for categorical variables and as the mean of all observations for continuous variables. Missing values for categorical variables co-varied and the multivariate model did not converge due to many constant values. In order to avoid this, the multivariate analysis only included patients with information on RBM3. In addition, the patient with missing information on lymphocytic infiltration had to be excluded. Co-variates were entered into the multivariate analysis using backward selection were a p-value of 0.05 decided entry and a p-value of 0.20 was used for removal. RBM3 was included in all models irrespective of the backward selection procedure.

All tests were two sided. A p-value of 0.05 was considered significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 17 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL).

REMARK criteria

A description of the fulfilment of REMARK [24] criteria for biomarker studies is provided in Additional file 1, Table S1.

Results

Distribution of clinicopathological parameters in the cohort

The distribution of patient- and tumour characteristics in the full cohort is shown in Table 1. In line with the relatively high median age of cases (69 years, range 44-85), the frequency of lentigo maligna melanomas was slightly higher (11.7%) than the average expected around 7% in Sweden [2]. The proportion of thinner melanomas (< = 1 mm, Stages 1A-B) was also higher than expected (86.5% compared to ~55.1%) as well as the proportion of non-ulcerated tumours (14.1% compared to ~24.1%)[2].
Table 1

Patient and tumour characteristics in the full cohort (n = 264)

Age

 

Mean

67.29

Median

69.00

Range

46-84

Sex

 

Female

135 (51.1%)

Male

129 (48.9%)

Location

 

Head and neck

17 (14.9%)

Extremities

111 (44.8%)

Dorsal thorax

65 (26.2%)

Frontal thorax

35 (14.1%)

Unknown

16

Clark level

 

II

93 (37.7%)

III

103 (41.7%)

IV

44 (17.8%)

V

7 (2.8%)

Unknown

17

Breslow (mm)

 

Mean

1.57

Median

0.71

Range

0.08-40.00

Breslow AJCC categories

 

< = 1

158 (59.8%)

1-2

36 (13.6%)

2-4

40 (15.2%)

> 4

14 (5.3%)

Unknown

16 (6.1%)

Clinical Stage

 

1A

154 (74.4%)

1B

25 (12.1%)

2A

17 (8.2%)

2B

7 (3.4%)

3A

2 (1.0%)

4

2 (1.0%)

Unknown

57

Histological type

 

SSM

160 (64.5%)

NMM

53 (21.48%)

LMM

29 (11.7%)

Other

6 (2.4%)

Unknown

16

Ulceration

 

Absent

214 (85.9%)

Present

35 (14.%)

Unknown

16

Mitotic count

 

< 1/mm2

131(51.8)

> = 1/mm2

122(46.2)

Lymphocytic infiltration

 

None-mild

72 (29.0%)

Moderate-high

176 (66.7%)

Unknown

16

Recurrence

 

No

217 (82.2%)

Yes

47 (17.8%)

Follow-up (years)

 

Mean

7.25

Median

6.88

Range

0.64-17.05

Vital status

 

Dead

55 (20,8%)

Alive

219 (79,2%)

Dead from malignant melanoma

28 (10.6%)

Immunohistochemical expression of RBM3 in primary tumours and metastases

Of the 226 cases in the TMA cohort it was possible to evaluate the expression of RBM3 protein in 215 cases (95,1%). There was no obvious heterogeneity in the staining pattern between the tissue cores. There was an excellent concordance between RBM3 scores assessed on full-face sections and TMAs (kappa-value 0.85). Examples of immunohistochemical staining are shown in Figure 1A-D and the staining distribution in primary tumours vs metastases in Figure 1E-F. Interestingly, and in line with previous in vitro data [20], RBM3 expression was strong in the majority of primary tumours, but weak or absent in the metastases (Figure 1E-F). Notably, similar associations were seen when comparing primary tumours and metastases in the 31 cases, for which both locations had been sampled (data not shown).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1479-5876-9-114/MediaObjects/12967_2011_Article_782_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

RBM3 expression in primary melanomas and metastases. Examples of malignant melanomas with (A) negative, (B) weak, (C) intermediate and (D) strong immunohistochemical RBM3 staining. RBM3 expression was strong in the majority of (E) primary tumours compared to (F) metastases.

Association between RBM3 expression and clinicopathological parameters

As shown in Table 2, there was a strong association between low RBM3 expression and depth of invasion, Clark level, clinical stage, mitotic count, nodular vs non-nodular type and ulceration. However, localization, age, lymphocytic infiltration and melanoma type were not associated with RBM3 expression. In some cases with strong RBM3 expression, cytoplasmic staining was present in various intensities, but this did not add any prognostic value (data not shown).
Table 2

Association between RBM3 expression and clinicopathological parameters

 

RBM3 staining intensity

 

0-2

3

 

n(%)

95 (44.2)

120 (55.8)

p-value

Age

   

Mean

68.00

67.15

0.673

(range)

(47-83)

(46-81)

 

Gender

   

Female

45(47.4)

63(52.5)

0.457

Male

50(52.6)

57(47.5)

 

Clark level

   

II

21(22.3)

50(42.4)

0.005**

IIII

48(51.1)

46(39.0)

 

IV-V

25(26.6)

22(18.6)

 

missing

1

2

 

Breslow(mm)

   

Mean

2.47

1.12

0.001**

(range)

(0.08-40.00)

(0.11-7.00)

 

Ulceration

   

No

71(74.7)

109(91.6)

0.001**

Yes

24(25.3)

10(8.4)

 

missing

0

1

 

Lymphocytic

   

infiltrate

   

0-1

26(27.4)

34(28.6)

0.846

2-3

69(72.6)

85(71.4)

 

missing

0

1

 

Clinical stage

   

I

54(76.1)

95(91.3)

0.005*

II-IV

17(23.9)

9(8.7)

 

missing

24

16

 

Vascular invasion

   

No

87(91.6)

114(95.0)

0.314

Yes

8(8.4)

6(5.0)

 

Localization

   

Head and neck

15(16.0)

16(14.0)

0.352

Extremities

40(42.6)

59(51.8)

 

Frontal thorax

10(10.6)

15(13.2)

 

Dorsal thorax

29(30.9)

24(21.1)

 

missing

1

6

 

Type

   

SSM, LMM, Other

65(58.9)

97(68.9)

0.027*

NMM

30(31.6)

22(18.5)

 

missing

0

1

 

Mitotic count

   

< 1/mm2

34(35.8)

71(59.2)

0.001**

> = 1/mm2

61(64.2)

49(40.8)

 

*Significant at the 0.05 level

** Significant at the 0.01 level

§ Mann Whitney U test for comparison of means

SSM = Superficial spreading melanoma

NMM = Nodular malignant melanoma

LMM = Lentigo malignant melanoma

Impact of high RBM3 expression on recurrence free survival and overall survival

Having demonstrated that RBM3 is associated with less advanced disease and favourable clinicopathological parameters, the relationship between RBM3 expression and disease outcome was examined. For survival analysis, data were dichotomized into strong vs negative-moderate intensity for RBM3.

Kaplan Meier analysis of the evaluated cohort (n = 215) demonstrated that high expression of RBM3 was associated with a significantly prolonged RFS (p = 0.020) and OS (p < 0.001) (Figure 2). In Cox multivariate analysis, high RBM3 expression remained an independent prognostic parameter for OS but not RFS (Table 3).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1479-5876-9-114/MediaObjects/12967_2011_Article_782_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Prognostic value of RBM3 expression in primary melanoma. Tumours with high (strong intensity) RBM3 expression had a significantly improved (A) recurrence free survival and (B) overall survival compared to tumours with low RBM3 expression (negative to moderate intensity).

Table 3

Relative risks of recurrence and death according to clinicopathological parameters and RBM3 expression

  

Relative risk of recurrence

 

Relative risk of death

  

Univariate

Multivariate

 

Univariate

Multivariate

 

n(events)

RR(95%CI

RR(95%CI

n(events)

RR(95%CI)

RR(95%CI)

Age

      

Continuous

255(47)

1.01(0.97-1.05)

 

255(53)

1.09(1.04-1.13)

1.07(1.02-1.12)

Gender

      

Female

132(21)

1.00

 

132(18)

1.00

1.00

Male

123(26)

1.51(0.85-2.69)

  

2.60(1.47-4.61)

2.37(1.22-4.57)

Clark level

      

II

93(5)

1.00

1.00

93(13)

1.00

 

III

103(21)

4.39(1.65-11.65)

1.93(0.51-7.26)

103(21)

1.70(0.85-3.40)

 

IV-V

51(21)

9.99(3.76-26.55)

1.02(0.24-4.34)

51(18)

3.04(1.49-6.22)

 

Breslow

      

Continuous

248(47)

1.07(1.03-1.11)

 

248(53)

1.07(1.03-1.12)

 

Subtype

      

SSM, LMM, Other

195(22)

1.00

 

195(30)

1.00

1.00

Nodular

53(24)

5.63(3.15-10.08)

 

53(22)

3.86(2.21-6.74)

2.32(1.20-4.94)

Ulceration

      

No

213(30)

1.00

 

214(35)

1.00

1.00

Yes

35(16)

5.80(3.12-10.77)

 

35(17)

6.29(3.46-11.45)

3.52(1.63-7.61)

Lymphocytic

      

infiltrate

      

0-1

72(20)

1.00

 

72(22)

1.00

1.00

2-3

176(76)

0.43(0.24-0.78)

 

176(30)

0.46(0.26-0.79)

0.55(0.30-1.00)

Clinical stage

      

I

179(12)

1.00

1.00

179(22)

1.00

 

II-IV

28(13)

15.02(6.39-35.30)

7.36(2.47-21.47)

28(11)

6.48(3.05-13.73)

 

Mitotic count

      

< 1/mm2

131(7)

1.00

1.00

131(17)

1.00

 

> = 1/mm2

122(40)

7.99(3.56-17.80)

2.86(0.96-8.47)

122(36)

1.26(1.19-1.34)

 

Vascular invasion

      

No

232(35)

1.00

1.00

232(42)

1.00

1.00

Yes

14(11)

9.25(4.67-18.35)

3.40(1.60-7.20)

14(9)

4.88(2.37-10.08)

3.81(1.62-8.97)

RBM3 intensity

      

0-2

95(24)

1.00

1.00

95(29)

1.00

1.00

3

120(20)

0.50 (0.27-0.91)

0.87(0.46-1.66)

120(20)

0.36(0.20-0.64)

0.33(0.18-0.61)

The number of cases in the multivariate analysis is equal to the number of cases evaluated for RBM3 expression (n = 215).

In thin melanomas (< = 1 mm; n = 129) there was no significant association between RBM3 expression and RFS (data not shown) and a trend, however non-significant, towards a prolonged OS for tumours with high RBM3 expression (RR = 0.48; 95%CI = 0.18-1.24). In melanomas > 1 mm (n = 84), RBM3 was not associated with RFS (data not shown) but with a significantly improved OS (RR = 0.40; 95% CI = 0.19-0.85), which remained significant in multivariate analysis (RR = 0.29; 95% CI = 0.11-0.77). Notably, tumour thickness measured as a continuous variable did not remain significant in multivariate analysis. However, this was not altered when AJCC categories (< 1 mm, 1-2 mm, 2-4 mm and > 4 mm) were used instead or when clinical stage was excluded from the analysis (data not shown).

Information on tumour diameter was only available for 162 (61%) of the patients and therefore not included in the analyses. There was an inverse association between tumour diameter and RBM3 expression (p = 0.030) but not to depth of invasion (data not shown). There was no association between tumour diameter and survival (data not shown)

Discussion

This study provides a first description of the patient and tumour characteristics of incident cases of malignant melanoma in the prospective, population-based cohort Malmö Diet and Cancer Study, diagnosed until Dec 31st, 2008. In addition, it is demonstrated that the investigative biomarker RBM3 is down-regulated in metastatic deposits, associated with favourable histopathological parameters in primary melanomas and an independent predictor of a prolonged overall survival. In a translational context, these findings are quite in line with a previous study, where RBM3 was demonstrated to be one of five down-regulated genes in an in vitro model of melanoma progression [20]. Moreover, as RBM3 has been demonstrated to be a good prognostic biomarker in several other cancer forms, e.g. breast cancer [14] and ovarian cancer [15], its clinical utility in stratification of melanoma patients should be validated in future studies.

According to current clinical guidelines in Sweden, sentinel node biopsy is performed in melanomas > 1 mm, but as an increase in thin melanomas (< = 1 mm) seems to make up for most of the increasing incidence of malignant melanomas [25], there is an unmet need for prognostic biomarkers in this category [26]. In this study, RBM3 was not significantly associated with prognosis in thin (< = 1 mm) melanomas but was an independent favourable prognostic factor for OS in melanomas > 1 mm. The reason for this remains unclear and further studies in larger patient cohorts are needed to determine the prognostic value of RBM3 in thin melanomas. However, the observation that RBM3 remained an independent factor for overall survival in the cohort as a whole, which represented tumours of less advanced clinical stages than in the average population [2], indicates its potential utility as a biomarker for prognostic stratification of patients with early-stage melanoma.

In the light of the above, a methodological aspect that needs further attention is the bias related to the use of the TMA technique in malignant melanoma biomarker studies, e.g. the technical difficulty in sampling small tumours. In this study, we attempted to sample melanomas < 0.5 mm if the diameter was > 10 mm, and in several cases, sampling was successful. The mean Breslow depth of invasion in the TMA cohort was only slightly higher than in the full cohort (1.66 mm compared to 1.57 mm). In addition, as determined by comparison with full-face sections for a subset of the tumours, RBM3 did not seem to display a heterogeneous expression pattern.

In this study we used a monoclonal antibody against RBM3, which was also used in our previous study on ovarian cancer [15]. In the first paper, describing the prognostic value of RBM3 in breast cancer, we used a polyclonal antibody generated within the HPA project [14]. Both antibodies have been extensively validated using siRNA techniques in breast cancer cell lines [14] and ovarian cancer cell lines [15] and similar results have been obtained regarding the staining distribution in various normal and cancerous tissues (data not shown). Although being a semi-quantitative method, IHC has several advantages since it allows for assessment of protein expression in different sub-cellular compartments, which might have important prognostic implications. In the case of RBM3, previous findings indicate that its nuclear rather than cytoplasmic localization is the most relevant parameter for prognostication [14, 15], which is also demonstrated here for melanoma.

As the MDCS is a population-based cohort study, a potential selection bias compared to the general population must be taken into consideration [22]. Since all participants were > 40 years at study entry, the mean age among melanoma cases was higher than in the average population. Notably, since older melanoma patients often present with more advanced disease [27], the relatively low proportion of cases with advanced disease reported here is somewhat unexpected. This could in part be explained by the fact that data necessary for staging could not be obtained for all cases. Nevertheless, clinical stage, as well as the prognostic impact of other established clinicopathological characteristics fell out as expected, which validates the cohort as a platform for future studies of lifestyle and tumour biology in relation to melanoma risk and prognosis.

Given the previously demonstrated association between RBM3 and cisplatin sensitivity in ovarian cancer cell lines [15], the potential value of RBM3 as a predictor of response to platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma could be of interest to investigate in future studies. However, in contrast to the situation in ovarian cancer, where RBM3 showed a consistent expression pattern in primary tumours and omental deposits [15], the data presented here, and previous in vitro data [20], show that RBM3 is down-regulated in the majority of metastatic melanomas. Hence, in the predictive setting in melanoma patients, thorough sampling and immunohistochemical analysis of metastatic deposits would be required in order to identify a comparatively small number of patients with RBM3 positive metastases.

Conclusions

We have demonstrated that the RNA- and DNA-binding protein RBM3 is an independent biomarker of a prolonged OS in patients with primary malignant melanoma and that RBM3 expression is lost during progression of the disease. The potential utility of RBM3 in risk stratification of patients with melanoma should be pursued in future studies.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, the Swedish Cancer Society, Gunnar Nilsson's Cancer Foundation, the Crafoord Foundation, and the Research Funds of Skåne University Hospital.

We thank Elise Nilsson for excellent technical assistance.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Clinical Sciences, Pathology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital
(2)
Department Clinical Sciences, Surgery, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital
(3)
The Malmö Diet and Cancer Study, Lund University
(4)
Department of Genetics and Pathology, Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala University
(5)
Department of Proteomics, AlbaNova University Center, Royal Institute of Technology
(6)
Science for Life Laboratory, Royal Institute of Technology

References

  1. Gimotty PA, Elder DE, Fraker DL, Botbyl J, Sellers K, Elenitsas R, Ming ME, Schuchter L, Spitz FR, Czerniecki BJ, Guerry D: Identification of high-risk patients among those diagnosed with thin cutaneous melanomas. J Clin Oncol. 2007, 25: 1129-1134. 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.1463.View ArticlePubMed
  2. Lindholm C, Andersson R, Dufmats M, Hansson J, Ingvar C, Moller T, Sjodin H, Stierner U, Wagenius G: Invasive cutaneous malignant melanoma in Sweden, 1990-1999. A prospective, population-based study of survival and prognostic factors. Cancer. 2004, 101: 2067-2078. 10.1002/cncr.20602.View ArticlePubMed
  3. McKinnon JG, Yu XQ, McCarthy WH, Thompson JF: Prognosis for patients with thin cutaneous melanoma: long-term survival data from New South Wales Central Cancer Registry and the Sydney Melanoma Unit. Cancer. 2003, 98: 1223-1231. 10.1002/cncr.11624.View ArticlePubMed
  4. Sondak VK, Messina JL: Current status of biomarkers for melanoma metastasis. IDrugs. 2006, 9: 627-631.PubMed
  5. Bittner M, Meltzer P, Chen Y, Jiang Y, Seftor E, Hendrix M, Radmacher M, Simon R, Yakhini Z, Ben-Dor A, Sampas N, Dougherty E, Wang E, Marincola F, Gooden C, Lueders J, Glatfelter A, Pollock P, Carpten J, Gillanders E, Leja D, Dietrich K, Beaudry C, Berens M, Alberts D, Sondak V: Molecular classification of cutaneous malignant melanoma by gene expression profiling. Nature. 2000, 406: 536-540. 10.1038/35020115.View ArticlePubMed
  6. Winnepenninckx V, Lazar V, Michiels S, Dessen P, Stas M, Alonso SR, Avril MF, Ortiz Romero PL, Robert T, Balacescu O, Eggermont AM, Lenoir G, Sarasin A, Tursz T, van den Oord JJ, Spatz A: Gene expression profiling of primary cutaneous melanoma and clinical outcome. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006, 98: 472-482. 10.1093/jnci/djj103.View ArticlePubMed
  7. Jonsson G, Busch C, Knappskog S, Geisler J, Miletic H, Ringner M, Lillehaug JR, Borg A, Lonning PE: Gene expression profiling-based identification of molecular subtypes in stage IV melanomas with different clinical outcome. Clin Cancer Res. 16: 3356-3367.
  8. Derry JM, Kerns JA, Francke U: RBM3, a novel human gene in Xp11.23 with a putative RNA-binding domain. Hum Mol Genet. 1995, 4: 2307-2311. 10.1093/hmg/4.12.2307.View ArticlePubMed
  9. Danno S, Nishiyama H, Higashitsuji H, Yokoi H, Xue JH, Itoh K, Matsuda T, Fujita J: Increased transcript level of RBM3, a member of the glycine-rich RNA-binding protein family, in human cells in response to cold stress. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997, 236: 804-807. 10.1006/bbrc.1997.7059.View ArticlePubMed
  10. Lleonart ME: A new generation of proto-oncogenes: cold-inducible RNA binding proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1805: 43-52.
  11. Uhlen M, Bjorling E, Agaton C, Szigyarto CA, Amini B, Andersen E, Andersson AC, Angelidou P, Asplund A, Asplund C, Berglund L, Bergstrom K, Brumer H, Cerjan D, Ekstrom M, Elobeid A, Eriksson C, Fagerberg L, Falk R, Fall J, Forsberg M, Bjorklund MG, Gumbel K, Halimi A, Hallin I, Hamsten C, Hansson M, Hedhammar M, Herkules G, Kampf C, Larsson K, Lindskog M, Lodewyckx W, Lund J, Lundeberg J, Magnusson K, Malm E, Nilsson P, Odling J, Oksvold P, Olsson I, Oster E, Ottosson J, Paavilainen L, Persson A, Rimini R, Rockberg J, Runeson M, Sivertsson A, Sköllermo A, Steen J, Stenvall M, Sterky F, Strömberg S, Sundberg M, Tegel H, Tourle S, Wahlund E, Waldén A, Wan J, Wernérus H, Westberg J, Wester K, Wrethagen U, Xu LL, Hober S, Pontén F: A human protein atlas for normal and cancer tissues based on antibody proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2005, 4: 1920-1932. 10.1074/mcp.M500279-MCP200.View ArticlePubMed
  12. Bjorling E, Lindskog C, Oksvold P, Linne J, Kampf C, Hober S, Uhlen M, Ponten F: A web-based tool for in silico biomarker discovery based on tissue-specific protein profiles in normal and cancer tissues. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2008, 7: 825-844. 10.1074/mcp.M700411-MCP200.View ArticlePubMed
  13. Ponten F, Jirstrom K, Uhlen M: The Human Protein Atlas--a tool for pathology. J Pathol. 2008, 216: 387-393. 10.1002/path.2440.View ArticlePubMed
  14. Jogi A, Brennan DJ, Ryden L, Magnusson K, Ferno M, Stal O, Borgquist S, Uhlen M, Landberg G, Pahlman S, Jirstrom K: Nuclear expression of the RNA-binding protein RBM3 is associated with an improved clinical outcome in breast cancer. Mod Pathol. 2009, 22: 1564-1574. 10.1038/modpathol.2009.124.View ArticlePubMed
  15. Ehlen A, Brennan DJ, Nodin B, O'Connor DP, Eberhard J, Alvarado-Kristensson M, Jeffrey IB, Manjer J, Brandstedt J, Uhlen M, Ponten F, Jirstrom K: Expression of the RNA-binding protein RBM3 is associated with a favourable prognosis and cisplatin sensitivity in epithelial ovarian cancer. J Transl Med. 8: 78-
  16. Sureban SM, Ramalingam S, Natarajan G, May R, Subramaniam D, Bishnupuri KS, Morrison AR, Dieckgraefe BK, Brackett DJ, Postier RG, Houchen CW, Anant S: Translation regulatory factor RBM3 is a proto-oncogene that prevents mitotic catastrophe. Oncogene. 2008, 27: 4544-4556. 10.1038/onc.2008.97.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  17. Wellmann S, Truss M, Bruder E, Tornillo L, Zelmer A, Seeger K, Buhrer C: The RNA-binding protein RBM3 is required for cell proliferation and protects against serum deprivation-induced cell death. Pediatr Res. 67: 35-41.
  18. Martinez-Arribas F, Agudo D, Pollan M, Gomez-Esquer F, Diaz-Gil G, Lucas R, Schneider J: Positive correlation between the expression of X-chromosome RBM genes (RBMX, RBM3, RBM10) and the proapoptotic Bax gene in human breast cancer. J Cell Biochem. 2006, 97: 1275-1282. 10.1002/jcb.20725.View ArticlePubMed
  19. Sutherland LC, Rintala-Maki ND, White RD, Morin CD: RNA binding motif (RBM) proteins: a novel family of apoptosis modulators?. J Cell Biochem. 2005, 94: 5-24. 10.1002/jcb.20204.View ArticlePubMed
  20. Baldi A, Battista T, De Luca A, Santini D, Rossiello L, Baldi F, Natali PG, Lombardi D, Picardo M, Felsani A, Paggi MG: Identification of genes down-regulated during melanoma progression: a cDNA array study. Exp Dermatol. 2003, 12: 213-218. 10.1034/j.1600-0625.2003.00026.x.View ArticlePubMed
  21. Berglund G, Elmstahl S, Janzon L, Larsson SA: The Malmo Diet and Cancer Study. Design and feasibility. J Intern Med. 1993, 233: 45-51. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1993.tb00647.x.View ArticlePubMed
  22. Manjer J, Carlsson S, Elmstahl S, Gullberg B, Janzon L, Lindstrom M, Mattisson I, Berglund G: The Malmo Diet and Cancer Study: representativity, cancer incidence and mortality in participants and non-participants. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2001, 10: 489-499. 10.1097/00008469-200112000-00003.View ArticlePubMed
  23. Kononen J, Bubendorf L, Kallioniemi A, Barlund M, Schraml P, Leighton S, Torhorst J, Mihatsch MJ, Sauter G, Kallioniemi OP: Tissue microarrays for high-throughput molecular profiling of tumour specimens. Nat Med. 1998, 4: 844-847. 10.1038/nm0798-844.View ArticlePubMed
  24. McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE, Gion M, Clark GM: Reporting recommendations for tumour marker prognostic studies. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23: 9067-9072. 10.1200/JCO.2004.01.0454.View ArticlePubMed
  25. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ: Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009, 59: 225-249. 10.3322/caac.20006.View ArticlePubMed
  26. Gimotty PA, Guerry D: Prognostication in thin cutaneous melanomas. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 134: 1758-1763.
  27. Lasithiotakis KG, Leiter U, Eigentler T, Breuninger H, Metzler G, Meier F, Garbe C: Improvement of overall survival of patients with cutaneous melanoma in Germany, 1976-2001: which factors contributed?. Cancer. 2007, 109: 1174-1182. 10.1002/cncr.22511.View ArticlePubMed

Copyright

© Jonsson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement