Impact of anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody on dendritic cell-tumor fusion vaccine efficacy in a murine melanoma model

  • Chunrui Tan5Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Varun Reddy2Email author,

      Affiliated with

      • Jens Dannull3,

        Affiliated with

        • Enyu Ding5,

          Affiliated with

          • Smita K Nair4,

            Affiliated with

            • Douglas S Tyler3, 5,

              Affiliated with

              • Scott K Pruitt3, 5 and

                Affiliated with

                • Walter T Lee5, 5Email author

                  Affiliated with

                  Journal of Translational Medicine201311:148

                  DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-11-148

                  Received: 26 February 2013

                  Accepted: 4 June 2013

                  Published: 17 June 2013



                  A promising cancer vaccine involves the fusion of tumor cells with dendritic cells (DCs). As such, a broad spectrum of both known and unidentified tumor antigens is presented to the immune system in the context of the potent immunostimulatory capacity of DCs. Murine studies have demonstrated the efficacy of fusion immunotherapy. However the clinical impact of DC/tumor fusion vaccines has been limited, suggesting that the immunosuppresive milieu found in patients with malignancies may blunt the efficacy of cancer vaccination. Thus, novel strategies to enhance fusion vaccine efficacy are needed. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are known to suppress anti-tumor immunity, and depletion or functional inactivation of these cells improves immunotherapy in both animal models and clinical trials. In this study, we sought to investigate whether functional inactivation of CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ Treg with anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody (mAb) PC61 prior to DC/tumor vaccination would significantly improve immunotherapy in the murine B16 melanoma model.


                  Treg blockade was achieved with systemic PC61 administration. This blockage was done in conjunction with DC/tumor fusion vaccine administration to treat established melanoma pulmonary metastases. Enumeration of these metastases was performed and compared between experimental groups using Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test. IFN-gamma ELISPOT assay was performed on splenocytes from treated mice.


                  We demonstrate that treatment of mice with established disease using mAb PC61 and DC/tumor fusion significantly reduced counts of pulmonary metastases compared to treatment with PC61 alone (p=0.002) or treatment with control antibody plus fusion vaccine (p=0.0397). Furthermore, IFN-gamma ELISPOT analyses reveal that the increase in cancer immunity was mediated by anti-tumor specific CD4+ T-helper cells, without concomitant induction of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells. Lastly, our data provide proof of principle that combination treatment with mAb PC61 and systemic IL-12 can lower the dose of IL-12 necessary to obtain maximal therapeutic efficacy.


                  To our knowledge, this is the first report investigating the effects of anti-CD25 mAb administration on DC/tumor-fusion vaccine efficacy in a murine melanoma model, and our results may aide the design of future clinical trials with enhanced therapeutic impact.


                  Regulatory T cell Fusion PC61 Dendritic cell Tumor Immunotherapy


                  Melanoma kills over 8,000 people in the US each year, and its incidence is increasing faster than that of any other malignancy, with over 65,000 diagnosed cases last year (NCI cancer statistics). The mainstay of treatment remains surgical excision of the primary skin lesion, with regional lymph node dissection to remove nodal metastases. For subjects with isolated nodal metastases at presentation, the 5 year survival rate is less than 50%, and standard treatments in both the adjuvant and inoperable metastatic disease settings show little to no survival benefit.

                  In contrast, immunotherapy with DC-tumor cell fusion vaccines represents a particularly promising approach for the treatment of metastatic melanoma. Melanoma cells express a wide spectrum of known as well as patient-specific tumor-associated antigens and DCs are the most potent antigen-presenting cells attributable to their abundant expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I and II molecules as well as co-stimulatory and adhesion molecules which provide signals 1 and 2 for stimulation of naïve T cells [1]. However, the induction of primary T-cell responses against tumor-associated antigens in vivo is critically dependent upon co-administration of an adjuvant that can provide a 3rd signal to prevent T-cell tolerance or anergy and hence to induce T-cell effector function and memory [2]. 3rd signals include systemic IL-12 [3], agonistic antiOX40- [4], anti4-1BB- [5] or antagonistic PD-1 [6] monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), as well as DC1-polarizing Toll-like receptor agonists such as poly(I:C) and CpG. [7] The success of DC/fusion-based cancer vaccination in animal models has prompted the initiation of several clinical trials, but despite potent induction of anti-tumor T-cell immunity, only modest clinical responses were observed in a minority of patients [8]. Thus, it is evident that additional strategies are needed to improve fusion vaccine efficacy.

                  A major obstacle to the development of any immunotherapeutic approach is the control of immune-balance. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are responsible for maintaining tolerance to self-antigens, and immune homeostasis by regulating the activation of non-regulatory T cells [9]. Tregs exert their effects through TGF-β [10], IL-10 [11], CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4) [12], or through sequestration of IL-2 via expression of CD25 [13], the α-subunit of the high-affinity IL-2 receptor, and are defined by their expression of the transcription factor forkhead box transcription factor 3 (FoxP3) [14]. Recently, several methods for the depletion or functional inactivation of Tregs have been developed as part of a multi-pronged approach to the immunotherapy of melanoma patients. Treatment with low dose cyclophosphamide resulted in a reduction of Treg frequencies [15], however Treg elimination was also associated with a concomitant reduction of CD8+ T cells and a lack of tumor antigen priming [16]. Administration of CD25-targeted immunotoxins, designed to have a direct cytocidal action on cells which express the high-affinity IL-2 receptor, only leads to a modest and transient reduction in Treg numbers and has achieved variable results in improving immunotherapy [17, 18]. The fully human mAb Ipilimumab was approved in 2011 by the FDA for clinical use against melanoma. Ipilumumab exerts its therapeutic effects through direct enhancement of CD8+ T-cell function and simultaneous inhibition of Treg function through blockade of CTLA-4 on both cell types [19], which makes it hard to delineate its effects on a DC vaccine that aims to induce primary immune responses against tumor-associated antigens. Lastly, the anti-mouse CD25 mAb PC61, as well as the anti-human CD25 mAbs Basiliximab and Daclizumab, demonstrated a potent deactivation of Treg suppression that was mediated through moderate reduction of Treg numbers [2023] and functional inhibition through blockade of IL-2 signaling [24]. Importantly, treatment with anti-CD25 mAbs did not abrogate tumor antigen-specific immunity elicited by DC-based vaccines, despite the fact that activated effector T cells transiently express high levels of CD25. We therefore chose to use mAb PC61 in our vaccination studies.

                  In this report, we demonstrate that administration of mAb PC61 was an effective means to functionally inactivate Tregs in a murine melanoma model. In addition, we provide evidence that inactivation of Tregs enhances the potency of vaccination with DC/tumor cell fusions in a synergistic fashion, and that the enhancement of anti-tumor activity was primarily mediated by CD4+ T-effector cells. Furthermore, our data provide proof of principle that combination treatment with mAb PC61 and systemic IL-12 can lower the dose of cytokine necessary to obtain maximal therapeutic efficacy and may therefore represent a viable strategy to reduce IL-12 mediated toxicity in a clinical setting.

                  Materials and methods


                  This work was approved by the Duke University School of Medicine and Durham VA Medical Center IACUC. Female C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Raleigh, NC). Animals were maintained in a specific pathogen-free environment and used for experiments at age 8 to 12 weeks.

                  Tumor cells

                  D5lacZ is a derivative of the B16 melanoma cell line which stably expresses the lacZ gene product β-galactosidase. These cells are cultured in complete medium (CM, RPMI 1640, 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 0.1 mM non-essential amino acids, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 mg/ml streptomycin, 0.5 μg/ml fungizone, 50 μg/ml gentamicin and 5 × 10-5 M 2-mercaptoethanol) (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY).

                  Preparation of antibody

                  Hybridoma cells expressing anti-CD25 PC61 or Y13 (anti-HaRas) control mAbs were cultured in Hybridoma Serum-Free Media (Invitrogen) with 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin (Invitrogen), at the Duke University Cell Culture Facility. Antibodies were purified by ammonium sulfate precipitation of supernatants.

                  Regulatory T-cell inactivation

                  The efficacy of the anti-CD25 PC61 mAb to deplete Treg was tested in both naïve and tumor bearing mice. 250 μg/0.5 ml Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) of PC61 or Y13 mAb was injected intraperitoneally into naive C3H/HeN mice. One mouse from each group was sacrificed at 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 days after antibody injection. Spleens were harvested and enriched for T cells using the EasySep T-cell isolation kit (Stemcell Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada). T cells were stained for fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis with FITC-CD4, APC-CD25, and PE-FoxP3, respectively (eBioscience, San Diego, CA). Frequencies of CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ populations in both groups were compared to determine Treg inactivation. In order to confirm that the PC61 mAb was also effective in tumor-bearing mice, a dose of 0.25×106 D5lacZ cells was injected via tail vein into C57BL/6 mice on Day 0. On Day 2, 250 μg/0.5 ml of PC61 or Y13 mAb were administered intraperitoneally. Mice were sacrificed at 3, 10, 20 days after tumor inoculation and Treg inactivation was determined by FACS.

                  Dendritic cell preparation

                  DCs were generated from the femoral and tibial bone marrow cells of female C57BL/6 mice, After depletion of B and T cells using monoclonal antibody-coated magnetic beads (Invitrogen Dynal AS, Oslo, Norway), cells were cultured at 0.5×106 cells/ml in CM supplemented with 10 ng/ml granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and 10 ng/ml IL-4 (Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ). On day 6, DCs were harvested and cultured in fresh CM+GM-CSF+IL-4 at 1×106 cells/ml. One day 7, 25 ng/ml of lipopolysaccharide (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO) was added to the cultured cells to stimulate DC maturation. After 24 hours, DCs were collected for electrofusion.

                  Electrofusion of dendritic cell-tumor hybrids

                  Irradiated D5lacZ cells (100 Gy) were stained green with intracellular carboxyfluoroscein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE; Molecular Probes, OR) and combined at a 1:1 ratio with matured DCs. Cells were washed in prefusion media and suspended in fusion media at a concentration of 2×107 cells/ml. Cells were fused using the ECM 2001 pulse generator (BTX instruments, San Diego, CA). First, a low voltage alternating current of 120 V/cm for 10 seconds was applied to achieve alignment and chain formation. Then, cells were pulsed with a high voltage direct current of 1100 V/cm for 25 μs to cause reversible breakdown of cell membranes. The resulting hybrid cells were cultured overnight in CM at 37°C with 5% CO2. After 24 hours, the adherent cell population containing the fusion hybrids was harvested and prepared for vaccination.

                  Animal studies

                  0.25×106 D5lacZ cells/200μl of Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution were injected via tail vein into C57BL/6 mice to establish pulmonary metastases for this therapeutic model. After 2 days, 250 μg/0.5 ml HBSS of PC61 or Y13 mAb were injected into mice. One day later, animals were vaccinated with 0.3×106 cells/10 μl HBSS of fusion cells that were injected into their inguinal lymph nodes. IL-12 (0.2 μg/0.5 ml HBSS) was administered intraperitoneally daily for 4 days, starting on the day of vaccination. Lungs and spleens of mice were harvested 3 weeks after establishment of pulmonary metastases. Metastases were enumerated and splenocytes were frozen for further analysis.

                  ELISPOT analyses

                  The D5lacZ cell line, which was used as a stimulator, was cultured in the presence of 0.1 μg/ml (1,000 U/ml) murine IFN-γ for 3 days to up-regulate the expression of MHC class I and II molecules. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were separately enriched from frozen spleen cells using their respective EasySep T cell isolation kits (Stemcell Technologies). IFN-γ cytokine secretion from stimulated T cells was detected according to the ELISPOT kit protocol provided by the manufacturer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Briefly, 96-well nitrocellulose plates were coated with purified anti-mouse IFN-γ and left overnight at 4°C. The next day, plates were washed, and blocked with CM for 2 hours. Effector cells (0.2×106/well) were then co-cultured with stimulator cells at a ratio of 5:1 and incubated for 24 hours at 37°C, 5% CO2. After lysis of the cells, plates were developed with biotinylated detection antibody, enzyme conjugate ExtrAvidin-Alkaline phosphatase, 1/10000 dilution (Sigma-Aldrich), and substrate solution BCIP/NBT phosphatase (KPL, Gaithersburg, MD). Spots were enumerated using a CTL-ImmunoSpot analyzer (Shaker Heights, OH).


                  PC61-mediated inactivation of Tregs

                  In a first set of experiments, the efficacy of the anti-CD25 PC61 mAb to inactivate Tregs was tested in both naïve and tumor bearing mice (Table 1). PC61 or Y13 (control) mAb was injected intraperitoneally into naive C3H/HeN mice. One mouse from each group was sacrificed at 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 days after antibody injection. Spleens were harvested and enriched for T cells. T cells were stained with anti-CD4, anti-CD25, and anti-FoxP3 antibodies and analyzed by FACS (data not shown). Frequencies of CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ Tregs in both groups were compared and the results are shown in Table 1 (top). We observed that 95-98% of Tregs were undetectable for up to 21 days. After 28 days, the Treg population began to return to 50% of the original level and Treg frequencies increased to 64% of baseline after 42 days, which is conceivable given a PC61 half-life of 20 days in vivo.
                  Table 1

                  Assessment of PC61-mediated Treg inactivation

                  Naive mice


                  Y13 (%)

                  PC61 (%)
















                  Tumor bearing mice










                  (Top) Naïve C3H/HeN mice were injected intraperitoneally with PC61 mAb or Y13 control mAb, respectively. Mice were sacrificed at the indicated time points and splenocytes were analyzed by FACS after staining with anti-CD4, anti-CD25, and anti-FoxP3. The percentage of triple-positive cells is presented. (Bottom) Lung metastases were established in C57BL/6 mice via tail vein injection of D5lacZ cells. 2 days later, animals received intraperitoneal injections of PC61 or Y13 mAbs. Mice were sacrificed at the indicated time points, splenocytes were analyzed by FACS as described above and the percentage of triple-positive cells was determined.

                  Next, we determined the efficacy of PC61-mediated Treg inactivation in D5lacZ tumor bearing C57BL/6 mice to confirm that tumor-induced Tregs are also being inhibited by PC61 administration. D5lacZ cells were injected via tail vein into C57BL/6 mice to establish pulmonary metastases and after 2 days, PC61 or Y13 mAbs were administered intraperitoneally. Mice were sacrificed at 3, 10, 20 days after tumor inoculation and Treg inactivation was determined by FACS. As can be seen in Table 1 (bottom), 87% of Tregs were inactivated as early as 1 day after administration of PC61 mAb (day 3) and remained at that level (86%) until day 20, the typical duration of our tumor vaccination studies.

                  DC-tumor cell fusion efficiency

                  The electrofusion rate between DCs and D5lacZ melanoma cells was determined by FACS analysis. As presented in Figure 1A (top), DCs appeared to be well-differentiated and expressed high levels of maturation marker CD80, CD86 and intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM, CD54). In contrast, cultured D5lacZ expressed none of the above-mentioned DC markers (data not shown). Prior to fusion, D5lacZ cells were intracellularly and covalently labeled with the green fluorescent dye CFSE. After electrofusion, cells were incubated in media and adherent fusion cells were harvested 24 hours later. Cells were stained with mAbs against DC markers CD80, CD86 and ICAM, for FACS analysis. Figure 1A (bottom) shows the percentages of double-positive fusion cells (upper right quadrant of dot plots). The observed fusion efficacy of about 55% was well in agreement with fusions yields routinely obtained in our laboratory. In contrast, while 78% of DCs were MHC class I positive and 84% of DCs were MHC class II positive (Figure 1B, top), only 26.6% of fusion cells expressed MHC class I molecules and only 28.0% of fusion cells were MHC class II positive (Figure 1B, bottom).
                  Figure 1

                  FACS analysis of DCs and subsequent confirmation of DC-D5LacZ fusion hybrids. (A) Electrofusion of DCs and D5lacZ cells. (Top panel) Phenotype of DCs at day 0 (black histograms) and day 8 (grey histograms) of culture. (Bottom panel) Prior to fusion, D5LacZ were intracellularly and covalently labeled with CFSE. 24 hours after fusion, adherent cells were harvested and stained with DC markers as indicated. Numbers in the upper right quadrant represent percentages of double-positive fusion hybrids. (B) MHC class I (H2-kb) and MHC class II (I-Ab) expression of DCs and DC-tumor fusion cells.

                  DC-Tumor cell fusion vaccine efficacy after inactivation of Treg

                  Next, we determined whether PC61-mediated inactivation of Tregs was capable of enhancing the efficacy of DC/tumor cell fusion vaccination in the B16 murine melanoma model (Figure 2). A subset of animals was also treated with fusion vaccine plus intraperitoneal IL-12, the current ‘gold standard’ in our murine melanoma model. Pulmonary metastases were established via tail vein injection of D5lacZ cells three days before intranodal vaccine administration and mice were sacrificed after 21 days. Mice were treated with saline (−), intraperitoneal Y13 control mAb (Y13), intraperitoneal PC61 mAb (PC61), intraperitoneal IL-12 (IL-12), Y13 mAb plus DC/D5lacZ fusion cells (Y13+FC), PC61 mAB plus DC/D5lacZ fusion cells (PC+FC), and intraperitoneal IL-12 plus DC/D5lacZ fusion cells (IL-12+FC). There was no statistically significant difference in pulmonary metastasis counts between untreated (206.4 ± 50.0), Y13- or PC61-treated animals (198.5 ± 59.17 versus 199.3 ± 49.16). However, mice treated with fusion vaccine and PC61 mAb had significantly fewer metastases (99.3 ± 89.2) than animals treated with Y13 control mAb and fusion vaccine (134 ± 74.2) (p = 0.0397) and animals treated with PC61 mAb alone (199.3 ± 49.16) (p = 0.002). We conclude that PC61 treatment synergized with fusion vaccination to increase vaccine efficacy, albeit to a lesser degree than treatment with fusion vaccine and IL-12 (4.7 ± 10.76).
                  Figure 2

                  Effects of Treg-inactivation on the efficacy of DC-tumor cell fusion vaccination. Lung metastases were established in C57BL/6 mice via tail vein injection of D5lacZ cells. After 2 days, mice received intraperitoneal injections of saline (−), Y13 mAb (Y13), or PC61 mAb (PC61). On day 3, DC-tumor fusion cells (FC) were delivered intranodally. IL-12 was administered intraperitoneally daily for 4 days, starting on the day of vaccination. Mice were sacrificed and lung metastases were enumerated after 21 days. P-values were calculated using the two-tailed Wilcoxon rank sum test. The number (n) of animals used in each group is indicated. Results are presented as box plots in which the median, the 25 percentile, the 75 percentile, as well as minimum and maximum of each group are shown.

                  ELISPOT Analysis of IFN-γ secretion by vaccine induced CD4+ and CD8+ T cells

                  After observing that PC61-based Treg inactivation significantly enhanced the tumor regression triggered by fusion vaccination, we sought to understand the immune mechanism by which this improvement occurred. Spleens were harvested from vaccinated animals, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were isolated and stimulated with D5LacZ tumor cells in IFN-γ ELISPOT assays (Figure 3B). Before using D5lacZ cells as stimulators, MHC class I and class II expression was induced by treatment with IFN-γ and analyzed by FACS (Figure 3A). Data from three independent experiments were averaged, and the results reveal an overall difference in the number of vaccine-induced IFN-γ secreting CD4+ T cells between fusion vaccine plus Y13 mAb treatment (Y13 + FC) and fusion vaccine plus PC61 mAb treatment (PC61+FC) (37 ± 26 versus 243 ± 120) (Figure 3A). In contrast, our data indicate that there was no statistically significant difference in the number of vaccine-induced CD8+ T cells between the fusion + Y13 and fusion + PC61 conditions (mean=4, SD=1.54 for fusion+Y13; mean=11, SD=5.72 for fusion+PC61) (Figure 4B).
                  Figure 3

                  IFN- γ ELISPOT analysis . (A) IFN-γ- stimulated D5lacZ tumor cells were used as stimulators in ELISPOT assays. Up-regulation of MHC class I (H2-kb) and class II (I-Ab) was confirmed by FACS. Isotypic controls (solid lines), MHC expression in the absence of IFN-γ (filled grey histograms), and MHC expression of D5lacZ tumor cells that had been treated for 72 hours with IFN-γ at 1,000 U/ml of media (dotted lines) are presented in our FACS analyses. (B) Frequencies of IFN-γ-secreting CD4+ and CD8+ T-effector cells in response to D5lacZ tumor stimulation. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were isolated from spleens that were harvested from naïve mice (naïve), mice treated with control mAb and DC/D5lacZ fusion cells (Y13+FC), mice treated with PC61 mAb and fusion cells (PC61+FC), and mice treated with systemic IL-12 and fusion cells (IL-12+FC). IFN-γ secreting cells were enumerated without stimulation (−) or after stimulation with D5lacZ cells (stimulators). 2.5×105 T cells (responders) per well were stimulated at a responder to stimulator ratio of 5:1. ELISPOT assays were performed in triplicates and averaged data of 3 independent experiments are shown.

                  Figure 4

                  Combination treatment with PC61 mAb and mIL-12. Lung metastases were established in C57BL/6 mice via tail vein injection of D5lacZ cells. After 2 days, mice received intraperitoneal injections of 250 μg/0.5 ml PC61 mAb (PC61 only, Fusion + PC61 + ½ dose IL-12). On day 3, DC-tumor fusion cells (Fusion) were delivered intranodally. IL-12 was administered intraperitoneally daily for 4 days at 0.2 μg/0.5 ml (full dose) or 0.1 μg/0.5 ml (1/2 dose), respectively, starting on the day of vaccination. Mice were sacrificed after 21 days and lung metastases were enumerated.

                  Combination treatment with PC61 mAb and intraperitoneal mIL-12

                  Even though treatment with PC mAb demonstrated therapeutic efficacy against murine melanoma, it was not capable of completely eradicating pulmonary metastases. On the other hand, IL-12 administration has resulted in severe toxicity in cancer patients, hence preventing systemic application at therapeutically relevant levels. We therefore sought to determine whether PC61 mAb treatment could synergize with systemic IL-12 administration in order to decrease the dose of the cytokine needed to obtain maximal therapeutic efficacy.

                  Pulmonary metastases were established via tail vein injection of D5lacZ cells three days before intranodal vaccine administration with fusion cells and mice were sacrificed after 21 days. Mice were treated with intraperitoneal PC61 mAb (PC61 only), intraperitoneal IL-12 (0.1 μg) plus DC/D5lacZ fusion cells (Fusion + ½ dose), intraperitoneal IL-12 (0.1μg), plus PC61 mAB, plus DC/D5lacZ fusion cells (Fusion + PC61 + ½ dose IL-12), and with intraperitoneal IL-12 (0.2 μg) plus DC/D5LacZ fusion cells (Fusion + full dose IL-12).

                  As shown in Figure 4, treatment of mice with PC61 mAb alone did not lead to any reduction in tumor burden and, expectedly, administration of 0.2 μg IL-12 (full dose IL-12) in combination with fusion vaccine resulted in complete eradication of lung metastases in 4 out of 5 animals. The remaining mouse in this group appears to be an outlier. In contrast, considerable numbers of lung metastases (35.6 ± 26.1) were observed, when the administered dose of IL-12 was reduced by 50% (Fusion + 1/2 dose IL-12). Remarkably, treatment of animals with PC61 mAb, half dose IL-12 and DC/D5LacZ fusion cells led to a complete protection from lung metastasis (Fusion + PC61 + ½ dose IL-12). Thus, our data provide proof of principle that combination treatment with PC61 mAb and systemic IL-12 can indeed lower the dose of IL-12 necessary to obtain maximal therapeutic efficacy and may therefore represent a viable strategy to reduce IL-12 mediated toxicity in a clinical setting.


                  The aim of this study was to examine whether PC61 mAb-mediated functional inactivation of Tregs would enhance the potency of a DC/tumor fusion-based vaccine in a murine melanoma model with established pulmonary metastases. In agreement with previous reports, we were able to demonstrate that administration of mAb PC61 causes significant inactivation of Tregs that is maintained for about 3 weeks until the Treg population returns [20, 21, 25]. It is important to note that after PC61 mAb treatment only a small portion of Tregs is actually being depleted by phagocytes expressing the FcγRIII receptor [26]. The majority of Tregs is being functionally inactivated through antibody-mediated blockade of IL-2 signaling [24]. Remarkably, administration of anti-CD25 in murine models and clinical studies has not resulted in treatment related morbidity due to autoimmune disease [25], and it is tempting to speculate that tissue-residing Tregs might be affected to a lesser degree by antibody treatment than Tregs found in the lymphatic system.

                  Furthermore, we observed that PC61 treatment enhanced DC/tumor fusion vaccination in a synergistic fashion, and did not abrogate the induction of T-effector cells despite their transient expression of CD25 molecules. These observations are in disagreement with a recent report which examined the ability of the humanized anti-IL-2Rα mAb daclizumab to deplete Tregs in metastatic melanoma patients receiving antitumor vaccination with peptide- and KLH (keyhole limpet hemocyanin)-loaded DCs [27]. The authors demonstrated that while Tregs were effectively depleted and anti-tumor T cells were induced, daclizumab impaired the acquisition of T-effector function in vivo. A different report as well as our own data suggest otherwise. First, Sampson et al. [23] showed that depletion of Tregs correlated with increased vaccine-stimulated humoral immunity in glioblastoma patients during temozolomide-induced lymphopenia. Second, after mAb PC61-treatment, we observed increased frequencies of vaccine-induced CD4+ T cells that secreted IFN-γ upon stimulation with tumor cells. And last, administration of mAb PC61 greatly enhanced the efficacy of vaccination with fusion cells and systemic IL-12 which clearly indicates that PC61 does not seem to have any immunoinhibitory effects.

                  In our studies, the vaccine-induced immune response after treatment with PC61 and fusion cells consisted primarily of tumor-specific CD4+ T cells. This is not without precedence and in accordance with several studies, which have demonstrated that CD4+ T cells play a pivotal effector role during tumor rejection [28]. While the mechanisms responsible for the observed antitumor effect are still being explored, possible effector mechanisms may include Fas/FasL-mediated killing [29], interferon-γ–mediated angiostasis [30], interferon-γ–mediated restoration of the antigen-presenting pathway [31], or the recruitment or activation of innate effectors, including macrophages and eosinophils [32].

                  Even though, CD4+ T-effector cells may play an important role in anti-tumor responses, the lack of vaccine-induced CD8+ cytotoxic T cells in the presence of a potent Th-1-biased T-helper cell response is unsettling and may indicate that efficient cross-presentation of tumor-associated antigens did not occur in DC/tumor fusions. B16 melanoma cells are poorly immunogenic due to downregulation of transporters associated with antigen processing (TAP-1 and TAP-2) [33], resulting in reduced MHC class I expression and a diminished ability to present antigens to CD8+ T cells. TAP downregulation has been observed in multiple human malignancies and plays a critical role in the clinical course of malignant melanoma [34]. It is conceivable that factors leading to downregulation of TAPs in B16 melanoma cells may act in a negative trans-dominant fashion in fusion cells, thereby impairing MHC class I presentation and hence the induction of CD8+ T cells by DC/tumor cell hybrids. If this was true, the observed induction of CD8+ T-cell responses by fusion vaccine in the presence of IL-12 would be either a result of IFN-γ induced antigen-presentation by fusion cells [35] or due to stimulation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and T cells in draining lymph nodes, as has been described [36, 37]. Therefore, strategies aiming to overexpress TAP1 and TAP2 in fusion cells may represent a promising new approach to increase the immunogenicity of fusion vaccines.

                  Systemic administration of IL-12 in combination with DC-tumor fusion vaccination has demonstrated impressive anti-tumor responses in murine models. In cancer patients, however, IL-12 administration and the concomitant induction of high IFN-γ levels have resulted in severe toxicity including adverse hematopoietic, intestinal, hepatic, and pulmonary side effects, which precludes systemic application of IL-12 at therapeutically relevant levels [38]. Here, we provide proof of principle that combination treatment consisting of mAb PC61 and systemic IL-12 can lower the dose of cytokine necessary to obtain maximal therapeutic efficacy and may therefore represent a viable strategy to reduce IL-12 mediated toxicity in a clinical setting. Further studies will be needed to determine the therapeutic window of this novel approach.ken together, we conclude that PC61-mediated inactivation of Tregs is a viable strategy to improve the efficacy of DC/tumor fusion vaccination and that combining vaccination with Treg depletion and systemic administration of IL-12 may represent a novel approach to unleash the full potential of DC/tumor fusion vaccines.



                  Carboxyfluoroscein diacetate succinimidyl ester


                  Complete media


                  Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4


                  Dendritic cell


                  Enzyme-linked immunospot


                  Fluorescence-assisted cell sorting


                  Forkhead box transcription factor 3


                  Granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor




                  Interleukin: mAb, monoclonal antibody


                  Roswell Park Memorial Institute


                  Regulatory T cell.



                  We thank Mark Berrong and Guido Ferrari for their expertise and assistance with use of their ELISPOT reader, and Greg Sempowski for help with antibody production and purification.

                  Financial support

                  This project was funded by a Career Development Grant −2 Award (I01BX007080) from the Biomedical Library Research and Development Service of the Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Research and Development (WTL).

                  This work was presented at the American Association for Cancer Research 2012 Annual Meeting, April 3, Chicago IL, USA.

                  Authors’ Affiliations

                  Division of Otolaryngology, Duke University Medical Center
                  Duke University School of Medicine
                  Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center
                  Department of Surgical Sciences, Duke University Medical Center
                  Department of Surgery, Durham VA Medical Center


                  1. Schuler G, Schuler-Thurner B, Steinman RM: The use of dendritic cells in cancer immunotherapy. Curr Opin Immunol 2003, 15:138–47.PubMedView Article
                  2. Curtsinger JM, Lins DC, Mescher MF: Signal 3 determines tolerance versus full activation of naive CD8 T cells: dissociating proliferation and development of effector function. J Exp Med 2003, 197:1141–51.PubMedView Article
                  3. Hayashi T, Tanaka H, Tanaka J, Wang R, Averbook BJ, Cohen PA, et al.: Immunogenicity and therapeutic efficacy of dendritic-tumor hybrid cells generated by electrofusion. Clin Immunol 2002, 104:14–20.PubMedView Article
                  4. Kuriyama H, Shimizu K, Lee W, Kjaergaard J, Parkhurst MR, Cohen PA, et al.: Therapeutic vaccine generated by electrofusion of dendritic cells and tumour cells. Dev Biol Basel 2004, 116:169–78. discussion 79–86PubMed
                  5. Zhang H, Snyder KM, Suhoski MM, Maus MV, Kapoor V, June CH, et al.: 4–1BB is superior to CD28 costimulation for generating CD8+ cytotoxic lymphocytes for adoptive immunotherapy. J Immunol 2007, 179:4910–8.PubMed
                  6. Fourcade J, Kudela P, Sun Z, Shen H, Land SR, Lenzner D, et al.: PD-1 is a regulator of NY-ESO-1-specific CD8+ T cell expansion in melanoma patients. J Immunol 2009, 182:5240–9.PubMedView Article
                  7. Zheng R, Cohen PA, Paustian CA, Johnson TD, Lee WT, Shu S, et al.: Paired Toll-like receptor agonists enhance vaccine therapy through induction of interleukin-12. Cancer Res 2008, 68:4045–9.PubMedView Article
                  8. Koido S, Hara E, Homma S, Namiki Y, Ohkusa T, Gong J, et al.: Cancer vaccine by fusions of dendritic and cancer cells. Clin Dev Immunol 2009, 2009:657369.PubMedView Article
                  9. Sakaguchi S, Sakaguchi N: Regulatory T cells in immunologic self-tolerance and autoimmune disease. Int Rev Immunol 2005, 24:211–26.PubMedView Article
                  10. Green EA, Gorelik L, McGregor CM, Tran EH, Flavell RA: CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cells control anti-islet CD8+ T cells through TGF-beta-TGF-beta receptor interactions in type 1 diabetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100:10878–83.PubMedView Article
                  11. Asseman C, Mauze S, Leach MW, Coffman RL, Powrie F: An essential role for interleukin 10 in the function of regulatory T cells that inhibit intestinal inflammation. J Exp Med 1999, 190:995–1004.PubMedView Article
                  12. Paust S, Lu L, McCarty N, Cantor H: Engagement of B7 on effector T cells by regulatory T cells prevents autoimmune disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101:10398–403.PubMedView Article
                  13. Fontenot JD, Rasmussen JP, Gavin MA, Rudensky AY: A function for interleukin 2 in Foxp3-expressing regulatory T cells. Nat Immunol 2005, 6:1142–51.PubMedView Article
                  14. Ono M, Yaguchi H, Ohkura N, Kitabayashi I, Nagamura Y, Nomura T, et al.: Foxp3 controls regulatory T-cell function by interacting with AML1/Runx1. Nature 2007, 446:685–9.PubMedView Article
                  15. Lutsiak ME, Semnani RT, De Pascalis R, Kashmiri SV, Schlom J, Sabzevari H: Inhibition of CD4(+)25+ T regulatory cell function implicated in enhanced immune response by low-dose cyclophosphamide. Blood 2005, 105:2862–8.PubMedView Article
                  16. Traverso I, Fenoglio D, Negrini S, Parodi A, Battaglia F, Kalli F, et al.: Cyclophosphamide inhibits the generation and function of CD8(+) regulatory T cells. Hum Immunol 2012, 73:207–13.PubMedView Article
                  17. Dannull J, Su Z, Rizzieri D, Yang BK, Coleman D, Yancey D, et al.: Enhancement of vaccine-mediated antitumor immunity in cancer patients after depletion of regulatory T cells. J Clin Invest 2005, 115:3623–33.PubMedView Article
                  18. Powell DJ Jr, Felipe-Silva A, Merino MJ, Ahmadzadeh M, Allen T, Levy C, et al.: Administration of a CD25-directed immunotoxin, LMB-2, to patients with metastatic melanoma induces a selective partial reduction in regulatory T cells in vivo . J Immunol 2007, 179:4919–28.PubMed
                  19. Peggs KS, Quezada SA, Chambers CA, Korman AJ, Allison JP: Blockade of CTLA-4 on both effector and regulatory T cell compartments contributes to the antitumor activity of anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. J Exp Med 2009, 206:1717–25.PubMedView Article
                  20. Kohm AP, McMahon JS, Podojil JR, Begolka WS, DeGutes M, Kasprowicz DJ, et al.: Cutting Edge: Anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody injection results in the functional inactivation, not depletion, of CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cells. J Immunol 2006, 176:3301–5.PubMed
                  21. Matsushita N, Pilon-Thomas SA, Martin LM, Riker AI: Comparative methodologies of regulatory T cell depletion in a murine melanoma model. J Immunol Methods 2008, 333:167–79.PubMedView Article
                  22. Mitchell DA, Cui X, Schmittling RJ, Sanchez-Perez L, Snyder DJ, Congdon KL, et al.: Monoclonal antibody blockade of IL-2 receptor alpha during lymphopenia selectively depletes regulatory T cells in mice and humans. Blood 2011, 118:3003–12.PubMedView Article
                  23. Sampson JH, Schmittling RJ, Archer GE, Congdon KL, Nair SK, Reap EA, et al.: A pilot study of IL-2Ralpha blockade during lymphopenia depletes regulatory T-cells and correlates with enhanced immunity in patients with glioblastoma. PLoS One 2012, 7:e31046.PubMedView Article
                  24. Goebel J, Stevens E, Forrest K, Roszman TL: Daclizumab (Zenapax) inhibits early interleukin-2 receptor signal transduction events. Transpl Immunol 2000, 8:153–9.PubMedView Article
                  25. Fecci PE, Sweeney AE, Grossi PM, Nair SK, Learn CA, Mitchell DA, et al.: Systemic anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody administration safely enhances immunity in murine glioma without eliminating regulatory T cells. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 2006, 12:4294–305.View Article
                  26. Setiady YY, Coccia JA, Park PU: In vivo depletion of CD4+FOXP3+ Treg cells by the PC61 anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody is mediated by FcgammaRIII+ phagocytes. Eur J Immunol 2010, 40:780–6.PubMedView Article
                  27. Jacobs JF, Punt CJ, Lesterhuis WJ, Sutmuller RP, Brouwer HM, Scharenborg NM, et al.: Dendritic cell vaccination in combination with anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody treatment: a phase I/II study in metastatic melanoma patients. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2010, 16:5067–78.View Article
                  28. Mumberg D, Monach PA, Wanderling S, Philip M, Toledano AY, Schreiber RD, et al.: CD4(+) T cells eliminate MHC class II-negative cancer cells in vivo by indirect effects of IFN-gamma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999, 96:8633–8.PubMedView Article
                  29. Caignard A, Guillard M, Cai Z, Asselin-Paturel C, Carayol G, Chouaib S: The renal cell carcinoma lysis by a specific cytotoxic T cell clone is independent of the Fas/Fas-L cytotoxic pathway. Tissue Antigens 1996, 48:295–300.PubMedView Article
                  30. Qin Z, Blankenstein T: CD4+ T cell–mediated tumor rejection involves inhibition of angiogenesis that is dependent on IFN gamma receptor expression by nonhematopoietic cells. Immunity 2000, 12:677–86.PubMedView Article
                  31. Seliger B, Hammers S, Hohne A, Zeidler R, Knuth A, Gerharz CD, et al.: IFN-gamma-mediated coordinated transcriptional regulation of the human TAP-1 and LMP-2 genes in human renal cell carcinoma. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 1997, 3:573–8.
                  32. Hung K, Hayashi R, Lafond-Walker A, Lowenstein C, Pardoll D, Levitsky H: The central role of CD4(+) T cells in the antitumor immune response. J Exp Med 1998, 188:2357–68.PubMedView Article
                  33. Agrawal S, Reemtsma K, Bagiella E, Oluwole SF, Braunstein NS: Role of TAP-1 and/or TAP-2 antigen presentation defects in tumorigenicity of mouse melanoma. Cell Immunol 2004, 228:130–7.PubMedView Article
                  34. Kageshita T, Hirai S, Ono T, Hicklin DJ, Ferrone S: Down-regulation of HLA class I antigen-processing molecules in malignant melanoma: association with disease progression. Am J Pathol 1999, 154:745–54.PubMedView Article
                  35. Terabe M, Berzofsky JA: The role of NKT cells in tumor immunity. Adv Cancer Res 2008, 101:277–348.PubMedView Article
                  36. Indrova M, Bieblova J, Rossowska J, Kuropka P, Pajtasz-Piasecka E, Bubenik J, et al.: HPV 16-associated tumours: IL-12 can repair the absence of cytotoxic and proliferative responses of tumour infiltrating cells after chemotherapy. Int J Oncol 2009, 34:173–9.PubMed
                  37. Zheng R, Kjaergaard J, Lee WT, Cohen PA, Shu S: Significance of regional draining lymph nodes in the development of tumor immunity: implications for cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Treat Res 2007, 135:223–37.PubMedView Article
                  38. Car BD, Eng VM, Lipman JM, Anderson TD: The toxicology of interleukin-12: a review. Toxicol Pathol 1999, 27:58–63.PubMedView Article


                  © Tan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

                  This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.