Open Access

Influence of anthropometric factors on tumour biological characteristics of colorectal cancer in men and women: a cohort study

  • Jenny Brändstedt1Email author,
  • Sakarias Wangefjord1,
  • Signe Borgquist2,
  • Björn Nodin1,
  • Jakob Eberhard1, 2,
  • Jonas Manjer3, 4 and
  • Karin Jirström1
Journal of Translational Medicine201311:293

DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-11-293

Received: 27 February 2013

Accepted: 12 November 2013

Published: 21 November 2013

Abstract

Background

Obesity is a well established risk factor of colorectal cancer (CRC), but how body size influences risk of colorectal cancer defined by key molecular alterations remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the relationship between height, weight, body mass index (BMI), waist- and hip circumference, waist-hip ratio (WHR) and risk of CRC according to expression of beta-catenin, cyclin D1, p53 and microsatellite instability status of the tumours in men and women, respectively.

Methods

Immunohistochemical expression of beta-catenin, cyclin D1, p53 and MSI-screening status was assessed in tissue microarrays with tumours from 584 cases of incident CRC in the Malmö Diet and Cancer Study. Six anthropometric factors: height, weight, BMI, waist- and hip circumference, and WHR were categorized by quartiles of baseline measurements and relative risks of CRC according to expression of beta-catenin, cyclin D1, p53 and MSI status were calculated using multivariate Cox regression models.

Results

High height was associated with risk of cyclin D1 positive, and p53 negative CRC in women but not with any investigative molecular subsets of CRC in men. High weight was associated with beta-catenin positive, cyclin D1 positive, p53 negative and microsatellite stable (MSS) tumours in women, and with beta-catenin negative and p53 positive tumours in men. Increased hip circumference was associated with beta-catenin positive, p53 negative and MSS tumours in women and with beta-catenin negative, cyclin D1 positive, p53 positive and MSS tumours in men. In women, waist circumference and WHR were not associated with any molecular subsets of CRC. In men, both high WHR and high waist circumference were associated with beta-catenin positive, cyclin D1 positive and p53 positive tumours. WHR was also associated with p53 negative CRC, and waist circumference with MSS tumours. High BMI was associated with increased risk of beta-catenin positive and MSS CRC in women, and with beta-catenin positive, cyclin D1 positive and p53 positive tumours in men.

Conclusions

Findings from this large prospective cohort study indicate sex-related differences in the relationship between obesity and CRC risk according to key molecular characteristics, and provide further support of an influence of lifestyle factors on different molecular pathways of colorectal carcinogenesis.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common forms of human cancer worldwide with approximately 1 million new cases detected every year[1]. Numerous epidemiological studies have examined the relationship between body weight and risk of CRC, most of which have demonstrated a positive association between a high body weight and an increased risk of CRC, particularly in men[24]. However, CRC is a largely heterogenous disease in terms of its biological properties and accumulating evidence suggest that aetiological factors influence the carcinogenetic process differentially according to different molecular pathways[58].

Colorectal carcinogenesis can be regarded as a complex process with multigene participation, mainly involving at least three distinct pathogenetic pathways: chromosomal instability (CIN), microsatellite instability (MSI) and CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP)[9, 10]. The ‘suppressor’ pathway involves loss of function of the tumour suppressor genes APC (Adenomatosis Polyposis Coli gene), DCC (Deleted in Colorectal Carcinoma gene), p53, and activation of the proto-oncogene k-ras. This pathway accounts for approximately 65-70% of sporadic CRC[11, 12] and for cancers associated with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), constituting less than 1% of all CRC[13].

Beta-catenin is a membrane-associated protein with essential functions in the regulation of cellular adhesion and the major mediator of the Wnt-signaling pathway[14, 15]. Inactivation of kinases in the APC-complex leads to accumulation of cytoplasmic and nuclear beta-catenin, contributing to tumour progression[1618]. Morikawa et al. have recently shown that BMI is associated with a higher risk of beta-catenin negative-, but not beta-catenin positive colorectal cancer[19]. Cyclin D1 is activated by WNT/beta-catenin signalling after mutation of the adenomatous polyposis coli gene (APC)[20]. Cyclin D1 is an important cell-cycle regulating protein and overexpression is seen in about one third of CRC[21]. Although various studies have linked the CCND1 G870A polymorphism to increased CRC risk, the results remain controversial[22, 23].

Inactivation of the p53 pathway by p53 mutations is one of the key genetic steps in colorectal carcinogenesis and approximately 40-50% of tumours in the colon have alterations in the p53 gene[2426]. The p53 suppressor gene is involved in numerous cellular processes, including induction of apoptosis and cell-cycle arrest, and p53 also plays an important role in cellular energy metabolism[2729]. It has been shown that reduced nutrient or energy levels induce p53[30], and given the important role of diet and lifestyle factors to the etiology of CRC, it can be hypothesized that life style factors are associated with p53 mutations. Very few previous studies have however addressed this question. Slattery et al. have shown a positive relationship between western style diet, but not obesity, and p53 mutations[31].

The second pathway is initiated by germline mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes, e.g. MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2, or somatic tumour MLH1 promoter methylation, leading to microsatellite instability (MSI). MSI is detected in approximately 15% of sporadic CRC, predominantly tumours located in the proximal colon, and in almost all cancers from patients with hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer (HNPCC), accounting for 3-5% of all CRC[3234]. Previous data indicate an association between obesity, MSS and risk of CRC[35].

Taken together, while it is well documented that body size influences CRC risk, also with differences regarding sex, location, and tumour stage[36], it remains unclear how this association differs according to molecular tumour phenotype.

The aim of this study was therefore to examine sex-related differences in the relationship between anthropometric factors and beta-catenin alterations, expression of cyclin D1 and p53, and MSI screening status of incident CRC in a large population based prospective cohort study (n = 584).

Subjects and methods

Study group

Until end of follow-up 31 December 2008, 584 incident cases of CRC had been registered in the prospective, population-based cohort study Malmö Diet and Cancer Study (MDCS)[37]. Between 1991–1996, a total number of 28 098 individuals; 11 063 (39,4%) men and 17 035 (60,6%) women, between 44–74 years where enrolled from a background population of 74 138. All participants completed the baseline examination, which included a questionnaire, anthropometric measurements and a dietary assessment. The questionnaire covered questions on physical activity, use of tobacco and alcohol, heredity, socio-economic factors, education, occupation, previous and current disease and current medication. In addition, blood samples were collected and stored in -80°C. Follow up is performed annually by record-linkage to national registries for cancer and cause of death. Cases were identified from the Swedish Cancer Registry up until 31 December 2007, and from The Southern Swedish Regional Tumour Registry for the period of 1 January to 31 December 2008. All tumours with available slides or paraffin blocks were histopathologically re-evaluated by a senior pathologist (KJ) on haematoxylin and eosin-stained slides. Histopathological, clinical and treatment data were obtained from the clinical and/or pathology records. Information on vital status and cause of death was obtained from the Swedish Cause of Death Registry up until 31 December 2009. Patient and tumour characteristics of the cohort, including specified location of colonic tumours, have been described in detail previously[3840]. Ethical permissions for the MDCS (Ref. 51/90), and the present study (Ref. 530/2008), were obtained from the Ethics Committee at Lund University.

Anthropometric measurements

At baseline examination, weight, (multiples of 0.1 kg) and height (to the nearest 0.005 m) were measured by a trained nurse, and body mass index (BMI) was calculated as kg/m2. Waist circumference was measured at the midpoint between the lower ribs and the iliac crest, and for hip circumference the level of greatest lateral extension was used. These measurements were estimated to the nearest 0.01 m. The waist and hip circumferences of each participant were used to calculate waist-hip ratio (WHR; cm/cm) as an additional measure of fat distribution.

Tissue microarray (TMA) construction and immunohistochemistry

Tumours with an insufficient amount of material were excluded, and a total number of 557 (89.0%) tumours were suitable for TMA construction. In brief, two 1.0 mm cores were taken from each tumour and mounted in a new recipient block using a semi-automated arraying device (TMArrayer, Pathology Devices, Westminster, MD, USA). As demonstrated previously, there was no selection bias regarding the distribution of clinicopathological characteristics between the TMA cohort and the full cohort[39].

For immunohistochemical analysis, 4 μm TMA-sections were automatically pre-treated using the PT-link system (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) and then stained in an Autostainer Plus (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark). MSI screening status was evaluated as previously described[41]. Immunohistochemical stainings were evaluated as negative when all tumour cells showed loss of nuclear staining. Surrounding stromal cells and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes served as internal controls for each biopsy core. A nuclear reaction of tumour cells was assessed as a positive staining. MSI screening status was defined in accordance with previous studies[41] whereby tumour samples lacking nuclear staining of MLH1, PMS2, MSH2 or MSH6 were considered to have a positive MSI screening status. Hereafter, tumours with a positive MSI screening status are referred to as MSI and tumours with negative MSI screening status are referred to as MSS.

Immunohistochemical staining of beta-catenin was performed and evaluated as previously described[42],whereby membranous staining was denoted as 0 (present) or 1 (absent), cytoplasmic staining intensity as 0–2 and nuclear staining intensity as 0–2. In this study, the analyses were limited to nuclear expression of beta-catenin. Cyclin D1 expression was evaluated as previously described[38] and p53 positivity was defined as > = 50% tumour cells with strong nuclear staining intensity in accordance with previous studies[40]. All immunohistochemical stainings were evaluated by two independent observers (SW and KJ), who were blinded to clinical and outcome data. Scoring differences were discussed in order to reach consensus.

Statistical methods

Distribution of established and potential risk factors for CRC was compared between CRC cases and the rest of the study cohort (Table 1). Distribution of cytoplasmic and nuclear beta-catenin expression, expression of p53 and cyclin D1, and MSI-status is also shown in Table 1. Anthropometric measurements were divided into quartiles. Separate quartiles were calculated for men and women[36]. A Cox proportional hazards analysis was used in order to compare risk of CRC between different categories of anthropometric factors according to beta-catenin over-expression, p53, and cyclin D1 expression and MSI screening status according to gender and tumour location, i.e. colon vs rectum. This yielded hazard ratios (HR) with a 95% confidence interval. Follow-up time was defined as time from baseline to diagnosis, death or end of follow-up 31 December 2009. The proportional hazards assumption was confirmed by a log, - log plot[43]. In the multivariate Cox analysis potential confounders were included, i.e. age (years), educational level (not completed elementary school/elementary school (6–8 years)/ “grundskola” (9–10 years)/“studentexamen” (10–12 years)/ one year after “studentexamen”/university degree), smoking habits (yes regularly, yes occasionally, former smoker, never smoker), and alcohol consumption (g/day) (Table 1). A case-to-case analysis examined the heterogeneity between different tumour subgroups regarding their association to anthropometrics using an unconditional logistic regression model. Chi square test was applied for assessment of the distribution of investigative factors according to baseline characteristics. All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 20 and 21 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Trend was calculated as linear trend over quartiles. A two-tailed p-value less than 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.
Table 1

Distribution of risk factors in cases and rest of cohort

Characteristics

Rest of cohort n = 27514

CRC cases n = 584

p

beta-catenin + n = 304 (61.0%)

beta- catenin – n = 194 (39.0%)

p

Cyclin D1+ n = 400 (80.3%)

Cyclin D1 –n = 98

(19.7%)

p

p53 + n = 241 (48.3%)

p53 – n = 258 (51.7%)

p

MSI n = 71 (14.6%)

MSS n = 416 (85.4%)

p

Sex

  

<0.001

  

0.863

  

0.226

  

0.722

  

0.057

 Male (%)

10783 (39.2)

280 (47.9)

 

145 (47.7)

91 (46.9)

 

185 (46.2)

52 (53.1)

 

112 (46.5)

124 (48.1)

 

26 (36.6)

203 (48.8)

 

 Female (%)

16731 (60.8)

304 (52.1)

 

159 (52.3)

103 (53.1)

 

215 (53.8)

46 (46.9)

 

129 (53.5)

134 (51.9)

 

45 (63.4)

213

 

Age at baseline (years)

58.0

61.8

 

61.9

62.0

 

62.3

60.2

 

61.5

62.3

 

64.4

61.5

 

 Male

59.2

61.7

<0.001

61.5

62.1

0.430

61.9

60.5

0.204

61.2

62.0

0.452

64.6

61.2

0.029

 Female

57.3

62.1

<0.001

62.5

61.7

0.638

62.7

59.7

0.001

61.7

62.6

0.252

64.3

61.7

0.024

Smoking male (% )

  

0.104

  

0.749

  

0.371

  

0.199

  

0.793

 Regularly

2572 (25.5)

53 (18.9)

 

25 (17.2)

17 (18.7)

 

35 (18.9)

8 (15.4)

 

17 (15.2)

24 (19.2)

 

5 (19.2)

38 (18.5)

 

 Occasionally

520 (4.8)

12 (4.3)

 

5 (3.4)

3 (3.3)

 

8 (4.3)

0

 

5 (4.4)

3 (2.4)

 

1 (3.89

7 (3.4)

 

 Former smoker

4635 (43.0)

145 (51.7)

 

80 (55.2)

44 (48.4)

 

94 (51.4)

31 (59.6)

 

66 (58.9)

60 (48.0)

 

11 (42.3)

107 (52.2)

 

 Never smoker

3046 (28.3)

70 (25.0)

 

35 (24.1)

27 (29.7)

 

48 (25.9)

13 (25.0)

 

24 (21.4)

38 (30.4)

 

9 (34.6)

53 (25.9)

 

Smoking female (%)

  

0.652

  

0.592

  

0.972

  

0.009

  

0.694

 Regularly

4976 (29.8)

71 (23.4)

 

36 (22.6)

25 (24.3)

 

49 (22.8)

11 (23.9)

 

26 (20.2)

35 (26.1)

 

12 (26.7)

47 (22.1)

 

 Occasionally

722 (4.3)

8 (2.6)

 

3 (1.9)

4 (3.9)

 

7 (3.2)

1 (2.2)

 

2 (1.6)

6 (4.5)

 

1 (2.2)

7 (3.3)

 

 Former smoke

4637 (27.7)

87 (28.6)

 

41 (25.7)

30 (29.1)

 

57 (26.5)

13 (28.3)

 

27 (20.9)

43 (32.1)

 

9 (20.0)

59 (27.7)

 

 Never smoker

7386 (44.2)

138 (45.4)

 

79 (49.7)

44 (42.7)

 

102 (47.4)

21 (45.7)

 

74 (57.4)

50 (37.3)

 

23 (51.1)

100 (46.9)

 

Level of education male (%)

  

0.912

  

0.727

  

0.760

  

0.250

  

0.451

 Not completed

85 (0.8)

2 (0.7)

 

1 (0.7)

0

 

1 (0.5)

0

 

1 (0.9)

0

 

0

1 (0.5)

 

 6-8 years

4852 (45.1)

137 (48.9)

 

76 (52.4)

41 (45.1)

 

93 (50.3)

25 (48.1)

 

57 (50.9)

61 (48.8)

 

13 (50.0)

102 (49.8)

 

 9-10 years

2113 (19.6)

55 (19.6)

 

28 (19.3)

21 (23.1)

 

35 (18.9)

14 (26.9)

 

24 (21.4)

25 (20.0)

 

4 (15.4)

44 (21.5)

 

 10-12 years

1279 (11.9)

29 (10.4)

 

16 (11.0)

10 (11.0)

 

21 (11.3)

4 (7.7)

 

7 (6.3)

18 (14.4)

 

6 (23.1)

20 (9.8)

 

 1 year university

998 (9.3)

19 (6.7)

 

9 (6.2)

5 (5.5)

 

12 (6.5)

2 (3.8)

 

9 (8.0)

5 (4.0)

 

1 (3.8)

13 (6.3)

 

 University degree

1424 (13.2)

38 (13.6)

 

15 (10.3)

14 (15.4)

 

23 (12.4)

7 (13.5)

 

14 (12.5)

16 (12.8)

 

2 (7.7)

25 (12.2)

 

Level of education female (%)

  

0.009

  

0.019

  

0.796

  

0.496

  

0.316

 Not completed

126 (0.8)

3 (1.0)

 

1 (0.6)

2 (1.9)

 

3 (1.4)

0

 

2 (1.6)

1 (0.7)

 

0

3 (1.4)

 

 6-8 years

6419 (38.5)

150 (49.8)

 

88 (56.4)

48 (46.6)

 

111 (52.4)

22 (47.8)

 

73 (56.6)

61 (46.2)

 

25 (55.6)

105 (50.0)

 

 9-10 years

5086 (30.5)

75 (24.9)

 

27 (17.3)

35 (34.0)

 

52 (24.5)

12 (26.1)

 

26 (20.2)

38 (28.8)

 

13 (28.9)

50 (23.8)

 

 10-12 years

1161 (7.0)

22 (7.3)

 

15 (9.6)

3 (2.9)

 

13 (6.1)

5 (10.9)

 

9 (7.0)

9 (6.8)

 

0

18 (8.6)

 

 1 year university

1399 (8.4)

26 (8.6)

 

13 (8.3)

9 (8.7)

 

18 (8.5)

3 (6.5)

 

9 (7.8)

13 (9.8)

 

5 (11.1)

18 (8.6)

 

 University degree

2496 (15.0)

25 (8.3)

 

12 (7.7)

6 (5.8)

 

15 (7.0)

4 (8.7)

 

9 (7.0)

10 (7.5)

 

2 (4.4)

16 (7.5)

 

Alcohol (g/day)

               

 Male

15.5

15.7

0.868

17.4

14.3

0.070

16.2

15.0

0.648

 

16.9

0.731

12.6

16.6

0.331

 Female

7.7

6.2

0.002

6.3

5.8

0.583

6.0

6.7

0.968

6.2

5.9

0.626

4.6

6.2

0.310

Height (cm)

               

 Male

176.4

176.3

0.400

176.1

176.9

0.392

176.3

176.9

0.773

176.8

176.0

0.329

176.4

176.3

0.817

 Female

163.6

163.3

0.220

162.8

163.6

0.179

163.4

162.6

0.394

162.2

164.2

0.006

163.1

163.3

0.620

Weight (kg)

               

 Male

81.7

83.8

0.014

83.9

82.9

0.953

83.1

84.5

0.457

84.6

82.8

0.250

86.2

82.8

0.433

 Female

68.0

70.0

0.008

70.9

68.3

0.112

70.4

71.0

0.881

69.0

71.5

0.154

68.9

70.7

0.484

BMI (kg/m2)

               

 Male

26.2

26.9

<0.001

27.0

26.5

0.481

26.7

27.1

0.562

27.0

26.7

0.591

27.5

26.6

0.258

 Female

25.4

26.3

0.001

26.7

25.5

0.013

26.7

27.0

0.525

26.2

26.5

0.929

25.9

26.5

0.402

WHR (cm/cm)

               

 Male

0.94

0.95

0.021

0.95

0.94

0.027

0.95

0.95

0.676

0.95

0.95

0.482

0.94

0.95

0.889

 Female

0.80

0.80

0.490

0.80

0.80

0.779

0.79

0.81

0.098

0.80

0.79

0.338

0.79

0.80

0.779

Waist (cm)

               

 Male

94.0

96.3

<0.001

96.6

94.9

0.424

95.6

96.8

0.575

96.9

95.4

0.427

96.6

95.5

0.586

 Female

77.9

80.1

0.001

80.9

78.8

0.215

79.9

81.9

0.299

79.9

80.7

0.839

79.0

80.6

0.494

Hip (cm)

               

 Male

99.4

101.2

<0.001

101.0

101.0

0.602

100.8

101.6

0.687

101.7

100.7

0.391

102.2

100.8

0.554

 Female

97.8

100.2

<0.001

101.2

98.8

0.091

100.4

101.0

0.872

99.5

101.4

0.287

99.6

100.9

0.380

Results

Distribution of risk factors in cases and rest of cohort

As shown in Table 1, CRC cases were slightly older (p <0.001 for both men and women), of higher weight (p = 0.014 for men and p = 0.008 for women), had a higher BMI (p = <0.001 for men and p = 0.001 for women), a higher waist circumference (p < 0.001 for both men and women), and a higher hip circumference (p < 0.001 for men and p = 0.001 for women) and a higher WHR in men (p = 0.021), than the rest of cohort. Among women, cases had a higher level of education (p = 0.009), and had a lower intake of alcohol (p = 0.002) than the rest of cohort. There was a significant association between beta-catenin positive tumours and level of education (p = 0.019), a higher BMI (p 0.013) in women and with WHR (p = 0.027) among men. Cyclin D1 positive tumours were associated with higher age (p = 0.001) in women. Furthermore, p53 positive tumours were associated with height (p = 0.009), more frequent among never-smokers in women (p = 0.009), and MSS was associated with higher age in both men (p = 0.029) and in women (p = 0.024).

Hazard ratios of CRC risk defined by different tumour characteristics in women

Associations of anthropometric factors with tumour biological parameters in women are shown in Table 2 (height, weight, hip) and Table 3 (BMI, WHR, waist). In women, a high height was associated with risk of cyclin D1 positive (ptrend =0.031), and p53 negative (ptrend =0.004) CRC. The risk of p53 negative tumours was highest in the top quartile of height (p for heterogeneity = 0.013). A high weight was associated with beta-catenin positive (ptrend =0.010), cyclinD1 positive (ptrend =0.019), p53 negative (p = 0.004) and MSS tumours (ptrend =0.008). Increased hip circumference was associated with beta-catenin positive (ptrend =0.014), p53 negative (ptrend =0.042) and MSS tumours (ptrend =0.005), but waist circumference and WHR were not associated with risk of any of the molecular subsets of CRC. A high BMI was associated with increased risk of beta-catenin positive (ptrend =0.004), but not beta-catenin negative tumours, with the highest risk in the top quartile (p for heterogeneity = 0.048). High BMI was also associated with risk of MSS tumours (ptrend =0.009).
Table 2

Hazard ratios of CRC risk defined by different tumour characteristics in relation to height, weight and hip circumference in women

Tumour characteristics

Quartiles

Height

Weight

Hip

Number of cases

 

Cases

RR

Cases

RR

Cases

RR

Positive nuclear beta-catenin

1

31

1.00

22

1.00

19

1.00

2

56

1.34(0.86-2.08)

39

1.50(0.89-2.52)

38

1.41(0.81-2.46)

3

39

1.32(0.82-2.13)

46

2.04(1.22-3.41)

37

1.28(0.73-2.26)

4

32

1.17(0.70-1.96)

51

1.87(1.12-3.10)

64

1.93(1.14-3.26)

 

p trend

 

0.593

 

0.010

 

0.014

Negative nuclear beta-catenin

1

20

1.00

19

1.00

21

1.00

2

30

1.13(0.64-2.00)

32

1.46(0.82-2.57)

21

0.72(0.39-1.32)

3

26

1.33(0.74-2.40)

22

1.17(0.63-2.17)

30

1.03(0.58-1.81)

4

27

1.56(0.86-2.84)

30

1.31(0.73-2.33)

31

0.88(0.50-1.55)

 

p trend

 

0.113

 

0.599

 

0.985

CyclinD1 positive

1

39

1.00

35

1.00

34

1.00

2

70

1.36(0.92-2.02)

54

1.32(0.86-2.02)

45

0.92(0.59-1.44)

3

53

1.47(0.97-2.23)

56

1.57(1.03-2.41)

57

1.11(0.72-1.70)

4

52

1.62(1.05-2.49)

69

1.60(1.06-2.42)

78

1.28(0.85-1.93)

 

p trend

 

0.031

 

0.019

 

0.110

CyclinD1 negative

1

12

1.00

6

1.00

6

1.00

2

14

0.80(0.37-1.73)

12

1.70(0.63-4.54)

11

1.42(0.52-3.85)

3

12

0.89(0.39-1.99)

14

2.38(0.91-6.22)

11

1.49(0.55-4.07)

4

8

0.61(0.24-1.53)

14

1.96(0.75-5.12)

18

2.13(0.83-5.48)

 

p trend

 

0.365

 

0.155

 

0.103

p53 positive (>50%)

1

30

1.00

25

1.00

19

1.00

2

46

1.16(0.73-1.84)

32

1.07(0.63-1.80)

32

1.19(0.67-2.10)

3

32

1.10(0.67-1.83)

34

1.31(0.77-2.20)

34

1.19(0.67-2.10)

4

21

0.78(0.43-1.39)

38

1.21(0.72-2.00)

44

1.31(0.76-2.28)

 

p trend

 

0.431

 

0.370

 

0.364

P53 negative (<50%)

1

25

1.00

16

1.00

21

1.00

2

40

1.39(0.82-2.37)

35

1.92(1.06-3.47)

25

0.85(0.48-1.53)

3

33

1.64(0.94-2.84)

37

2.36(1.31-4.26)

35

1.18(0.68-2.04)

4

39

2.17(1.25-3.76)*

45

2.36(1.33-4.21)

52

1.47(0.87-2.47)

 

p trend

 

0.004

 

0.004

 

0.042

MSI

1

11

1.00

8

1.00

9

1.00

2

14

1.01(0.46-2.23)

12

1.35(0.55-3.13)

9

0.68(2.271.71)

3

9

0.96(0.39-2.33)

11

1.49(0.60-3.71)

13

0.9(0.40-2.21)

4

11

1.43(0.61-3.38)

14

1.49(0.62-3.59)

14

0.81(0.34-1.90)

 

p trend

 

0.477

 

0.387

 

0.864

MSS

1

41

1.00

30

1.00

27

1.00

2

67

1.20(0.81-1.78)

58

1.64(0.05-2.55)

50

1.33(0.83-2.13)

3

56

1.39(0.92-2.09)

55

1.79(1.14-2.80)

52

1.34(0.84-2.13)

4

48

1.28(0.83-1.97)

69

1.87(1.21-2.88)

83

1.85(1.18-2.88)

 

p trend

 

0.203

 

0.008

 

0.005

Adjusted for age, level of education, smoking habits and alcohol consumption.

*Heterogeneity analysis with p < 0.05.

Table 3

Hazard ratios of CRC risk defined by different tumour characteristics in relation to BMI, WHR and waist and hip circumference in women

Tumour characteristics

Quartiles

BMI

WHR

Waist

Number of cases

 

Cases

RR

Cases

RR

Cases

RR

Positive nuclear beta-catenin

1

20

1.00

43

1.00

23

1.00

2

40

1.73(1.00-2.97)

29

0.83(0.52-1.34)

33

0.97(0.57-1.67)

3

43

1.79(1.05-3.05)

40

0.92(0.59-1.43)

51

1.40(0.85-2.30)

4

55

2.25(1.33-3.80)*

46

1.20(0.79-1.84)

51

1.36(0.82-2.25)

 

p trend

 

0.004

 

0.366

 

0.097

Negative nuclear beta-catenin

1

22

1.00

24

1.00

16

1.00

2

29

1.20(0.69-2.09)

25

1.21(0.69-2.12)

25

1.16(0.62-2.18)

3

28

1.06(0.60-1.87)

32

1.31(0.77-2.22)

37

1.51(0.84-2.73)

4

24

0.89(0.49-1.61)

22

0.97(0.54-1.74)

25

1.00(0.53-1.90)

 

p trend

 

0.588

 

0.952

 

0.860

CyclinD1 positive

1

35

1.00

55

1.00

31

1.00

2

53

1.31(0.85-2.02)

48

1.07(0.72-1.58)

49

1.09(0.69-1.72)

3

61

1.42(0.94-2.17)

62

1.12(0.77-1.62)

75

1.51(0.99-2.31)

4

65

1.48(0.97-2.25)

49

0.98(0.66-1.45)

59

1.14(0.73-1.78)

 

p trend

 

0.076

 

0.997

 

0.357

CyclinD1 negative

1

7

1.00

10

1.00

8

1.00

2

12

1.64(0.64-4.20)

7

0.80(0.31-2.11)

7

0.69(0.25-1.90)

3

9

1.19(0.44-3.23)

12

1.18(0.51-2.74)

12

1.08(0.44-2.66)

4

18

2.46(1.00-6.02)

17

1.92(0.87-4.22)

19

1.81(0.78-4.21)

 

p trend

 

0.071

 

0.066

 

0.063

p53 positive (>50%)

1

19

1.00

30

1.00

21

1.00

2

33

1.51(0.85-2.67)

27

1.10(0.65-1.86)

27

0.89(0.50-1.59)

3

38

1.63(0.93-2.84)

35

1.20(0.73-1.96)

40

1.20(0.70-2.05)

4

39

1.65(0.94-2.89)

37

1.41(0.87-2.31)

41

1.23(0.72-2.10)

 

p trend

 

0.103

 

0.158

 

0.248

P53 negative(<50%)

1

23

1.00

35

1.00

18

1.00

2

33

1.29(0.75-2.21)

28

0.96(0.58-1.58)

29

1.16(0.64-2.09)

3

33

1.23(0.72-2.11)

39

1.08(0.68-1.71)

49

1.77(1.03-3.06)

4

44

1.61(0.96-2.71)

31

0.95(0.58-1.54)

37

1.28(0.72-2.27)

 

p trend

 

0.091

 

0.953

 

0.236

MSI

1

10

1.00

11

1.00

6

1.00

2

9

0.79(0.32-1.95)

10

1.08(0.46-2.55)

13

1.53(0.58-4.05)

3

14

1.09(0.48-2.48)

14

1.22(0.56-2.70)

16

1.59(0.62-4.10)

4

12

0.91(0.39-2.25)

10

0.96(0.41-2.27)

10

0.95(0.34-2.65)

 

p trend

 

0.972

 

0.971

 

0.765

MSS

1

31

1.00

57

1.00

33

1.00

2

56

1.60(1.03-2.50)

44

0.94(0.63-1.40)

43

0.92(0.58-1.46)

3

55

1.51(0.97-2.36)

55

0.96(0.66-1.40)

69

1.37(0.90-2.08)

4

70

1.90(1.23-2.93)

56

1.10(0.76-1.60)

67

1.31(0.85-2.00)

 

p trend

 

0.009

 

0.625

 

0.065

Adjusted for age, level of education, smoking habits and alcohol consumption.

*Heterogeneity analysis with p < 0.05.

Hazard ratios of CRC risk defined by different tumour characteristics in men

Associations of anthropometric factors with tumour biological parameters in men are shown in Table 4 (height, weight, hip) and Table 5 (BMI, WHR, waist).
Table 4

Hazard ratios of CRC risk defined by different tumour characteristics in relation to height, weight and hip circumference in men

Tumour characteristics

Quartiles

Height

Weight

Hip

Number of cases

 

Cases

RR

Cases

RR

Cases

RR

Positive nuclear beta-catenin

1

40

1.00

29

1.00

26

1.00

2

36

0.97(0.61-1.55)

42

1.41(0.86-2.29)

33

1.28(0.76-2.18)

3

33

0.71(0.44-1.14)

35

1.15(0.69-1.93)

45

1.55(0.93-2.57)

4

42

1.15(0.73-1.81)

45

1.53(0.94-2.49)

47

1.39(0.84-2.30)

 

p trend

 

0.877

 

0.180

 

0.182

Negative nuclear beta-catenin

1

14

1.00

19

1.00

17

1.00

2

26

2.13(1.09-4.16)

19

1.02(0.53-1.94)

11

0.65(0.30-1.40)

3

32

1.94(1.00-3.75)

26

1.31(0.71-2.43)

33

1.87(1.02-3.42)

4

27

1.90(0.96-3.79)

35

1.70(0.94-3.07)

38

1.46(0.79-2.70)

 

p trend

 

0.122

 

0.048

 

0.036

CyclinD1 positive

1

45

1.00

40

1.00

36

1.00

2

46

1.16(0.76-1.77)

49

1.23(0.80-1.89)

32

0.91(0.56-1.48)

3

53

1.02(0.67-1.54)

44

1.08(0.69-1.68)

61

1.57(1.02-2.41)

4

52

1.25(0.82-1.90)

63

1.57(1.04-2.39)

67

1.38(0.90-2.12)

 

p trend

 

0.442

 

0.058

 

0.034

CyclinD1 negative

1

10

1.00

8

1.00

7

1.00

2

15

1.48(0.66-3.34)

12

1.39(0.57-3.42)

12

1.65(0.65-4.21)

3

13

1.00(0.43-2.32)

17

1.85(0.79-4.34)

16

2.12(0.87-5.18)

4

17

1.52(0.68-3.43)

18

1.78(0.76-4.22)

20

1.90(0.78-4.62)

 

p trend

 

0.513

 

0.151

 

0.159

p53 positive (>50%)

1

22

1.00

20

1.00

15

1.00

2

32

1.64(0.93-2.90)

26

1.27(0.70-2.30)

22

1.48(0.76-2.90)

3

32

1.31(0.74-2.31)

33

1.42(0.79-2.54)

38

2.29(1.23-4.26)

4

33

1.65(0.93-2.92)

40

1.85(1.06-3.23)

44

2.12(1.14-3.92)

 

p trend

 

0.191

 

0.026

 

0.009

P53 negative (<50%)

1

32

1.00

27

1.00

27

1.00

2

30

1.02(0.62-1.70)

36

1.33(0.79-2.22)

22

0.82(0.46-1.46)

3

33

0.84(0.51-1.39)

27

1.06(0.61-1.83)

39

1.36(0.82-2.27)

4

36

1.13(0.68-1.87)

41

1.48(0.88-2.48)

43

1.15(0.69-1.91)

 

p trend

 

0.845

 

0.251

 

0.288

MSI

1

5

1.00

4

1.00

5

1.00

2

9

2.07(0.69-6.20)

7

1.76(0.51-6.05)

5

0.94(0.27-3.26)

3

5

0.98(0.28-3.42)

7

1.91(0.55-6.60)

6

1.06(0.32-3.51)

4

8

1.79(0.55-5.77)

9

2.36(0.70-7.96)

11

1.45(0.49-4.32)

 

p trend

 

0.630

 

0.176

 

0.431

MSS

1

48

1.00

46

1.00

39

1.00

2

51

1.16(0.77-1.74)

51

1.09(0.73-1.65)

39

1.03(0.65-1.61)

3

59

1.02(0.69-1.53)

52

1.07(0.71-1.62)

64

1.54(1.02-2.33)

4

58

1.25(0.83-1.87)

67

1.38(0.93-2.05)

74

1.40(0.93-2.11)

 

p trend

 

0.411

 

0.126

 

0.038

Adjusted for age, level of education, smoking habits and alcohol consumption.

Table 5

Hazard ratios of CRC risk defined by different tumour characteristics in relation to BMI, WHR and waist circumference in men

Tumour characteristics

Quartiles

BMI

WHR

Waist

Number of cases

 

Cases

HR

Cases

HR

Cases

HR

Positive nuclear beta-catenin

1

33

1.00

29

1.00

26

1.00

2

31

0.90(0.54-1.48)

28

1.21(0.71-2.08)

27

0.90(0.52-1.56)

3

37

0.97(0.60-1.59)

43

1.60(0.99-2.59)

47

1.36(0.84-2.23)

4

50

1.52(0.96-2.41)

51

2.14(1.34-3.42)*

51

1.66(1.02-2.69)

 

p trend

 

0.050

 

0.001

 

0.009

Negative nuclear beta-catenin

1

25

1.00

30

1.00

21

1.00

2

15

0.57(0.29-1.10)

18

0.78(0.43-1.45)

11

0.43(0.20-0.91)

3

21

0.72(0.39-1.33)

26

0.98(0.57-1.68)

33

1.21(0.69-2.12)

4

38

1.51(0.86-2.57)

25

0.96(0.54-1.69)

34

1.27(0.72-2.23)

 

p trend

 

0.074

 

0.993

 

0.076

CyclinD1 positive

1

47

1.00

45

1.00

39

1.00

2

33

0.69(0.44-1.09)

39

1.13(0.72-1.77)

29

0.62(0.38-1.02)

3

50

0.93(0.61-1.42)

54

1.33(0.89-2.00)

63

1.22(0.80-1.84)

4

66

1.46(0.99-2.16)

58

1.61(1.08-1.42)

65

1.40(0.93-2.10)

 

p trend

 

0.019

 

0.015

 

0.009

CyclinD1 negative

1

11

1.00

14

1.00

8

1.00

2

12

0.95(0.41-2.19)

6

0.48(0.17-1.32)

9

1.02(0.39-2.64)

3

10

0.78(0.33-1.86)

17

1.28(0.63-2.61)

17

1.64(0.70-3.84)

4

22

1.75(0.83-3.71)

18

1.32(0.63-2.72)

21

2.01(0.87-4.64)

 

p trend

 

0.146

 

0.211

 

0.046

p53 positive (>50%)

1

23

1.00

25

1.00

16

1.00

2

22

0.89(0.49-1.62)

24

1.18(0.66-2.12)

21

1.05(0.54-2.04)

3

32

1.17(0.67-2.04)

33

1.43(0.84-2.44)

41

1.85(1.02-3.33)

4

42

1.69(0.99-2.88)

37

1.72(1.02-2.91)

41

2.05(1.14-3.68)

 

p trend

 

0.023

 

0.033

 

0.003

P53 negative (<50%)

1

34

1.00

32

1.00

30

1.00

2

23

0.65(0.38-1.13)

22

0.91(0.52-1.59)

16

0.48(0.26-0.89)

3

28

0.73(0.43-1.24)

38

1.33(0.82-2.15)

40

1.05(0.64-1.71)

4

46

1.44(0.90-2.30)

39

1.52(0.93-2.47)

45

1.25(0.76-2.03)

 

p trend

 

0.084

 

0.048

 

0.070

MSI

1

5

1.00

6

1.00

5

1.00

2

5

0.98(0.28-3.42)

5

1.27(0.39-4.18)

4

0.73(0.20-2.72)

3

6

0.95(0.27-3.34)

9

1.82(0.64-5.15)

9

1.58(0.53-4.75)

4

11

2.47(0.84-7.26)

7

1.52(0.48-4.80)

9

1.50(0.49-4.65)

 

p trend

 

0.082

 

0.344

 

0.272

MSS

1

53

1.00

55

1.00

43

1.00

2

40

0.72(0.47-1.10)

40

0.90(0.59-1.39)

34

0.67(0.42-1.06)

3

50

0.84(0.56-1.25)

58

1.14(0.78-1.67)

67

1.16(0.78-1.73)

4

73

1.37(0.95-1.99)

63

1.36(0.93-1.98)

72

1.39(0.94-2.05)

 

p trend

 

0.053

 

0.071

 

0.012

Adjusted for age, level of education, smoking habits and alcohol consumption.

*Heterogeneity analysis with p < 0.05.

High height in men was not associated with increased risk of any of the molecular subsets of CRC, but high weight was associated with beta-catenin negative (ptrend =0.048) and p 53 positive (ptrend =0.026) CRC. A high hip circumference was associated with beta-catenin negative (ptrend =0.036), cyclin D1 positive (ptrend =0.034), p 53 positive (ptrend =0.009) and MSS (ptrend =0.038) tumours. High BMI was associated with cyclin D1 positive (ptrend =0.019) and p 53 positive (ptrend =0.023) tumours, and borderline significantly associated with beta-catenin positive CRC (ptrend =0.050). High WHR was associated with beta-catenin positive, but not beta-catenin negative CRC (ptrend =0.001), with the highest risk in the top quartile (p for heterogeneity = 0.015). A high WHR was also associated with cyclin D1 positive (ptrend =0.015), p 53 positive (ptrend =0.033) and p53 negative tumours (ptrend =0.048). High waist circumference was associated with beta-catenin positive (ptrend =0.009), cyclin D1 positive (ptrend =0.009), p 53 positive (ptrend =0.003), and MSS (ptrend =0.012) tumours.

Discussion

In this large prospective cohort study, we present data on associations between anthropometric factors and risk of molecular subsets of CRC, i.e. beta-catenin overexpression, expression of cyclin D1 and p53, and MSI screening status.

Positive MSI screening status has recently been demonstrated to be an independent favourable prognostic factor in the here studied cohort[40]. In the present study, no significant associations were found between any of the anthropometric measurements and risk of MSI tumours. One previous prospective study has investigated the relationship between anthropometric factors and risk of CRC according to MSI status, demonstrating an association of high BMI with MSS tumours but not with MSI tumours[35]. These data are generally in agreement with previous case control studies[8, 44]. Slattery et al. found that MSI tumours were more common in older people, in women and in the proximal colon, and found a positive relationship between smoking and MSI, and no association between MSI tumours and obesity[8]. In this study, we found significant associations of high weight, BMI and hip circumference with MSS tumours in women. Among men, significant associations were found between increased waist- and hip ratio and hip circumference and MSS tumours. These results are consistent with previous data from Hughes et al.[35], and also generally in agreement with the two previous case control studies from Slattery and Campbell[8, 44].

Several anthropometric factors were significantly associated with risk of beta-catenin positive CRC in both sexes; i.e. high weight, BMI and hip circumference in women, and high WHR and waist circumference in men. Differential effects on beta-catenin overexpression, attributable to the top quartiles, were seen for BMI in women and WHR in men. No anthropometric factors were associated with beta-catenin negative tumours in women, whereas in men, high weight and hip circumference were associated with betacatenin negative CRC. Accumulating evidence support a role of WNT/beta-catenin signalling in adipogenesis, obesity and metabolic disorders[45, 46], as well as in carcinogenesis[14, 15]. Considering the dual roles of beta-catenin in both colorectal carcinogenesis and energy metabolism, we investigated potential links between obesity and beta-catenin alterations in CRC. One former study by Morikawa et al. examined the associations of beta-catenin expression and obesity with survival from CRC[47], showing an improved cancer-specific survival in obese patients with tumours displaying nuclear beta-catenin localization. In non-obese patients, there were no associations between beta-catenin status and survival. Furthermore, Morikawa et al. have recently presented data on the relationship between obesity, measured as BMI, and risk of CRC according to beta-catenin status, whereby the results demonstrate that obesity and physical inactivity are associated with a higher risk of betacatenin negative but not of betacatenin positive CRC[19]. Of note, in the MDCS, beta-catenin overexpression has been demonstrated to be significantly associated with favourable clinicopathological factors and a prolonged survival[40].

As regards cyclin D1 expression, the results from the present study demonstrate a significant association between a high height and weight and risk of cyclin D1 positive tumours in women. In men, significant associations were seen between high BMI, WHR, waist and hip circumference and cyclin D1 positive tumours. Notably, in order to avoid too small subgroup analyses, a dichotomized variable of negative vs positive cyclin D1 expression was used, since this cut off takes both nuclear fraction and intensity into account and has previously shown to have the strongest impact on survival[38]. We are not aware of any previous studies on the influence of anthropometric factors on CRC risk according to cyclin D1 expression. Although various studies have linked the CCND1 G870A polymorphism to increased risk of CRC, the findings remain controversial[22, 23]. The prognostic role of cyclin D1 has been investigated in several studies, however with inconsistent results[4852]. In a previous study, expression of cyclin D1 was found to be associated with a significantly prolonged survival from CRC in men but not in women in the MDCS[38].

Lastly, the results from the present study demonstrate a positive relationship of all investigated anthropometric factors except height and weight, with p53 positive tumours in men, whereas in women, no associations were found between any anthropometric factors and p53 positive CRC. In contrast, high height, in particular the top quartile, weight and hip circumference were associated with p53 negative tumours in women. As a cautionary remark, the correlation between p53 gene mutations and p53 positivity by immunohistochemistry is not entirely concordant, and these analyses may therefore include some false positive and negative cases[53]. Previous studies on anthropometric factors and risk of CRC according to p53 expression are sparse, and with inconclusive results. Zhang et al. reported a possible association between p53 overexpression and obesity[54], and Slattery et al. have shown a positive relationship between western style diet and p53 mutations, but not between obesity and p53 mutations[31].

Taken together, while it is well documented that body size influences CRC risk, also with differences regarding sex, location, and tumour stage, the exact biologic mechanisms underlying the association between obesity and increased risk of CRC are not fully understood. A large number of studies have shown an increased risk of CRC in men, but not in women, and the complex interplay between hormonal factors and tumour biology underlying these sex differences remains to be further elucidated. Further, our results validate previous findings demonstrating significant associations of obesity and risk of microsatellite unstable, but not microsatellite stable, colorectal cancer in both sexes.

Certain methodological aspects need further attention. The validity of the anthropometric measurements is one aspect, as there may be a potential inter-observer variation. Recommendations for the nurses performing baseline examinations described how participants should be dressed, in which position the participants should be examined, and location for the estimation of waist- and hip measurements. We therefore consider the risk of misclassification of anthropometric measurements to be low. In contrast, most previous studies have used self- reported anthropometric measures.

It is also possible that participation in the MDCS was associated with body constitution, which may have lead to potential selection bias. In a previous paper, Manjer et al. compared BMI in the MDCS population in relation to the background population, and found an equal distribution of overweight/obesity[25]. Another aspect is the validity of collected data. As anthropometric data was assessed only at baseline, it is possible that some individuals have gained and some have lost weight. Such a misclassification is likely to lead to an attenuation of risks and, if anything, observed risks may be underestimated.

Conclusions

The results from this large prospective cohort study demonstrate that obesity, measured by several anthropometric factors, is differently associated with beta-catenin alterations, expression of cyclin D1 and p53, and MSI screening status of colorectal tumours in men and women. While not allowing for any firm conclusions to be drawn, these findings further support that the influence of lifestyle factors on various pathways of colorectal carcinogenesis differs between sexes. Further study on this topic is encouraged in order to enable development of novel strategies for screening and prevention of colorectal cancer.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, the Swedish Cancer Society, the Gunnar Nilsson Cancer Foundation, Region Skåne and the Research Funds of Skåne University Hospital.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Pathology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital
(2)
Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Oncology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital
(3)
Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Surgery, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital
(4)
The Malmö Diet and Cancer Study, Lund University

References

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D: Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011, 61 (2): 69-90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Pischon T, Lahmann PH, Boeing H, Friedenreich C, Norat T, Tjonneland A, Halkjaer J, Overvad K, Clavel-Chapelon F, Boutron-Ruault MC: Body size and risk of colon and rectal cancer in the european prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC). J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006, 98 (13): 920-931.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Renehan AG, Tyson M, Egger M, Heller RF, Zwahlen M: Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Lancet. 2008, 371 (9612): 569-578.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Larsson SC, Wolk A: Obesity and colon and rectal cancer risk: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007, 86 (3): 556-565.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ogino S, Shima K, Nosho K, Irahara N, Baba Y, Wolpin BM, Giovannucci EL, Meyerhardt JA, Fuchs CS: A cohort study of p27 localization in colon cancer, body mass index, and patient survival. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009, 18 (6): 1849-1858.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Limsui D, Vierkant RA, Tillmans LS, Wang AH, Weisenberger DJ, Laird PW, Lynch CF, Anderson KE, French AJ, Haile RW: Cigarette smoking and colorectal cancer risk by molecularly defined subtypes. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010, 102 (14): 1012-1022.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Satia JA, Keku T, Galanko JA, Martin C, Doctolero RT, Tajima A, Sandler RS, Carethers JM: Diet, lifestyle, and genomic instability in the North Carolina colon cancer study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005, 14 (2): 429-436.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Slattery ML, Curtin K, Anderson K, Ma KN, Ballard L, Edwards S, Schaffer D, Potter J, Leppert M, Samowitz WS: Associations between cigarette smoking, lifestyle factors, and microsatellite instability in colon tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000, 92 (22): 1831-1836.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Armaghany T, Wilson JD, Chu Q, Mills G: Genetic alterations in colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2012, 5 (1): 19-27.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Pancione M, Remo A, Colantuoni V: Genetic and epigenetic events generate multiple pathways in colorectal cancer progression. Patholog Res Int. 2012, 2012: 509348-PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Pino MS, Chung DC: The chromosomal instability pathway in colon cancer. Gastroenterology. 2010, 138 (6): 2059-2072.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Al-Sohaily S, Biankin A, Leong R, Kohonen-Corish M, Warusavitarne J: Molecular pathways in colorectal cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012, 27 (9): 1423-1431.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Half E, Bercovich D, Rozen P: Familial adenomatous polyposis. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2009, 4: 22-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kikuchi A: Regulation of beta-catenin signaling in the Wnt pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000, 268 (2): 243-248.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lugli A, Zlobec I, Minoo P, Baker K, Tornillo L, Terracciano L, Jass JR: Prognostic significance of the wnt signalling pathway molecules APC, beta-catenin and E-cadherin in colorectal cancer: a tissue microarray-based analysis. Histopathology. 2007, 50 (4): 453-464.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Brabletz T, Jung A, Kirchner T: Beta-catenin and the morphogenesis of colorectal cancer. Virchows Arch. 2002, 441 (1): 1-11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Clevers H: Wnt breakers in colon cancer. Cancer Cell. 2004, 5 (1): 5-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Klaus A, Birchmeier W: Wnt signalling and its impact on development and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008, 8 (5): 387-398.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Morikawa T, Kuchiba A, Lochhead P, Nishihara R, Yamauchi M, Imamura Y, Liao X, Qian ZR, Ng K, Chan AT: Prospective analysis of body mass index, physical activity, and colorectal cancer risk associated with beta-catenin (CTNNB1) status. Cancer Res. 2013, 73 (5): 1600-1610.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Tetsu O, McCormick F: Beta-catenin regulates expression of cyclin D1 in colon carcinoma cells. Nature. 1999, 398 (6726): 422-426.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Arber N, Hibshoosh H, Moss SF, Sutter T, Zhang Y, Begg M, Wang S, Weinstein IB, Holt PR: Increased expression of cyclin D1 is an early event in multistage colorectal carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology. 1996, 110 (3): 669-674.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Yang J, Zhang G, Chen J: CCND1 G870A polymorphism is associated with increased risk of colorectal cancer, especially for sporadic colorectal cancer and in Caucasians: a meta-analysis. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2012, 36 (2): 169-177.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhang LQ, Wang J, Shang JQ, Bai JL, Liu FY, Guan X, Zhou JN: Cyclin D1 G870A polymorphism and colorectal cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis of 20 populations. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2011, 26 (10): 1249-1255.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Baker SJ, Fearon ER, Nigro JM, Hamilton SR, Preisinger AC, Jessup JM, VanTuinen P, Ledbetter DH, Barker DF, Nakamura Y: Chromosome 17 deletions and p53 gene mutations in colorectal carcinomas. Science. 1989, 244: 217-221.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Baker SJ, Markowitz S, Fearon ER, Willson JK, Vogelstein B: Suppression of human colorectal carcinoma cell growth by wild-type p53. Science. 1990, 249 (4971): 912-915.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Markowitz SD, Bertagnolli MM: Molecular origins of cancer: molecular basis of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009, 361 (25): 2449-2460.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Vousden KH, Ryan KM: p53 and metabolism. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009, 9 (10): 691-700.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Levine AJ, Puzio-Kuter AM: The control of the metabolic switch in cancers by oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Science. 2010, 330 (6009): 1340-1344.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Cairns RA, Harris IS, Mak TW: Regulation of cancer cell metabolism. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011, 11 (2): 85-95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Jones RG, Plas DR, Kubek S, Buzzai M, Mu J, Xu Y, Birnbaum MJ, Thompson CB: AMP-activated protein kinase induces a p53-dependent metabolic checkpoint. Mol Cell. 2005, 18 (3): 283-293.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Slattery ML, Curtin K, Ma K, Edwards S, Schaffer D, Anderson K, Samowitz W: Diet activity, and lifestyle associations with p53 mutations in colon tumors. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002, 11 (6): 541-548.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Samowitz WS, Slattery ML, Kerber RA: Microsatellite instability in human colonic cancer is not a useful clinical indicator of familial colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 1995, 109 (6): 1765-1771.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu B, Nicolaides NC, Markowitz S, Willson JK, Parsons RE, Jen J, Papadopolous N, Peltomaki P, de la Chapelle A, Hamilton SR: Mismatch repair gene defects in sporadic colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability. Nat Genet. 1995, 9 (1): 48-55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Aaltonen LA, Peltomaki P, Mecklin JP, Jarvinen H, Jass JR, Green JS, Lynch HT, Watson P, Tallqvist G, Juhola M: Replication errors in benign and malignant tumors from hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Res. 1994, 54 (7): 1645-1648.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hughes LA, Williamson EJ, van Engeland M, Jenkins MA, Giles GG, Hopper JL, Southey MC, Young JP, Buchanan DD, Walsh MD: Body size and risk for colorectal cancers showing BRAF mutations or microsatellite instability: a pooled analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2012, 41 (4): 1060-1072.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Brandstedt J, Wangefjord S, Nodin B, Gaber A, Manjer J, Jirstrom K: Gender, anthropometric factors and risk of colorectal cancer with particular reference to tumour location and TNM stage: a cohort study. Biol Sex Differ. 2012, 3 (1): 23-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Berglund G, Elmstahl S, Janzon L, Larsson SA: The malmo diet and cancer study. Design and feasibility. J Intern Med. 1993, 233 (1): 45-51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Wangefjord S, Manjer J, Gaber A, Nodin B, Eberhard J, Jirstrom K: Cyclin D1 expression in colorectal cancer is a favorable prognostic factor in men but not in women in a prospective, population-based cohort study. Biology of sex differences. 2011, 2: 10-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Larsson A, Johansson ME, Wangefjord S, Gaber A, Nodin B, Kucharzewska P, Welinder C, Belting M, Eberhard J, Johnsson A: Overexpression of podocalyxin-like protein is an independent factor of poor prognosis in colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2011, 105 (5): 666-672.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Wangefjord S, Brandstedt J, Lindquist KE, Nodin B, Jirstrom K, Eberhard J: Associations of beta-catenin alterations and MSI screening status with expression of key cell cycle regulating proteins and survival from colorectal cancer. Diagn Pathol. 2013, 8: 10-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Eberhard J, Gaber A, Wangefjord S, Nodin B, Uhlen M, Ericson Lindquist K, Jirstrom K: A cohort study of the prognostic and treatment predictive value of SATB2 expression in colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2012, 106 (5): 931-938.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Nodin B, Johannesson H, Wangefjord S, O'Connor DP, Lindquist KE, Uhlen M, Jirstrom K, Eberhard J: Molecular correlates and prognostic significance of SATB1 expression in colorectal cancer. Diagn Pathol. 2012, 7: 115-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Katz MH, Hauck WW: Proportional hazards (Cox) regression. J Gen Intern Med. 1993, 8 (12): 702-711.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Campbell PT, Jacobs ET, Ulrich CM, Figueiredo JC, Poynter JN, McLaughlin JR, Haile RW, Jacobs EJ, Newcomb PA, Potter JD: Case–control study of overweight, obesity, and colorectal cancer risk, overall and by tumor microsatellite instability status. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010, 102 (6): 391-400.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Christodoulides C, Lagathu C, Sethi JK, Vidal-Puig A: Adipogenesis and WNT signalling. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2009, 20 (1): 16-24.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Schinner S: Wnt-signalling and the metabolic syndrome. Horm Metab Res. 2009, 41 (2): 159-163.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Morikawa T, Kuchiba A, Yamauchi M, Meyerhardt JA, Shima K, Nosho K, Chan AT, Giovannucci E, Fuchs CS, Ogino S: Association of CTNNB1 (beta-catenin) alterations, body mass index, and physical activity with survival in patients with colorectal cancer. JAMA. 2011, 305 (16): 1685-1694.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Maeda K, Chung Y, Kang S, Ogawa M, Onoda N, Nishiguchi Y, Ikehara T, Nakata B, Okuno M, Sowa M: Cyclin D1 overexpression and prognosis in colorectal adenocarcinoma. Oncology. 1998, 55 (2): 145-151.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Handa K, Yamakawa M, Takeda H, Kimura S, Takahashi T: Expression of cell cycle markers in colorectal carcinoma: superiority of cyclin A as an indicator of poor prognosis. Int J Cancer. 1999, 84 (3): 225-233.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Holland TA, Elder J, McCloud JM, Hall C, Deakin M, Fryer AA, Elder JB, Hoban PR: Subcellular localisation of cyclin D1 protein in colorectal tumours is associated with p21(WAF1/CIP1) expression and correlates with patient survival. Int J Cancer. 2001, 95 (5): 302-306.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Bahnassy AA, Zekri AR, El-Houssini S, El-Shehaby AM, Mahmoud MR, Abdallah S, El-Serafi M: Cyclin A and cyclin D1 as significant prognostic markers in colorectal cancer patients. BMC Gastroenterol. 2004, 4: 22-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Bondi J, Bukholm G, Nesland JM, Bukholm IR: Expression of non-membranous beta-catenin and gamma-catenin, c-Myc and cyclin D1 in relation to patient outcome in human colon adenocarcinomas. APMIS. 2004, 112 (1): 49-56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Curtin K, Slattery ML, Holubkov R, Edwards S, Holden JA, Samowitz WS: p53 alterations in colon tumors: a comparison of SSCP/sequencing and immunohistochemistry. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2004, 12 (4): 380-386.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang ZF, Zeng ZS, Sarkis AS, Klimstra DS, Charytonowicz E, Pollack D, Vena J, Guillem J, Marshall JR, Cordon-Cardo C: Family history of cancer, body weight, and p53 nuclear overexpression in Duke’s C colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 1995, 71 (4): 888-893.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Brändstedt et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.