The anti-tumor effect of Apo2L/TRAIL on patient pancreatic adenocarcinomas grown as xenografts in SCID mice
© Hylander et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005
Received: 10 March 2005
Accepted: 19 May 2005
Published: 19 May 2005
Apo2L/TRAIL has considerable promise for cancer therapy based on the fact that this member of the tumor necrosis factor family induces apoptosis in the majority of malignant cells, while normal cells are more resistant. Furthermore, in many cells, when Apo2L/TRAIL is combined with chemotherapy, the effect is synergistic. The majority of this work has been carried out using cell lines. Therefore, investigation of how patient tumors respond to Apo2L/TRAIL can validate and/or complement information obtained from cell lines and prove valuable in the design of future clinical trials.
We have investigated the Apo2L/TRAIL sensitivity of patient derived pancreatic tumors using a patient tumor xenograft/ SCID mouse model. Mice bearing engrafted tumors were treated with Apo2L/TRAIL, gemcitabine or a combination of both therapies.
Patient tumors grown as xenografts exhibited a spectrum of sensitivity to Apo2L/TRAIL. Both Apo2L/TRAIL sensitive and resistant pancreatic tumors were found, as well as tumors that showed heterogeneity of response. Changes in apoptotic signaling molecules in a sensitive tumor were analyzed by Western blot following Apo2L/TRAIL treatment; loss of procaspase 8, Bid and procaspase 3 was observed and correlated with inhibition of tumor growth. However, in a tumor that was highly resistant to killing by Apo2L/TRAIL, although there was a partial loss of procaspase 8 and Bid in response to Apo2L/TRAIL treatment, loss of procaspase 3 was negligible. This resistant tumor also expressed a high level of the anti-apoptotic molecule Bcl-XL that, in comparison, was not detected in a sensitive tumor. Importantly, in the majority of these tumors, addition of gemcitabine to Apo2L/TRAIL resulted in a greater anti-tumor effect than either therapy used alone.
These data suggest that in a clinical setting we will see heterogeneity in the response of patients' tumors to Apo2L/TRAIL, including tumors that are highly sensitive as well as those that are resistant. While much more work is needed to understand the molecular basis for this heterogeneity, it is very encouraging, that Apo2L/TRAIL in combination with gemcitabine increased therapeutic efficacy in almost every case and therefore may be a highly effective strategy for controlling human pancreatic cancer validating and expanding upon what has been reported for cell lines.
The high mortality rate seen in patients with pancreatic cancer reflects both the difficulty in early detection and the lack of effective treatment to augment surgery [1, 2] so that, following diagnosis, the average survival time of the majority of patients is between 4–5 months . Within the last few years, the use of the deoxycytodine analog gemcitabine has been shown to result in improved clinical benefit, slightly longer mean survival time and has become the first line chemotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma [4, 5]. However, since the five-year survival rate has remained at 4%, many new approaches to the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma are being investigated [5, 6]. Several of these approaches focus on combination therapies in which gemicitabine is combined with a second cytotoxic agent (e.g. auristatin-PE, ), or a targeted biological therapy (e.g.; the anti-EGFR antibody C225, [8, 9]; OSI-774, Tarceva, ).
In 1995, a new member of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) family was independently identified by two different groups and named TRAIL (Tumor Necrosis Factor Related Apoptosis Inducing Ligand, ) and Apo2L (based on its homology to Fas/Apo1L ). This molecule induces apoptosis in a large number of human tumor cell lines, both in vitro and in vivo, while normal cells are not susceptible [11–15]. This is in contrast to other members of this family of ligands (i.e. TNF and FasL), which have marked toxicity when administered systemically (for further discussion see recent reviews by [16–18]). An important natural role for Apo2L/TRAIL in the immunosurveillance of tumors has been proposed based on its expression on several immune cells, including activated NK and T cells (see for discussion). This natural role of Apo2L/TRAIL in anti-tumor activity provides further rationale for attempting to develop Apo2L/TRAIL as a therapeutic molecule. The original studies with Apo2L showed that it could act synergistically with the chemotherapeutic agents 5-FU and CPT-11 in animal studies using a colon tumor cell line [14, 20]. There have since been numerous studies expanding these observations using a large number of cell lines of different tumor types with a variety of chemotherapies, both in vitro and in vivo. Among the types of solid tumors that have been studied are breast , lung , prostate , mesothelioma, , renal , ovarian , bladder , glioma  and pancreas . However, there is a concern that these results might not be predictive of the response of actual patients' tumors. Therefore, an investigation of how patient tumors respond to Apo2L/TRAIL could validate and/or complement information obtained from cell lines and prove valuable in the design of future clinical trials.
Our group has previously investigated the efficacy of Apo2L/TRAIL and CPT-11 combination therapy on patient-derived colon tumors  using a SCID mouse xenograft model that our lab has developed [31–34]. The value of this model is that it enables evaluation of actual patient tumors that retain the heterogeneity and histological architecture of the original tumor. TRAIL exerted a significant anti-tumor effect on three different patient colon tumors grown as xenografts and this effect was significantly augmented by the addition of CPT-11 or 5-FU . However, use of this model has also revealed the existence of patient-derived colon tumors which are resistant to Apo2L/TRAIL alone but are sensitive to the combination of Apo2L/TRAIL and CPT-11 (Kenji, manuscript in preparation) This suggested the possibility that a differential response to Apo2L/TRAIL may occur between patients and that additional research is critical for 1) appreciating the degree to which variability occurs between tumors, 2) developing strategies for using Apo2L/TRAIL in combination therapies and 3) determining methods for predicting ahead of time which patients will benefit from Apo2L/TRAIL.
It has previously been reported that pancreatic cell lines exhibit varying degrees of sensitivity to Apo2L/TRAIL and that some of these lines are extremely resistant [35, 29, 36, 37]. It has also been reported that resistant cells can be sensitized to Apo2L/TRAIL (e.g. [29, 38]). However, although the combination of Apo2L/TRAIL and gemcitabine in vitro has been investigated using pancreatic cell lines, there have been conflicting reports on whether this combination does  or does not  have a synergistic cytotoxic effect.
In this paper, we describe our experience in evaluating five different patient pancreatic tumors grown in SCID mice to Apo2L/TRAIL. The recombinant form of human Apo2L/TRAIL used shows low activity against the murine TRAIL receptor and therefore this model may not reveal any potential toxicities of Apo2L/TRAIL, however it does provide a relevant model for evaluating the sensitivity of patient tumors. Our data support the idea that some patients' tumors may exhibit significant sensitivity while others may be resistant. Still other patients' tumors may be heterogeneous and exhibit regions of both sensitivity and resistance. However, the combination of Apo2L/TRAIL and gemcitabine can enhance the anti-tumor effect against Apo2L/TRAIL sensitive tumors and, importantly, can overcome resistance to either single agent, and result in suppression of resistant tumors. Thus, these findings predict that patients' tumors will exhibit both sensitivity and resistance to Apo2L/TRAIL treatment and that it may be possible to develop approaches for overcoming this resistance by combining Apo2L/TRAIL and chemotherapy.
Materials and methods
Patient pancreatic tumor-SCID mouse model
Our use of the SCID mouse-patient tumor xenograft model has been previously described ([31, 33, 41, 32, 34, 30]). For these studies, surgical specimens of patients' pancreatic tumors were received shortly after resection through the Tissue Procurement Facility (TP) of RPCI and cut into 2 mm × 2 mm pieces in tissue culture medium (RPMI 1640) under sterile conditions. SCID mice were then anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of 0.4–0.5 ml Avertin (2.5 g 2,2,2-tribromoethanol dissolved in 5 ml 2-methyl-butanol/200 ml ddH2O) and individual tumor pieces were implanted subcutaneously in the abdominal wall of three mice (1st passage) and monitored for growth. The mice used in all experiments were 7–8 weeks old CB17 SCID mice with an average weight of 18–20 g. They were kept in sterile cages (4–5 mice per cage) and fed with autoclaved chow and water. Mice were maintained in air-conditioned and light controlled rooms (12 hr cycles). All procedures, injections and tumor measurements were carried out under a laminar flow hood using aseptic precautions. Tumor specimens that grew to a size of 1 cm (8–12 weeks) were retrieved and subsequently passaged into recipient mice (2nd passage) and were considered to have successfully engrafted when these tumors grew. Pathological diagnosis of patient specimens and evaluation of engrafted/ passaged tumors was performed in collaboration with a member of the Pathology Department at RPCI.
Five different pancreatic adenocarcinomas that successfully engrafted into SCID mice were selected for passage into groups of experimental mice. Tumors reached 4–5 mm in diameter in approximately 4–6 weeks and the mice were divided into experimental groups of similar tumor sizes. These tumors are referred to as Tumor #1 (TP#10791), Tumor #2 (TP#10978), Tumor #3 (TP#11424), Tumor #4 (TP#12424), and Tumor #5 (TP#11727).
Apo2L/TRAIL used in this investigation was prepared by Genentech, Inc. as described previously  and provided as a gift by Genentech and Amgen. A cycle of treatment with Apo2L/TRAIL consisted of daily intraperitoneal injection of 500 μg Apo2L/TRAIL /200 ul saline for 14 days. Mice received 2 such cycles separated by a 7–10 day rest period. Control mice received sterile saline. Tumor volume was calculated with the formula V= LD × (SD)2 / 2, where V is the tumor volume, LD is the longest tumor diameter and SD is the shortest tumor diameter. Data was graphed and the Students unpaired t-test was calculated using SigmaPlot. At various time points during and at the termination of an experiment, mice were sacrificed and pieces of tumor were fixed in formalin, snap-frozen in cryovials in liquid nitrogen, or both, for subsequent analysis. Sections of all tumor samples were processed for light microscopy by standard methods.
Gemcitabine (Gemzar, Eli Lilly obtained from McKesson, Buffalo, NY) was administered by intraperitoneal injection daily 5 days/wk in two two-week cycles with a rest interval of one week at doses between 1.0 – 2.5 mg/kg as indicated. Therefore mice received 7.5–13.5 mg/kg weekly, which is less than that routinely administered clinically to patients (25 mg/kg/week).
Apoptosis was evaluated by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-nick end-labeling (TUNEL) staining (ApopTag, Intergen, Corp) according to the manufacturers instructions.
Cell and tissue lysates (lysis buffer containing 20 mM Tris pH 7.5, 120 mM NaCl, 100 mM NaF, 0.5% Nonionic P40, 200 μM Na3VO4, 50 mM β-Glycerophosphate, 10 mM NaPPi, 4 mM PMSF, 10 μg/ml Leupeptine, 2 mM Benzamidine, 10 μg/ml Aprotinin) were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. Blots were immunostained by standard techniques: non-specific binding was blocked and membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibody. Antibodies used were anti-caspase 8 (Oncogene # AM46), anti-Bcl-XL, (Cell Signaling #2762), anti-Bid (Cell Signaling #2002), anti-human mitochondria (Chemicon #Mab 1273; recognizes a 65 kd epitope on the membrane of intact human mitochondria) and anti-Caspase 3 (Imgenex IMG-144). This was followed by washing, incubation with peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody and visualization of the bands by enhanced chemoluminescence (ECL) and exposure of the blots to Kodak BioMax film. Anti β-actin was used as a loading control.
Immunohistochemical evaluation of p53 (mouse monoclonal antibody DO-7, Novocasta) was performed on sections of formalin fixed, paraffin embedded tumors. Antigen retrieval was accomplished with DAKO Target Retrieval Solution using a Black and Decker steamer for 20 minutes followed by a 20 minute cooling period.
Results and discussion
Patient pancreatic adenocarcinomas engrafted into SCID mice maintain the histological features of the original tumor
The growth of patient-derived pancreatic adenocarcinomas can be inhibited by Apo2L/TRAIL
Combination therapy with Apo2L/TRAIL and gemcitabine resulted in enhanced inhibition of tumor growth over that of either single agent alone
In contrast to Tumor #3, Tumor #4 exhibited resistance to both Apo2L/TRAIL and gemcitabine when administered as single agents. However, the use of these two agents in combination was able to overcome this resistance and significant tumor growth inhibition was achieved (Fig 5, E–H ).
At this time, the basis for the cooperation between Apo2L/TRAIL and gemcitabine is not known. It is likely that knowledge about the expression of molecules such as p53 in these tumors will be important in understanding factors which affect sensitivity to chemotherapy. Although we have not sequenced p53 for mutations, we have evaluated p53 expression by immunohistochemistry in Tumors #2, 3, 4 and 5. Whereas p53 overexpression was not detected in Tumors #2, 3 and 4, heterogeneous overexpression was detected in Tumor #5 (data not shown). This suggests that the responses of these tumors to combination therapy may be independent of p53 status. It has been demonstrated that the response of tumors to gemcitabine can occur in a p53 independent manner in . Future studies investigating the mechanism(s) of cooperation between Apo2L/TRAIL and gemicitabine will include analyses of the status of critical molecules such as p53.
Thus, these tumors demonstrated a heterogeneous range of responses to Apo2L/TRAIL. Tumor #3 is significantly sensitive to killing with Apo2L/TRAIL alone and this was consistently seen in subsequent experiments. Interestingly, Tumors #4 and 5 were resistant to Apo2L/TRAIL alone in the passage that was evaluated. It is informative that with Tumor #2, which was evaluated in several experiments, the response varied in different passages. Although the basis for this variability is unknown, it seems likely that this is the result of an inherent heterogeneity in the original tumor. Alternatively, this may indicate the response of this tumor to different factors in the tumor microenvironment. Interestingly, even when Tumor #2 was not inhibited by Apo2L/TRAIL alone, an increased amount of apoptosis was detected within the tumor early in the treatment. Although this variability is problematic, it is likely reflective of the situation that can be expected in the clinic and therefore, it is especially encouraging that combination therapy with gemcitabine shows such potential for complementing and enhancing the anti-tumor effect of Apo2L/TRAIL in the majority of these tumors.
Investigation of the basis for the difference in sensitivity to Apo2L/TRAIL
Trauzold  characterized five pancreatic cell lines with regard to Apo2L/TRAIL sensitivity and concluded that although Bcl-XLwas differentially expressed in sensitive (Capan1, Colo357) vs. resistant (PancTul, Panc89, Panc1) cells and made a significant contribution to the observed resistance to Apo2L/TRAIL, it is not the only factor. These authors concluded that resistance arose from the combined effects of the downregulation of pro-apoptotic molecules (FADD, Bid) and the concurrent upregulation of anti-apoptotic molecules (Bcl-XL, FLIP or IAP). Their experiments support the idea that there is a balance of several pro- and anti-apoptotic factors in pancreatic cells that ultimately determines the efficacy of the apoptotic signal. Recently, Bai et al. have found that knock-down of Bcl-XL in pancreatic cells that predominantly overexpress it, results in increased sensitivity of these cells to TRAIL in combination with other anti-tumor drugs . The possible role of Bcl-XL and other critical molecules, particularly those upstream of caspase 8, in resistance of patient pancreatic tumors to Apo2L/TRAIL needs to be more fully investigated. Additionally, the mechanism(s) of the interaction between Apo2L/TRAIL and gemcitabine needs to be determined.
Although much more work needs to be done, especially in evaluating a larger number of patients' tumors, these studies are important because they investigate for the first time the response of patient pancreatic tumors, grown as xenografts in SCID mice, to Apo2L/TRAIL. The results confirm previous work done with cell lines and support the idea that both the sensitivity and resistance to killing by Apo2L/TRAIL that has been observed in cell lines will be seen in patient tumors. Furthermore, these patients' tumors show heterogeneity of responsiveness both between tumors and within the same tumor that may be predictive of variability in a clinical setting. Importantly, it is encouraging that the combination of Apo2L/TRAIL with gemicitabine is able to enhance the antitumor efficacy and results in significant suppression of tumors that exhibit resistance to either one or both of these therapeutics. One potential benefit that remains to be explored is whether the enhanced efficacy achieved with combination therapy will allow lower doses of chemotherapy and/or Apo2L/TRAIL to be used, thus reducing the possibilities of toxicity and acquired resistance. The results of this study strongly support the further development of Apo2L/TRAIL as a therapeutic agent for the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
This work used core facilities supported in part by Roswell Park Cancer Institute's National Cancer Institute-funded Cancer Center Support Grant CA 16056. The authors thank Jeanne Prendergast and Diane Thompson for their expert laboratory assistance. We also gratefully acknowledge the invaluable contributions of Nancy Reska, Harry Slocum and the Tissue Procurement Facility at RPCI.
- Li D, Xie K, Wolff R, Abbruzzese JL: Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 2004, 363: 1049-1057. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15841-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chu QD, Khushalani N, Javle MM, Douglass HOJ, Gibbs JF: Should adjuvant therapy remain the standard of care for patients with resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas?. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003, 10: 539-545. 10.1245/ASO.2003.06.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jemal A, Murray T, Samuels A, Ghafoor A, Ward E, Thun MJ: Cancer statistics, 2003. CA Cancer J Clin. 2003, 53: 5-26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kulke MH: Recent developments in the pharmacological treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2003, 12: 983-992. 10.1517/135437184.108.40.2063.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Neoptolemos JP, Cunningham D, Friess H, Bassi C, Stocken DD, Tait DM, Dunn JA, Dervenis C, Lacaine F, Hickey H, Raraty MG, Ghaneh P, Buchler MW: Adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: historical and current perspectives. Ann Oncol. 2003, 14: 675-692. 10.1093/annonc/mdg207.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rosenberg L, Lipsett M: Biotherapeutic approaches to pancreatic cancer. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2003, 3: 319-337. 10.1517/147125220.127.116.119.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mohammad RM, Dugan MC, Mohamed AN, Almatchy VP, Flake TM, Dergham ST, Shields AF, Al-Katib AA, Vaitkevicius VK, Sarkar FH: Establishment of a human pancreatic tumor xenograft model: potential application for preclinical evaluation of novel therapeutic agents. Pancreas. 1998, 16: 19-25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xiong HQ, Rosenberg A, LoBuglio A, Schmidt W, Wolff RA, Deutsch J, Needle M, Abbruzzese JL, Li D, Xie K, Wolff R: Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor, in combination with gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer: a multicenter phase II TrialPancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004, 22: 2610-2616. 10.1200/JCO.2004.12.040.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bruns CJ, Harbison MT, Davis DW, Portera CA, Tsan R, McConkey DJ, Evans DB, Abbruzzese JL, Hicklin DJ, Radinsky R: Epidermal growth factor receptor blockade with C225 plus gemcitabine results in regression of human pancreatic carcinoma growing orthotopically in nude mice by antiangiogenic mechanisms. Clin Cancer Res. 2000, 6: 1936-1948.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ng SS, Tsao MS, Nicklee T, Hedley DW: Effects of the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor OSI-774, Tarceva, on downstream signaling pathways and apoptosis in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Mol Cancer Ther. 2002, 1: 777-783.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wiley SR, Schooley K, Smolak PJ, Din WS, Huang CP, Nicholl JK, Sutherland GR, Smith TD, Rauch C, Smith CA: Identification and characterization of a new member of the TNF family that induces apoptosis. Immunity. 1995, 3: 673-682. 10.1016/1074-7613(95)90057-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pitti RM, Marsters SA, Ruppert S, Donahue CJ, Moore A, Ashkenazi A: Induction of apoptosis by Apo-2 ligand, a new member of the tumor necrosis factor cytokine family. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271: 12687-12690. 10.1074/jbc.271.22.12687.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Griffith TS, Lynch DH: TRAIL: a molecule with multiple receptors and control mechanisms. Curr Opin Immunol. 1998, 10: 559-563. 10.1016/S0952-7915(98)80224-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ashkenazi A, Pai RC, Fong S, Leung S, Lawrence DA, Marsters SA, Blackie C, Chang L, McMurtrey AE, Hebert A, DeForge L, Koumenis IL, Lewis D, Harris L, Bussiere J, Koeppen H, Shahrokh Z, Schwall RH: Safety and antitumor activity of recombinant soluble Apo2 ligand. J Clin Invest. 1999, 104: 155-162.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walczak H, Miller RE, Ariail K, Gliniak B, Griffith TS, Kubin M, Chin W, Jones J, Woodward A, Le T, Smith C, Smolak P, Goodwin RG, Rauch CT, Schuh JC, Lynch DH: Tumoricidal activity of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand in vivo. Nat Med. 1999, 5: 157-163. 10.1038/5517.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Almasan A, Ashkenazi A: Apo2L/TRAIL: apoptosis signaling, biology, and potential for cancer therapy. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2003, 14: 337-348. 10.1016/S1359-6101(03)00029-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ashkenazi A, Dixit VM: Apoptosis control by death and decoy receptors. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1999, 11: 255-260. 10.1016/S0955-0674(99)80034-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ashkenazi A: Targeting death and decoy receptors of the tumour-necrosis factor superfamily. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002, 2: 420-430. 10.1038/nrc821.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smyth MJ, Takeda K, Hayakawa Y, Peschon JJ, van den Brink MR, Yagita H: Nature's TRAIL-On a Path to Cancer Immunotherapy. Immunity. 2003, 18: 1-6. 10.1016/S1074-7613(02)00502-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gliniak B, Le T: Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand's antitumor activity in vivo is enhanced by the chemotherapeutic agent CPT-11. Cancer Res. 1999, 59: 6153-6158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Keane MM, Ettenberg SA, Nau MM, Russell EK, Lipkowitz S: Chemotherapy augments TRAIL-induced apoptosis in breast cell lines. Cancer Res. 1999, 59: 734-741.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frese S, Brunner T, Gugger M, Uduehi A, Schmid RA: Enhancement of Apo2L/TRAIL (tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand)-induced apoptosis in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines by chemotherapeutic agents without correlation to the expression level of cellular protease caspase-8 inhibitory protein. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002, 123: 168-174. 10.1067/mtc.2002.119694.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nimmanapalli R, Perkins CL, Orlando M, O'Bryan E, Nguyen D, Bhalla KN: Pretreatment with paclitaxel enhances apo-2 ligand/tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-induced apoptosis of prostate cancer cells by inducing death receptors 4 and 5 protein levels. Cancer Res. 2001, 61: 759-763.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu W, Bodle E, Chen JY, Gao M, Rosen GD, Broaddus VC: Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand and chemotherapy cooperate to induce apoptosis in mesothelioma cell lines. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2001, 25: 111-118.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dejosez M, Ramp U, Mahotka C, Krieg A, Walczak H, Gabbert HE, Gerharz CD: Sensitivity to TRAIL/APO-2L-mediated apoptosis in human renal cell carcinomas and its enhancement by topotecan. Cell Death Differ. 2000, 7: 1127-1136. 10.1038/sj.cdd.4400746.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cuello M, Ettenberg SA, Nau MM, Lipkowitz S: Synergistic induction of apoptosis by the combination of trail and chemotherapy in chemoresistant ovarian cancer cells. Gynecol Oncol. 2001, 81: 380-390. 10.1006/gyno.2001.6194.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mizutani Y, Nakao M, Ogawa O, Yoshida O, Bonavida B, Miki T: Enhanced sensitivity of bladder cancer cells to tumor necrosis factor related apoptosis inducing ligand mediated apoptosis by cisplatin and carboplatin. J Urol. 2001, 165: 263-270. 10.1097/00005392-200101000-00076.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nagane M, Pan G, Weddle JJ, Dixit VM, Cavenee WK, Huang HJ: Increased death receptor 5 expression by chemotherapeutic agents in human gliomas causes synergistic cytotoxicity with tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Res. 2000, 60: 847-853.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matsuzaki H, Schmied BM, Ulrich A, Standop J, Schneider MB, Batra SK, Picha KS, Pour PM: Combination of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and actinomycin D induces apoptosis even in TRAIL-resistant human pancreatic cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2001, 7: 407-414.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Naka T, Sugamura K, Hylander BL, Widmer MB, Rustum YM, Repasky EA: Effects of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand alone and in combination with chemotherapeutic agents on patients' colon tumors grown in SCID mice. Cancer Res. 2002, 62: 5800-5806.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sakakibara T, Xu Y, Bumpers HL, Chen FA, Bankert RB, Arredondo MA, Edge SB, Repasky EA: Growth and Metastasis of Surgical Specimens of Human Breast Carcinomas in SCID Mice. Cancer J Sci Am. 1996, 2: 291-PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Silver DF, Hempling RE, Piver MS, Repasky EA: Effects of IL-12 on human ovarian tumors engrafted into SCID mice. Gynecol Oncol. 1999, 72: 154-160. 10.1006/gyno.1998.5239.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xu Y, Silver DF, Yang NP, Oflazoglu E, Hempling RE, Piver MS, Repasky EA: Characterization of human ovarian carcinomas in a SCID mouse model. Gynecol Oncol. 1999, 72: 161-170. 10.1006/gyno.1998.5238.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ghamande S, Hylander BL, Oflazoglu E, Lele S, Fanslow W, Repasky EA: Recombinant CD40 ligand therapy has significant antitumor effects on CD40-positive ovarian tumor xenografts grown in SCID mice and demonstrates an augmented effect with cisplatin. Cancer Res. 2001, 61: 7556-7562.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hinz S, Trauzold A, Boenicke L, Sandberg C, Beckmann S, Bayer E, Walczak H, Kalthoff H, Ungefroren H: Bcl-XL protects pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells against CD95- and TRAIL-receptor-mediated apoptosis. Oncogene. 2000, 19: 5477-5486. 10.1038/sj.onc.1203936.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Satoh K, Kaneko K, Hirota M, Masamune A, Satoh A, Shimosegawa T: Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand and its receptor expression and the pathway of apoptosis in human pancreatic cancer. Pancreas. 2001, 23: 251-258. 10.1097/00006676-200110000-00005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Trauzold A, Schmiedel S, Roder C, Tams C, Christgen M, Oestern S, Arlt A, Westphal S, Kapischke M, Ungefroren H, Kalthoff H: Multiple and synergistic deregulations of apoptosis-controlling genes in pancreatic carcinoma cells. Br J Cancer. 2003, 89: 1714-1721. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601330.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nozawa F, Itami A, Saruc M, Kim M, Standop J, Picha KS, Cowan KH, Pour PM: The combination of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL/Apo2L) and Genistein is effective in inhibiting pancreatic cancer growth. Pancreas. 2004, 29: 45-52. 10.1097/00006676-200407000-00055.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xu ZW, Kleeff J, Friess H, Buchler MW, Solioz M: Synergistic cytotoxic effect of TRAIL and gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer cells. Anticancer Res. 2003, 23: 251-258.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ibrahim SM, Ringel J, Schmidt C, Ringel B, Muller P, Koczan D, Thiesen HJ, Lohr M: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell lines show variable susceptibility to TRAIL-mediated cell death. Pancreas. 2001, 23: 72-79. 10.1097/00006676-200107000-00011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Repasky EA, Tims E, Pritchard M, Burd R: Characterization of mild whole-body hyperthermia protocols using human breast, ovarian, and colon tumors grown in severe combined immunodeficient mice. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 1999, 7: 91-97. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-0997(1999)7:1/2<91::AID-IDOG16>3.0.CO;2-F.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Robinson BW, Ostruszka L, Im MM, Shewach DS: Promising combination therapies with gemcitabine. Semin Oncol. 2004, 31: 2-12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shi X, Liu S, Kleeff J, Friess H, Buchler MW: Acquired resistance of pancreatic cancer cells towards 5-Fluorouracil and gemcitabine is associated with altered expression of apoptosis-regulating genes. Oncology. 2002, 62: 354-362. 10.1159/000065068.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bai J, Sui J, Demirjian A, Vollmer CMJ, Marasco W, Callery MP: Predominant Bcl-XL knockdown disables antiapoptotic mechanisms: tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-based triple chemotherapy overcomes chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer cells in vitro. Cancer Res. 2005, 65: 2344-2352.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.