Adenovirus-mediated delivery of interferon-γ gene inhibits the growth of nasopharyngeal carcinoma
- Ran-yi Liu†1,
- Ying-hui Zhu†1,
- Ling Zhou1,
- Peng Zhao1, 2,
- Hong-li Li1, 3,
- Lan-cai Zhu1,
- Hong-yu Han1,
- Huan-xin Lin1,
- Liang Kang4,
- Jiang-xue Wu1Email author and
- Wenlin Huang1, 5, 6Email author
© Liu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 25 October 2012
Accepted: 17 December 2012
Published: 28 December 2012
Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) is regarded as a potent antitumor agent, but its clinical application is limited by its short half-life and significant side effects. In this paper, we tried to develop IFN-γ gene therapy by a replication defective adenovirus encoding the human IFN-γ (Ad-IFNγ), and evaluate the antitumoral effects of Ad-IFNγ on nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) cell lines in vitro and in xenografts model.
The mRNA levels of human IFN-γ in Ad-IFNγ-infected NPC cells were detected by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and IFN-γ protein concentrations were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in the culture supernatants of NPC cells and tumor tissues and bloods of nude mice treated with Ad-IFNγ. The effects of Ad-IFNγ on NPC cell proliferation was determined using MTT assay, cell cycle distribution was determined by flow cytometry analysis for DNA content, and cells apoptosis were analyzed by Annexin V-FITC/7-AAD binding assay and hoechst 33342/PI double staining. The anti-tumor effects and toxicity of Ad-IFNγ were evaluated in BALB/c nude mice carrying NPC xenografts.
The results demonstrated that Ad-IFNγ efficiently expressed human IFN-γ protein in NPC cell lines in vitro and in vivo. Ad-IFNγ infection resulted in antiproliferative effects on NPC cells by inducing G1 phase arrest and cell apoptosis. Intratumoral administration of Ad-IFNγ significantly inhibited the growth of CNE-2 and C666-1 cell xenografts in nude mice, while no significant toxicity was observed.
These findings indicate IFN-γ gene therapy mediated by replication defective adenoviral vector is likely a promising approach in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
KeywordsGene therapy Interferon-γ Nasopharyngeal carcinoma Adenoviral vector
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a rare tumor arising from the epithelium of the nasopharynx. However, it has a high incidence rate in South China and Southeast Asia . Radiation therapy is the main strategy for local control of NPC , but the 5-year survival for stage IV NPC is only 30%. The poor survival is often associated with high incidences of local, regional and systemic recurrences. Although concurrent chemoradiotherapy is developed as a standard treatment approach for advanced NPC, the outcome isn’t still satisfactory . Therefore, the development of multidisciplinary therapeutic approaches is crucial for improvement of survival in NPC patients.
Interferon-γ (IFN-γ), a multifunctional cytokine produced mainly by T helper cells, cytotoxic T cells and natural killer cells , exerts antiviral, antiproliferative, immunomodulatory and antiangiogenesis effects . IFN-γ inhibits the growth of numerous tumors [6–10] and has been tried to use in the clinical management of tumors [11–14]. However, the clinical application of recombinant IFN-γ protein is hampered by its short half-life and significant side effects. IFN-γ Gene therapy can continuously produce and release therapeutic protein in local focus to overcome the obstacle of recombinant IFN-γ protein [9, 10, 15, 16].
In this study, we tried to develop IFN-γ gene therapy by a replication defective adenovirus encoding the human IFN-γ (Ad-IFNγ) on nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), our results showed Ad-IFNγ effectively expressed in NPC cells, significantly inhibited tumor cell proliferation and induced cell apoptosis in vitro, inhibited the growth of xenografts in nude mice.
Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), fetal bovine serum, propidium iodide (PI), and TRIzol® reagent were from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Reverse Transcription System and GoTaq® DNA Polymerase were from Promega (Beijing) Biotech Co., Ltd (Beijing, China). Annexin V-FITC/7-AAD apoptosis detection kit was from Beckman Coulter, Inc. (Marseille, France), while Double Stain Apoptosis Detection Kit (Hoechst 33342/PI) from GenScript USA Inc. (Piscataway, NJ, USA). Rabbit anti-human Ki-67 polyclonal antibody was from NeoMarkers For Lab Vision Corporation (Fremont, CA, USA), and Streptavidin-Horseradish Peroxidase kit from Beijing Zhongshan Golden Bridge Biotechnology Co. (Beijing, China). In Situ Cell Death Detection kit was purchased from Roche Applied Science (Mannheim, Germany). Human interferon-γ ELISA kit was purchased from Boster (Wuhan, China), recombinant human interferon-γ (rhIFN-γ) protein was from Shanghai Clonbiotech. Co., Ltd (Shanghai China). (3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) and all other reagents were of molecular biology grade and obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Shanghai, China).
Cell lines, recombinant adenoviruses and infection
Human nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) cell lines CNE-1, CNE-2 and C666-1 were maintained in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) at a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 at 37°C. Replication defective adenoviruses encoding human interferon-γ (Ad-IFNγ) and β-galactosidase (Ad-LacZ), kindly provided by Guangzhou Doublle Bioproducts Co., Ltd., were stored at -80°C for use.
For adenovirus infection, NPC cells were seeded and cultured for 24 h, and then removed culture medium, washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.4), followed by infection with adenovirus in serum-free DMEM for 3 h. After removal of residual virus by PBS washing, cells were cultured in normal medium for indicated time before the analyses of IFN-γ expression, cell proliferation and apoptosis.
Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
Cells were harvested and total RNAs were extracted using TRIzol® reagent according to the manufacture’s instruction. mRNAs were transcribed into cDNAs and PCR reactions were carried out using their specific primer pairs: IFN-γ’s sense, 5′- TTCAGCTCTGCATCGTTTTG-3′, antisense, 5′-TTACTGGGATGCTCTTCGAC-3′ (amplicon 473 bp); β-actin’s sense, 5′-CGTCTTCCCCTCCATCGTG-3′, antisense, 5′- TAGCACAGCCTGGATAGCAAC-3′ (amplicon 334 bp). Amplification was done with an initial cycle of 95°C for 4 min, followed by 30 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 55°C for 50 s, 72°C for 30 s, with a final extension at 72°C for 10 min. PCR products were analyzed by ethidium bromide staining on 1.5% agarose gels.
Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
NPC cells were seeded into 6-well plate at a density of 1×105 cells/well for 24 hours and then infected with adenoviruses as described above. The culture supernatants were collected at different time points and IFN-γ concentration was determined by ELISA according to the manufacture’s instruction (Boster, Wuhan, China) (the sensitivity is 15.6 pg/mL).
Cell proliferation analysis
The effect of Ad-IFNγ on NPC cell proliferation was determined using MTT assay as previously described . Briefly, cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 2000 cells/well for 24 hours and then infected with adenoviruses as described above, followed by incubation for 72 h. Viable cells were stained with MTT for 4 hours and followed by determination of OD570 nm with a reference wavelength at 630 nm.
Cell cycle distribution and apoptosis analysis
Cell cycle distribution was determined by flow cytometry analysis for DNA content. Briefly, cells were harvested by trypsinization and washed by PBS, and followed by fixed in cold 70% ethanol for 1 hour at 4º°C. Cell suspensions were washed twice in PBS, treated by ribonuclease and followed by PI staining. And then cells were performed flow cytometry analysis for DNA content and cell cycle distribution.
Cells apoptosis were analyzed by Annexin V-FITC/ 7-AAD binding assay and hoechst 33342/PI double staining. Both floating and adherent cells were harvested and washed by PBS, then followed by staining according to the manufacture’s instruction. Cells stained with Annexin V-FITC/7-AAD were analyzed by flow cytometry, while those stained with hoechst 33342/PI were analyzed by fluorescence microscopy.
Animal model and experimental design
Female BALB/c nude mice (5-6 weeks old, 18-20 g) were obtained from Shanghai Slike Experimental Animals Co. Ltd. (License No. SCXK(hu)2003-0003), housed and fed under specific pathogen-free conditions (Certificate No. 26-2004C008) according to protocols approved by the Sun Yat-sen University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. All of the animal experiments were performed in accordance with Guidelines for the Welfare of Animals in Experimental Neoplasia. The pieces (about 1.5 mm in diameter) of CNE-2 or C666-1 tumors, which were maintained by serial subcutaneous transplantation in BALB/c nude mice, were subcutaneously transplanted into the flanks of mice to construct xenograft model.
To test the expression of Ad-IFNγ in vivo, mice were intratumorally injected with 2×109 pfu in 100 μL of PBS when CNE-2 xenografts reached an approximate diameter of 7 mm. Tumor tissues and bloods were collected at different time. IFNγ concentration in the samples was measured by ELISA.
To assess antitumor effects of Ad-IFNγ in vivo, mice were randomly assigned into eight groups (7-8 mice per group) when xenografts reached 4-5 mm diameter. Mice were treated by weekly intratumoral injection of 100 μL of PBS, 2×109 pfu (plaque-forming unit) of Ad-LacZ, 2×109 pfu, 1×109 pfu, 5×108 pfu, or 1×108 pfu of Ad-IFNγ (in 100 μL of PBS) per dose respectively; while mice in other two groups were treated by daily intratumoral injection of 100 μL of normal saline or 1×106 IU/(kg body weight) of rhIFN-γ protein per dose respectively. The treatment was performed for three consecutive weeks, every injection was distributed equally into each half (8-12 mm of diameter) or quadrants (>12 mm of diameter) of tumors. Body weight and tumor size were measured every 4-5 days, and tumor xenografts were weighed at the end point of experiments.
Tumor tissue was fixed in buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. Sections (5 μM thick) were mounted on Poly-L-Lysine treated slides, standard H&E staining was utilized for histopathological assay. Human Ki67 immunohistochemistry was performed for cell proliferation assay, while TUNEL labeling was done using a fluorescent in situ cell death detection kit for apoptosis analysis in tumor tissues.
All experiments were repeated at least three times. The data were analyzed with One-way ANOVA or t test by using SPSS 10.0 for Windows software (SSPS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Ad-IFNγ efficiently expressed hIFNγ in NPC cells
We investigated IFNγ expression at protein levels in CNE-1, CNE-2 or C666-1 infected by Ad-IFNγ, and found that IFNγ protein concentration in the supernatants of NPC cells continuously increased within 72 hours post-infection (Figure 1C). The differences from IFNγ mRNA which peaked at 48 hours may be due to the instability of the mRNA. No IFNγ proteins were found in the supernatants of Ad-LacZ-infected NPC cells (data not shown).
Ad-IFNγ inhibited the proliferation of NPC cells in vitro
To explore the mechanism involved in proliferation inhibition of Ad-IFNγ on NPC cells, the cell cycle profiles were analyzed by flow cytometry for DNA contents on NPC cells after infection with 100 MOIs of adenoviruses for 72 h. The results showed a significantly higher percentage at the G1 phase in the cells infected with Ad-IFNγ than those in Ad-LacZ infected cells (CNE-2: 70.8% ± 6.3% vs 56.1% ± 5.9%, p<0.05; C666-1: 75.8% ± 6.9% vs 62.0% ± 4.8%, p<0.05) (Figure 2B). These indicated that Ad-IFNγ possesses an effect of G1 phase arrest on NPC cells.
Ad-IFNγ induced the apoptosis of NPC cells in vitro
Ad-IFNγ efficiently expressed human IFNγ in NPC xenografts in nude mice
Ad-IFNγ inhibited the growth of human NPC xenografts
Interferon-γ (IFN-γ), as a multifunctional cytokine, exerts diverse biological functions related to host defense and immune regulation, such as inflammation, innate and acquired immunity, cell cycle and apoptosis . IFN-γ plays a critical role in promoting protective host responses to tumors, which proposed mechanisms include, (a) anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic actions, (b) anti-angiogenesis in tumors, and (c) promoting both the innate and adoptive immune responses against tumors [20, 21].
Although IFN-γ has been investigated as a potential therapeutics for various types of tumors [6–13], the attempts to improve antitumor efficacy by increasing the dose or by repetitive continuous administration resulted in higher toxicity and low efficacy . Considerable experimental data from our group and other investigators demonstrated that intratumoral IFN-γ gene transfer to achieve long-term, continuous locoregional exposure of IFN-γ is likely an appropriate approach for improving efficacy and reducing toxicity of IFN-γ [9, 10, 15, 16, 23, 24]. In this study, we reported that adenovirus-mediated IFN-γ gene transfer (Ad-IFNγ) inhibited tumor growth of human nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) cells (Figure 2 and Figure 5). Here the anti-NPC activity of IFN-γ included not only direct anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic actions, also indirect mechanisms, such as immunomodulation and antiangiogenesis.
Ad-IFNγ efficiently expressed human IFN-γ in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells in vitro and in vivo (Figure 1 and Figure 3), and exhibited strong antiproliferative effects (Figure 2A and Figure 6). According to previous reports, the antiproliferative mechanisms of IFN-γ seem to be cell type specific [9, 25–29], either induction of cell cycle arrest or apoptosis. Here we found that both G1 phase arrest and apoptosis contributed to Ad-IFNγ-mediated growth suppression in NPC cell lines (Figure 2B, Figure 3 and Figure 6), consistent with the report that the antiproliferative effects of minicircle-IFNγ on NPC cell lines could be attributed to G1 arrest and apoptosis . The JAK/STAT pathway may be responsible for most biological effects mediated by IFN-γ [20, 30], which regulates different cell cycle-associated proteins that control the G1-S checkpoint , or induce cell apoptosis through up-regulating the expression of various apoptosis-related proteins in different cell types [31–33].
Although antiproliferation and apoptosis induction were main effects of Ad-IFNγ-mediated anti-NPC in this study, antiangiogenesis may contribute also to growth inhibition of NPC xenografts in nude mice. Because the microvessel densities (MVDs) were found to be decreased in the xenografts treated with Ad-IFNγ compared with those treated with Ad-LacZ or PBS in our study (data not shown). Previous studies reveal that IP-10, an inhibitor of angiogenesis, could be induced by IFN-γ in endothelial cells and exert potent antiangiogenesis activity by inhibiting endothelial cell differentiation, motility and tube formation [34, 35]. However, due to highly species specificity, human unlikely exerts direct effects on murine vascular system, but likely acts on tumor cells to indirectly regulate angiogenesis. It was reported that IFN-γ acted as antiangiogenic cytokine by inhibiting the expression of angiogenic factors, such as VEGF or perlecan, in renal cell carcinoma , stromal fibroblasts , human cornea , and WiDr/HT29 colon carcinoma cells, or by inducing the expression of anti-angiogenic factor monokine induced by interferon-gamma (MIG, or CXCL9) in non-small cell lung carcinom . Here we would like to make a hypothesis that IFN-γ may exert antiangiogenic effect in nude mice carrying NPC xenografts by regulating the expression of some angiogenic or antiangiogenic factors in NPC cells. This hypothesis, of course, needs to be tested and verified.
Human and murine IFN-γ display low level of sequence homology (only 40%) at protein level, which explains why the human and murine proteins display a strict species specificity in their ability to bind to and activate human and murine cells . So human IFN-γ has less activity in the nude mouse host, though nude mice display potent macrophage and NK cell activity [42–44] and remain some basal T-cell function . Direct immunomodulation on mouse immune system by human IFN-γ unlikely contributes to its antitumor effects. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that other indirect effects are involved in Ad-IFNγ-mediated antitumor immune response. Firstly, human IFN-γ could modify the expression of MHC and costimulatory molecules or cytokines, chemokines on human NPC cells [21, 46], which may activate the residual immune system of nude mice. Secondly, adenoviral vector and heterogenous IFN-γ expression likely induce a nonspecific immune response directed by NK and/or microphage cells in nude mice .
Taken together, Ad-IFNγ displayed efficient anti-NPC activities by inhibiting tumor cell proliferation and induced cell apoptosis in this study. Additional indirect effects on antiangiogenesis and immunomodulatory may also be involved in this antitumor activity. So IFN-γ gene therapy by a replication defective adenovirus encoding the human IFN-γ (Ad-IFNγ) is likely a potential novel therapeutics on comprehensive therapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Nevertheless, recent reports have shown that the immune response activated by IFN-γ plays a dual role in cancer: It can not only suppress tumor growth by destroying cancer cells or inhibiting their outgrowth but also promote tumor progression either by selecting for tumor cells that are more fit to survive in an immunocompetent host or by establishing conditions within the tumor microenvironment that facilitate tumor outgrowth . IFN-γ treatment is a double-edged sword whose anti- and protumorigenic activities are dependent on the cellular, microenvironmental, and/or molecular context . Thereby, more investigations should be carried out to clarify the influences of cellular, microenvironmental, immunological and molecular events on the anti-NPC effects of Ad-IFNγ before its clinical application.
The results of the present study indicate that Ad-IFNγ likely performs potent anti-nasopharyngeal carcinoma effects by inhibiting cell proliferation, inducing G1 phase arrest and cell apoptosis. These findings have implications for the use of IFN-γ gene therapy mediated by replication defective adenoviral vector as a promising approach in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Recombinant human interferon-gamma
A replication defective adenovirus encoding the human IFN-γ
A replication defective adenovirus encoding β-galactosidase
Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium
Phosphate buffered saline
Fetal bovine serum
Hematoxylin and eosin
Multiplicities of infection
TdT-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling
Monokine induced by interferon-gamma
- NK cell:
Natural killer cell.
This study was supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (project 863, No. 2012AA020403; 2012AA02A204), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81071822), Guangdong Province Natural Science Fund (No. 9451008901002636) and Guangdong Innovative Research Team Program (No. 2009010058). We also thank Guangzhou Doublle Bio-product Inc. (Guangzhou, China) for their kindly providing recombinant adenoviruses Ad-IFNγ and Ad-LacZ.
- Adham M, Kurniawan AN, Muhtadi AI, Roezin A, Hermani B, Gondhowiardjo S, Tan IB, Middeldorp JM: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma in Indonesia: epidemiology, incidence, signs, and symptoms at presentation. Chin J Cancer. 2012, 31: 185-196.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Xiao WW, Han F, Lu TX, Chen CY, Huang Y, Zhao C: Treatment outcomes after radiotherapy alone for patients with early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009, 74: 1070-1076. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.09.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pan XB, Zhu XD: Role of chemotherapy in stage IIb nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Chin J Cancer. 2012, 31: 573-578.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Boehm U, Klamp T, Groot M, Howard JC: Cellular responses to interferon-gamma. Annu Rev Immunol. 1997, 15: 749-795. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.15.1.749.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schroder K, Hertzog PJ, Ravasi T, Hume DA: Interferon-gamma: an overview of signals, mechanisms and functions. J Leukoc Biol. 2004, 75: 163-189.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kominsky SL, Hobeika AC, Lake FA, Torres BA, Johnson HM: Down-regulation of neu/HER-2 by interferon-gamma in prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2000, 60: 3904-3908.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sasagawa T, Hlaing M, Akaike T: Synergistic induction of apoptosis in murine hepatoma Hepa1-6 cells by IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000, 272: 674-680. 10.1006/bbrc.2000.2835.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Detjen KM, Farwig K, Welzel M, Wiedenmann B, Rosewicz S: Interferon gamma inhibits growth of human pancreatic carcinoma cells via caspase-1 dependent induction of apoptosis. Gut. 2001, 49: 251-262. 10.1136/gut.49.2.251.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wu J, Xiao X, Zhao P, Xue G, Zhu Y, Zhu X, Zheng L, Zeng Y, Huang W: Minicircle-IFNgamma induces antiproliferative and antitumoral effects in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2006, 12: 4702-4713. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0520.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhao P, Zhu YH, Wu JX, Liu RY, Zhu XY, Xiao X, Li HL, Huang BJ, Xie FJ, Chen JM: Adenovirus-mediated delivery of human IFNgamma gene inhibits prostate cancer growth. Life Sci. 2007, 81: 695-701. 10.1016/j.lfs.2007.05.028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kane A, Yang I: Interferon-gamma in brain tumor immunotherapy. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2010, 21: 77-86. 10.1016/j.nec.2009.08.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Windbichler GH, Hausmaninger H, Stummvoll W, Graf AH, Kainz C, Lahodny J, Denison U, Muller-Holzner E, Marth C: Interferon-gamma in the first-line therapy of ovarian cancer: a randomized phase III trial. Br J Cancer. 2000, 82: 1138-1144.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hastie C: Interferon gamma, a possible therapeutic approach for late-stage prostate cancer?. Anticancer Res. 2008, 28: 2843-2849.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller CH, Maher SG, Young HA: Clinical use of Interferon-gamma. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009, 1182: 69-79. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05069.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dummer R, Eichmuller S, Gellrich S, Assaf C, Dreno B, Schiller M, Dereure O, Baudard M, Bagot M, Khammari A: Phase II clinical trial of intratumoral application of TG1042 (adenovirus-interferon-gamma) in patients with advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphomas and multilesional cutaneous B-cell lymphomas. Mol Ther. 2010, 18: 1244-1247. 10.1038/mt.2010.52.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wu J, Xiao X, Jia H, Chen J, Zhu Y, Zhao P, Lin H, Huang W: Dynamic distribution and expression in vivo of the human interferon gamma gene delivered by adenoviral vector. BMC Cancer. 2009, 9: 55-10.1186/1471-2407-9-55.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Liu RY, Dong Z, Liu J, Yin JY, Zhou L, Wu X, Yang Y, Mo W, Huang W, Khoo SK: Role of eIF3a in regulating cisplatin sensitivity and in translational control of nucleotide excision repair of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oncogene. 2011, 30: 4814-4823. 10.1038/onc.2011.189.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- O’Reilly MS, Boehm T, Shing Y, Fukai N, Vasios G, Lane WS, Flynn E, Birkhead JR, Olsen BR, Folkman J: Endostatin: an endogenous inhibitor of angiogenesis and tumor growth. Cell. 1997, 88: 277-285. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81848-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li L, Liu RY, Huang JL, Liu QC, Li Y, Wu PH, Zeng YX, Huang W: Adenovirus-mediated intra-tumoral delivery of the human endostatin gene inhibits tumor growth in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2006, 118: 2064-2071. 10.1002/ijc.21585.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ikeda H, Old LJ, Schreiber RD: The roles of IFN gamma in protection against tumor development and cancer immunoediting. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2002, 13: 95-109. 10.1016/S1359-6101(01)00038-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dunn GP, Ikeda H, Bruce AT, Koebel C, Uppaluri R, Bui J, Chan R, Diamond M, White JM, Sheehan KC, Schreiber RD: Interferon-gamma and cancer immunoediting. Immunol Res. 2005, 32: 231-245. 10.1385/IR:32:1-3:231.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Curnis F, Gasparri A, Sacchi A, Cattaneo A, Magni F, Corti A: Targeted delivery of IFNgamma to tumor vessels uncouples antitumor from counterregulatory mechanisms. Cancer Res. 2005, 65: 2906-2913. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-4282.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gattacceca F, Pilatte Y, Billard C, Monnet I, Moritz S, Le Carrou J, Eloit M, Jaurand MC: Ad-IFN gamma induces antiproliferative and antitumoral responses in malignant mesothelioma. Clin Cancer Res. 2002, 8: 3298-3304.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dummer R, Hassel JC, Fellenberg F, Eichmuller S, Maier T, Slos P, Acres B, Bleuzen P, Bataille V, Squiban P: Adenovirus-mediated intralesional interferon-gamma gene transfer induces tumor regressions in cutaneous lymphomas. Blood. 2004, 104: 1631-1638. 10.1182/blood-2004-01-0360.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sangfelt O, Erickson S, Grander D: Mechanisms of interferon-induced cell cycle arrest. Front Biosci. 2000, 5: D479-D487. 10.2741/Sangfelt.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chawla-Sarkar M, Lindner DJ, Liu YF, Williams BR, Sen GC, Silverman RH, Borden EC: Apoptosis and interferons: role of interferon-stimulated genes as mediators of apoptosis. Apoptosis. 2003, 8: 237-249. 10.1023/A:1023668705040.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gollob JA, Sciambi CJ, Huang Z, Dressman HK: Gene expression changes and signaling events associated with the direct antimelanoma effect of IFN-gamma. Cancer Res. 2005, 65: 8869-8877. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1387.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wall L, Burke F, Barton C, Smyth J, Balkwill F: IFN-gamma induces apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells in vivo and in vitro. Clin Cancer Res. 2003, 9: 2487-2496.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Dunn GP, Sheehan KC, Old LJ, Schreiber RD: IFN unresponsiveness in LNCaP cells due to the lack of JAK1 gene expression. Cancer Res. 2005, 65: 3447-3453.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zaidi MR, Merlino G: The two faces of interferon-gamma in cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011, 17: 6118-6124. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0482.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ruiz-Ruiz C, de Almodovar Ruiz C, Rodriguez A, Ortiz-Ferron G, Redondo JM, Lopez-Rivas A: The up-regulation of human caspase-8 by interferon-gamma in breast tumor cells requires the induction and action of the transcription factor interferon regulatory factor-1. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 19712-19720. 10.1074/jbc.M313023200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miura Y, Tsujioka T, Nishimura Y, Sakaguchi H, Maeda M, Hayashi H, Dong M, Hyodoh F, Yata K, Wada H: TRAIL expression up-regulated by interferon-gamma via phosphorylation of STAT1 induces myeloma cell death. Anticancer Res. 2006, 26: 4115-4124.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barton C, Davies D, Balkwill F, Burke F: Involvement of both intrinsic and extrinsic pathways in IFN-gamma-induced apoptosis that are enhanced with cisplatin. Eur J Cancer. 2005, 41: 1474-1486. 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.03.022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bodnar RJ, Yates CC, Rodgers ME, Du X, Wells A: IP-10 induces dissociation of newly formed blood vessels. J Cell Sci. 2009, 122: 2064-2077. 10.1242/jcs.048793.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bodnar RJ, Yates CC, Wells A: IP-10 blocks vascular endothelial growth factor-induced endothelial cell motility and tube formation via inhibition of calpain. Circ Res. 2006, 98: 617-625. 10.1161/01.RES.0000209968.66606.10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sasamura H, Takahashi A, Miyao N, Yanase M, Masumori N, Kitamura H, Itoh N, Tsukamoto T: Inhibitory effect on expression of angiogenic factors by antiangiogenic agents in renal cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2002, 86: 768-773. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600152.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lu Y, Yang W, Qin C, Zhang L, Deng J, Liu S, Qin Z: Responsiveness of stromal fibroblasts to IFN-gamma blocks tumor growth via angiostasis. J Immunol. 2009, 183: 6413-6421. 10.4049/jimmunol.0901073.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kommineni VK, Nagineni CN, William A, Detrick B, Hooks JJ: IFN-gamma acts as anti-angiogenic cytokine in the human cornea by regulating the expression of VEGF-A and sVEGF-R1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008, 374: 479-484. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.07.042.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Sharma B, Iozzo RV: Transcriptional silencing of perlecan gene expression by interferon-gamma. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273: 4642-4646. 10.1074/jbc.273.8.4642.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Addison CL, Arenberg DA, Morris SB, Xue YY, Burdick MD, Mulligan MS, Iannettoni MD, Strieter RM: The CXC chemokine, monokine induced by interferon-gamma, inhibits non-small cell lung carcinoma tumor growth and metastasis. Hum Gene Ther. 2000, 11: 247-261. 10.1089/10430340050015996.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Farrar MA, Schreiber RD: The molecular cell biology of interferon-gamma and its receptor. Annu Rev Immunol. 1993, 11: 571-611. 10.1146/annurev.iy.11.040193.003035.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang F, Lu W, Dong Z: Tumor-infiltrating macrophages are involved in suppressing growth and metastasis of human prostate cancer cells by INF-beta gene therapy in nude mice. Clin Cancer Res. 2002, 8: 2942-2951.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nielsen LL: NK cells mediate the anti-tumor effects of E1-deleted, type 5 adenovirus in a human tumor xenograft model. Oncol Rep. 2000, 7: 151-155.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sarkar D, Su ZZ, Vozhilla N, Park ES, Randolph A, Valerie K, Fisher PB: Targeted virus replication plus immunotherapy eradicates primary and distant pancreatic tumors in nude mice. Cancer Res. 2005, 65: 9056-9063. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1261.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ikehara S, Pahwa RN, Fernandes G, Hansen CT, Good RA: Functional T cells in athymic nude mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984, 81: 886-888. 10.1073/pnas.81.3.886.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Seliger B, Ruiz-Cabello F, Garrido F: IFN inducibility of major histocompatibility antigens in tumors. Adv Cancer Res. 2008, 101: 249-276.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hu X, Chakravarty SD, Ivashkiv LB: Regulation of interferon and Toll-like receptor signaling during macrophage activation by opposing feedforward and feedback inhibition mechanisms. Immunol Rev. 2008, 226: 41-56. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00707.x.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Schreiber RD, Old LJ, Smyth MJ: Cancer immunoediting: integrating immunity’s roles in cancer suppression and promotion. Science. 2011, 331: 1565-1570. 10.1126/science.1203486.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.