Open Access

Safety evaluation of allogeneic umbilical cord blood mononuclear cell therapy for degenerative conditions

  • Wan-Zhang Yang1,
  • Yun Zhang2,
  • Fang Wu1,
  • Wei-Ping Min3,
  • Boris Minev4,
  • Min Zhang1,
  • Xiao-Ling Luo2,
  • Famela Ramos5,
  • Thomas E Ichim5,
  • Neil H Riordan5 and
  • Xiang Hu2Email author
Contributed equally
Journal of Translational Medicine20108:75

DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-8-75

Received: 2 April 2010

Accepted: 3 August 2010

Published: 3 August 2010

Abstract

Background

The current paradigm for cord blood transplantation is that HLA matching and immune suppression are strictly required to prevent graft versus host disease (GVHD). Immunological arguments and historical examples have been made that the use of cord blood for non-hematopoietic activities such as growth factor production, stimulation of angiogenesis, and immune modulation may not require matching or immune suppression.

Methods

114 patients suffering from non-hematopoietic degenerative conditions were treated with non-matched, allogeneic cord blood. Doses of 1-3 × 107 cord blood mononuclear cells per treatment, with 4-5 treatments both intrathecal and intravenously were performed. Adverse events and hematological, immunological, and biochemical parameters were analyzed for safety evaluation.

Results

No serious adverse effects were reported. Hematological, immunological, and biochemical parameters did not deviate from normal ranges as a result of therapy.

Conclusion

The current hematology-based paradigm of need for matching and immune suppression needs to be revisited when cord blood is used for non-hematopoietic regenerative purposes in immune competent recipients.

Background

Cord blood mononuclear cells are comprised of a heterogenous population of hematopoietic and mesenchymal stem cells, endothelial progenitor cells, and immature immunological cells [1, 2]. The conventional medical use of cord blood is limited to hematopoietic reconstitution [3], with clinical trials ongoing in type I diabetes [4], and cerebral palsy [5]. Preclinical studies have demonstrated efficacy of cord blood in diverse conditions ranging from heat stroke [6, 7], to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [8], to post infarct regeneration [9], to liver failure [10].

In hematopoietic stem cell transplants ablation of recipient marrow is required to eradicate the endogenous stem cell compartment, and HLA matching with post transplant immune suppression is used to prevent GVHD [3]. For non-hematopoietic applications such as cardiovascular or neurological indications, the therapeutic activities of the cord blood are believed to be mediated in many cases by growth factor secretion [11, 12], therefore permanent graft survival is not essential. In these situations the use of non-matched, allogeneic cells may be acceptable. The major barrier to this approach is the theoretical fear of inducing GVHD.

From practical experience there is some evidence that in immune competent recipients, non-matched allogeneic cord blood cells do not elicit GVHD. Specifically: a) Recipients of cord blood in the transfusion scenario, in some cases up to 37 units, have not reported GVHD; b) T cells comprise the GVHD-causing component of cord blood. Administration of allogeneic lymphocytes for prevention of recurrent spontaneous abortion has not led to GVHD, despite higher T cell doses than found in cord blood transplants; and c) Despite presence of fetal T cells in mothers, GVHD associated with pregnancy has not been reported [13].

Under the practice of medicine, several treatment facilities have been using cord blood stem cells without matching or immune suppression [1417]. Despite identification of a "clinical signal", studies have been extremely limited in patient numbers. In the current report we analyzed safety parameters of 114 patients treated with non-matched, allogeneic cord blood mononuclear cells. Treatments included intravenous and intrathecal administration. No immunological reactions, GVHD, or serious adverse effects were observed. Hematological, biochemical, and immunological parameters remained within normal range.

Methods

Patient characteristics

Data reported was collected from patients treated during August 2005-July 2007 as part of medical practice at the Nanshan Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical College. All patients were free of: 1) prior history of severe allergic reactions; 2) history of, or active, malignancy; 3) active systemic or severe focal infections (including HIV and syphilis); 4) active cardiac, pulmonary, renal, hepatic or gastrointestinal disease; 5) coagulopathy or any other contraindication for lumbar puncture; 6) gastrostomy, tracheostomy or noninvasive ventilatory support - as these could influence the prognosis and end-point measurements; 7) any severe psychiatric disorder and 8) any immunodeficiency disease or condition.

Age range was 15 to 68 and the male:female ratio was 1.6:1 (70 males, 44 females). In terms of diagnosis, 4 patients had multiple system atrophy (MSA), 23 patients had ataxias, 42 patients were paraplegic, 19 patients had multiple sclerosis, 12 patients had Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) and 14 patients had other diagnoses (Table 1). The local institutional review board of the Nanshan Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical College, under the auspices of the National Ministry of Heath, approved application of the technique and consent forms were obtained from each patient before initiation of treatment.
Table 1

Patients treated by condition

Condition

Number of patients

Paraplegia

42

Ataxia

23

Multiple Sclerosis

19

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

12

Sequelae of Cerebrovascular Diseases

6

Multiple System Atrophy

4

Motor Neuron Disease

2

Cerebral Palsy

1

Nerve Injury (Brachial plexus)

1

Traumatic Brain Injury Sequelae

1

Hypoxic-ischemic Encephalopathy Sequelae

1

Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

1

Optic Nerve Hypoplasia

1

Cell processing

Umbilical Cord Blood (100~ 150 mL) was collected from healthy unrelated donors (signed an informed consent) in accordance with the sterile procurement guidelines for cord blood in each hospital. After collection, each blood sample was tested for communicable diseases such as HBV, HCV, HIV, ALT, and Syphilis. Cord blood was diluted with saline in the ratio 2:1 and 30 mls of the diluted blood was then added to 15 mls of Ficoll in every 50 ml centrifuge tube and then centrifuged (750 g × 22 minutes). Mononuclear cells were collected and washed twice in saline. Contaminating erythrocytes were lyzed with lysis buffer comprising of injection grade water.

Cell density was adjusted to 2 ~ 6 × 106/ml and seeded in DMEM/F12 culture medium with bFGF and EGF at a concentration of 20 ng/ml. Culture media was mixed with 2% v/v B-27 Stem Cell Culture Supplements. Cells were cultured at 37°C with saturated humidity and 5% CO2 by volume. At this stage, all relevant information about the initial culture is entered in the batch information record including test results for sterility, mycoplasma and endotoxin. Cell growth was regularly monitored and the inspection records updated accordingly. Cells were harvested for clinical application after one week of cultivation with cell quantity ≥1 × 107 and viability ≥95%.

To ensure the quality of the UCB-derived mononuclear cells, a number of parameters are confirmed before use. These are as follows: 1) Raw material control: Tests (HBV, HCV, HIV, ALT and Syphilis) for communicable diseases for UCB units are carried out before any processing begins. Testing was performed by third party laboratory under local government-monitored conditions.

2) In-process control: Non-qualifying cells were eliminated in accordance with Beike's cell counting and morphology standards which include cell quantity ≥1 × 107 and the highly homogeneous cells possessing a round shape and non-adherence to the culture flask.

3) Culture control: Any contaminated cell suspensions or unhealthy cells were eliminated upon discovery. Non-contamination was determined as lack of sterility, mycoplasma, and lack of visible microorganisms by microscopy. Furthermore samples had to have an endotoxin level≤0.5 EU/ml and be negative for free DNA.

4) Finished product control: This incorporates a final cell count (≥1 × 107, containing 1.0-2.0% CD34+ cells as determined by flow cytometry), cell viability (≥95%) and sterility test.

Cell administration

Intrathecal injection by lumbar puncture was combined with intravenous infusion and repeated four or five times - depending on the patient's condition. Treatments were separated by one week intervals. Lumbar puncture was performed in the lateral decubitus position, prepped and draped in sterile fashion, and the needle placed in the lumbar cistern. Two mls of Cerebro-Spinal Fluid (CSF) was removed and replaced by 2 mls of cell suspension containing 1-3 × 107 cells. A 30 ml intravenous infusion of cell suspension was given through an intravenous catheter in 15-20 minutes.

Statistics

Adverse events were analyzed for all 114 cases, and are presented as percentage values. For analysis of laboratory parameters, the continuous variables were compared using Student t-test with alpha set at 0.05 by group. When the data set did not conform to the normal distribution, logarithmic transformation was used. Inter-quartile-range (IQR) computation and boxplots were used to detect outliers. The outliers were firmly believed to be data errors or data entry errors and were removed from the data analysis. The SPSS 13.0 statistical package was applied for statistical analysis.

Results

Administration of cord blood mononuclear cells via intrathecal and intravenous routes was well tolerated. No allergic or immunological reactions were noted at the time of injection or while under observation. Analysis of overall adverse events (Table 2) for a 4-5 week follow-up time period indicated headache as the most common (3.21%). In all cases headaches were transient in nature. No deviation outside of reference ranges was observed for hematological (Table 3), biochemical (Table 4), or immunological (Table 5) measurements. Average follow-up time for post-treatment analysis was 30 days. Some pre and post treatment differences reaching statistical significance were however observed.
Table 2

Analysis of adverse events (AE)

AE

Total injections in person time

Number of AE by type (person-time)

Incidence of AE

Headache

592

19

3.21%

Fever

592

7

1.18%

Waist pain

592

5

0.84%

Shivering

592

3

0.51%

Vomiting

592

2

0.34%

Lower limb pain

592

2

0.34%

Total

592

38

6.42

Table 3

Hematology

Parameter

Number of patients

Before treatment

After treatment

Reference range

P value

Significance

Leukocytes (×109/L)

114

6.94 (1.57)

7.85 (2.25)

4.0-10.0

<0.001

In normal range but significantly elevated after treatment

Neutrophilic leukocytes % of total leukocytes

114

59.70 (10.39)

65.03 (13.06)

50.0-70.0

0.001

In normal range but significantly elevated after treatment

Lymphocytes % of total leukocytes

114

30.23 (9.20)

26.03 (10.32)

20.0-40.0

<0.001

In normal range but significantly decreased after treatment

RBC (×1012/L)

113

4.61 (0.51)

4.47 (0.46)

3.5-5.0

<0.001

In normal range but significantly decreased after treatment

Mean cell hemoglobin (g/L)

113

137.02 (14.54)

132.88 (13.98)

110.0-150.0

<0.001

In normal range but significantly decreased after treatment

Platelets (×109/L)

113

193.94 (47.64)

206.21 (54.52)

100.0-300.0

0.005

In normal range but significantly elevated after treatment

Table 4

Serum chemistry

Parameter

Number of patients

Before treatment

After treatment

Reference range

P value

Significance

Total bilirubin (μmol/L)

113

1.13 (0.14)

1.09 (0.15)

0.23-1.35

0.002

In normal range but significantly decreased after treatment

Total protein (g/L)

114

65.03 (5.27)

63.20 (6.27)

60.0-85.0

0.002

In normal range but significantly decreased after treatment

Glutamic-pyruvic transaminase, (GPT) (U/L)

114

1.37 (0.22)

1.33 (0.20)

0.7-1.65

0.037

In normal range but significantly decreased after treatment

Glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (GOT) (U/L)

114

23.60 (12.45)

21.01 (8.56)

5.0-45.0

0.005

In normal range but significantly decreased after treatment

Serum urea nitrogen (BUN) (μmol/L)

114

4.63 (1.58)

4.58 (1.88)

2.0-7.1

0.750

In normal range, no significant difference

Serum creatinine (SCR) (μmol/L)

114

1.81 (0.16)

1.81 (0.16)

1.64-2.12

0.898

In normal range, no significant difference

Uric acid (UA) (μmol/L)

114

308.27 (80.88)

309.28 (89.64)

90.0-440.0

0.871

In normal range, no significant difference

Table 5

Immunological parameters

Parameter

Number of patients

Before treatment

After treatment

Reference range

P value

Significance

T-cells (CD3)% of total T cells

113

79.91 (6.78)

77.67 (8.18)

61-85

0.001

In normal range but significantly decreased after treatment

Helper T-cell (Th cell/CD4) % of total T cells

114

48.84 (9.03)

45.44 (10.65)

28-58

<0.001

In normal range but significantly decreased after treatment

Ts cell (CD8)% of total T cells

114

25.38 (7.18)

26.89 (8.10)

19-48

0.005

In normal range but significantly increased after treatment

CD4/CD8

114

0.30 (0.20)

0.24 (0.23)

-0.05-0.30

<0.001

In normal range but significantly decreased after treatment

IgG (g/L)

114

0.96 (0.12)

0.91 (0.14)

0.86-1.23

<0.001

In normal range but significantly decreased after treatment

IgA (g/L)

114

2.15 (0.79)

2.01 (0.72)

0.68-3.83

<0.001

In normal range but significantly decreased after treatment

IgM (g/L)

114

1.13 (0.62)

1.32 (0.72)

0.63-2.77

<0.001

In normal range but significantly increased after treatment

Complement C3 (g/L)

114

1.19 (0.23)

1.21 (0.25)

0.85-1.93

0.103

In normal range but no significant changes after treatment

Complement C4 (g/L)

114

-0.62 (0.17)

-0.63 (-0.16)

-0.92 - -0.44

0.283

In normal range but no significant changes after treatment

Slight but statistically significant alterations in mean hematological values were noted. Treatment was associated with increased total leukocyte 6.94 ± 1.57 vs 7.85 ± 2.25, neutrophil 59.70 ± 10.39 vs 65.03 ± 13.06, and platelet 193.94 ± 47.64 vs 206.21 ± 54.52 counts. Reduction in lymphocyte 30.23 ± 9.20 vs 26.03 ± 10.32, RBC4.61 ± 0.51 vs 4.47 ± 0.46, and MCH 137.02 ± 14.54 vs 132.88 ± 13.98 was observed (Table 3).

Total bilirubin 1.13 ± 0.14 vs 1.09 ± 0.15, total protein 65.03 ± 5.27 vs 63.20 ± 6.27, GPT1.37 ± 0.22 vs 1.33 ± 0.20, GOT 23.60 ± 12.45 vs 21.01 ± 8.56, and creatinine 1.81 ± 0.16 vs 1.81 ± 0.16 where significantly decreased after treatment, whereas BUN and uric acid were not altered (Table 4).

CD3 T cells 79.91 ± 6.78 vs 77.67 ± 8.18, CD4 T cells 48.84 ± 9.03 vs 45.44 ± 10.65, and the CD4/CD8 ratio 0.30 ± 0.20 vs 0.24 ± 0.23 were decreased, whereas an increase in CD8 cells was observed with treatment 25.38 ± 7.18 vs 26.89 ± 8.10. Of soluble immune parameters, C3 and C4 were not affected by treatment, whereas IgG 0.96 ± 0.12 vs 0.91 ± 0.14 and IgA 2.15 ± 0.79 vs 2.01 ± 0.72 levels were decreased. An increase in IgM levels 1.13 ± 0.62 vs 1.32 ± 0.72 was noted post treatment (Table 5).

Discussion

The possibility of using non-matched, allogeneic cord blood cells for regenerative medicine applications in absence of immune suppression would overcome several substantial hurdles existing today in stem cell therapy. Although cord blood derived cells are superior to bone marrow in terms of growth factor production ability, pluripotency, and immune modulating activity [18, 19], their use has been limited to autologous sources for regenerative applications. The reason for this is has been the argument that the potential adverse effects of myeloablative therapy outweigh possible regenerative activities. The current study investigated the safety of allogeneic cord blood cells for use in regenerative applications in absence of immune suppression.

No serious adverse effects were observed. The most common adverse reaction reported was headache (3.21%), some of which was believed to be caused by postural hypotensive headaches, which is a known complication of lumbar puncture procedures. These symptoms chronologically followed the treatment, and resolved spontaneously without aggressive intervention. These findings are consistent with a Boston Children's Hospital's study that recorded a similar adverse reaction profile to cryopreserved (CD34+) hematopoietic stem cells in the treatment of children [20]. These incidence rates are also similar to those of the published PBPC and Ficoll groups (grouped by isolation method).

Of the full range of laboratory parameters in the analysis, only the changes of lymphocyte (decreased) and neutrophil (increased) count could be described as medically significant. A key contributing factor to these changes is possibly the fact that most patients received an intravenous injection of dexamethasone (5 mg, once) prior to each stem cell injection, to suppress possible adverse reactions. It has been reported that dexamethasone affects white blood cells, segmented neutrophils and lymphocytes [21], and that dexamethasone at therapeutic doses can have a suppressive effect on the lymphocyte proliferative response.

Conclusion

In summary, these data support the safety and freedom from immunologically-mediated adverse effects of allogeneic cord blood therapy in absence of immune suppression/myeloablation. This study presents for the first time a detailed safety analysis of using non-matched, allogeneic cord blood cells to treat non-hematopoietic degenerative conditions. The longest follow-up with this protocol was 4 years with no evidence of immune reactivity or GVHD. Evaluation of therapeutic benefit is currently in progress.

Notes

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Nanshan Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical College
(2)
Shenzhen Beike Cell Engineering Research Institute
(3)
Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario
(4)
Department of Medicine, Division of Neurosurgery, University of California San Diego
(5)
Medistem Inc

References

  1. Javed MJ, Mead LE, Prater D, Bessler WK, Foster D, Case J, Goebel WS, Yoder MC, Haneline LS, Ingram DA: Endothelial colony forming cells and mesenchymal stem cells are enriched at different gestational ages in human umbilical cord blood. Pediatr Res. 2008, 64: 68-73. 10.1203/PDR.0b013e31817445e9.PubMedView Article
  2. Hutton JF, Gargett T, Sadlon TJ, Bresatz S, Brown CY, Zola H, Shannon MF, D'Andrea RJ, Barry SC: Development of CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ regulatory T cells from cord blood hematopoietic progenitor cells. J Leukoc Biol. 2009, 85: 445-451. 10.1189/jlb.1008620.PubMedView Article
  3. Gratwohl A, Baldomero H: Trends of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the third millennium. Curr Opin Hematol. 2009, 16: 420-426. 10.1097/MOH.0b013e328330990f.PubMedView Article
  4. Haller MJ, Wasserfall CH, McGrail KM, Cintron M, Brusko TM, Wingard JR, Kelly SS, Shuster JJ, Atkinson MA, Schatz DA: Autologous umbilical cord blood transfusion in very young children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009, 32: 2041-2046. 10.2337/dc09-0967.PubMedPubMed CentralView Article
  5. Harris DT: Non-haematological uses of cord blood stem cells. Br J Haematol. 2009, 147: 177-184. 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07767.x.PubMedView Article
  6. Liu WS, Chen CT, Foo NH, Huang HR, Wang JJ, Chen SH, Chen TJ: Human umbilical cord blood cells protect against hypothalamic apoptosis and systemic inflammation response during heatstroke in rats. Pediatr Neonatol. 2009, 50: 208-216. 10.1016/S1875-9572(09)60065-6.PubMedView Article
  7. Hwang WS, Chen SH, Lin CH, Chang HK, Chen WC, Lin MT: Human umbilical cord blood-derived CD34+ cells can be used as a prophylactic agent for experimental heatstroke. J Pharmacol Sci. 2008, 106: 46-55. 10.1254/jphs.FP0071567.PubMedView Article
  8. Garbuzova-Davis S, Willing AE, Zigova T, Saporta S, Justen EB, Lane JC, Hudson JE, Chen N, Davis CD, Sanberg PR: Intravenous administration of human umbilical cord blood cells in a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: distribution, migration, and differentiation. J Hematother Stem Cell Res. 2003, 12: 255-270. 10.1089/152581603322022990.PubMedView Article
  9. Xing YL, Shen LH, Li HW, Zhang YC, Zhao L, Zhao SM, Xu Q: Optimal time for human umbilical cord blood cell transplantation in rats with myocardial infarction. Chin Med J (Engl). 2009, 122: 2833-2839.
  10. Moon YJ, Yoon HH, Lee MW, Jang IK, Lee DH, Lee JH, Lee SK, Lee KH, Kim YJ, Eom YW: Multipotent progenitor cells derived from human umbilical cord blood can differentiate into hepatocyte-like cells in a liver injury rat model. Transplant Proc. 2009, 41: 4357-4360. 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.08.053.PubMedView Article
  11. Bachstetter AD, Pabon MM, Cole MJ, Hudson CE, Sanberg PR, Willing AE, Bickford PC, Gemma C: Peripheral injection of human umbilical cord blood stimulates neurogenesis in the aged rat brain. BMC Neurosci. 2008, 9: 22-10.1186/1471-2202-9-22.PubMedPubMed CentralView Article
  12. Xiao J, Nan Z, Motooka Y, Low WC: Transplantation of a novel cell line population of umbilical cord blood stem cells ameliorates neurological deficits associated with ischemic brain injury. Stem Cells Dev. 2005, 14: 722-733. 10.1089/scd.2005.14.722.PubMedView Article
  13. Riordan NH, Chan K, Marleau AM, Ichim TE: Cord blood in regenerative medicine: do we need immune suppression?. J Transl Med. 2007, 5: 8-10.1186/1479-5876-5-8.PubMedPubMed CentralView Article
  14. Ghen MJ, Roshan R, Roshan RO, Blyweiss DJ, Corso N, Khalili B, Zenga WT: Potential clinical applications using stem cells derived from human umbilical cord blood. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006, 13: 562-572. 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60646-3.PubMedView Article
  15. Ichim TE, Solano F, Brenes R, Glenn E, Chang J, Chan K, Riordan NH: Placental mesenchymal and cord blood stem cell therapy for dilated cardiomyopathy. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008, 16: 898-905. 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60159-9.PubMedView Article
  16. Riordan NH, Ichim TE, Min WP, Wang H, Solano F, Lara F, Alfaro M, Rodriguez JP, Harman RJ, Patel AN, Murphy MP, Lee RR, Minev B: Non-expanded adipose stromal vascular fraction cell therapy for multiple sclerosis. J Transl Med. 2009, 7: 29-10.1186/1479-5876-7-29.PubMedPubMed CentralView Article
  17. Ichim TE, Alexandrescu DT, Solano F, Lara F, Campion Rde N, Paris E, Woods EJ, Murphy MP, Dasanu CA, Patel AN, Marleau AM, Leal A, Riordan NH: Mesenchymal stem cells as anti-inflammatories: implications for treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Cell Immunol. 260: 75-82. 10.1016/j.cellimm.2009.10.006.
  18. Yoo KH, Jang IK, Lee MW, Kim HE, Yang MS, Eom Y, Lee JE, Kim YJ, Yang SK, Jung HL, Sung KW, Kim CW, Koo HH: Comparison of immunomodulatory properties of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult human tissues. Cell Immunol. 2009, 259: 150-156. 10.1016/j.cellimm.2009.06.010.PubMedView Article
  19. Hwang JH, Shim SS, Seok OS, Lee HY, Woo SK, Kim BH, Song HR, Lee JK, Park YK: Comparison of cytokine expression in mesenchymal stem cells from human placenta, cord blood, and bone marrow. J Korean Med Sci. 2009, 24: 547-554. 10.3346/jkms.2009.24.4.547.PubMedPubMed CentralView Article
  20. Jiang ChF WCX, Fu YSh: Adverse reactions to blood transfusion and transfusion transmitted disease. 2004, GuangDong, CHINA, Guangdong Science and Technology press, 222-1
  21. Peng CT, Lin HC, Lin YJ, Tsai CH, Yeh TF: Early Dexamethasone Therapy and Blood Cell Count in Preterm Infants. Pediatrics. 1999, 104: 476-481. 10.1542/peds.104.3.476.PubMedView Article

Copyright

© Yang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement