Microenvironment generated during EGFR targeted killing of pancreatic tumor cells by ATC inhibits myeloid-derived suppressor cells through COX2 and PGE2 dependent pathway
© Thakur et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 9 October 2012
Accepted: 28 January 2013
Published: 9 February 2013
Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are one of the major components of the immune-suppressive network, play key roles in tumor progression and limit therapeutic responses. Recently, we reported that tumor spheres formed by breast cancer cell lines were visibly smaller in a Th1 enriched microenvironment with significantly reduced differentiation of MDSC populations in 3D culture. In this study, we investigated the mechanism(s) of bispecific antibody armed ATC mediated inhibition of MDSC in the presence or absence of Th1 microenvironment.
We used 3D co-culture model of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) with pancreatic cancer cells MiaPaCa-2 [MiaE] and gemcitabine resistant MiaPaCa-GR [MiaM] cells to generate MDSC in the presence or absence of Th1 cytokines and EGFRBi armed ATC (aATC).
We show significantly decreased differentiation of MDSC (MiaE, p<0.005; MiaM, p<0.05) in the presence of aATC with or without Th1 cytokines. MDSC recovered from control cultures (without aATC) showed potent ability to suppress T cell functions compared to those recovered from aATC containing co-cultures. Reduced accumulation of MDSC was accompanied by significantly lower levels of COX2 (p<0.0048), PGE2 (p<0.03), and their downstream effector molecule Arginase-1 (p<0.01), and significantly higher levels of TNF-α, IL-12 and chemokines CCL3, CCL4, CCL5, CXCL9 and CXCL10 under aATC induced Th1 cytokine enriched microenvironment.
These data suggest aATC can suppress MDSC differentiation and attenuation of their suppressive activity through down regulation of COX2, PGE2 and ARG1 pathway that is potentiated in presence of Th1 cytokines, suggesting that Th1 enriching immunotherapy may be beneficial in pancreatic cancer treatment.
Keywords3D culture model Pancreatic cancer Activated T-cells Bispecific antibody Epidermal growth factor receptor Myeloid derived suppressor cells
Most cancers can evade the immune surveillance and circumvent antitumor immune defenses by several passive and active mechanisms. Preclinical and clinical studies suggest that regulatory/suppressor immune cells in the inflammatory tumor microenvironment can induce an immune tolerizing effect and inhibit the ability of immune based therapies or cancer vaccines to initiate robust anti tumor immune responses [1, 2]. Among many suppressor regulators, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are of great interest because they have the capacity to suppress both the adaptive immune response mediated by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells [3–5] and the cytotoxic activities of natural killer (NK) and NKT cells .
Increasing evidence suggests that tumor- and MDSC-derived arachidonic acid metabolites, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) play critical roles in T cell suppression [7–11]. One of the mechanisms of COX2 and PGE2 mediated suppression of T cells is through the induction of arginase-1 (ARG1) [12, 13]. A better understanding of these molecules in the tumor microenvironment and assessment of the regulatory cross talk between tumor cells and the immune cells would help in developing clinically effective immunotherapeutic approaches against pancreatic cancer.
In our previous study in breast cancer 3D culture model, we reported a significant reduction of MDSC in the presence of Th1 cytokines and activated T cells armed with anti-CD3 x anti-Her2 bispecific antibodies (aATC) . In this study, we investigated the mechanism(s) of aATC mediated inhibition of MDSC in the presence or absence of Th1 microenvironment. Furthermore, we examined whether presence of aATC in the tumor microenvironment can shift the immune suppressive tumor microenvironment to immune activating anti-tumor Th1 microenvironment.
The human pancreatic cancer (PC) cell lines (MiaPaCa-2 cells with epithelial characteristics [MiaE] and gemcitabine resistant MiaPaCa-GR cells with mesenchymal characteristics [MiaM]) were maintained in DMEM culture media (Lonza Inc., Allendale, NJ) supplemented with 10% FBS (Lonza Inc.), 2 mM L-glutamine (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), 50 units/ml penicillin, and 50 μg/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen). MiaM was maintained in 200 nM gemcitabine in DMEM media. MiaE show typical epitheloid like morphology whereas MiaM show mesenchymal like morphology. The reason for using chemo sensitive and resistant pancreatic cell lines was to evaluate whether ATC armed with bispecific antibodies can be effective, irrespective of chemo resistance of the cell lines. Both cell lines showed high expression of EGFR by flow cytometry (data not show).
Expansion and generation of ATC
CD3+ T cells from PBMC were activated and expanded using 20 ng/ml of OKT3 and 100 IU/ml of IL-2 for 14 days at a concentration of 1–2 × 106 PBMC/ml in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% FBS .
Production of anti-OKT3 x anti-EGFR bispecific antibodies (EGFRBi)
Bispecific Antibodies (BiAb) were produced by chemical heteroconjugation of OKT3 (a murine IgG2a anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody, Ortho Biotech, Horsham, PA) and Erbitux (a humanized anti-EGFR IgG1, Genentech Inc., San Francisco, CA) as described [15, 16]. ATC were armed with EGFRBi (aATC) using a previously optimized concentration of BiAb of 50 ng/106 ATC.
3D culture in matrigel
Cells were prepared at a concentration of 2,500 cells/ml in RPMI-1640 or DMEM culture media. Single cells are overlaid on a solidified layer of Matrigel measuring approximately 1 mm in thickness as described . Briefly, wells were coated with 100% Matrigel in 0.25-ml aliquots in 24-well glass bottom plates and allowed to solidify by incubating at 37°C for 30 min. Pancreatic cancer cells were then seeded onto the matrigel base as a single-cell suspension in the medium containing 2% matrigel, in the presence or absence of Th1 cytokines (10 ng/ml IFN-γ and 100 IU/ml IL-2). PBMC were added either simultaneously or after 5–7 days when tumor spheres were formed, PBMC were added at 10:1 ratio (10 PBMC:1 tumor cell). EGFRBi aATC were added after 7 days of tumor cell and PBMC 3D co-culture at 10:1 (10 aATC/1 tumor cell) ratio. The medium was replaced every 4 days. Tumor spheres were visualized in 5–7 days in 3D culture.
Tumor cells were seeded in 24-well plate at 100,000 cells/well in volume of 1 ml. Cells were allowed to adhere followed by incubation with aATC for 3–5 days at 1:1 E:T in the presence or absence of Th1 cytokines. At the end of incubation, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) was added (40 μL/well of 5 mg/mL MTT in PBS) to each well and incubated in the dark for 3 h at 37°C. After removal of the medium, the dye crystals formed in viable cells were dissolved in isopropanol and detected by reading the absorption at 595 nm in the Tecan Ultra plate reader. Experiments were repeated three times in quadruplicate wells to ensure reproducibility.
Flow cytometry to identify MDSC
Flowcytometry was done at the Microscopy, Imaging and Cytometry Resources Core at Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University. The phenotype of MDSC generated in 3D co-culture of tumor cells with PBMC was evaluated for expression of CD33, CD11b, CD14 and HLA-DR. After non-adherent cells were collected, matrigel was digested to collect tumor cells or tumor associated MDSC and, washed with FACS buffer (0.2% BSA in PBS). Cells collected prior to digestion were pooled with matrigel digested single cell suspension before staining. Cells were stained for 30 min on ice with mixtures of fluorescently conjugated mAbs or isotype-matched controls, washed twice with FACS buffer and analyzed. Antibodies used for staining include: anti-CD11b, -CD14, -CD15, -CD33, -HLA-DR, (BD Biosciences San Jose, CA). Cells were analyzed on a FACScalibur (BD Biosciences) and data were analyzed using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences). Cells were gated on CD11b+/CD33+ population and analyzed for CD14+/HLA-DR- and CD15+/HLA-DR- expression.
MDSC isolation and co-culture with T cells
Cells were collected from the digested matrigel cultures. CD33+ cells were isolated from each culture using anti-CD33 magnetic microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec) as previously described . The purity of isolated cell populations was found to be >80% by flow cytometry. Effect of MDSC on T cell proliferation was measured by co-incubation of CD33+ cells with purified CD3+ T-cells. Briefly, purified CD3+ T-cells plated at 0.5 7 × 105 cells/well in 24-well plates coated either with anti-CD3 antibodies (0.5 μg/ml in PBS) or isotype matched control antibodies. Irradiated (2500 rads) CD33+ cells were then added at various MDSC: T cells or ATC ratios ranging from 1:5–1:20 in a final volume of 500 μl of medium. Control wells did not receive any MDSC. The plates were incubated for 24–72 hrs (for CD3+ T cells) or 4 hrs (for ATC) at 37°C in humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere followed by a flow cytometric analysis of T cell activation and function using anti-CD71, anti-CD62L, anti-NKG2D and anti-IFN-γ antibodies.
Inhibition of T cell proliferation and cytotoxicity by MDSC
Inhibitory activity of the CD33+ cells isolated from matrigel co-cultures towards T cell proliferation and cytotoxicity was examined as described previously (14).
Flow cytometric analysis for COX2 and arginase-1 positive cells
Co-cultures were evaluated for the expression of, COX2 and Arginase-1 (ARG1) using anti-ARG1-PE, and anti-COX2-FITC antibodies along with anti-CD11b, -CD14, -CD15, -CD33, -HLA-DR (BD Biosciences San Jose, CA) in a 7-color analysis by FACScalibur (BD Biosciences). Data were analyzed using FloJo software. Total COX2 or ARG1 positive cells as well as ARG1 or COX2 positive MDSC were analyzed. Cells were gated for CD33+/CD11b+/HLA-DR- and analyzed for CD14 or CD15 versus ARG1, CD14 or CD15 versus COX2 expression.
Analysis of PGE2 was performed by EIA kit as per manufacturer’s instruction (Enzo Life Sciences, Plymouth Meeting, PA) in the culture supernatants from 3D co-cultures.
Cytokine profiling of co-cultures
Cytokines were quantitated in culture supernatants collected from matrigel co-cultures in the presence or absence of Th1 cytokines and in the presence or absence of ATC or armed ATC using a 25-plex human cytokine Luminex Array (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) on a Bio-Plex system (Bio-Rad Lab., Hercules, CA). The limit of detection for these assays is < 10 pg/mL based on detectable signal of > 2 fold above background (Bio-Rad). Cytokine concentrations were automatically calculated by the BioPlex Manager Software (Bio-Rad).
Quantitative data are presented as the mean of at least three or more independent experiments ± standard deviation. A one-way ANOVA was used to determine whether there were statistically significant differences among different conditions within each experiment. Differences between groups were tested via an unpaired, two-tailed t test.
Armed ATC induced Th1 cytokine microenvironment inhibits MDSC differentiation
MDSC mediated suppression of T cell proliferation and cytotoxic activity was partially reversed by EGFRBi armed ATC
MDSC mediated suppression of activated T and NK cells was partially reversed by aATC
T cells from three different culture conditions were stained for T cell activation markers CD71 (Upper panel) and NKG2D (Lower panel at the end of 72 h co-cultures). OKT3 stimulated T cells showed 63.8% CD71 positive cells, this was considered as 100% positive control. CD71 expression was suppressed by 55% in the presence of CD33+ cells (isolated from co-cultures without aATC). This suppression was partially reduced to 38% when T cells were incubated with CD33+ cells isolated from aATC containing co-cultures (n=3; Figure 2C, top panel). Immunostaining for NKG2D showed 31.2% of T cells positive for NKG2D (Positive control, 100%) and this expression was decreased to 20.3% (35% inhibition from control) by the addition of CD33+ cells isolated from co-cultures without aATC. This inhibition was reversed by adding CD33+ cells isolated from aATC containing co-cultures, restoring the expression of NKG2D to 28.8% (n=3; Figure 2C, second panel). These data suggest that aATC inhibited the immune suppressive ability of MDSC.
MDSC mediated suppression of T cell IFN-γ production was reversed by aATC
We asked whether addition of MDSC to ATC would suppress the ability of ATC to produce IFN-γ when stimulated with MiaE targets at a 1:10:2 ratio (Tumor cell:ATC:CD33+) for 4 hrs. Stimulated ATC showed 9.7% cells positive for intracellular IFN-γ (positive control, 100%). Incubation of stimulated ATC with CD33+ cells isolated from co-cultures without aATC inhibited IFN-γ production by 54%. This inhibition was partially reverted when ATC were mixed with CD33+ cells isolated from aATC containing co-cultures to 37% (n=3; Figure 2C, third panel).
MDSC mediated suppression of CD62L expression on naive T cells was reversed by aATC
Since, MDSC have been shown to mitigate the expression of L-selectin (CD62L) on naïve T cells , we asked whether incubation of T cells with MDSC isolated from various culture conditions can alter the expression of CD62L differentially. Naïve T cells showed 70.8% expression of CD62L (positive control, considered 100%), CD62L expression was inhibited by 65% in the presence of CD33+ cells (isolated from co-cultures without aATC). CD33+ isolated from aATC containing co-cultures showed significantly reduced suppression of CD62L expression (12%) on naive T cells (n=3; Figure 2C, bottom panel).
Armed ATC mediated microenvironment inhibits MDSC differentiation by suppressing MDSC-associated suppressive factors
Armed ATC induce cytokines and chemokines that are suppressive for MDSC differentiation and activation
Recently, we reported that tumor spheres formed by breast cancer cells were visibly smaller in size in a Th1 enriched microenvironment, differentiation of granulocytic CD14−/HLA-DR−/CD11b+/CD33+ and monocytic CD14+/HLA-DR−/CD11b+/CD33+ MDSC populations was reduced with further reduction and attenuation of their suppressive activity in the presence of aATC . In this study, we investigated the mechanism(s) of aATC mediated inhibition of MDSC in the presence or absence of Th1 microenvironment. We show significantly decreased differentiation and accumulation of MDSC in the presence of aATC or aATC and Th1 cytokines. The decreased percentage of MDSC was paralleled by significantly lower levels of IL-6, COX2, PGE2, ARG1 in the presence of aATC or aATC and Th1 cytokines. While, levels of IFN-γ, IL-2, TNF-α, IL-12 and chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 were higher in the presence of aATC or aATC and Th1 cytokines.
Consistent with other studies that inflammation is associated with the expansion of MDSC [21, 22], our data also show that increased numbers of MDSC were accompanied by increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and IL-1β/IL-1Ra ratio. A delayed accumulation of MDSC and reduced primary and metastatic tumor progression was reported in mice that have reduced inflammation due to IL-1 receptor-deficiency [23, 24]. On the other hand, excessive inflammation in IL-1R antagonist-deficient mice promoted the accumulation of MDSC and produced MDSC with enhanced suppressive activity [23, 24]. Relevance of increased levels of TNF-α in the presence of Th1 cytokines or Th1 cytokines + aATC in the context of MDSC is not clear. TNF has been shown to play a crucial role in the differentiation of myeloid cells [25, 26]. However, binding of TNF to TNFR-1 and TNFR-2 activates distinct signaling pathways [27–30]. Depending on TNF signaling pathway it may favor tumor growth and differentiation of MDSC or may induce immune responses .
In addition to cytokines, bioactive lipid mediators, such as PGE2 and COX2 produced by many tumors are known to induce the inflammatory and immune suppressive tumor microenvironment [10, 32–34]. Kalinski et al. showed that PGE2 can modulate the Th1 responses by impairing IL-12, and IFN-γ expression [35–37]. PGE2 and COX2 amplify ARG1 levels in MDSC and suppress the adaptive immune response in part through ARG1 production that enhances the L-arginine catabolism and thus depletion of L-arginine [13, 19, 38, 39]. Catabolism of L-arginine is essential for the suppressive activity of MDSC, which serves as a substrate for two enzymes, oxide synthase (iNOS) and arginase 1 (ARG1). MDSCs express high levels of both ARG1 and iNOS and both these enzymes play roles in the inhibition of T-cell function [13, 19, 20]. Depletion of L-arginine in the tumor microenvironment leads to the inhibition T cell proliferation by decreasing expression of the CD3ζ chains . and induction of T cell apoptosis . Collectively, these studies show a strong association between expansion of MDSCs and inflammation mediated by the arachidonic acid cascade. Consistent with these findings, our data suggest a strong correlation between increased accumulation of MDSC and high levels of COX2/PGE2/ARG1 expression.
Analysis of chemokines showed significantly reduced levels of CCL3/MIP1α, CCL4/MIP-1β, CCL5/RANTES, CXCL9/MIG and CXCL10/IP-10 in the supernatants from control culture conditions (without aATC) which increased dramatically when either aATC or aATC and Th1 cytokines were added to the co-cultures. Co-cultures with reduced chemokine levels contained a significantly higher percentage of MDSC and significantly higher levels of COX2 and PGE2. PGE2 has been shown to inhibit mRNA and protein expression of chemokines including CCL3/MIP1α, CCL4/MIP-1β, CXCL10/IP-10 in activated monocytes and macrophages [41–44]. COX2 and PGE2 were reported to deregulate the chemokine production of DCs, abrogating the CXCL9/MIG, CXCL10/IP-10 and CCL5/RANTES-mediated ability of DC to attract naive, effector, and memory T and NK cells [42, 44–46].
Activated T cells express a variety of surface markers, including CD25, CD71, CD95, CD137, HLA-DR, and secrete Th1 cytokines IL-2 and IFN-γ . We analyzed CD71, CD62L and IFN-γ as T cell activation and functional markers and NKG2D as NK or NKT cell activation marker to assess the suppressive activity of MDSC on T cells and NK cells. In the presence of MDSC isolated from control (without aATC), the expression of all the T cell activation markers were markedly downregulated whereas MDSC isolated from aATC containing co-cultures showed attenuated inhibition of T cells activation markers. Study by Ochoa et al. showed restoration of IFN-γ production and T-cell proliferation after MDSC depletion . MDSC can abrogate the expression of L-selectin (CD62L) on both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, subverting the homing of these cells to the tumor site leading towards a dominant immunosuppressive microenvironment .
These studies were funded in part by R01 CA 092344 (L.G.L.), R01 CA 140412 (L.G.L), 5P39 CA 022453 from National Cancer Institute, Translational Grants #6066-06 and #6092-09 from the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society (L.G.L), Susan G. Komen Foundation Translational Grant #BCTR0707125 (L.G.L), and Young Family Foundation, The Helen L. Kay Charitable Trust, Chris for Life Foundation. Michigan Cell Therapy Center for Excellence Grant from the State of Michigan #1819, and startup funds from the Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute. The Microscopy, Imaging and Cytometry Resources Core is supported, in part, by NIH Center grant P30CA22453 to The Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University and the Perinatology Research Branch of the National Institutes of Child Health and Development, Wayne State University.
- Marigo I, Dolcetti L, Serafini P, Zanovello P, Bronte V: Tumor-induced tolerance and immune suppression by myeloid derived suppressor cells. Immunol Rev. 2008, 222: 162-179. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00602.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nagaraj S, Schrum AG, Cho HI, Celis E, Gabrilovich DI: Mechanism of T Cell Tolerance Induced by Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells. J Immunol. 2010, 184: 3106-3116. 10.4049/jimmunol.0902661.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Katamura K, Shintaku N, Yamauchi Y, Fukui T, Ohshima Y, Mayumi M, Furusho K: Prostaglandin E(2) at Priming of Naive Cd4(+) T-Cells Inhibits Acquisition of Ability to Produce Ifn-Gamma and Il-2, But Not Il-4 and Il-5. J Immunol. 1995, 155: 4604-4612.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kusmartsev S, Nefedova Y, Yoder D, Gabrilovich DI: Antigen-specific inhibition of CD8(+) T cell response by immature myeloid cells in cancer is mediated by reactive oxygen species. J Immunol. 2004, 172: 989-999.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kusmartsev S, Nagaraj S, Gabrilovich DI: Tumor-associated CD8(+) T cell tolerance induced by bone marrow-derived immature myeloid cells. J Immunol. 2005, 175: 4583-4592.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Terabe M, Swann J, Ambrosino E, Sinha P, Takaku S, Hayakawa Y, Godfrey DI, Ostrand-Rosenberg S, Smyth MJ, Berzofsky JA: A non-classical type IINKT cell suppresses tumor immunity. J Immunol. 2006, 176: S274-Google Scholar
- Eruslanov E, Kaliberov S, Daurkin I, Kaliberova L, Buchsbaum D, Vieweg J, Kusmartsev S: Altered Expression of 15-Hydroxyprostaglandin Dehydrogenase in Tumor-Infiltrated CD11b Myeloid Cells: A Mechanism for Immune Evasion in Cancer. J Immunol. 2009, 182: 7548-7557. 10.4049/jimmunol.0802358.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eruslanov E, Daurkin I, Vieweg J, Daaka Y, Kusmartsev S: Aberrant PGE(2) metabolism in bladder tumor microenvironment promotes immunosuppressive phenotype of tumor-infiltrating myeloid cells. Int Immunopharmacol. 2011, 11: 848-855. 10.1016/j.intimp.2011.01.033.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Legler DF, Bruckner M, Uetz-von Allmen E, Krause P: Prostaglandin E(2) at new glance: Novel insights in functional diversity offer therapeutic chances. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2010, 42: 198-201. 10.1016/j.biocel.2009.09.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sinha P, Clements VK, Fulton AM, Ostrand-Rosenberg S: Prostaglandin E2 promotes tumor progression by inducing myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Cancer Res. 2007, 67: 4507-4513. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4174.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Veltman JD, Lambers MEH, van Nimwegen M, Hendriks RW, Hoogsteden HC, Aerts JGJV, Hegmans JPJJ: COX-2 inhibition improves immunotherapy and is associated with decreased numbers of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in mesothelioma. Celecoxib influences MDSC function. BMC Cancer. 2010, 10: 464-476. 10.1186/1471-2407-10-464.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ochoa AC, Zea AH, Hernandez C, Rodriguez PC: Arginase, prostaglandins, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells in renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2007, 13: 721S-726S. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2197.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rodriguez PC, Quiceno DG, Ochoa AC: L-arginine availability regulates T-lymphocyte cell-cycle progression. Blood. 2007, 109: 1568-1573. 10.1182/blood-2006-06-031856.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thakur A, Schalk D, Al-Khadimi Z, Sarkar F, Lum L: A Th1 cytokine-enriched microenvironment enhances tumor killing by activated T cells armed with bispecific antibodies and inhibits the development of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2012, 61: 497-509. 10.1007/s00262-011-1116-1.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sen M, Wankowski DM, Garlie NK, Siebenlist RE, Van Epps D, LeFever AV, Lum LG: Use of anti-CD3 x anti-HER2/neu bispecific antibody for redirecting cytotoxicity of activated T cells toward HER2/neu Tumors. J Hematother Stem Cell Res. 2001, 10: 247-260. 10.1089/15258160151134944.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grabert RC, Cousens LP, Smith JA, Olson S, Gall J, Young WB, Davol PA, Lum LG: Human T cells armed with Her2/neu bispecific antibodies divide, are cytotoxic, and secrete cytokines with repeated stimulation. Clin Cancer Res. 2006, 12: 569-576. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hanson EM, Clements VK, Sinha P, Ilkovitch D, Ostrand-Rosenberg S: Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells Down-Regulate L-Selectin Expression on CD4(+) and CD8(+) T Cells. J Immunol. 2009, 183: 937-944. 10.4049/jimmunol.0804253.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Obermajer N, Muthuswamy R, Lesnock J, Edwards RP, Kalinski P: Positive feedback between PGE(2) and COX2 redirects the differentiation of human dendritic cells toward stable myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Blood. 2011, 118: 5498-5505. 10.1182/blood-2011-07-365825.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rodriguez PC, Zea AH, Zabaleta J, Ochoa JB, Ochoa AC: L-Arginine consumption by macrophages modulates the expression of T cell receptor CD3Z chain in T lymphocytes. J Immunother. 2003, 26: S28-10.1097/00002371-200311000-00009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rodriguez PC, Ochoa AC: T cell dysfunction in cancer: Role of myeloid cells and tumor cells regulating amino acid availability and oxidative stress. Semin Cancer Biol. 2006, 16: 66-72. 10.1016/j.semcancer.2005.10.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sica A, Balkwill F: Cancer-related inflammation. Nature. 2008, 454: 436-444. 10.1038/nature07205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ostrand-Rosenberg S, Sinha P: Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells: Linking Inflammation and Cancer. J Immunol. 2009, 182: 4499-4506. 10.4049/jimmunol.0802740.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bunt SK, Sinha P, Clements VK, Leips J, Ostrand-Rosenberg S: Inflammation induces myeloid-derived suppressor cells that facilitate tumor progression. J Immunol. 2006, 176: 284-290.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bunt SK, Yang L, Sinha P, Clements VK, Leips J, Ostrand-Rosenberg S: Reduced inflammation in the tumor microenvironment delays the accumulation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and limits tumor progression. Cancer Res. 2007, 67: 10019-10026. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2354.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fong L, Engleman EG: Dendritic cells in cancer immunotherapy. Annu Rev Immunol. 2000, 18: 245-273. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.18.1.245.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Geissmann F, Manz MG, Jung S, Sieweke MH, Merad M, Ley K: Development of Monocytes, Macrophages, and Dendritic Cells. Science. 2010, 327: 656-661. 10.1126/science.1178331.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hehlgans T, Pfeffer K: The intriguing biology of the tumour necrosis factor/tumour necrosis factor receptor superfamily: players, rules and the games. Immunology. 2005, 115: 1-20. 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2005.02143.x.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kelliher MA, Grimm S, Ishida Y, Kuo F, Stanger BZ, Leder P: The death domain kinase RIP mediates the TNF-induced NF-kappa B signal. Immunity. 1998, 8: 297-303. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80535-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yeh WC, Shahinian A, Speiser D, Kraunus J, Billia F, Wakeham A, DelaPompa JL, Ferrick D, Hum B, Iscove N, Ohashi P, Rothe M, Goeddel DV, Mak TW: Early lethality, functional NF-kappa B activation, and increased sensitivity to TNF-induced cell death in TRAF2-deficient mice. Immunity. 1997, 7: 715-725. 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80391-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vallabhapurapu S, Karin M: Regulation and Function of NF-kappa B Transcription Factors in the Immune System. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009, 27: 693-733. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132641.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Balkwill F: Tumour necrosis factor and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009, 9: 361-371. 10.1038/nrc2628.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gabrilovich DI, Nagaraj S: Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as regulators of the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009, 9: 162-174. 10.1038/nri2506.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gabrilovich DI: Myeloid-derived Suppressor Cells and Tumor Microenvironment. J Immunother. 2009, 32: 987-988.Google Scholar
- Nagaraj S, Gabrilovich DI: Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in Human Cancer. Cancer J. 2010, 16: 348-353. 10.1097/PPO.0b013e3181eb3358.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kalinski P, Hilkens C, Schuitemaker J, Snijders A, Kapsenberg M: CD1a(+)CD83(+) DC, which mature in the absence or in the presence of PGE(2). Promote Th1 versus Th2 responses. J Invest Dermatol. 1997, 109: 27-Google Scholar
- Kalinski P, Hilkens CMU, Snijders A, Snijdewint FGM, Kapsenberg ML: IL-12-deficient dendritic cells, generated in the presence of prostaglandin E-2, promote type 2 cytokine production in maturing human naive T helper cells. J Immunol. 1997, 159: 28-35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kalinski P, Schuitemaker JHN, Hilkens CMU, Kapsenberg ML: Prostaglandin E-2 induces the final maturation of IL-12-deficient CD1a(+)CD83(+) dendritic cells: The levels of IL-12 are determined during the final dendritic cell maturation and are resistant to further modulation. J Immunol. 1998, 161: 2804-2809.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rodriguez PC, Zea AH, Culotta KS, Zabaleta J, Ochoa JB, Ochoa AC: Regulation of T cell receptor CD3 chain expression by L-arginine. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 21123-21129. 10.1074/jbc.M110675200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rodriguez PC, Ernstoff MS, Hernandez C, Atkins M, Zabaleta J, Sierra R, Ochoa AC: Arginase I-Producing Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells in Renal Cell Carcinoma Are a Subpopulation of Activated Granulocytes. Cancer Res. 2009, 69: 1553-1560. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1921.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sinha P, Chornoguz O, Clements VK, Artemenko KA, Zubarev RA, Ostrand-Rosenberg S: Myeloid-derived suppressor cells express the death receptor Fas and apoptose in response to T cell-expressed FasL. Blood. 2011, 117: 5381-5390. 10.1182/blood-2010-11-321752.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kuroda E, Sugiura T, Okada K, Zeki K, Yamashita U: Prostaglandin E-2 up-regulates macrophage-derived chemokine production but suppresses IFN-Inducible protein-10 production by APC. J Immunol. 2001, 166: 1650-1658.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Muthuswamy R, Kalinski P, Reinhart T, Schadendrof D: PGE2 Transiently Enhances DC Expression of CCR7 but Inhibits the Ability of DCs to Produce CCL19 and Attract Naive T cells. Clin Immunol. 2010, 135: S100-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sharma S, Stolina M, Yang SC, Baratelli F, Lin JF, Atianzar K, Luo J, Zhu L, Lin Y, Huang M, Dohadwala M, Batra RK, Dubinett SM: Tumor cyclooxygenase 2-dependent suppression of dendritic cell function. Clin Cancer Res. 2003, 9: 961-968.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takayama K, Garcia-Cardena G, Sukhova GK, Comander J, Gimbrone MA, Libby P: Prostaglandin E-2 suppresses chemokine production in human macrophages through the EP4 receptor. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277: 44147-44154. 10.1074/jbc.M204810200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fujita M, Kohanbash G, Fellows-Mayle W, Hamilton RL, Komohara Y, Decker SA, Ohlfest JR, Okada H: COX-2 Blockade Suppresses Gliomagenesis by Inhibiting Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells. Cancer Res. 2011, 71: 2664-2674. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3055.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Obermajer N, Muthuswamy R, Odunsi K, Edwards RP, Kalinski P: PGE(2)-Induced CXCL12 Production and CXCR4 Expression Controls the Accumulation of Human MDSCs in Ovarian Cancer Environment. Cancer Res. 2011, 71: 7463-7470. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-2449.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Samarasinghe S, Mancao C, Pule M, Nawroly N, Karlsson H, Brewin J, Openshaw P, Gaspar HB, Veys P, Amrolia PJ: Functional characterization of alloreactive T cells identifies CD25 and CD71 as optimal targets for a clinically applicable allodepletion strategy. Blood. 2010, 115: 396-407. 10.1182/blood-2009-08-235895.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.